Ordinary Israelis are just as exterminationist as I am. The only difference is that they want to exterminate the Goyim from the countries around them, while I want to exterminate non-Aryans (unless a non-Aryan is a priest or a priestess of the sacred words, in which case s/he wouldn’t have the right to breed).
Exterminationism seems natural in Israel because they base their morals on the Old Testament: books written by Jews for the good of Jews. Conversely, Westerners freak out, like the blonde woman in the video linked above, because even though they might be atheists, they unconsciously have as their moral compass the New Testament: books written by Jews to the detriment of Gentiles (especially to the detriment of Aryans, since the Gospels were written right after the Romans destroyed Jerusalem).
The key to saving the Aryan from ongoing extinction is to repudiate the NT moral compass that the Jews wrote for us, and to develop a code similar to the Old Testament but for Aryan consumption: what we call here the “transvaluation of all values” (for example, the semi-secret opuscules that Himmler gave to members of the SS, including the Master Plan East).
Why can’t white nationalists see something so obvious? Will they continue to be enslaved to Christian morality simply because they are incapable of shaking off the Jew (NT) from their backs?
Allegory of Old and New Testament is a painting by artist Garofalo inspired by the collections of the State Hermitage Museum in St. Petersburg: an artwork that captures the themes of faith and history.
I’ve barely mentioned it on this site, but a discerning reader would have noticed that my priesthood of sacred words doesn’t apply to all white people, only to the most beautiful.
They are the ones the priest would like to preserve.
If, in the future, the social architects of a fourth Reich were to decree mandatory beauty on the planet, they would choose only the most beautiful specimens of Homo sapiens.
“For many genes are called, but few are chosen.”
In ancient Greece, before they committed the sin against the Holy Spirit (miscegenation), there was already something of this, and it is precisely for this reason that their art reflected that spirit.
Editor’s note: Although the author of this post on X is a Christian, and therefore an enemy, what he says is true except for the 6 million holocausted Jews. (Even in the famous David Irving trial, both the defence and the prosecution had to acknowledge that the number of Jews who died in WWII was no more than 4 million.)
Remember that this year I made a pilgrimage to Dachau because I not only approve of what Himmler did there, but because I want us to found an archipelago of Dachaus throughout the West after the holy racial wars bring us to power.
The Christian posted:
______ 卐 ______
Catholics who find themselves defending or downplaying Hitler should read this to the end.
It’s time to put it to rest.
Adolf Hitler was not a misguided patriot. He was one of the Church’s most determined enemies.
He personally authorized the annihilation of six million Jews.
He ordered the gassing of the disabled, the sterilization of those he judged defective, and the deliberate starvation of prisoners in a program that began with children and never truly ended.
He filled Dachau with Catholic clergy; hundreds were worked to death or died under medical experiments.
Bishops who preached against euthanasia faced arrest.
The Gestapo dissolved every independent Catholic youth organization in Germany. Catholic newspapers were banned, publishing houses seized, confessional schools closed or converted to state use.
The Concordat he signed in 1933 was violated before the ink dried.
In his own recorded words he called Christianity “an invention of the Jew” and “the heaviest blow that ever struck humanity,” declaring that the Church would be eradicated once the war was won. His inner circle confirmed the plan was total.
Pius XI answered with Mit brennender Sorge, the only encyclical in history smuggled into a country and read from every Catholic pulpit on the same Sunday, condemning the idolatry of race and blood, and National Socialism itself, by name.
Maximilian Kolbe, Edith Stein, Franz Jägerstätter, and thousands of others laid down their lives rather than accommodate that regime for a single moment.
There is no Catholic path that passes through admiration for Hitler, sympathy for his movement, or silence about what he did.
The only response compatible with the Catholic faith is this: remember it exactly as it was, and reject it entirely.
______ 卐 ______
Editor’s note: Let’s rephrase: The only response compatible with the faith of the priest of the sacred words, the Hitlerist, is this: remember it exactly as it was and accept it entirely.
The previous entry, “4 Words Explained!,” is fundamental. Together with the rephrased quotes from Francis Parker Yockey that appear in a post linked to the featured article, it reflects what it means to “transvalue all values.” These words are a Nietzschean formula that indicates the only path to saving the Aryan from the extinction it suffers throughout the West.
