web analytics

Tag: Feminized western males

Categories
Eduardo Velasco Real men

Tough replies

by Eduardo Velasco, 2

Pedrito said:

You are a case of supreme intellectual perversion. They should hire you at Libertad Digital or COPE.
 

NT (Velasco) replied:

Oh, yes, my dear Pedrito-ito-ito, I am a pervert, a very perverse pervert, and even the Antichrist himself would do well to hire me and have me at his side when the time comes. Cuchi cuchi cuchi cuchi, the pervert is coming to tease you!

If you have no sense of spelling, at least you have a sense of humour… very flat, that’s for sure.

Okay.

And now fuck off from my blog to the Paris metro at 3 am to preach how much you like the good vibes of the multi-culti movement.

Your failed, lapsed, ageing, wrinkled, atrophied and malfunctioning generation has uneventfully ended its insipid, grey and pathetic reign, OK? So face it. You have no ability to influence or participate in an issue or have art or part.

The future world belongs to the young, and I’m sorry to tell you that the young don’t give a shit about your pacifist, hippiesque, sedative rubbish. We care about other, nobler things (like, for example, ourselves).

Modern youth have much higher goals than your leftist bubble. Like, for example, fucking, partying, getting drunk, getting high, fighting, making money, buying stuff, sinking into the most hedonistic material joy and living comfortably.

No kidding, those petty and abject aspirations are much loftier and more logical goals than the pathetic, tiny, anaemic motives of the modern 30-50-year-old bourgeois, and they constitute a positive change.

We have made some progress, yes. Now real physical drives, based on biology and base instincts, have taken the place of an abstract entelechy preached by four half-witted Jews. The next step is higher instincts.

Progre-shitheads = Bruaaaaaaaaargh (retching, cramping and, finally, vomiting). Go to your graves, poor shadows of yourselves.
 

Pedrin said:

Let me get this straight. You have an emotional schizophrenia that perverts your thinking. And your skill for rhetoric and sophistry (clearly visible to the eyes of those who read you) makes you even more gone.

Ok, I agree with you that the recycled bourgeoisie (read progressives) is trash. But your hatred of it makes you only think with your left (look at you, left) brain hemisphere.
 

NT replied:

Schizophrenia is not telling truths like American fists, but (for example) calling each other Pedrin by day and Natasha by night. Stop with the ad hominem attacks and concentrate on arguments like in the biological quality post.

You’re not a progressive, good for you.

My advice to you is to wander through my blog without renouncing to wave your flag of morbidity, breathing deeply and inhaling the perverse vapours emanating from my perverse schizophrenia emanating from my left hemisphere. After Nietzsche and Jung, my blog may become the cornerstone of your irreversible Nazification.
 

Pedrin said:

[Long comment quoted below by Velasco:]
 

NT replied:

Look at Daoism (Taoism) and Confucianism. Ethos and pathos. Pure dualistic thinking, and therefore false and shallow.

You lightly dismiss two extremely ancient and profound doctrines. Taoism is, so to speak, a jewel. No philosophy has reached even a fraction of its knowledge of the human body, its hidden springs and techniques of inner alchemy (Hinduism and Buddhism are comparable). Dualism is not synonymous with simplicity. There are dualisms of conciliation or separation, and there are interesting examples in both cases. Manichaeism is 100% dualistic and yet I consider it to be extremely profound and complete.

All the vigorous macho men I’ve known were at heart pussies on the psychological level.

I get the feeling that’s what the weak in character and body try to tell themselves to overcome the trauma of not being that way. So ‘deep down’ they were pussies. Did you explore the cerebral cortex of each of them to come to that conclusion, or were you perhaps guided by prejudice? Did you slap each of them on the ass to see if they would let out a ‘ha-ha’? Was Achilles a pussy? Leonidas? El Cid? So what are you proposing? That instead of vigorous macho men we should be weak damsels? What’s wrong with being a vigorous macho man? Is it better to be like a Zerolo? What would Nietzsche or Jung think of Zerolo? Hmm, I’m intrigued, pal…

Violence for violence’s sake is an armour.

Yeah, tell that to Attila, Genghis Khan or Tamerlane, and see what they say.

First of all, the most insecure children are precisely those who have felt little maternal warmth. It is indispensable in the first years of life.

I never said otherwise, read well. The maternal-filial bond materialised in the cord and breastfeeding is important in the first years of life. But at a certain age, the child must be emancipated from that influence. In societies as far apart as Sparta and the chivalric orders of the Middle Ages, that age was 7.

In patriarchal society, the consummation of this symbiosis is prevented, the mother-child dyad is ripped away to create mindless warriors.

At 7, the symbiosis is more than complete, and a prolongation of it would produce a spoiled and capricious child. On the other hand, if Leonidas is a ‘brainless warrior’, well… we need more ‘brainless warriors’!

Don’t confuse matriarchy with matristics. There have never been matriarchies (where women rule), that is an anthropological aberration. There have been matristic societies, which is different.

Anthropological aberration? Male chauvinist! We’re all equal and blah blah blah. Just kidding. We use different terms. I call gynecocracy what you call matriarchy, and I call matriarchy what you call matristic.

