web analytics
Categories
Rape of the Sabine Women

The Rape

of Polyxena

In the sixth question of Benjamin’s survey published yesterday, he asks: “Are we required to reclaim our women by force in the manner of the Sabines?”

As I have already said, if the Aryan male so desired, he could destroy feminism overnight during the racial revolution.

Before feminism, our 19th-century ancestors had more contact with our pre-Christian past than today’s feminised racialists, who find the idea of abducting the contemporary Sabines to found a new Rome appalling: an empire that would resemble Hitler’s dream much more than ancient Rome. But since feminism has already taken over our post-Christian, neo-Christian culture, we will have no choice but brutal solutions:

In the Loggia dei Lanzi in Florence stands this sculpture known as The Rape of Polyxena by the artist Pio Fedi, created between 1855 and 1865. Polyxena is considered the Trojan version of Iphigenia, daughter of Agamemnon and Clytemnestra.

As a commenter on Twitter recently said, “it is a breathtaking marble celebration of abduction, power, and zero consent!”

Unwertuung aller Werte!

Categories
Racial right

White

nationalists:

When will you stop sinning?
When will you renounce the Judeo-Christian ethics
that have been destroying the Aryan race
since Constantine seized power
—and return to our true Gods?

Categories
Aryan beauty Gaedhal (commenter)

Contempt

for physical beauty

by Gaedhal

 
As Richard Carrier now demonstrates, there really was no such thing as “Gnosticism”. All of the early Christian sects were Gnostics to one degree or another. “The Gnostics” were made up, essentially by orthodox apologists/theologians. Thus, the term “musterio”’, is never really translated in our bibles… it is transliterated into “mystery”. However, “musterion”, if translated, means: “secret”. Thus, the New Testament writers believed in secret knowledge, or musteria, and it goes without saying that the belief in secret knowledge is a hallmark of Gnosticisim.

“mustēria”, in Greek—thanks to how the neuter plurals of neuter nouns work, i.e. they sometimes act as a singular mass noun—could then be translated: “a body of secret teachings”. However, “mustēria” is never translated that way, as it would give the game away that early Christianity was a secret society, with a secret body of teaching only for adepts. This is why Jesus taught in parables. To the profane, they only got the surface meaning of the parables, however to the in-group, Jesus’s disciples, the true, often shocking import of what he is saying is only revealed to them. Thus, the non-adepts remain in their sins, for failing to understand the secret meaning of the parable. This is all most clearly spelled out in the gospel of Mark.

The term “gnōsis” appears frequently in the knew testament. Also, the term “pleroma”, which is Greek for “fullness” appears in the New Testament. The Pleroma is a Gnostic belief, as well.

Another hallmark of Gnosticism is the hatred of the physical world. Indeed, the physical world was created by the demiurge, or Satan, in the Christian version of Gnosticism. Thus, Jesus calls Satan “the god of this world” which is perfectly in line with Gnostic belief. Hatred of “the flesh” and “carnal wisdom” is more Gnosticism. “The natural man” is railed against: only the spiritual man can discern spiritual things.

Whereas in Greco-Roman paganism, the flesh profited much, such that the Gymnasia had as much to do with athletics as with the perfection of the mind—which is why secondary schools in Germany are called “Gymnasia” even unto our own day, in Christianity, the Flesh profited little. During the Christian era, the Olympic Games stopped. It was only in the 1800s, when Christianity began to lose ground to secular modernity that the Olympic Games were brought back.

And so, a contempt for physical beauty and physical perfection is the perfect element to spawn such a movement as fat acceptance. Christians are always on the lookout for lower and lower forms of lepers to uplift. Hence, all this talk about “marginalised communities” as if their marginalisation somehow conferred value upon them. Ayn Rand said that need is not a virtue; need is not valuable. In our day, she might have said that marginalisation isn’t valuable. It is only the Christian axiology that makes need or marginalisation valuable. And, of course, I am not a Randian libertarian. Rand, as a stopped clock, is sometimes right. I think that sentient beings should be treated ethically. Indeed, I concur with César that we ought to eliminate, as far as is possible, unnecessary suffering. As someone who has skimmed through Benatar, then if someone is brought to this hell-planet, against his will, then he/she/it ought to be treated ethically, and not tormented with unnecessary horrendous suffering. However, my instinct is towards pagan eudaimonia, or “well mindedness” or, as modern psychologists might put it: “positive mental states”.