It is very illuminating to compare our POV with that of the granddaddy of the American racial right. In his recent article, Jared Taylor has realised that his nation’s project has failed. In fact, his article is titled “The American Experiment Has Failed (Adapted from remarks given at the American Renaissance conference, Nov. 15, 2025).” Taylor simply describes the bare facts of why the US has failed. But he ignores the aetiology of white decline:
I cannot foresee the political will to persuade or force 100 million citizens to bugger off. It wouldn’t be practical and in some cases I would argue it wouldn’t be moral. American Indians: where are they supposed to go? And we brought blacks here against their will.
This is Christian ethics. A Christian, Nick Fuentes, was once asked what book he would recommend. Since Nick isn’t a scholar he didn’t know what to say. I would say that the most important books to have come from the pen of an American are The Turner Diaries (fiction) and Who We Are (nonfiction): both by William Pierce. Let’s read another passage from Taylor, taken from his most recent lecture at AmRen:
I envy the simple choice our ancestors had: Kill the enemy or die trying. If the choice were that simple, every man in this room would do his duty, cheerfully.
Why is it that the racial right, unlike our ancestors—and unlike the Russians who are killing lots of Ukrainians right now!—no longer wants to kill the enemy?
Taylor’s article, originally published in AmRen, has been reposted on The Unz Review. As of this writing, I don’t see a single comment in the discussion threads of either forum reminding visitors of Pierce’s great novel, which in my opinion is the only way for white Americans to reclaim their territory: by exterminating all non-whites who refused to leave.
The problem with Taylor’s piece is that it describes the problem but doesn’t offer a deep analysis of why Aryans in general, and white Americans in particular, lost their Lebenskraft. Revilo Oliver said that if a race loses its thirst for life, that thirst can never be recovered; and all indications are that since 1945, whites have lost it around the world. I don’t know if I should be as pessimistic as Oliver because, unlike him, I believe that the energy devolution that will occur this century, and at the beginning of the next, will open one last window of opportunity for Aryans to redeem themselves from their ethnosuicidal sins.
Last month I was posting videos about how children’s stories had a completely different origin from the later fairy tales, and I gave the example of Snow White and Hansel and Gretel (in the original stories they were infanticidal mothers, not stepmothers: an important topic of my writings on child abuse at home). Now I’d like to talk about Jack and the Beanstalk.
The key symbol is the harp or the story to lull the white man to sleep (the rulers have offered their subjects a false story or worldview). But let’s take it one step at a time.
If my predictions are correct, Mother Nature (stealing the harp) will help the Jack of this century to seize the riches of the entire Jewish oligarchy and traitorous whites. In a video titled The Crash Course, originally published in October 2008, Chris Martenson, based on neo-Malthusian concepts, tries to explain energy devolution. A couple of years ago, Martenson developed these concepts into a book that can be purchased on Amazon.
The basic reason why the Aryan has lost his Lebenskraft (life force) is due to the incredible comfort of living, since the 1950s, in an environment of false abundance (peak oil), coupled with the Christian ethics that even atheists suffer from, and the current story or anti-Nazi “harp” to lull the white man to sleep.
Very well. Since oil will become increasingly scarce, if what the neo-Malthusians say is true, that means billions of humans will die unnatural deaths. At any event, all of them were born because of capitalist greed and the Christian ethics whose ideal is to help every coloured child. Nature will punish this white man’s sin of pride by exterminating the vast majority of humans, whom we here call “Neanderthals.”
Something of this kind happened in the Middle Ages. The Black Death of the 14th century was a devastating bubonic plague pandemic that swept through Eurasia and North Africa, reaching its peak between 1347 and 1353. It is estimated to have caused the death of between 80 and 200 million people, wiping out between 30 and 60 per cent of the European population.
This new plague, now in the form of an energy devolution, will be our great window of opportunity. Well, I won’t be around when billions die, but adding something of my own making to the video’s metaphor, there’s a difference between the harp and playing it.
The harp—billions dead in a century that will dwarf the Black Death of the 14th century—requires a musician. And that musician is the Aryan of the future, an SS Nazi redivivus. Playing the harp means repudiating Christian ethics, which is nothing more than stupidly following the commandments that some 1st-century Jews wrote for Gentile consumption, the so-called New Testament.
