web analytics
Categories
Racial right

Raising the enemy flag

It is true that, due to what I said yesterday, I no longer want to visit the forums of the racialists. But when I got out of bed this morning a thought came to me that deserves a place here.

Some time ago I saw that in an interview Jared Taylor openly said that the causes of the darkest hour in the West were an absolute mystery. He mentioned Christianity but dismissed the hypothesis of blaming it, although he has spoken of pathological altruism: something that didn’t exist before the religion of his fanatical parents (so fanatical that they migrated to Japan when Jared was a child to preach the Word of the Lord to the heathen).

The case of Brad Griffin is even worse, who used the Prozium penname before his current pseudonym, Hunter Wallace. In a forum called Phora, when Griffin was known as Prozium (and we are talking before he created Occidental Dissent), Griffin defended the actions of the Yankee government to fight the Nazis in World War II. Years later, when Griffin was already the editor of Occidental Dissent, he once said that the causes of the Western dark hour were unknown.

Look at Griffin and Taylor’s level of blind self-righteousness! When Griffin said that years ago, he didn’t realise that he himself, along with millions of Americans who think like him, has been a vector among millions of Western vectors that cause the dark ages. It should be more than obvious that only those who retrospectively side with the good guys in WW2 are not contributing to the dark times!

Charlottesville is the most dramatic example that comes to mind as to why the American racialist movement is made up of schizophrenics in its etymological sense of divided mind: their left is unaware of what their right does; Jekyll doesn’t remember that last night he transformed into Hyde. As we know, among a huge number of American flags, among those who demonstrated on August 12, 2017 a fellow carried a Nazi flag. After the catastrophe, many complained about poor optics and even speculated that the guy who had carried the Nazi flag was an FBI implant to discredit the movement.

I am not asking American racialists to follow in the footsteps of Commander Rockwell and use, for their American movement, the flag that Hitler devised for his German movement. But they could perfectly devise an American flag with the swastika in the middle, and with colours different from Hitler’s flag, to differentiate it. Until they devise that American flag with the swastika, it is understandable that some American racists use, by default, the German flag.

What I want to get to is that the general outcry after Charlottesville of those who were concerned with optics only shows their terrible schizophrenia. Whose side are they on? Do they side Uncle Sam, who fought anti-racist wars in the 1860s and 1940s, and that currently wants to exterminate them in a racial cold war? Because that is what the flag with stars and stripes really means. And if they are on the side of the Aryan race, why, like vampires, are they afraid of the swastika that the Aryans who conquered India already used?

After the degenerate Weimar Republic Hitler immediately realised that the old German flag could no longer represent the spirit of the German people, and decided to create a new one. So little imagination the American racists have that, except for Pierce and Covington, both deceased, they have not even been able to create a new flag that reflects the interests of white Americans: a flag that must be flown against the enemy flag. They do the opposite: welcoming the enemy flag into Charlottesville and condemning the flag with the swastika.

A more charitable critic might think that they are just learning to see History and their past. But I am not a charitable critic and can say that they have forfeited an examination of conscience. Otherwise, they would never have used the enemy flag. By way of illustration I would like to say something about the country where I live.

A few years ago I met a descendant of Spaniards living in Mexico who speaks of ‘the enemy flag’ when referring to the Mexican flag. For this criollo, the flag to be flown is the Cross of Burgundy, the flag of New Spain* before the mestizos took power during the War of Independence. This son of Spaniards is a racist and dreams of a Latin America inhabited by criollos. We could already imagine him and his group flying the Mexican flag: something utterly inconceivable to them!

It must be reiterated: as long as the Americans fail to vehemently reject the enemy symbols their movement will continue to be quackery. If the people of Charlottesville had not been schizophrenic, they would have felt infinite revulsion at the stars and stripes and would have welcomed the swastika.

________

(*) Instead of ‘the flag of New Spain’, it would be more appropriate to call this Cross of Burgundy the flag of the Indian Viceroyalty, as instead of exterminating the race they found on the continent they married the Indians and, instead of genetically copying Spain, they dedicated themselves solely to exploit natural resources. ‘New Spain’ is a misnomer if you commit the sin of miscegenation.