It is in patriarchy that women rule in the pussy that hides behind the warrior, and where the manipulative woman appears.

Examples? Bullshit, this archetype of the manipulative woman appears in matriarchies, in pseudo-patriarchies (Jews, Gypsies, Islam) or in already decadent patriarchal societies (Sparta, Rome). See the case of the Roman Poppea Sabina, or in the Sultanate of Women during a certain phase of the Ottoman Empire.

Very documented and flowery everything you say, but they are falsehoods, contradictions, and shallow thinking.

The good thing about having an opinion is that it’s free. Or as ZP would say, ‘I’m glad we disagree, that’s the greatness of democracy, ñaña’.

But I don’t believe in democracy. You think you’re right, I think I’m right and, in the end, only one of us is right.

(Needless to say, that one is me, and the other is you: the one who is barking, braying and yapping.)
 

Pedrin said:

[…] [Omitted by Ed.] And I would like to know what is a ‘pure’ patriarchal society and what is the ‘pure’ race for you, and from this I can criticise it. I know what the Aryan race is, but where is the purity of the Aryan race? It seems to me that as Plato was looking for the highest good, you are also looking for an ideal that does not exist. What is a pure Aryan? I don’t quite understand.
 

NT replied:

If you think that aggressiveness is only for defending yourself, fighting for females, food or territory, you don’t know yourself. Aggressiveness and violence are perfectly healthy and perfectly natural, and a man who doesn’t have them is a sick disgusting creep.

If you want to know what a pure patriarchal society is, read this post.

If you want to know what the Aryan Race is… you’ve gone to probably the only place in Spanish where this is explained understandably, so I don’t know why you’re not wandering around the blog (particularly in the ‘Nordicism’ topic) or scratching your head.
 

An Argentinian said:

Nordic: if you are as manly, violent and phallic as you say; if you would like to clash swords against the flesh of others and taste the blood of the defeated; if you would like to be led in a political direction by kicking the boots of uniformed men in the ass… Why don’t you go live in Cuba?

If you are so handsome, post a picture of yourself so that your schoolmates and your parents (who probably don’t know that you have this idiocy in your head) know about the reading you resort to for recreation. We are in the 21st century, and we have to have a more critical vision than those who came before us. Get rid of your prejudices and find your true voice. Don’t be left with the first impression of power or violence. Underneath the mask is the true face of control and aggression.
 

NT responded:

Please point me to the exact spot where I say I am ‘violent and phallic’ and that I want to taste the blood of my enemies (you’re out of your mind pal, ha ha) or all the nonsense you just said.

So think before you write, you oaf.

And what schoolmates? I haven’t been to school for a long time, and when I was in high school, I was a skinhead and my whole fucking town knew I was a Nazi, besides my parents.

Yes, this is the 21st century, the century of the cowardly, mechanical, ant-like, unnatural, degenerate and ungodly man. You understand I look back to times when life was pure, man almost perfect and justice simple.

You are invited to read this blog. You, a Judeo-Christian morbidly curious about Nazism, you repressed Argentine Nazi. 🙂

Categories
Eduardo Velasco Feminism Real men

Tough replies

by Eduardo Velasco, 1

Regarding the article I translated yesterday, below I include some comments from Eduardo Velasco’s defunct site and Velasco’s responses that appeared under the pen name of ‘NT’ (Nordic Thunder). The comments I now translate into English date from December 2008 to March 2010. The thread is so long that it will take me many posts to translate Velasco’s responses to commenters on his articles. The ellipses mean that I have omitted many paragraphs from the commenters, which can be read in full in the original language (here). On Velasco’s old site—
 

Juan commented:

I think that humans suck, they educate their children one way up to a certain age and then they take care of corrupting them (including the parents). I don’t see the day when the end of the world will come and put an end to this hypocritical race.
 

NT (Velasco) replied:

To talk about ‘humans’ is to generalise. To give you an example, I often hear things like ‘HUMAN BEINGS are curious beings because they are capable of creating art, cathedrals, philosophy and music, but they are also capable of performing ablations, cannibalism, etc.’

Wrong. Let’s talk properly: ‘There are human beings capable of building cathedrals and blah blah blah (let’s call them A) and human beings (let’s call them B) capable of creating Marilyn Manson etc.’ As good racists, we should wish that the ‘end of the world’ (which will be nothing but a new beginning, a full stop) will take away all the B’s and keep the A’s. People who are carriers of a higher potential in their blood must survive.
 

A woman commented:

It’s scary to think that there are people like you, intellectually deformed, and with such an inferiority complex that you can’t take on other ways of looking at things. Vagina envy is what you have and a horrible fear of being found out as vulnerable and stupid as you really are. I hope no woman ever loves you, (nor any man) and that you never procreate.
 

NT replied:

Haha.

But where the fuck do you think you’re going with that loud and annoying orchestra in a Nazi blog, you dumbass? Aren’t you afraid of being mocked from head to toe? What do you think, that this is Maria Teresa Campos’ set?

Watch out: the brave, 45-heeled, stainless steel, the pure survivor gets scared of us, and that’s why she enters a patriarchal blog to kick, to tantrum, to get hysterical and to piss on the floor.