So if Nature itself will provide us with the harp that will kill billions, we also have to do our part and learn how to play it: kill the remaining non-whites (see, for example, what happened to all the Chinese by the end of The Turner’s Diaries).
This is something that Jared Taylor and his readers will never dare to say: we must sacrifice the religion of our parents, which is nothing more than a Jewish psyop so that the Aryan will immolate himself.
In this video uploaded today, Megyn Kelly appears accompanied by Tucker Carlson at a public event to talk about his decision to interview Nick Fuentes.
Tucker proves the whole point of this blogsite, The West’s Darkest Hour! He used the term “Christian ethics” to explain why he isn’t an anti-Semite; said that a Jew, Paul the Apostle is “my personal hero” and regarding neochristianity he added: “That’s where the idea of human rights comes from”!
He also explains that when such Xtian ethics are removed from the Aryan collective unconscious, exterminationism arises (which he calls “genocide”).
If we see Christianity and the French Revolution’s human rights as two sides of the same axiological coin, let us venture to say that the perfect symbol of our counter-revolution would be for thousands of blonde beasts starting to wear T-shirts emblazoned with Himmler’s face while burning churches, crucifying all those who tried to destroy their race and wiping their asses with the remains of the pages of the now destroyed Bibles all over the West, but especially in the US. And the Arc de Triomphe in Paris, which symbolises the historic inauguration of Neo-Christianity, must be razed to the ground as well.
If I were to publish it as a printed book, I would use the final scene of Stanley Kubrick’s Spartacus as its cover: the Appian Way, a Roman road used as a military supply route for the conquest of southern Italy and to improve communications. As Tom Holland says, crucifying the rebels in this way was a billboard to let people know what happens to those who raise their hand against the empire.
Following what I said in my previous post about The Turner Diaries and what Uncle Adolf allowed H & H to perpetrate—a relative power in contrast to the absolute power over earthlings of Hugo Drake in his exterminationist ship—, obviously in a realist revolution we would never have the powers of someone like the fictional Drake. Therefore, we have no choice but scare the degenerate whites like in Pierce’s Day of the Rope.
That, I insist, doesn’t mean we’re unnecessarily cruel. I would crucify the child psychiatrists, yes: but not for unnecessary cruelty. I would do it because only with tremendous power, like that of the “bad guy” in the 007 movie, would it be possible to exterminate in the cleanest way possible, practically without the Neanderthals suffering.
All this stuff about the Appian Way or the Day of the Rope is nothing more than lack of absolute technological power. Lacking it, we revolutionaries have to scare the shit out of the degenerate whites (and non-whites, obviously). Only fear, the age of terror that always follows a bloody Revolution, does the psyop to dominate the rabble. Remember Voltaire’s letter to the Marquis de Condorcet: “Il y a une autre canaille à laquelle on sacrifie tout, et cette canaille est le peuple.”
All this is very sad, because I don’t want those I wish to exterminate to suffer unnecessarily. But white people today are like spoiled children, and the difference between fiction, like that James Bond movie with Roger Moore, and the sordid real world is precisely that, lacking power, we have to put on a little show to, as I tell myself in my silent soliloquies, asustar a los venaditos (scare the little deer); that is, the naive/spoiled humans.
The Organization then established certain patterns in Detroit which were soon followed elsewhere. All captured White troops, as soon as they had laid down their weapons, were offered a chance to fight with the Organization against the System. Those who immediately volunteered were taken aside for preliminary screening and then sent to camps for indoctrination and special training. The others were machine-gunned on the spot, without further ado.
The same degree of ruthlessness was used in dealing with the White civilian population. When the Organization’s cadres moved into the White strongholds in the Detroit suburbs, the first thing they found it necessary to do was to liquidate most of the local White leaders, in order to establish the unquestioned authority of the Organization. There was no time or patience for frying to reason with shortsighted Whites who insisted that they weren’t “racists” or “revolutionaries” and didn’t need the help of any “outside agitators” in dealing with their problems, or who had some other conservative or parochial fixation.
