web analytics

Tag: Christian question (CQ)

Categories
Blacks Racial right Videos

A little black lady

who serves our cause!

In sharp contrast to the first ten minutes, the end of the video shows some awful anti-music played by niggers. This said, I love that the ZOG concept is becoming mainstream! Without realising it, this black lady is helping our cause. As I said in previous days regarding edgy podcasters, what we need now is for at least one Groyper to read a Hellstorm review as a prelude to drinking from this site’s wellspring.

In the video above, it’s clear how even Gentiles in the US Congress are guilty of the excessive empowerment of Jews. Sooner or later, racialists will have to confront the CQ. Sooner or later, the ideas of The West’s Darkest Hour (21st Century NS) will have to sink into the collective unconscious of the Aryan.

Categories
Conservatism Israel / Palestine

Thanks, Bibi!

Regarding what’s been happening these past few days following Tucker’s interview with Nick, I’m astonished. Of course, the primary cause of this uproar isn’t due to this pair, but to Bibi Netanyahu’s blunder and his genocidal campaign in Gaza. In the days following October 7, 2023, almost all of American public opinion was in favour of Israel. As a result of Bibi’s blunder, for the first time in US history, the majority of Americans are on the side of Palestine!

Think about that.

What’s happening in the American collective unconscious is similar to a tectonic plate readjustment, with natural earthquakes and potential tsunamis producing geological changes: a huge opportunity that Tucker, Nick and many other podcasters have been able to seize.

Although this is a step in our direction, and although R.G. and Jamie are right that Americans aren’t ready for National Socialism, we must always keep in mind that Christianity is connected to the power of Jews in the West. I invite visitors to watch just ten seconds of this clip of Charlie Kirk from March 14, 2025 (“But I think you can acknowledge that we as Christians have to honor the Jews. You believe that?”). Ted Cruz, senator from Texas said similar things in his heated argument with Tucker earlier this year, and millions of evangelical Christians in North America think, or used to think, the same.

Jamie is right. Taking Christianity away from Americans is going to be a hard sell! That’s why I love the economists who predict the collapse of the dollar (a few months ago the ounce of gold was below $3,000 and now it has surpassed $4,000—it has to reach $27,000 or more for us to be talking about hyperinflation). But that won’t be enough, not barely enough to kill Christianity. What will really be apocalyptic is energy devolution thanks to peak oil (alas, unlike the collapse of the dollar, this process could take a century to unfold…).

Anyway, and reiterating what I told the Groypers in my previous post: if we are to save the Aryan from extinction we must reject Christian ethics.

Categories
Nick Fuentes Racial right

Groypers

This Monday I continue writing about what I said yesterday.

I have been watching my autobiographical videos that I recorded in Spain sixteen years ago about the devastating abuse I suffered at the hands of my parents as a teenager, and I realise that I don’t look so bad on camera. True, I am not white in the American sense of the word, which refers to Anglo-Germans north of the Rio Grande, but by Mediterranean standards I couldn’t say I looked too bad at fifty, when those videos were recorded. However, since I don’t know anything about software that can translate me into English, I will continue using text today.

The idea behind creating a channel is simply so that the Groypers can see me on Rumble, because I very much doubt they visit The West’s Darkest Hour. The urgent message I would like to convey to these young people so that they finish crossing the Rubicon towards NS is not hard to understand. But first of all, I would like to reiterate why I think it is a good idea to try to communicate with them.

If visitors remember what I said about my trip to Europe this year, which I recently linked to with a picture of me in Dachau, they will see that if Europeans are emasculated, it is simply because they aren’t allowed to speak. Giving my friends Chris and Joseph eight and seven years in prison for Thought Crime in the UK for what they said on Black Wolf Radio seems excessive even by the standards of Europe’s so-called soft totalitarianism! (and Canada and Australia are no much better when it comes to freedom of speech). Americans have a huge advantage: they are allowed to speak. That is why racialist webzine forums have flourished although, as Hitler well knew, that intellectual phase only fertilises the soil for the seed to germinate, whereas only the power of oratory can catapult a racialist to power.

From this angle, only Nick Fuentes is using oratory for this purpose, as seen in this YouTube video uploaded yesterday.

The reason I would like the message of this site to reach the ears of at least some Groypers is that, although I admire young Nick as the only orator at the moment, his message is contradictory due to his Catholicism.

Please understand me correctly. An American politician cannot be openly anti-Christian, as he would lose the votes of Christians if he wanted to come to power as Hitler did (and upon reaching it, eliminate superstitions such as parliamentarianism, etc., as Savitri Devi rightly said).