You’re right to be scared, you stuck in the ’60s and out of touch with the real world because, with the thing that’s about to hit the West, I’d be scared too if I were an ugly, hairy, bitter, masculinised, fanatic-pathetic feminist trucker, frustrated by her sterility, childless, ‘culturally’ nurtured on tabloids and other oestrogenic swill, and with no chance of ever being taken care of by a guy who dresses down to his feet.

Vagina envy, yes… similar, perhaps, to your camouflaged, subconscious phallus-phobia-morbid phallus envy, quite superior to your little clit?

Your ‘hopes’ are in vain, you pity-worthy little twerp, but I, on the other hand, wish you luck ‘surviving’ in the torrent of testosterone about to be unleashed. Remember, you still have time (if you’re under 45 and not ugly, which I highly doubt) to get fit, diet, exercise, wear pink, snag a guy to take care of you, give birth, cook and scrub, before Islam puts a burqa on you. You’ll never be able to compete with those 20-something girls now, who kick the shit out of you, but hey, you screwed up when you had the chance, so pass on getting on our backs, okay?

Here’s a picture of your beloved ideological acolyte, Jewish feminist Andrea Dworkin, who brags (!) about having been raped. [link added]

What more could you want, you arctic sperm whale!

What a sack of gelatinous shit. I couldn’t even shake her hand if she pulled a kilo of Viagra, 8 gallons of beer, 37 litres of Afrodiasiac, 20,000 mg of intramuscular testosterone enanthate, 38 consecutive Spanish National Team victories over France and 88 years in prison.

Hey, I think I know why that cetacean became a feminist.

Because no guy paid any attention to her and of course: she started hating men, tired of seeing how they flirted with female specimens as the Gods command, tired of seeing lovebirds couples and tired of seeing happy mothers pushing a trolley with 2 babies.

Go survive somewhere else, you bitter and soured seal.

Thus spoke NT.
 

Gonzalo commented:

That ‘vagina envy’ thing really got to me XD…
 

NT replied:

Ernesto Milá’s blog is a mine.

I interpret this in the sense that the times of real crisis and violence are going to end with this estrogenic bubble of sanitary towels with wings, which we have the imbecility to call ‘Western civilisation’.

Contrary to the deluded feminists, who believe that we live in a patriarchy and are moving towards a matriarchy, I maintain that we have been living for decades in a pestilent and unnatural matriarchy that nullifies the virile element and that the difficult times will lead us headlong to the establishment of an iron and totalitarian patriarchy.

Categories
Men Sword

Eunuchs

In a discussion thread on this site today, Benjamin said:

I tend to just hope there are more decent people hidden away in the woodwork, unannounced and unpublicised, thinking deeply together about what to do next. It’s very hard, post-childhood, to encourage anyone to change or develop, and often impossible if they have not had the seeds in them to do this independently all along. I hope very much that there are enough pre-existing people though.

Rephrasing Dominique Venner, Michael O’Meara once said that the European in history is best seen as a warrior carrying his sword as a symbol of his will, adding that the Hellenes made their debut in history by refusing to be slaves.

But the white man has dropped his sword since 1945. What we now have are lobotomized eunuchs.

Categories
Racial right

On eunuchs

A Eunuch’s Dream (1874, Cleveland Museum of Art) depicts a eunuch who wanted to marry a harem slave. He experienced a vision of her while smoking his opium pipe, but her little companion holding a knife dripping with blood reminds us that the eunuch’s anatomy precludes the fulfillment of his dream.

 

______ 卐 ______

 

I started the Crusade Against the Cross series, now a book, a month ago. Before I return to what I used to do, quoting Simms’ book on Hitler, I would like to say a few things about the racial right. I never tire of analysing the subject precisely because of what I was saying yesterday about how Europeans lost their manhood.

On this side of the Atlantic, whites also lost their manhood, although at least some of them still defend some of it with the Second Amendment. But that’s not remotely enough. What racialists need now is to shift their paradigm: from believing that the Jewish problem is the primary cause of white decline, to realising that the Christian problem is that primary cause. And to do so requires balls: intellectual manhood that racialists on this side of the Atlantic still lack.

Recently, for example, Counter-Currents (CC), one of the most representative sites of American white nationalism, surveyed its visitors. I was enthusiastic about this initiative and answered the survey questions myself.

In doing so, I noticed that the survey taker asked many questions from the System’s POV. For example, he asked the respondents whether they considered themselves to be male, female or a third sex (we can imagine a survey of imperial Germans if the Third Reich had won the war!). Likewise, the CC survey asked whether the respondent suffered from autism or ADHD.

For years I have complained that racialists haven’t realised that psychiatric labels like ADHD are relatively recent, and have been used to tame brave male children with drugs. I brought this to Greg Johnson’s attention himself, as he read my article ‘Why psychiatry is a false science’ in an expanded version in which I included some passages about ADHD and white children.