The Whites of Detroit and the other new enclaves were organized more along the lines described by Earl Turner for Baltimore than for California, but even more rapidly and roughly. In most areas of the country there was no opportunity for an orderly, large-scale separation of non-Whites, as in California, and consequently a bloody race war raged for months, taking a terrible toll of those Whites who were not in one of the Organization’s tightly controlled, all-White enclaves.
Food became critically scarce everywhere during the winter… The Blacks lapsed into cannibalism, just as they had in California, while hundreds of thousands of starving Whites, who earlier had ignored the Organization’s call for a rising against the System, began appearing at the borders of the various liberated zones begging for food. The Organization was only able to feed the White populations already under its control by imposing the severest rationing, and it was necessary to turn many of the latecomers away.
Those who were admitted—and that meant only children, women of childbearing age, and able-bodied men willing to fight in the Organization’s ranks—were subjected to much more severe racial screening than had been used to separate Whites from non-Whites in California. It was no longer sufficient to be merely White; in order to eat one had to be judged the bearer of especially valuable genes.
In Detroit the practice was first established (and it was later adopted elsewhere) of providing any able-bodied White male who sought admittance to the Organization’s enclave with or hot meal and a bayonet or other edged weapon. His forehead was then marked with an indelible dye, and he was turned out and could be readmitted permanently only by bringing back the head of a freshly killed Black or other non-White. This practice assured that precious food would not be wasted on those who would not or could not add to the Organization’s fighting strength, but it took a terrible toll of the weaker and more decadent White elements.
Tens of millions perished… and the total White population of the country reached a low point of approximately 50 million by August of that year. […]
As the war of extermination wore on, millions of soft, city-bred, brainwashed Whites gradually began regaining their manhood. The rest died. […]
Since then he has been issuing idiotic proclamations about “restoring the Constitution,” stamping out “communism and pornography,” and holding new elections to “re-establish the republican form of government intended by the Founding Fathers,” whatever that means.
And he has denounced our radical measures in the south as “communism.” He is appalled that we didn’t hold some sort of public referendum before expelling the non-Whites and that we didn’t give individual trials to the Jews and race-criminals we dealt with summarily.
Doesn’t the old fool understand that the American people voted themselves into the mess they’re in now? Doesn’t he understand that the Jews have taken over the country fair and square, according to the Constitution? Doesn’t he understand that the common people have already had their fling at self-government, and they blew it?
Where does he think new elections can possibly lead now, with this generation of TV-conditioned voters, except right back into the same Jewish pigsty? And how does he think we could have solved our problems down here, except by the radical measures we used?
Doesn’t Harding understand that the chaos in his area will continue to grow worse until he identifies the categories of people responsible for that chaos and deals with them categorically—that it is physically impossible, considering the relative numbers involved, for him to deal with the Jews, the Blacks, the Chicanos, and the other troublesome elements on an individual basis?
Apparently not, because the idiot is still making appeals to “responsible” Black leaders and to “patriotic” Jews to help him restore order. Harding, like conservatives in general, can’t bring himself to do what must be done, because it would mean punishing the “innocent” along with the “guilty,” the “good” Negroes and the “loyal” Jews along with the rest—as if those terms had any meaning in the present context. And so, afraid of treating individuals “unjustly,” he is floundering around helplessly while everything goes to hell and the civilians in his area die like flies from starvation. Generals should be made of sterner stuff. […]
We are laying the foundations here for the new social order which will serve our race for the next thousand years.
And to be able to live and work in a sane, healthy, White man’s world—that is something which is beyond valuation for me. These last few weeks have been wondertul. It is terribly depressing to think of leaving this White oasis and plunging once again into that cesspool of mongrels and Blacks and Jews and sick, twisted White liberals out there. [pages 173-175]
______ 卐 ______
Then, after they learned to fear us, they were all too eager to please us. But they weren’t really interested in the rights and wrongs of the struggle; they couldn’t be bothered with soul-searching and long-range considerations. Their attitude was: “Just tell us what we’re supposed to believe, and we’ll believe it.” They just wanted to be safe and comfortable again as soon as possible. And they weren’t being cynical; they weren’t jaded sophisticates, but ordinary people.
