The word ‘racism’

Hadding Scott wrote a very important article about how, in the late 19th century, the term originated without the derogatory meaning with which it is used today (see Scott’s piece: here). These are my two cents:
 

______ 卐 ______

 

The critique of language is the most radical of all critiques.

If we don’t uproot from our vocabulary the Newspeak of the anti-white West—keep in mind that when all great European civilisations were at their apex the word ‘racism’ didn’t exist—, we won’t even be able to start discussing the issues.

According to George Orwell, the objective of Newspeak is social control. ‘Newspeak’ is propagandistic language characterized by neologism, euphemism and the inversion of customary meanings.

The 4th century of the Common Era, during the reign of Theodosius, witnessed the consolidation of power of the bishops in the Roman Empire after the premature death of Julian the Apostate. Those unconverted to the new religion became second-class citizens. A new word was coined, ‘pagan’ to label the adept of the millenarian Hellenic culture. Once created the Newspeak those stigmatised as ‘pagans’ were persecuted and destroyed ).

If we translate the term racist back to Oldspeak, just as ‘pagan’ only really meant the common adept of classical culture, we will see that ‘racism’ is a code word for ‘pro-white’. But after the Second World War it has been weaponized to become a term that induces guilt among whites.

Detecting this psyop together with other epithets is pivotal in the process of de-brainwashing whites. Besides the most obvious words—‘Islamophobe,’ ‘xenophobe,’ ‘transphobe,’ etc.—, below appears a short sample of Newspeak terms translated back to Oldspeak:

‘Affirmative action’ – Blacks stealing our jobs.
 
‘Anti-Semitism’ – The belief by gentiles that Jews may be criticized like any other group.
 
‘Civil rights’ – Untermenschen and spoiled white women have more rights than Übermenschen in the New World Order.
 
‘Diversified workforce’ – Much fewer white males are to be hired or promoted.
 
‘Disadvantaged’ – Unqualified and can’t speak English, German or another Aryan language, so give them money.
 
‘Equal treatment and opportunity’ – Fewer opportunities for the Aryan folk.
 
‘Historic grievances’ – White people ended slavery, human sacrifice in the American continent and cannibalism in tribal societies.
 
‘Homophobia / gay bashing’ – The healthy revulsion by Lot for Sodomite or Gomorrahite behaviour.
 
‘Human Rights Commissions’ – Inquisitions denying free speech. Thought Police that enforces liberal political doctrine.
 
‘Immigration’ – Race replacement. Genocidal levels of immigration.
 
‘Interracial relationship’ – White women having non-white babies. Also called racial engineering or soft genocide of white people (just see the ads advertising mixed couples throughout the city of London!).
 
‘Misogynist’ – Anyone who disagrees with the racially-suicidal empowerment of the feminists.
 
‘Multicultural enhancement’ – Destroy all European cultures.
 
‘Politically correct’ – Fines and/or jail for anybody not sufficiently ‘woke’ and following the New World Order.
 
‘Respect and tolerance’ – Surrender. ‘Tolerance’ for millions of immigrants means demographic genocide for whites.
 
‘Culture of Hate’ – Anything pro-white.
 
‘Woman’s choice’ – Abortion and genocide of millions of white babies.

Nevertheless, and despite all that has been said above, ‘racism’ might be a term mostly used not by our enemies but by us! (Tom Metzger’s tactic). Hadn’t values been inverted by Christianity and its bastard son, liberalism, racist attitudes would be considered a great virtue, as Nietzsche saw:

Christianity, sprung from Jewish roots and comprehensible only as a growth on this soil, represents the counter-movement to any morality of breeding, of race, privilege: it is the anti-Aryan religion par excellence. Christianity—the revaluation of all Aryan values, the victory of chandala values, the gospel preached to the poor and base, the general revolt of all the downtrodden, the wretched, the failures, the less favoured, against ‘race’: the undying chandala hatred is disguised as a religion of love.

If the transvaluation of values advocated by Nietzsche were to take place throughout the West, ‘racism’ would be considered the greatest of virtues. Therefore—

Umwertung aller werte!

_________

Postscript: To see how this piece looked in the old incarnation of this site click here, although links of that PDF are now broken.

8 replies on “The word ‘racism’”

I imagine in the hopefully not-so distant future, historians from the White Ethnostate will spend the entirety of their academic careers studying and trying to fully comprehend this unprecedented culture of control we live under.

It has many names: Hollywood, “Western Culture”, political correctness, multiculturalism.

The West had already reached a terminal stage when “what’s on T.V.?” became a habitual and constant question among the masses.

Yet ultimately it is impossible to encompass the enemy’s culture in one all defining definition. It is a strange synthesis of human psychology, rampant in-built moral assumptions by its producers, and sustained by the simple human desire for conformity.

As Stalin once said “quantity has a quality of its own,” of which Western thought-control has taken upon as a fundamental tenet. The dissemination of culture has reached torrential level of output, likely growing exponentially by advancements in digital technology, and has long been a kind of white noise in our everyday lives. Constant yet subtle, it drowns us in its presence as we slowly acclimate and become desensitized to things that may have once disgusted us. Heck, it desensitizes things our ancestors once would have killed over out of pure principle. It is powerful, so powerful we become fearful, even aggressive, when something threatens to dampen our white noise of the West. Ultimately it is a fear of the unknown and unfamiliar.

I think White Nationalists are too quick to forget their “dream” phase in their past life. Once a WN has awakened from the matrix, he seems to forget what it was like to be originally plugged in. He forgets that, likely not so long ago, he was as relatively brainwashed as the run-of-the-mill Joe six-pack he supposedly so despises.

I believe this is why White Nationalists have such difficulties making inroads into the wider population. Once we’ve liberated ourselves, it becomes near impossible to relate with the culture at large. Our languages, thought processes, outlooks become racialized in a world where Whites have been thoroughly deracinated.

I give credit where credit is due. No apparatus of thought culture has been as powerful and unique as that employed by the Zionist West. Towards the dying days of the Soviet Union, citizens became bored of their propaganda, and farther and farther along found it irrelevant in their everyday lives. It shows the power, and necessity, in having a powerful myth and culture standing behind a Nation. The Soviets shrugged their shoulders when their empire collapsed, a fascinating and rapid change in outlook when they had a mere few decades back sacrificed themselves by the millions to save their Socialist State during the Great War. I am waiting to see the days when White America reacts in such a way to the death of their Nation, but we face a foe much more cunning and formidable than any propaganda ministry in Moscow.

The reason to me that the White Nationalists haven’t made more of an inroad to the broader white community is we are to fragmented.

Our people have a racial concience just that they are disconnected & must be brought under one banner.

How many groups on the right recognized the jew zionists as a threat? Plenty only some are cruder & lack the racial sophistication. All who hate our common enemy should be welcomed into our tent.

I think we souldn’t be to cerebral about the battle to come. Pragmatism helps to get whatever has to be done, done… Whether we agree or not as long as the enemy is the same.

The soldiers running & shooting there way through a village don’t have to like each other or agree on anything just the common enemy.

Just read the above article and see how “racism” is merely a newspeaking word of relatively recent coinage. All western nations thrived well for millenia without the need of that little fucking word, you moron.

That’s why its important to say “kikes and niggers” because language must be free to express ideas, which are supreme to the feelz of the hereby aformentioned. Open (or push if you prefer) the overton window, good sirs, and find your freedom in using words in a truly “liberal” sense.