The problem with the kind of questions like the one in the CC survey is that they don’t adequately rebel against crazy or pseudo-scientific fads (that there are more than two sexes or that there is such a thing as ADHD). But that wasn’t the worst of the survey. It would have been fascinating to see how many of the respondents were Christian, or sympathetic to Christianity for example. But on Saturday, Johnson published an article saying that he will keep some of the poll results to himself! What a disappointment. And we cannot know if any CC readers were upset, because Johnson is known to sometimes not let some comments through (I gave up trying to comment there when he wouldn’t let me discuss Nordicism).

Now let’s turn to another of the most respected sites on the American racial right: the one chaired by Kevin MacDonald. Tobias Langdon is a featured author at The Occidental Observer. On Sunday, Langdon published an optimistic article that opens with these words:

“The West is doomed!” “France is finished!” “Britain is over!” I’ve never understood expressions of despair and defeat like those. They’re obviously self-indulgent and harmful things to say, so how could people with any common sense and self-control utter them? Unless those people aren’t what they pretend to be, of course. No genuine friend of the West should announce that “The West is doomed!” Or announce the same of any part of the West, whether they happen to live there or not.

Langdon goes on to say that fortune favours the brave and that defeatism has been a capital crime in wartime. But he omits one small detail! No one in the mainstream articles of today’s racial right is saying what, a dozen years ago, Michael O’Meara was still saying about an eventual armed revolution. And it is precisely because of this lack of revolutionaries, albeit at the moment only at a theoretical level, that it makes perfect sense to say that France or Britain are finished (David Lane had said so in ‘Open Letter to a Dead Race’). But of course: like CC, Langdon writes for an audience of eunuchs.

There was one commenter who took issue with Langdon and posted this. Remarkably, another commenter defended Langdon Christianly, even talking about the god of the Jews as if (1) that god exists, and (2) capitalising the word ‘God’ as implying that we Gentiles must worship it. That’s fairly common on that supposedly Jew-wise webzine!

Before this site gets back on track, I must quote from the last page of Crusade against the Cross, actually a quote from the last page of Nietzsche’s Der Antichrist:

Law against Christianity [1]

Given on the Day of Salvation, on the first day of the year one (30 September 1888, according to the false calculation of time).

War to the death against vice: the vice is Christianity

First article.—Every type of anti-nature is a vice. The priest is the most vicious type of person: he teaches anti-nature. Priests are not to be reasoned with, they are to be locked up.

Second article.—Any participation in church services is an attack on public morality. One should be harsher with Protestants than with Catholics, harsher with liberal Protestants than with orthodox ones. The criminality of being Christian increases with your proximity to science. The criminal of criminals is consequently the philosopher.

Third article.—The execrable location where Christianity brooded over its basilisk eggs should be razed to the ground and, being the depraved spot on earth, it should be the horror of all posterity. Poisonous snakes should be bred on top of it.

Fourth article.—The preacher of chastity is a public incitement to anti-nature. Contempt for sexuality, making it unclean with the concept of ‘uncleanliness’, these are the real sins against the holy spirit of life.

Fifth article.—Eating at the same table as a priest ostracizes: you are excommunicated from honest society. The priest is our Chandala, —he should be ostracized, starved, driven into every type of desert.

Sixth article.—The ‘holy’ history should be called by the name it deserves, the cursed history; the words ‘God’, ‘saviour’, ‘redeemer’, ‘saint’ should be used as terms of abuse, to signify criminals.

Seventh article.—The rest follows from this.

Friedrich Nietzsche – The Antichrist

I quote this just to show the gulf that separates me from the typical American racialist. Unlike Langdon’s goofy optimism, I am convinced that to save the Aryan man it will be necessary to implement the ‘Law against Christianity’ when we revolutionaries come to power. There is no other way to save him since it’s precisely Christian ethics that has been screwing the Aryan mind.

______________

[1] Nietzsche’s ‘Law Against Christianity’ has been eliminated from numerous editions of The Anti-Christ: A Curse on Christianity because the editors simply cucked before the Judeo-Christian ethos of the masses.

Categories
Degenerate art Philosophy of history

Lost manhood

Since the conflict in Ukraine, the lectures of John Mearsheimer, professor of political science at the University of Chicago, have become fashionable. I have seen quite a few of his interviews, including some recent ones. Despite co-authoring a book on the Israel lobby, Mearsheimer is a normie in every sense of the word, though he can see international relations in a much more realistic way than the vast majority of Westerners do. Mearsheimer’s insights have made me understand the dynamics of how states interact with each other. But his greatest contribution to my understanding of the West’s darkest hour was one of his pronouncements on Europe.

It had been a mystery why this site receives hardly any feedback from Germans, even though I touch profoundly on Germany as we recently saw in Crusade against the Cross. But it’s not just them: why have the men of the countries that in the past played crucial roles in Western history—besides Germany, England, France, Italy and Spain—lost their manhood?

Let it be clear that Mearsheimer is not only a normie, but a patriotard. In a recent interview, a Dutchman asked him whether Europe could become (again) a regional hegemon. Mearsheimer replied that no, that Europe would do well to remain subordinate to his country, the United States. However, thanks to that and another of his recent lectures, I believe it was the one in Australia, Mearsheimer, using very different words from mine, explained why the French and the Germans have lost their manhood.