The fact is that the ordinary people are not really much less culpable than the not-so-ordinary people, than the pillars of the System. Take the political police, as an example. Most of them— the White ones—are not especially evil men. They serve evil masters, but they rationalize what they do; they justify it to themselves, some in patriotic terms (“protecting our free and democratic way of life”) and some in religious or ideological terms (“upholding Christian ideals of equality and justice”). One can call them hypocrites—one can point out that they deliberately avoid thinking about anything which might call into question the validity of the shallow catch-phrases with which they justify themselves—but is not everyone who has tolerated the System also a hypocrite, whether he actively supported it or not? Is not everyone who mindlessly parrots the same catch-phrases, refusing to examine their implications and contradictions, whether he uses them as justifications for his deeds or not, also to be blamed?
I cannot think of any segment of White society, from the Maryland rednecks and their families whose radioactive bodies we bulldozed into a huge pit a few days ago to the university professors we strung up in Los Angeles last July, which can truly claim that it did not deserve what happened to it. […]
No, talk of “innocents” has no meaning. We must look at our situation collectively, in a race-wide sense. We must understand that our race is like a cancer patient undergoing drastic surgery in order to save his life. There is no sense in asking whether the tissue being cut out now is “innocent” or not. That is no more reasonable than trying to distinguish the “good” Jews from the bad ones—or, as some of our thicker-skulled “good ol’ boys” still insist on trying, separating the “good niggers” from the rest of their race.
The fact is that we are all responsible, as individuals, for the morals and the behavior of our race as a whole. There is no evading that responsibility, in the long run, any more for the members of our own race than for those of other races, and each of us individually must be prepared to be called to account for that responsibility at any time. In these days many are being called. [pages 196-198]
To answer your question regarding your latest post, I agree with you in that I too think (lawful? as if that would be allowed!) secession is not enough, and would be better achieved itself through violent aggressive revolution.
There are too many enemies otherwise, and they cannot be left alive, as with their grasp on modern technology, and, as the quotation of extermination says, in paraphrase, what if 10, or 10,000 aren’t enough, and you need to eliminate nigh on 10 billion. One can only do that through long-term—perhaps intergenerational—Turner Diaries-style insurgency. Secession feels a little like these ‘prepper’ hippies who retire to the woods in cabins and think that is enough to save them from civilisation’s degradation, with the problem unsolved all about, just over their horizon, or indeed Covington’s effective ‘Murka II’, where, without ideological fanaticism and stringent adherence to iron rule patriarchal norms, it slips back into just another (feminist) democracy.
As you commented on the final author saying—revolution being a state of mind, I think I go with the former commenters (I can’t remember if it was originally Greg Johnson, Larry Auster, or Alex Linder) that the fanatic attitude of hatred as much as the mythological ideals of what our race was and should be thinking of Cro-Magnon point for a historical example—coupled to the 4-words is enough for me to feel there is already revolution, even if not among many people; even if they are simply waiting in frustration for an opportunity.
Personally, I find the (second half of the) 14-words harder to fight for, almost a given to me, and harder to feel passion over (perhaps it’s because I have a long-term partner, so am in some sense complacent, small-minded or selfish over that). But to answer O’Meara’s point then, it’s not about inheriting the Leviathan as much as de-fanging and de-clawing it permanently, and tossing the remains into that ‘ashpit of history’, so nothing like our current situation can ever arise again, a real scorched earth tactic psychologically, and only then could I realistically think descendants could plan for a peaceful pure Aryan society in aftermath, having that opportunity awarded automatically to then, as the only survivors, left then to expand across the globe in further war, and wipe out remaining enclaves of enemies. At the moment, there’s too much war in my mind to think of a simple dislocation.
I hope this gives my basic thoughts reflecting on your latest piece.
Even on that same day, 23 September 2009, I read the Prozium article that Johnson reposted on TOQ Online, “Myths, Facts, Self-Interest”, from which I quote the following passages:
Americans are not analytical / empirical / objective. I have mentioned elsewhere that Tim LaHaye’s Left Behind series [LaHaye was a Christian fundamentalist —Ed.] has sold 65 million copies. Even within academia, the progressive mythos dominates entire disciplines, especially in the culture sensitive humanities. I just can’t see an appeal to science winning out (without substantial culture wind behind it); look what happened to James Watson (with all his prestige) when he stepped across the line of political correctness. Geneticists bend over backwards to avoid using the word “race” in lieu of Watson’s fall from grace. Most try to avoid it altogether (smart career move there). They bend to popular opinion and the progressive party line. Remember all that talk about how the Human Genome Project had discredited racialism? That and God talk has done wonders for Francis Collins’ career.