I speak of myself. Whilst a traditionalist Catholic, I let myself go, physically, as my profile picture demonstrates. However, that profile pic is about 2 or 3 years old, if not more so, and I have actually lost a considerable amount of weight since then. I am still overweight, but perhaps not obese, any more. My BMI is now, probably, on the cusp or boundary between my being obese and overweight, however, more than ten years ago, when I was still a traditionalist Catholic, I was well well within the obese threshold. Partly, it didn’t matter. I was soon to enjoy the traditionalist Catholic version of the rapture: the “3 days of darkness” and the “tribulation” predicted by Fatima and La Sallette. When one deconverts, his scale of values shifts dramatically. One removes one’s eye from a mythical post-mortem eternity, and the here and now then becomes all important.

However, what I mean most to talk about in this email is that there are a quarter of a billion Nigerians in this world? Thanks, Christians!

This is what happens when you believe that Africans have infinite dignity. This is what happens when every featherless biped is imago Dei, made in the image and likeness of God. As César points out: were it not for Christianity, blacks would probably be extinct by now, as predicted by Darwin. Instead of this, we have a quarter of a billion of them in a single African country! As I said before: the human virus is now consuming more than what the planet can sustain. Calling humans infinitely valuable, as Frankenpope did, is like saying that locusts or mosquitoes are infinitely valuable. Locusts, like humanity, are a consumptive plague too, aren’t they? And of course the go-to sight for all things overpopulation related—and Christianity’s extreme culpability in this regard—is church and state dot org dot uk.

Imagine James and the Giant Peach (written by the Nordic atheist antisemite, Roald Dahl). For a time, they had to eat parts of the peach to survive. Now, let us suppose that this peach was a magically self-healing peach. And now let us imagine that James and his crew began to eat more of the peach, per day, than what the peach could self-restore unto itself. This is where we are today. Humanity is a consumptive plague that is destroying the planet—and itself, ironically enough, into the bargain—and Christianity blinds us to this reality. It is spiritual toxoplasmosis. It causes us to worship what is destroying us.

And for those who say that “oh well that isn’t real Christianity”. You seem to forget that Archbishop Lefebvre was the papal delegate for all of French-speaking Africa. The overpopulation crisis in Africa is partly the fault of a man largely credited with founding traditionalist Catholicism. Bob Pope and Frankenpope are not saying anything new when they call the human plague “infinitely valuable”, not just as regards the mass of humanity in total, but each specimen is, in particular, “infinitely valuable” according to Dignitas Infinita.

Most of our social problems are caused by the fallout of Christianity. As I said before: “woke” is the residue that remains once the supernaturalism of Christianity evaporates. Revilo P. Oliver called woke “the Marxian Reformation”. (although the term “woke” did not exist in his day, he was describing precisely what the term “woke” encaptures).

Categories
William Pierce

Our task

Yes, the Jews know exactly what they’re doing. But one really can’t blame them. That’s the sort of thing Jews always have done. It’s in their genes. What’s really disappointing and disturbing is the feminine response of our people to these Jewish lies. What’s disappointing is our gullibility.

— William Pierce: “Lies, Murder, and Jews”

Our task today is not to fight Blacks or Jews or communists or Mexicans, but to bring about a spiritual revolution among our own people [emphasis by Ed.]. Our task is not to fight an external enemy but to cure our own illnesses and weaknesses. It is, for the present, not to overthrow the government but to provide a new and sound set of values, a new world view, for the White race. It is to bring about a new sense of racial consciousness among our people and to convince them that our race must survive and must carry out its mission of breeding a new and better race, of breeding a higher mankind, and thus carrying us a step further along the path to Godhood.

— William Pierce: “The US Government Vs. the White Race”

It seems that the great Pierce put into a couple of quotes what we believe in The West’s Darkest Hour!

Categories
Aryan beauty

Visual

Since pure Aryans were infinitely more beautiful than the Semites of the early centuries of our era, when the Judeo-Christians seized Rome, the first thing they did was destroy the temples and statues that displayed Aryan beauty.

One visual way to understand the “transvaluation of all values” we propose—an improved National Socialism—is to put statues of naked Aryans back in the ethnostate: a proposal I haven’t heard in any racialist forum, except for a statement made by Greg Johnson about a dozen years ago.

Categories
Exterminationism

OT & NT

Ordinary Israelis are just as exterminationist as I am. The only difference is that they want to exterminate the Goyim from the countries around them, while I want to exterminate non-Aryans (unless a non-Aryan is a priest or a priestess of the sacred words, in which case s/he wouldn’t have the right to breed).

Exterminationism seems natural in Israel because they base their morals on the Old Testament: books written by Jews for the good of Jews. Conversely, Westerners freak out, like the blonde woman in the video linked above, because even though they might be atheists, they unconsciously have as their moral compass the New Testament: books written by Jews to the detriment of Gentiles (especially to the detriment of Aryans, since the Gospels were written right after the Romans destroyed Jerusalem).