This is a psychological phenomenon.

Readers of my anthology On Beth’s Cute Tits will remember a passage in which we said that, in an environment of great abundance, males tend to become feminised: what we might call the empire of yin, like the bonobo apes (as opposed to chimpanzees, in whose environment there is no such abundance of fruit and the more aggressive Yang reigns). The point is, and here Mearsheimer helped to enlighten me, that for seventy-five years NATO has served as Europe’s sole gorilla, and the once proud European nations have, since the end of World War II, accepted their role as vassals protected by NATO’s military umbrella so that they could devote the bulk of their GDP—oh heroic materialism!—to worshipping Mammon. As I said, Mearsheimer used very different words, but I am translating his message into a much rougher language.

Yesterday I was saying that my blood boiled when I saw ‘walking tours’ supposedly on Sparta and other ancient Greek cities. The human figures they put there to brainwash us—or rather: to aggressively lobotomize us—have skin the colour of the Mexicans I see every day on my walks. On today’s walk, I even saw a whiter and lighter-haired woman than the women with negroid features that they show us in those videos of the ‘classical world’ (and I live in an area of brown people!).

Those popular videos denote the level of the most abject psychological conquest to which the Europeans have been subjected. NATO dominance is the key, I said, because, parallel to the worship of Mammon, the explanation of why Europeans fail to protect their ethnicity is clarified by the presence of the gorilla.

If Mearsheimer is correct, and it seems to me that he is, we might deduce that when the dollar collapses and American military bases have to be dismantled and their men returned to the US, Europeans will be forced to rebuild their armies while NATO and its epigone, the European Union, disappear. That will be the beginning of Europeans regaining their manhood, and if Russia feels threatened in the Ukrainian war and gets tough by nuking bases in Poland or Romania that host menacing F-16s, much the better!

The punishment that future history has in store for Europeans who let themselves be castrated and lobotomised for the sake of a bourgeois life must be apocalyptic so that they wake up from the treacherous ultra-feminisation in the yin empire they have created for themselves. As we have already said, the sins of Westerners are such that only an Indo-European Kalki could save us.

I would like to end this entry with some words from the Spaniard Eduardo Velasco that I have quoted more than once:

Let us compare today’s Europeans with the Spartans. We are extremely dismayed when encountering such physical, mental and spiritual degeneration! Such stultification! The European man, who used to be the hardest and most courageous on Earth, has become a weakling rag and degenerated biologically as a result of comfort. His mind is weak; his spirit fragile, and on top of that he considers himself the summit of the creation! But that man, just because of the blood he carries, has enormous potential.

The rules on which Sparta was seated were eternal and natural, as valid today as yesterday, but today the dualistic mens sana in corpore sano has been forgotten: the physical form has been abandoned producing soft, puny, deformed monsters; and the mental poisoning has produced similar abominations in the realm of the spirit.

The modern European knows no pain, no honour, no blood, no war, no sacrifice, no camaraderie, no respect or combat; and thus he does not know the ancient and gentle Goddesses known as Gloria or Victoria.

Passages from ‘Sparta and its Law’, one of Velasco’s essays in The Fair Race’s Darkest Hour.

Categories
Videos

Wow!

‘There is not such a thing as Jewish domination; there is only white submissiveness.’

Categories
Civil war Real men

Gendron’s manifesto:

A brief critique

First of all, I would like to say that the way bourgeois racialists denigrate the actions not only of this shooter but previous ones (Breivik, Tarrant, etc.) in the comments section of Counter-Currents, The Unz Review and even The Occidental Observer, is infinitely more reprehensible than what these lone wolves do (see what Robert Morgan said on The Unz Review).

I have the impression that these bourgeois racialists have been saying these mean things about the lone wolves because they are incapable of revolutionary thinking, only reactionary comments; and the existence of the wolves confronts them not only with their cowardice as Aryan men, but with their intellectual cowardice.

As I said in my post yesterday, this is no time for violence. But it is time to talk about revolution while respecting the limits of Brandenburg v. Ohio: something the cowardly bourgeois don’t even dare to do with their internet pseudonyms—cowards! That said, the manifesto of the latest lone wolf is full of typical adolescent mistakes; which is obvious, as this wolfie is a teenager.

For example, it is striking how many pages the teenager devoted to educating his readers about the weapons he said we should acquire for immediate revolutionary action. Herein lies his first error, a psychological error. Unlike mature racists like us, Payton Gendron hasn’t realised, as Robert Morgan has, that the overwhelming majority of whites simply don’t want to be saved. They are, as I have said several times, the worst generation of whites since prehistoric times.

It is impossible to make a revolution when almost one hundred per cent of white males have fallen into a state of terminal degeneration. And if the race still has a chance of being saved, it is only because there is a chance that some of them will begin to cross the whole psychological Rubicon toward National Socialism (not just part of the river, as the despicable bourgeois racialists do) once the social catastrophes start to converge.

In his manifesto, the teenager wrote:

Did or do you personally hate foreigners or other cultures?

No, many people and their cultures are great, but it’s important to note that they can only stay great if they are separated from each other.