And precisely because of this unforgivable sin of miscegenation, after Independence the mestizos chose an Aztec symbol. The eagle on a prickly pear cactus devouring a snake in the tricolor flag that appears in the main text was the symbol of the birth of Tenochtitlan before the arrival of the Spanish.

Categories
3-eyed crow

The most famous crow

I have recently used the 3-eyed raven symbol when speaking of those who clairvoyantly or retrocognitively portrayed what is happening, or what happened in the historical past. Following the metaphor, what better than to listen to the most famous crow in Westeros even though, due to almost a century of Judeo-Anglo-Saxon defamation, his image has yet to be vindicated in today’s world.

‘With what clairvoyance the authors of the 18th, and especially those of the past, century criticised Christianity and passed judgment on the evolution of the Churches!’ —Hitler’s Table Talk, page 88.

‘When understanding of the universe has become widespread, when the majority of men know that the stars are not sources of light but worlds, perhaps inhabited worlds like ours, then the Christian doctrine will be convicted of absurdity’. —Hitler’s Table Talk, page 59.

‘The fact that the Japanese have retained their political philosophy, which is one of the essential reasons for their successes, is due to their having been saved in time from the views of Christianity’. —Hitler’s Table Talk, page 393.

‘This terrorism in religion is the product, to put it briefly, of a Jewish dogma, which Christianity has universalised and whose effect is to sow trouble and confusion in men’s minds’. —Hitler’s Table Talk, page 393.
‘It may be asked whether concluding a concordat with the churches wouldn’t facilitate our exercise of power… I’m convinced that any pact with the Church can offer only a provisional benefit, for sooner or later the scientific spirit will disclose the harmful character of such a compromise. Thus the State will have based its existence on a foundation that one day will collapse’. —Hitler’s Table Talk, pages 58-59.

‘It is to these private customs that peoples owe their present characters. Christianity, of course, has reached the peak of absurdity in this respect. And that’s why one day its structure will collapse. Science has already impregnated humanity. Consequently, the more Christianity clings to its dogmas, the quicker it will decline’. —Hitler’s Table Talk, page 60.

Categories
Racial right

Don’t look at those left behind anymore

In this post I am referring to those white advocates who still live, not to deceased Americans like Francis Parker Yockey, George Lincoln Rockwell, Revilo Oliver or William Pierce. What happened yesterday, even though it happens every April 20, has me somewhat shocked. It adds nothing new to what I knew about the recent racial movement, but it is becoming increasingly apparent that we live in parallel universes.

In fairness, I must thank the American racialists who, with their work, helped me leave Normiland behind as I crossed the psychological Rubicon.

When Greg Johnson edited The Occidental Quarterly Online, this webzine meant my first solid steps across the river. In particular, Johnson’s comment on April 20, 2010, ten years ago, in Occidental Dissent helped me greatly. Occidental Dissent never publishes articles on Hitler, but a decade ago a writer was allowed this eccentricity. Johnson’s comment in the comments section was nothing short of Irmin Vinson’s entire essay, which Johnson would later choose for a book of Counter-Currents Publishing.

Vinson’s essay, published in toto in the comments section of Hunter Wallace’s webzine, was a watershed for me to stop demonising Uncle Adolf. (Conversely, the resistances on the part of racialist Christians are so overwhelming that Wallace later deleted Johnson’s comment-essay.) Johnson used to publish a post every April 20 with links to his old article on Hitler, a practice that he has abandoned. Yesterday, for example, he didn’t say anything about Hitler. In contrast, on each anniversary of dead right-wing writers, Johnson pays tribute to them.

Kevin MacDonald also helped me in my first Rubicon steps. I read his trilogy on Jewry. Of it, the first of his books opened the doors for me to understand Judaism as a group survival strategy.

Both the personality of Alex Linder and the novels of Harold Covington (not the character of the latter!) helped me regain my manhood, which had been overwhelmed by decades of propaganda and sex role reversals. I still remember, as if I watched it recently, Alien, the first movie in which the roles of warrior and defenceless women was reversed in Hollywood. (Due to that sexual inversion I didn’t include it in my recent list of 50 movies.)

Finally, Phil Rushton’s videos on IQ at AmRen helped me understand that intelligence is differential between races.