The key to saving the Aryan from ongoing extinction is to repudiate the NT moral compass that the Jews wrote for us, and to develop a code similar to the Old Testament but for Aryan consumption: what we call here the “transvaluation of all values” (for example, the semi-secret opuscules that Himmler gave to members of the SS, including the Master Plan East).

Why can’t white nationalists see something so obvious? Will they continue to be enslaved to Christian morality simply because they are incapable of shaking off the Jew (NT) from their backs?

Allegory of Old and New Testament is a painting by artist Garofalo inspired by the collections of the State Hermitage Museum in St. Petersburg: an artwork that captures the themes of faith and history.

Categories
Julius Caesar William Pierce

Caesar

Editor’s Note: The photo I posted yesterday from a film about Alexander (wrongly called “the Great” by normie historians) marrying a mudblood can also be applied to Caesar.

Whoever controls the past controls the future, and if we don’t invert the values of the official narrative about Alexander and Caesar, it won’t be easy to fulfil the 14 words in a West resurrected from its historical catatonia.

Let’s see what William Pierce said about Caesar:

Celtic bands continued to whip Roman armies, even to the end of the second century B.C., but then Roman military organization and discipline turned the tide. The first century B.C. was a time of unmitigated disaster for the Celts. Caesar’s conquest of Gaul was savage and bloody, with whole tribes, including women and children, being slaughtered by the Romans.

By the autumn of 54 B.C, Caesar had subdued Gaul, having destroyed 800 towns and villages and killed or enslaved more than three million Celts. And behind his armies came a horde of Roman-Jewish merchants and speculators, to batten on what was left of Gallic trade, industry, and agriculture like a swarm of locusts. Hundreds of thousands of blond, blue-eyed Celtic girls were marched south in chains, to be pawed over by greasy, Semitic flesh-merchants in Rome’s slave markets [emphasis by Editor!] before being shipped out to fill the bordellos of the Levant.

Vercingétorix Memorial in Alesia, near the village of Alise-Sainte-Reine, France.

 
Vercingetorix

Then began one, last, heroic effort by the Celts of Gaul to throw off the yoke of Rome, thereby regaining their honour and their freedom, and—whether consciously or not—re-establishing the superiority of Nordic mankind over the mongrel races of the south. The ancestors of the Romans had themselves established this superiority in centuries past, but by Caesar’s time Rome had sunk irretrievably into the quagmire of miscegenation and had become the enemy of the race which founded it.

The rebellion began with an attack by Ambiorix, king of the Celtic tribe of the Eburones, on a Roman fortress on the middle Moselle. It spread rapidly throughout most of northern and central Gaul. The Celts used guerrilla tactics against the Romans, ruthlessly burning their own villages and fields to deny the enemy food and then ambushing his vulnerable supply columns.

For two bloody years the uprising went on. Caesar surpassed his former cruelty and savagery in trying to put it down. When Celtic prisoners were taken, the Romans tortured them hideously before killing them. When the rebel town of Avaricum fell to Caesar’s legions, he ordered the massacre of its 40,000 inhabitants.

Meanwhile, a new leader of the Gallic Celts had come to the fore. He was Vercingetorix, king of the Arverni, the tribe which gave its name to France’s Auvergne region. His own name meant, in the Celtic tongue, “warrior king,” and he was well named.

Vercingetorix came closer than anyone else had to uniting the Celts. He was a charismatic leader, and his successes against the Romans, particularly at Gergovia, the principal town of the Arverni, roused the hopes of other Celtic peoples. Tribe after tribe joined his rebel confederation, and for a while it seemed as if Caesar might be driven from Gaul.

But unity was still too new an experience for the Celts, nor could all their valor make up for their lack of the long experience of iron discipline which the Roman legionaries enjoyed. Too impetuous, too individualistic, too prone to rush headlong in pursuit of a temporary advantage instead of subjecting themselves always to the cooler-headed direction of their leaders, the Celts soon dissipated their chances of liberating Gaul.

Finally, in the summer of 52 B.C., Caesar’s legions penned up Vercingetorix and 80,000 of his followers in the walled town of, Alesia, on the upper Teaches of the Seine. Although an army of a quarter-million Celts, from 41 tribes, eventually came to relieve besieged Alesia, Caesar had had time to construct massive defenses for his army. While the encircled Alesians starved, the Celts outside the Roman lines wasted their strength in futile assaults on Caesar’s fortifications.
 

Savage End

In a valiant, self-sacrificing effort to save his people from being annihilated, Vercingetorix rode out of Alesia, on a late September day, and surrendered himself to Caesar. Caesar sent the Celtic king to Rome in chains, kept him in a dungeon for six years, and then, during the former’s triumphal procession of 46 B.C., had him publicly strangled and beheaded in the Forum, to the wild cheers of the city’s degraded, mongrel populace.