If the teenager had come across this site, he would have realised that the above statement is false. Just remember what I have said about pre-Columbian cultures, and the way the Chinese treat animals, to realise that the above statement is rubbish. I don’t even want to link what I have said in books like Day of Wrath and On Exterminationism about Amerindians or the Chinese because the regular visitor to this site already knows what I mean. These non-whites have behaved like real monsters towards animals and children and don’t deserve our sympathy. The teenager’s ignorance on this point proves that it is no time for revolution but, as Bloodraven said, to learn. In his manifesto, Gendron wrote:

Are you a Christian?

No. I do not ask God for salvation by faith, nor do I confess my sins to Him. I personally believe there is no afterlife. I do however believe in and practice many Christian values.

So Gendron believes and practices many Christian values. He is aware that ‘leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful’. But precisely because he left Bloodraven’s cave before finishing his training, he failed to see the past to the extent of realising, as those who did stay there have realised (remember that in his Zarathustra Nietzsche put this legendary character in a cave), that it was precisely the early Christians who hated anything strong, good and successful, such as Greco-Roman statuary that they shattered. Gendron continues:

Who is truly to blame?

The people who are to blame most are ourselves, European men. Strong men do not get ethnically replaced, strong men do not allow their culture to degrade, strong men do not allow their people to die. Weak men have created this situation and strong men are needed to fix it… STRONG MEN MUST RISE UP.

Once again: the adolescent doesn’t realise that these strong men no longer exist, only lemmings. Then Gendron talks about a subject that hurts me to the core: the rapes of a huge number of pubescent English roses on Cuck Island, linking articles with statistics. Gendron ignores that Rudyard Kipling’s poem about the wrath of the awakened English is now such an anachronism that English males can hear of those statistics and they still love immigrants. (The Christian triumph of loving the enemy has reached its climax today, especially among secular whites.) Gendron wrote:

They see the decay all around them, plummeting, free-falling birth rates all across the Western world. Millions of invaders landing on our shores, conquering our towns and without a single shot fired in response. Broken families with soaring divorce rates, that’s if they even bother to get married at all. Suicide rates climbing year by year, not just for adults, by even teens and children as well and the only time people seem to even notice is when one of their own idols commits the act (singers, sports stars, actors). Drug use at all levels of society, in all age groups, any source of distraction or relief to escape a culture of nihilism. Rampant urbanization and industrialization, ever expanding cities and shrinking forests, a complete removal of man from nature, with the obvious results. Pedophile politicians, pedophile priests and pedophile pop stars, demonstrating to all the true depravity of our age. Art and beauty subverted beyond all recognition, bauhaus travesties replacing nouveau wonders, soulless metropolitan architecture of glass and steel reflecting no society, no culture, no people and therefore belonging everywhere, and nowhere. Suicidal, nihilistic and degenerate pop icons produced from a dead culture: Michael Jackson (pedophile, self hating, self mutilating, opiod addict), Madonna (degenerate, drug addict, childless, whore, anti-christian, pro miscegenation), Kurt Cobain (suicidal, drug addict, self hater, anti-social), Freddy Mercury (lifelong identity crisis, lifelong battle with hedonism and drug use, eventual death due to sexual hedonism) just to name a few.

Bold typeface is mine. Pedophile priests have always existed in Christendom (cf. what we have been saying on this site about psychohistory). The teenager ignores that Christian ethics is behind some of the things he abhors in that paragraph, as anyone who has stayed long enough in the cave knows.

I was going to quote 750 more words from Gendron’s manifesto, including his concluding paragraphs and his call to arms, but it’s unnecessary.

Let us remember that Michael O’Meara ends the first book published by Counter-Currents with a call to arms, and we already see what has happened since the year of its publication in 2010: the authors and readers of that webzine sank more and more into a bourgeois lifestyle and essayism, not the ‘iron dream’ that Harold Covington liked to talk about in his radio podcasts.

Gendron probably never read a major intellectual like Michael O’Meara, and by jumping out of the cave prematurely he doesn’t even mention a less educated revolutionary, James Mason.

Incidentally, the image above was chosen by Gendron himself for the end of his manifesto.

Categories
Conservatism Rape of the Sabine Women Real men

The return of the Blond Beast

Or:

Against Pierce and Laje

In our latest translation of the preface to a reliable edition of Hitler’s after-dinner talks, we came across this passage:

The defeat of 1918, he thought, and the harsh terms of the peace treaty so wounded the national pride and self-confidence of the German people that they exerted all their strength to get out of the distress.

The German who wrote that passage was referring to Hitler’s mind, but now I could say that the defeat of 1945 and the harsh Diktat imposed by the Allies so wounded the national pride and self-confidence of the German people that they, finally, gave up.

And this reminds me of what I said a couple of days ago in criticising Jordan Peterson: that the Woke Monster was spawned by the anti-German propaganda that the entire West has suffered after 1945. As to the medicine, I would like to take this opportunity to say something vitally important.

