by Tomislav Sunic
Contrary to widespread belief [in the American racial right], political sycophancy toward Israel—including its fellow travelers among millions of fervent Christians awaiting the coming Apparition of Jesus—is not the result of a violent ideology imposed by a handful of Jewish conspirators.
Rather, long-standing, Bible-inspired guilt feelings had already created fertile ground for the erosion of freedom of thought. Coupled with the illusion of endless capitalist growth, alongside Christian “love thy non-White neighbor” ecumenism, a belief has taken hold that everything will somehow sort itself out.
It won’t. At its core, the spirit of Christian-inspired self-denial amounts to a loss of Spirit itself.
____________
The above is just an excerpt from a recent article:
“U.S. Political Theology: Weaponizing the Bible” (here).
6 replies on “Fertile ground”
I’m glad Sunic mentions a ‘loss of Spirit’. What do you think is the interplay psychospiritially between this inherited (by pedagogic transmission) Christian guilt and self-denial, and the withering of the racial soul – not just the anti-aesthetic regression of the physical form taken overtly – that accompanies centuries of miscegenation?
For example, were these individuals – most whites – on the whole not miscegenated (to below Nordic standards), how easily could Christian ‘pathology’ affect them, and in what weighting would you say this Spiritual dissolution occurred?
I’m not sure if my question is silly or not. I’m interested in a multifactorial picture though. My gut instinct is that Christianity has done the most damage, but, at the same time, needs something slightly handicapped to facilitate its – lifelong – acceptance and transmission the while.
Again though, I am left with the worrying pronouncements of Heinrich and his pure Nordic colleagues from some months back; the observation that even most pure Nordics in the modern age/Kali Yuga as susceptible to degeneracy and monotheistic dogma. It’s a difficult question for me.
The imposition of Christianity on the white race, and the destruction of Hitler’s Reich, will likely condemn the Aryan race to extinction.
If the American racial right (I’m not counting Europeans because, as you know, I consider them lobotomized eunuchs) were manly and honest, they could still reverse this process by repudiating Christianity and replacing it with Hitler’s religion.
But they do the exact opposite: they don’t repudiate the foundations of their country (by proposing to nuke the heads of Mount Rushmore, etc.) nor the Judaic malware that the Puritans brought to the first colonies.
I’ve said it several times: there’s nothing wrong with Aryan hardware (there’s no ethno-suicidal DNA), only with the software (Christian ethics).
I can’t elaborate right now because that woman I mentioned in the email yesterday is about to arrive…
I personally wasn’t really thinking of genetics/DNA so much as that bit in The New Racial Classification on core psychological/character traits among pure Nordids. I was wondering if miscegenation would alter those, i.e. bring them closer in temperament to other, non-white races, and that that in some way might act as a tiny destabiliser also. I realise, logically, that that would imply there was something genetic/heritable to personality though, which, from all your writings—and everything I’ve read also—I don’t think is the case (it’s the most controversial part of TNRC for me).
It’s Christianity all the way, albeit with the practical ramification of that being that we effectively destroyed our last hope in Adolf Hitler, the spiritual knock on effects of that perhaps—to be esoteric about it—requiring a certain brutal penance on our parts, in line with that recorded tract I sent you a few months ago of me reading Savitri: we certainly deserve everything we get.
Much as it does increasingly seem to be the case. What truly effective and dedicated guerrillas, etc., can we form from this bunch of mewling idiots?! I ask myself sometimes, could anything we do by now, or past that future tipping point, when historical conditions can arm us against the enemy at all, be enough? I can’t really think of our extermination as a race, in totality. I’m too optimistic. I don’t think anyone online—well, hardly anyone—can truly grasp the seriousness of what an existential threat is, though, taken in all adult realism (especially not the boorish, degenerate pseudo-intellectuals of the right wing). It transcends all academic and political classification, which is all these morons can interpret.
Your last words remind me of today’s podcast on C-C.
Although I didn’t hear it, I find it astonishing by the title alone that they don’t grasp that the Aryan situation is really like that of a patient in a coma who will probably die. Just look at the migration levels in Europe and nobody is rebelling. As you ask above: What truly effective and dedicated guerrilla groups can we form from this bunch of whiny idiots?
According to Joseph Walsh, who is now rotting in an English prison for daring to rebel against this migratory genocide by orcs, only a Fourth Reich, improved compared to the Third, could save us.
But not even Joseph and the other imprisoned Englishman accepted my offer to come where I live to avoid the judicial trial that was coming their way…
Once William Pierce died, there were no longer any real men with the necessary intelligence to understand what was happening. Racialists don’t even read his story of the white race. Why are you an optimist?
I completely agree with you. I’m not a rational optimist over all this… it’s just an inherent part of my character otherwise. That knee-jerk response that ‘hey, we’ll put these bastards down, no matter how difficult’. It’s like an assumed naivety, almost for morale purposes, yet subconscious. The reality is more of a grim fascination in seeing what does happen – when something eventually happen that is.
As long as a body still has the potential to enact action, there is no moral recourse to consider suicide, of which I feel despair over this matter to be an equivalency, if not also a precursor to actual self-inflicted death. To gloat over our extinction is almost pornographic to me – or to worry into the ground over it. It renders a person automatically handicapped then the shit does kick off.
You’d think it should have by now. My one adopted faith position, much is it could be a gamble also, is expecting it will at all. This is, disastrously perhaps, why I remain positive. I’d rather be consider deluded over the matter than submit to defeatism. One’s just a speculative insult, the other leaves me tangibly useless (which, so far, isn’t the case). I hope this answers your question.
Well, if I were to draw Tarot cards and land on the Star of Hope, I’d think that the collapse of the petrodollar when Iran wins (and Russian tanks enter Kiev) will initiate the Aryan awakening after 80 years of catatonia, especially if the first signs of energy devolution begin afterwards.
Only then could I feel the Star’s ray of hope…
The problem is that the petrodollar hasn’t collapsed yet, and I won’t live long enough to see the apocalyptic consequences of oil depletion.
My problem with white nationalists is that they seem to wear rose-tinted glasses. My glasses aren’t black, they’re clear: we see things as they are.