I must acknowledge the help I received from the work of these people. But except Linder I don’t withdraw what I said in The Fair Race, or yesterday, about white nationalists stuck in the middle of the river. What happened yesterday motivates me for a dramatic twist to the way I’ve been adding posts to this blog. In the past, I had been reading a few things contemporary racialists say on their forums to immediately criticise them from the POV of a priest of the 14 words.

It seems to me that I should discontinue that practice. Just visiting the forums of those stagnant who refuse to finish crossing the river injures my morale. Regarding future articles we’ll see what I can think of. At the moment I only can add that, as I said in ‘The power to see the past’, we are seeing History in a very different way.

Categories
Racial right

The racialist movement is pure quackery!

I had thought to leave the previous post, with an enlarged portrait of Uncle Adolf, at the top of this page throughout the day out of respect for his memory. But a comment in that entry motivated me to say something very obvious.

The last time I checked Goebbels Hub (1:30 pm), the best ‘news aggregator’ site that links almost all the sites of white advocates, I discovered that, with the exception of a Stormfront thread, it doesn’t contain articles that, this April 20th, honours the best man in the history of the West.

How is that possible?

I have said it many times: the racialist movement is quackery. These valiant anti-Semites were able to say ‘Happy Easter’ a week ago in their forums, thus celebrating the god of the Jews (a Jesus who didn’t even exist by the way). But to celebrate an Aryan man who did exist, and who fought the most against Jewry in the century when most of us were born? God forbid!

The movement with the deceiving title of white nationalism was quackery from its origins in the Judeo-Christian US, it remains quackery today, and it will be quackery.

Our only hope is that a wiser generation arises that finally transvalues Semitic values to Aryan values. Will it happen, or will the racists cling to their Semitism?

Categories
Sticky post

On sticky posts

The post ‘Weirwood’ is no longer ‘sticky’ but can still be seen: here. The old sticky post was moved up the sidebar not long ago (‘Start reading this!…’).

Greatest man to ever live

Email message

The pen-friend who sent me the portrait of Uncle Adolf that I’ll post at midnight also informed me:

I am Mexican-American so from time to time I have read part of the content of your blog The West’s Darkest Hour. And I totally agree with you on the attitude of the Anglo-Saxon people towards the Germans of the Second World War. I did my whole school in the USA, so I tell you from my own experience: There are no people more indoctrinated in these questions of lies about the German people than the people of the USA. If you can, please share on your blog this image.

Categories
3-eyed crow

Fused teacher, and pupil

Categories
Alexandr Solzhenitsyn Who We Are (book)

La Blouse Roumaine


Left, The Romanian Blouse by Nicolae Grigorescu (1838-1907).

I understand better and better why almost no white advocate values Pierce’s book, which opened my eyes to the real history of the West. And I’m not just referring to this recent exchange with a commenter. I am also referring to what is said outside this site.

In this recent conversation between an American and a Romanian we see the causes. Both are Christians and both are clueless about the double aetiology of the dark hour of Westerners: their religion and how WW2 ended up enthroning the gospels’ suicidal message, even in the secular world.

The American and the Romanian speak of how the Jews took over the US, but they fail to clarify how it was that the Americans so easily sold their souls to the devil. For example, Hunter Wallace concedes that southerners lost power after the American Civil War, and that the Yankees in turn ceded power to Jews in the decades from the 1920s to the 1940s. But not a word did he say, nor did his interviewer, that there was a war both ideological and of blood and fire against Jewry in those decades.

Their blindness has to do with Christianity. A few years ago I wondered why Solzhenitsyn, whom I quoted in my post yesterday, ‘Weirwood tree’, did not support Nazism if he wanted so badly to liquidate the Soviet state. Some years ago an Englishman answered me, on this site, that it was due to Solzhenitsyn’s religion (the same religion of the Romanian girl).

After 1:20 the Romanian, an Eastern Orthodox Christian, said: ‘We will have a strong Christian revival’ and added: ‘Christianity is part of who we are’. Let’s compare it with what is said in Who We Are (new visitors to this blog would do well to read it).

Only later did they start talking about the aftermaths of the Chinese virus, without realising that the dollar is going to fall. But that’s another song.

Categories
PDF backup

WDH – pdf 341

Click: here