The most popular Spanish-speaking intellectual on conservative media is Agustín Laje, whom I have discussed both here and in the Spanish section of this site. Laje’s case reminds me of an argument between Greg Johnson and Hunter Wallace a dozen years ago about why, according to the former, conservatives will never win. Laje, branded an ‘ultra-right-winger’ by the Latin American and Spanish press (in fact, he’s a typical conservative), has said several times in interviews that a man who rapes a woman should be given life imprisonment and chemical castration.

Compare Laje’s stance with what I quoted yesterday from Andrew Anglin!

The Spanish Vox party, branded as fascist by the Spanish press, has made identical pronouncements on life imprisonment for rapists (i.e., males). How can’t we be living in the darkest hour if these so-called ultra-right-wingers and so-called fascists do nothing but demoralise males even further? Certainly, conservatives will never win! Note that they aren’t saying that women who give false testimony against men should be given life imprisonment as liars. No: the phoney right-wing extremists and fascists in today’s media are part of the machinery of absolute demoralisation to which the Aryan male has been subjected since Hitler lost the war.

The Aryans are so demoralised that they no longer want to fight. As we also saw at noon, in table talk #114 Hitler said ‘If the German people are not prepared to stand up for their self-preservation, fine: then let them disappear!’ In this light, even the toughest thing ever written in America to save the race, William Pierce’s novel, has a passage that resembles what Laje is saying in the media about rapists. Two years ago I wrote:

An individual who truly transvalues all values detects reminiscences of the Christian ethos even in the harshest novel a white advocate has written. The Turner Diaries contains a passage in which it is said that the Order would take a freedom fighter to the firing squad if he rapes a woman who also belongs to that liberation movement.

The first thing to consider here is that Pierce wrote his novel before the movement of frustrated men emerged on the internet analysing women’s psychology to the point of understanding it. In a nutshell, women only become bad if they don’t have many children, just as men become bad if we fail to kill the enemy.

During war the life of a man is worth infinitely more than the life of a woman, and this is where Pierce erred. One of the toughest episodes during Caesar’s war in Gaul happened when those on Vercingetorix’s side had to expel Gallic women and children from a besieged fortress, as the food was scarce, and it was understood that without the precious life of the male warriors the war would be lost.

Unlike the above anecdote, which shows how precious male life is worth in time of war, in the reader’s mind that passage from Pierce’s novel, which is very brief, only demoralises the would-be soldier. In total war what counts is to kill, genocide, exterminate, and not leave a stone unturned of the enemy culture as the Romans did in Carthage. Occasionally, this Blond Beast is allowed to rape even the women in his tribe. Although the Vikings TV series is as flawed as Game of Thrones to describe the spirit of yesteryear, I remember in one of the episodes of the first season that the Viking Rollo raped a woman from his village simply because he fancied her.

For the white advocate who wants to do something for his race, and even for the Pierce who wrote that passage, it would be inconceivable if you carried that barbarism into the world today. True, once there is a social contract in a pure white society (think of the Jane Austen or Downton Abbey worlds), rape shouldn’t be allowed. But in those societies the institution of marriage—every Jack had his Jill—was rock solid.

The point is that we are not living in times of early or late Victorianism. We live in a time when Christianity has been axiologically transformed into a neochristianity whose goal is that whites must immolate themselves. In these times, the only thing that matters is to disabuse the Aryan male from the lie of millennia, as Nietzsche would say.

Postscript: The Aryan must be disabused even of what visionaries like Pierce occasionally said. This is the only way for the male to regain his self-esteem and self-image, so crushed after WW2. Do whites want to rise from the ashes like the phoenix? Think like Vercingetorix and other Germanic warriors—including the Berserkers—, not like the white nationalists. Ultimately, the referenced page from The Turner Diaries smells of ink: not of fresh enemy blood from the ax of the Blond Beast.

Categories
Manosphere Sexual "liberation"

Incels were right all along

by Andrew Anglin

 
Me destroying the realities of woman supporters on the internet

I was on Gab. You should follow me on there—if you don’t have an account, just bookmark my page—in case the domain disappears again. You can find the new domain there.

Anyway, I posted something against women, and some gay retard came in white knighting, talking about ‘chivalry’.

I replied:

You are a gay retard.

Proper balance of the sexes can only exist in a universe where women understand that their behavior can potentially result in male violence against them. If you take that threat away, as the West has done with ‘domestic violence’ laws, you cannot possibly have ‘chivalry’—which is really more of an obsolete relic of the Victorian elite than a traditional masculine virtue. Check the publishing date on Ivanhoe—it wasn’t written in the 12th century.

This doesn’t mean that men went around constantly beating up women, it means that women understood that a man was physically stronger than her, and if it came down to it, that physical strength meant that he had the ability to force his will on her. Just so, the man knew she could make his life hell by being an irate whore. It was a power balance.

Right now, women are systemically encouraged to use all of their powers of emotional manipulation and sexual abuse against men, and men are left without any response. In fact, women have a monopoly on violence, with the government having built a standing army to come and throw you in a cage if you dare to even restrain a woman.

Social engineering has created a situation where women are masters and men are slaves. The institutional power a woman now has with sexual harassment allegations—which do not need to be proved with evidence—is absolutely tyrannical. Men live in terror of the unrestrained power of women.