However, the new Führer must be aware of the Christian Question. And this, even though Hitler only spoke out about the CQ to his inner circle.

In Tucker’s interview with Fuentes, he asked him if he would ever run for president. Fuentes said maybe. But it is not the same for a Catholic like Fuentes to become president as it would be for a Groyper who thinks like Hitler: show yourself to the masses as a devout Christian, but reveal to your friends your true colours as a pantheist. And from this angle, it is necessary to criticise Fuentes.

Yesterday I saw a video uploaded a couple of days ago to YouTube. It shows part of Candace Owens’ interview with Fuentes, and I was struck by the fact that from the outset Fuentes admitted that, as a Catholic, he couldn’t oppose interracial marriage. Fuentes then spoke about Jared Taylor-like race realism, a point on which Owens is as ignorant as most Westerners. But even in that cordial segment of the interview—as cordial as the interview with Tucker—the contradiction between Fuentes’ Christian ethics and his racial realism is more than evident.

Considering what I recently said to my interlocutor Benjamin in the comments section, that crossing the psychological Rubicon is done step by step (even I took time to cross it since I recorded those videos about child abuse in Spain), the ideal situation would be for someone like Fuentes to become president. We can already imagine the difference between a Fuentes presidency and Trump’s abject international politics!

But what would happen to the country’s laws? Fuentes has said that power should not be relinquished (just what Hitler did when he became chancellor). Is it possible that in the future Fuentes, or someone like him, could become the first dictator of the US? Even in this fantastical scenario I see serious problems due to Fuentes’ Catholicism, and that is what I want to communicate to the Groypers.

Let’s suppose that Fuentes is the dictator of the US. If we take into account what he said to the negress Owens, will there be Nuremberg Laws in his dictatorship? And the thorniest question: what about the 100 million non-Aryans living in the US? A true Christian cannot expel them, right?

If I, a true Hitlerist, were in power, it is clear what I would do—as any reader of William Pierce’s first novel can imagine. But the dictator Fuentes, because he constantly says that in the US he imagines the first thing is “Christ King,” would never dare to take that step… and over the centuries, with other Christian dictators, white Americans would become extinct. The dictator Fuentes and his successors would only have delayed the process that the Jewish zeitgeist is now accelerating: a boiling frog that doesn’t know it’s being slowly killed because of Xtian ethics.

This is what the Groypers who continue to take baby steps towards our side should know.

Categories
Axiology Exterminationism New Testament

Thanks Tucker!

In this video uploaded today, Megyn Kelly appears accompanied by Tucker Carlson at a public event to talk about his decision to interview Nick Fuentes.

Tucker proves the whole point of this blogsite, The West’s Darkest Hour! He used the term “Christian ethics” to explain why he isn’t an anti-Semite; said that a Jew, Paul the Apostle is “my personal hero” and regarding neochristianity he added: “That’s where the idea of human rights comes from”!

He also explains that when such Xtian ethics are removed from the Aryan collective unconscious, exterminationism arises (which he calls “genocide”).

Thankyouverymuch!

Categories
Axiology Nick Fuentes Racial right Real men

On Nick Fuentes

Something that strikes me about mornings is that it’s the time when inspiration strikes. For example, I went to bed and woke up planning to spend the morning reviewing the chapter against Sigmund Freud in my Hojas Susurrantes, which I’m translating into English. But inspiration struck while I was getting ready, so I decided to write this post instead.
 

______ 卐 ______

 
I’d like to clarify what I have said in my two previous posts, about the movie The Village and Nick Fuentes (here and here). The crucial phrase doesn’t appear in the articles, not even in the question I posed in the last one (“Does such 21st century American film exist…?”), but rather in the comments section and even in parentheses: “Who needs Jews when we have white nationalists?”

I will explain it in this entry.

I’ve been reading the recent articles about Fuentes published on Counter-Currents. I think we’re all missing the main point.

Fuentes is like the kid who says the emperor has no clothes. At 27, he doesn’t have my maturity, or the erudition of the authors of C-C. Compared to me or my mentors William Pierce and Savitri Devi, Fuentes seems like a child. But it’s important to remember that it’s precisely that naive cry to a cowardly public—that the emperor has no clothes—that’s the first step in making them see the obvious.