After the disaster at Alesia, the confederation Vercingetorix had put together crumbled, and Caesar had little trouble in extinguishing the last Celtic resistance in Gaul. He used his tried-and-true methods, which included chopping the hands off all the Celtic prisoners he took after one town, Uxellodunum, commanded by a loyal adjutant of Vercingetorix, surrendered to him.

Decadent Rome did not long enjoy dominion of the Celtic lands, however, because another Indo-European people, the Germans, soon replaced the Latins as the masters of Europe.

Categories
Aryan beauty Exterminationism

Architects

I’ve barely mentioned it on this site, but a discerning reader would have noticed that my priesthood of sacred words doesn’t apply to all white people, only to the most beautiful.

They are the ones the priest would like to preserve.

If, in the future, the social architects of a fourth Reich were to decree mandatory beauty on the planet, they would choose only the most beautiful specimens of Homo sapiens.

“For many genes are called, but few are chosen.”

In ancient Greece, before they committed the sin against the Holy Spirit (miscegenation), there was already something of this, and it is precisely for this reason that their art reflected that spirit.

Categories
Ancient Greece

Probitas

“The first time I wore a fine linen chiton,” writes The Hellenist, “decades of trauma from wearing profane democracy clothes were instantly purged from my weary spirit. Virtue begins with clothing and ends in justice.”

Part of the transvaluation of all values will even involve changing our clothing, in the sense that we will no longer dress as Christians or atheist neochristians do now.

The ancient Romans, heirs to the culture of ancient Hellas, called integrity probitas. This leads to maturity of judgment, consilium. Let us be virtuous in our thinking in order to reach maturity:

Do you really believe that if the ancient Spartans had conquered the American continent, you would now have a philosemite president north of the Rio Grande (or the abject miscegenation with Native Americans south of that river that contaminated the Iberian blood forever)?

Since our hypothetical American Spartans wouldn’t have betrayed their Gods to worship a Semitic god, this is my question to white nationalists: Do you sincerely believe that these American Greeks, with a collective unconscious never conquered by the Bible, would have rolled out the red carpet for the Hebrews (as so many Zionist Christians do now)?

Reconquering your lands, once of the Aryans, begins with an internal jihad: probing within oneself, with due probitas, these kinds of questions.

Categories
Axiology

Narcos

I read the below post here:

The NS Worldview rejects Christianity as racially universalist and fundamentally foreign to the Germanic way of life.

The Christian fundamental laws, which were forcibly imposed on the Germanic people, stand in stark contrast to the Nordic-Germanic worldview. The Church teaches the equality of all people. It also puts this into practice within its sphere of influence. Anyone can become a Christian, whether Aryan, Jew, or Black. Thus, a unified humanity was to be created by eliminating all racial differences between peoples.

The dogmas of the Catholic Church originated in the Orient. They were shaped under Byzantine influence. The Germanic way of life, which alone corresponded to the German national character, had to give way to an unnatural Christian dogma.

The dogma of the Catholic Church states that human life on earth is filled with sin. The better afterlife is supposed to redeem them from it. “Love your enemies,” “Thou shalt not kill” are fundamental tenets of this faith. Motherhood, for the Germanic woman the fulfillment of her existence, is sinful.

The unnatural seclusion in a monastery or convent is pleasing to God. With all these beliefs, Christianity was alien to the nature of the Nordic-Germanic people. Through the doctrine that all people are equal before God, the Church destroyed racial consciousness. The Jewish blood element penetrated and weakened the peoples.

Only Adolf Hitler’s various laws for the preservation of the purity of Germanic blood and the elimination of foreign races from the national community put a stop to this.

I’d like to change the subject slightly.

I don’t want to talk about all the torture in this Mexican prison related to the cartels. But I do want to mention that in one type of execution, the victims had their eyes and feet taped, were wrapped in plastic, and put alive into a freezer meant for livestock. After a couple of days, the Mexicans were frozen solid. They called a butcher and cut them into small squares, which were later fed to the pigs.

This was a common practice around 2011 or 2012, not too far from the US.

Incredibly, many of these felons who had belonged to cartels are already free because, regarding the sanctity of human life, Mexican criminal law follows Christian mandates (“Love your enemies,” “Thou shalt not kill”). There is no death penalty in Mexico (these freezing were apparently done under the orders of the cartel, not the Mexican state).

In an ethnostate the ethical way, according to our scale of values, would be to kill them all. There wouldn’t be any prisoners, not even those like the gigantic penitentiaries Bukele built in El Salvador. These kinds of criminals would simply be wiped out.

Considering that many cartel members are free (I’ve most likely run into them on the street) and wield enormous power in this country—veritable states within a state!—do you grasp our concept of transvaluation of all values? Human life has no value except the value our internal ethics assign to it.

Heil Himmler!