What can be said for self-interest? In our current political environment, it reinforces the LDC [Liberal-Democratic Capitalist] system. The career-minded, family-minded selfish individual prefers to go along with the flow. He is content to live in his whitebread suburb, shop at the Big Box stores for plasma televisions, pull the (R) lever at the ballot box in November. The first rule of conservative politics: Number One always comes first, second, and last. If such an individual is feeling really brave, he might go teabagging or do something really radical like visit a paleo website.
Just think about it: the tide of self-interest against us is so strong that White Nationalists have to cheer for a national catastrophe like a Second Great Depression, Hurricane Katrina or Kunstler’s Long Emergency to disrupt the status quo. Self-interest will come into play whenever our success appears plausible (think of the NSDAP) or catastrophic circumstances intervene. That’s when the opportunists and conservatives will flock into our ranks.
Looking at our situation objectively, even with the eye of an analytical empiricist (a bent of mind I share with GuessedWorker), what is needed right now (in the embryonic stage) is fanaticism[emphasis added by Ed.]. There are few incentives to join our movement. Racially conscious Whites are the most despised minority in America. I’m willing to wager we are hated even more than the atheists.
We need myths that are powerful enough to move a vanguard beyond their own rational self-interest. An alluring vision is needed comparable to the colorblind utopia that animates the left. It has to be expressed in art, literature, music and film; vehicles more accessible to the masses than academic texts… This is a task for artists, not intellectuals.
Regarding what Benjamin asked today (“Do you think part of this catastrophic regression has been because of the shift away from keeping personal libraries?”), I don’t think so because Prozium apparently reads a lot of books. “Prozium” was his old pen name. His real name is Brad Griffin, and since then he has been blogging on Occidental Dissent under another pen name, Hunter Wallace.
The point is: sixteen years ago Prozium was a self-proclaimed white nationalist and his blog’s subtitle, if I remember correctly, was “Western racial and cultural preservation”. Compare that to Occidental Dissent’s subtitle today: “Nationalism, populism, reaction”. What caused the shift to a reactionary mindset?
The European image that Occidental Dissent flaunted when that webzine defined itself as a “white nationalist” site.
For sixteen years I have followed the blogging career of Prozium, now known as Hunter Wallace in racialist forums. When he had bitter arguments with white nationalists, he repudiated the term “white nationalism” to define his position. As he confessed at the time, he became a “Southern Nationalist”. Years later, he decided that the best term to define his ideology was “Christian Nationalist”.
So, to answer Benjamin, I would say that it is not a large personal library that makes one wise (this man claims to have read hundreds of books). When one finds oneself in the middle of the psychological Rubicon, with water up to one’s knees, a dilemma arises: either one continues to cross the river to the other side, National Socialism (see above where Prozium himself mentioned the NSDAP), or one retreats back to the lands of Normieland (remember that on one occasion, after Prozium / Wallace took steps back, he called himself a “neo-normie”).
As I mentioned in my previous post about Greg Johnson and the vanguardist literature he used to publish in TOQ Online, the same can be said about Prozium / Wallace / Griffin: the pull that Normieland exerts on the minds of American racialists is so powerful that they rarely cross the river. To put it in a nutshell, the exterminationism on the other side scares the hell out of them!
Likewise, Andrew Anglin originally used a lot of Nazi paraphernalia on his site, The Daily Stormer. Then he Christianised his site and has been using Christian symbols. No more love for Uncle Adolf… On this side of the Atlantic, only racists like William Pierce (1933-2002) crossed the river to the extent of embracing exterminationism. So I’m glad, Benjamin, that you recommended Pierce’s book, Who We Are, to your friend. That book should be available in print! (as our anthologies were available before Lulu Press deplatformed us).
If we remember that Greg Johnson used to deliver pious homilies in his church in San Francisco as late as 2010, and that Griffin and Anglin remain openly Christian, it is clear why the magnet of Normieland moved them to retrace their steps as they were about to cross the Rubicon.