In racialist forums I’m ignored for taking the message of white nationalism to its logical conclusion: violent revolution à la Third Reich. And I’m not just referring to the question I asked yesterday, which was left hanging (although I admit that only a film expert could answer it). I’m referring to the fact that regarding those crucial words conflating my last posts (“Who needs Jews when we have white nationalists?”) I haven’t received any response on X either, where I tweeted them a day ago. Of my 259 followers on X, nobody has said a word yet. As I was told in an email yesterday, they leave me talking to myself “because increasingly—silently, clandestinely—their egos are bruised by the scolding truth brings, and they are otherwise in distaste, having disagreed silently in the background but without the balls to add more.”

But let’s return to Fuentes, who, unlike my followers in X and here, is always willing to discuss important issues with great frankness. He’s like the kid in the story because he speaks the truth—as far as he understands it—about the ethnocidal levels of migration and feminist ethnosuicide: the cancer in the Aryan collective unconscious of our times (cf. what I said yesterday about The Village).

In fact, young Fuentes is far more mature than the veterans Jared Taylor and those of VDARE, insofar as he has already awakened to the JQ (see this clip). On the other hand, by obeying the Christian mandate to love all human beings (remember that from our POV most are exterminable Neanderthals), Fuentes falls into a great contradiction (see, for example, this other clip).

At the end of Tucker’s interview, he asked Fuentes if he would run for president in the future, and Fuentes said perhaps. Tucker asked him what he would do in power, and Fuentes replied that, since the Left wants to crush us (remember that if Harris had won, the First Amendment would have been at her mercy), the Right should crush the Left as a prophylactic measure.

Fuentes is right. Trump promised a Wall in his first term, and there’s nothing of the sort. In his second term he has promised to destroy Antifa, and the same thing happened: there aren’t thousands upon thousands imprisoned like Nayib Bukele is doing in El Salvador, or much better: what Hitler asked Himmler to do in Dachau, a place I love with all my heart and which I visited this very year!

César Tort, the Editor of The West’s Darkest Hour in Dachau Camp, Germany (see my report on that trip here).

Fuentes’s humanitarian sentiments in the second clip are that American whites must resign themselves to the fact that 100 million non-whites will be residing in the US, even though the Enemy imported them without any plebiscite. This represents a major contradiction with what he told Tucker, the same contradiction as Trump’s unfulfilled promises. Tellingly, both Tucker and Fuentes concede in that interview that it is precisely Christian scruples that compel them not to solve the problem (as Himmler was solving it before the deluded Anglo-Americans intervened).

This said, the adolescent way in which Fuentes speaks, shattering post-WWII taboos, is the right one. He speaks out in a crude manner, like an innocent child with no self-consciousness surrounded by adults under the delusion that the emperor has clothes. It doesn’t matter that compared to us, the 21st-century National Socialists, Fuentes seems like a kid. He uses the exact tone that the Aryan collective unconscious needs to awaken!

Let’s compare Fuentes’s most controversial statements in the clips the Left has been circulating with the boring C-C articles or those published by Jared Taylor and VDARE. Alex Linder compared them to those gatherings of posh people who eat crustless sandwiches and speak in politely low voices. With those bourgeois types we’re not going to get anywhere! We need classy thugs. We need an archipelago of Dachau camps throughout the West! Linder spoke with the right tone—the way potential revolutionaries speak.

Since Linder is no longer with us, I think that for the American collective unconscious, a voice like Fuentes’s is the first baby step across the psychological Rubicon in our direction.

Categories
Nick Fuentes Racial right

Fuentes

Nick Fuentes and Tucker Carlson.

Listen to another Nick Fuentes interview just for 50 seconds starting from this moment.

It is clear that, due to Christian universalism, which drives Nick to love all humans including Neanderthals (compare it to our exterminationism), Fuentes will never be the American Führer who saves whites from extinction. He, with his million followers, is a man of his time (the Christian Era). I, with Ben, am a man against our time (the Hitlerian Era).

Categories
Abortion New Testament

Matthew

by Gaedhal

Christianity, as I said before, is about breeding up “the least of these”, because, as I said before, only “the least of these” have ever, historically found Christianity attractive.

Minus coercion, as Captain Cassidy points out, the best of these have no interest in Christianity. The best of these only pretended to be Christian when Christianity had the power of the sword. Today, when Christianity no longer has the sword, the best of these, the scientists and the philosophers and the otherwise well educated, are atheists, overwhelmingly.

Christianity is abroad in the world breeding up the future generations of the least of these.