Anyone who defends women, at all, in any way whatsoever, while this power imbalance exists is a simp. Citing ‘chivalry’—as if you are a literal knight in shinning armor—is gay and retarded in any context, but in this context, where you are defending literal fat, half-naked street whores, it is beyond the pale.

You should feel bad.

This individual then started quoting ancient Greek philosophers at me, and explained that actually, he is in a very good relationship with a woman, and he has a secret method of keeping a woman in check—he ‘establishes moral authority’.

I replied:

Firstly, I have the decency not to quote ancient Greek philosophers at you, and I’d appreciate it if you would do me the same basic dignity.

Secondly, calling you a ‘gay retard’ was not ad hominem or slander, but a simple statement of fact.

Here’s another statement of fact: if your marriage to your ‘fiance’ goes through, it is going to end in divorce. She is going to take your kids and your money, and purposefully humiliate and destroy you out of sadism as a result of your weakness and simply because she can.

You have no idea what is going on. Of course you are in a ‘serious relationship’ with a ‘fiance’. You are blinded by your own brain dumping sexual reproduction hormones on you, which are overpowering your ability to reason, making you into a gay retard. Therefore the need to overcompensate by literally quoting Greek philosophers at me.

‘Moral authority is all that is needed to put women into their place’ is right up there with ‘vaccines are safe and effective’ and ‘Ukraine is winning the war’ among the stupidest statements I’ve ever heard in my life.

Here’s reality: look around you. Look at everyone you know, in real life. Ask yourself: whose marriage is working out? If you have any examples at all, then I can guarantee they’ve been together less than 5 years. Many people here do not even have one example they can point to of men who are in apparently healthy marriages. Maybe they did ten years ago, but the grandparents of millennials are all dead now […].

It’s not my business to tell you not to get married, just as it is not my business to tell you not to become a contract killer or a free solo rock climber. You’re a grown man, capable of making your own decisions. However, you are living in a state of utter delusion, and I would advise you to understand the risks of the endeavor you are undertaking, which may lead you to taking more appropriate precautions.

______ 卐 ______

Editor’s note:

The rest of the article can be read on Anglin’s site. I would translate his last line (‘Anyone who is defending women is trying to destroy you’) into my words: Anyone who is defending feminism is trying to destroy you. The same with Anglin’s term ‘gay retard’. I much prefer my own term: ‘heterosexual fag’.

Categories
Racial right

National Socialist booklets, 1

In April I ordered several booklets from Third Reich Books, which translates the originals from German into English. When they arrived, I confined myself to quoting a few sentences from the translation of Sieg der Waffen – Sieg des Kindes, plus a critical post about Erich Maschke in the booklet Looking East: Germany Beyond the Vistula. I didn’t want to start a critical series on what I read because it makes me uncomfortable to criticise some Christian aspects of National Socialism. But I have decided to read the rest of the pamphlets and confess what I think, and what better way to do so than to quote here what I wrote on 19 July this year when I read Looking East. It should be noted that the following notes were addressed to me. Four months ago I didn’t think I would publish them:

No sooner do I see the first paragraph of this booklet than a problem arises.

Since I am a 14/4-word priest and not a Nazi, the (probable) fact that this book won’t be anti-Christian (cf. also my central difference with the white nationalists) suddenly came to my mind. This means that the author [Erich Maschke] will probably not be denigrating Christianity on every page, as this is an essay, apparently, about history.

Page 5. It’s worse than what I wrote on the inside front cover! Such is the surprise I received today that it motivates me to a new series for The West’s Darkest Hour that we could start like this—:

Why Nazism failed, 1

—and I would still think this way if I came across this kind of message in the other thirteen booklets I bought and will read (I don’t count Sieg der Waffen, which has no bad messages).

I never expected this. It is becoming clearer and clearer that the priest of the 14 words is not a Nazi, although he still considers Hitler the man whose birth would have to replace that of the mythical Jew that the fools of American racialism still worship.

On page 12 I wrote down [a sign I use when suspending a reading: a down arrow and a perpendicular slash] because he is talking about things that have nothing to do with ‘race’. I would have to order the Open University history books by mail to become better acquainted with German history.

These pamphlets could have been elegantly edited in the 1930s. This edition that translated them is fatal, and they have lost all their numinous content (because the white man who buys them today is spiritually dead).

There is another booklet about which, also in July, I said something on this site. I’m referring to The SS Calls You!:

For example, the final pages of the booklet are about the Insignia Colours of the Waffen-SS. Those in the concentration camps got light brown. Could an American racialist, say one of those libertarians who comment on AmRen, conceive one of his children with light-brown insignia during a project of ethnic cleansing on American soil?

Indeed. We could already imagine someone at the recent annual American Renaissance conference—at which F. Roger Devlin, Peter Brimelow, Michelle Malkin, Jared Taylor, Gregory Hood and Sam Dickson spoke—seeing one of their kids with light-brown insignia!

(Left, speaker Michelle Malkin at AmRen conference of 2021.) Next week I’ll say a little more about The SS Calls You! For the moment, my July criticism of Erich Maschke’s essay in Looking East can be read: here.