Abortion is usually argued for in Liberal—i.e. axiologically Christian—terms. Liberal Atheism, or Humanism, is just an aggressive and obnoxious form of godless Christianity. As Revilo P. Oliver correctly put it: it is merely a non-theistic sect of Christianity; the non-theistic Christianity of the Marxian Reformation. Atheistic Hyperchristians still subconsciously believe in some sort of a magical force that magically makes us all equal; all equally adapted to living in a modern technological world. In a technical sense, the term “equal” or “superior” is meaningless in evolution. However, an organism can be better or worse adapted to a Given environment—in this case a technological Western Civilization. In a godless universe, such as what presents itself to us, we would not expect all humans to be equally adapted to living in a Western technological civilization. Indeed, the people best adapted to a modern Western technological civilization would likely be those who invented it, i.e. White Europeans.

Abortion is usually argued for in Liberal, i.e. Neo-christian terms… however it could also be argued for in right-wing terms… whatever works, right?

Even the antichristian radical right is usually pro-life… even though, as this book The Fall of Roe puts it, more poor non-white women get abortions in America than white women. Abortion appeared to be operating in a eugenic way in America, one of the few statistics that were positive, as regards maintaining White demographics in America… and then Christians killed Roe, first with the Hyde amendment, which stopped the government from federally funding abortion in its donations to Planned Parenthood, and with getting rid of Roe itself.

Abortion was one of the few phenomena, in this world, actually working in favour of White demographics, and the Christians got rid of it.

Every. Single. Time.

As César points out: the Christians are doing more to harm us whites than the Jews.

The podcast whence this book emanates, incidentally, is what changed my mind on the abortion issue. Pro-lifery was one of the last Christian vestiges that I deconstructed / deconverted from.

Categories
Christendom

X post

by Uberboyo

Rome destroyed Judea in 70AD, replaced it with Palestine, and set us off on the greatest war in history:

– The Jews were forced to begin wandering and spread out into Rome

– They could not win a physical battle, but they wanted revenge

– They waged psychological warfare on Rome

– This was done through worldview domination, where they bent the Roman mind into turning on its own religion

– A few centuries later, Roman paganism was banned and the only legal worldviews in Rome were Jewish (Christianity and Judaism)

– Rome fell 19 years later, vengeance was complete, and Rome was destroyed

______ 卐 ______

 
– For 1500 years Europe groaned and wretched as this worldview spread through it like a parasite

– All pagan worldviews were defeated one by one

– Christian kings would invade and in the aftermath the wandering Jews as “people of the book” would appear and offer financial services to the subjugated nation

– The Christian worldview would then sterilise the pagan worldview of the nation, but then “exempt” Jews to practice usury

– This has been so effective that a modern “antisemitie” can be aware of this Jewish exploitation but then default to Christianity in defence – complete incoherence
 

______ 卐 ______

 
– The Nazis were completely conscious of every line of thinking here and were implicitly anti-Christian and explicitly antisemitic

– They were clear they were waging a worldview war to expel Abrahamic thinking from Europe

– Their propaganda and plans all clearly state this

– They were defeated by Marx’s Communism and the Financial empire of the West

______ 卐 ______

 
– In the aftermath, European nativist thinking is crushed with the full force of modern psychological warfare

– This is done to make sure Europeans do not ever consider the worldview that flickered in the 1930s

– This is married to a protracted effort to destroy the actual people of Europe through immigration: the final nail in the coffin

______ 卐 ______

 
– The only way out of this is a worldview revolution, followed by political action

– There have been two major bursts in the last 250 years

– The French Enlightenment enforced by Napoleon and German Idealism enforced by Hitler

– Modern Europe still has the most latent potential for a worldview revolution to occur

– Modern Europe is the most atheist territory of Earth, and all the Jews left Europe after WW2

– But Europes political class has been entirely managed since WW2 and every person in power is a lackey mandated to hold Europe down

______ 卐 ______

 
– The internet provided the fertile ground for the new mental revolution of our age – just like book printing did for the Enlightenment

– The awakening has already happened, what comes next is already a forgone conclusion

– There will be a final attempt to reevaluate our values and establish a new worldview into political reality

– We have had our Enlightenment… what comes next is our Napoleon.

Categories
Racial right

JQ v. CQ

I agree that organized Jewry is the chief enemy of our people…

—Counter-Currents today.

Nope! It’s Xtian ethics.

Categories
Exterminationism Racial right

Sixteen

years later (IV)

Even on that same day, 23 September 2009, I read the Prozium article that Johnson reposted on TOQ Online, “Myths, Facts, Self-Interest”, from which I quote the following passages:

Americans are not analytical / empirical / objective. I have mentioned elsewhere that Tim LaHaye’s Left Behind series [LaHaye was a Christian fundamentalist —Ed.] has sold 65 million copies. Even within academia, the progressive mythos dominates entire disciplines, especially in the culture sensitive humanities. I just can’t see an appeal to science winning out (without substantial culture wind behind it); look what happened to James Watson (with all his prestige) when he stepped across the line of political correctness. Geneticists bend over backwards to avoid using the word “race” in lieu of Watson’s fall from grace. Most try to avoid it altogether (smart career move there). They bend to popular opinion and the progressive party line. Remember all that talk about how the Human Genome Project had discredited racialism? That and God talk has done wonders for Francis Collins’ career.

What can be said for self-interest? In our current political environment, it reinforces the LDC [Liberal-Democratic Capitalist] system. The career-minded, family-minded selfish individual prefers to go along with the flow. He is content to live in his whitebread suburb, shop at the Big Box stores for plasma televisions, pull the (R) lever at the ballot box in November. The first rule of conservative politics: Number One always comes first, second, and last. If such an individual is feeling really brave, he might go teabagging or do something really radical like visit a paleo website.

Just think about it: the tide of self-interest against us is so strong that White Nationalists have to cheer for a national catastrophe like a Second Great Depression, Hurricane Katrina or Kunstler’s Long Emergency to disrupt the status quo. Self-interest will come into play whenever our success appears plausible (think of the NSDAP) or catastrophic circumstances intervene. That’s when the opportunists and conservatives will flock into our ranks.

Looking at our situation objectively, even with the eye of an analytical empiricist (a bent of mind I share with GuessedWorker), what is needed right now (in the embryonic stage) is fanaticism [emphasis added by Ed.]. There are few incentives to join our movement. Racially conscious Whites are the most despised minority in America. I’m willing to wager we are hated even more than the atheists.

We need myths that are powerful enough to move a vanguard beyond their own rational self-interest. An alluring vision is needed comparable to the colorblind utopia that animates the left. It has to be expressed in art, literature, music and film; vehicles more accessible to the masses than academic texts… This is a task for artists, not intellectuals.

Regarding what Benjamin asked today (“Do you think part of this catastrophic regression has been because of the shift away from keeping personal libraries?”), I don’t think so because Prozium apparently reads a lot of books. “Prozium” was his old pen name. His real name is Brad Griffin, and since then he has been blogging on Occidental Dissent under another pen name, Hunter Wallace.

The point is: sixteen years ago Prozium was a self-proclaimed white nationalist and his blog’s subtitle, if I remember correctly, was “Western racial and cultural preservation”. Compare that to Occidental Dissent’s subtitle today: “Nationalism, populism, reaction”. What caused the shift to a reactionary mindset?

The European image that Occidental Dissent flaunted when that webzine defined itself as a “white nationalist” site.

For sixteen years I have followed the blogging career of Prozium, now known as Hunter Wallace in racialist forums. When he had bitter arguments with white nationalists, he repudiated the term “white nationalism” to define his position. As he confessed at the time, he became a “Southern Nationalist”. Years later, he decided that the best term to define his ideology was “Christian Nationalist”.

So, to answer Benjamin, I would say that it is not a large personal library that makes one wise (this man claims to have read hundreds of books). When one finds oneself in the middle of the psychological Rubicon, with water up to one’s knees, a dilemma arises: either one continues to cross the river to the other side, National Socialism (see above where Prozium himself mentioned the NSDAP), or one retreats back to the lands of Normieland (remember that on one occasion, after Prozium / Wallace took steps back, he called himself a “neo-normie”).

As I mentioned in my previous post about Greg Johnson and the vanguardist literature he used to publish in TOQ Online, the same can be said about Prozium / Wallace / Griffin: the pull that Normieland exerts on the minds of American racialists is so powerful that they rarely cross the river. To put it in a nutshell, the exterminationism on the other side scares the hell out of them!

Likewise, Andrew Anglin originally used a lot of Nazi paraphernalia on his site, The Daily Stormer. Then he Christianised his site and has been using Christian symbols. No more love for Uncle Adolf… On this side of the Atlantic, only racists like William Pierce (1933-2002) crossed the river to the extent of embracing exterminationism. So I’m glad, Benjamin, that you recommended Pierce’s book, Who We Are, to your friend. That book should be available in print! (as our anthologies were available before Lulu Press deplatformed us).

If we remember that Greg Johnson used to deliver pious homilies in his church in San Francisco as late as 2010, and that Griffin and Anglin remain openly Christian, it is clear why the magnet of Normieland moved them to retrace their steps as they were about to cross the Rubicon.