by Andrew Anglin
I was on Gab. You should follow me on there—if you don’t have an account, just bookmark my page—in case the domain disappears again. You can find the new domain there.
Anyway, I posted something against women, and some gay retard came in white knighting, talking about ‘chivalry’.
You are a gay retard.
Proper balance of the sexes can only exist in a universe where women understand that their behavior can potentially result in male violence against them. If you take that threat away, as the West has done with ‘domestic violence’ laws, you cannot possibly have ‘chivalry’—which is really more of an obsolete relic of the Victorian elite than a traditional masculine virtue. Check the publishing date on Ivanhoe—it wasn’t written in the 12th century.
This doesn’t mean that men went around constantly beating up women, it means that women understood that a man was physically stronger than her, and if it came down to it, that physical strength meant that he had the ability to force his will on her. Just so, the man knew she could make his life hell by being an irate whore. It was a power balance.
Right now, women are systemically encouraged to use all of their powers of emotional manipulation and sexual abuse against men, and men are left without any response. In fact, women have a monopoly on violence, with the government having built a standing army to come and throw you in a cage if you dare to even restrain a woman.
Social engineering has created a situation where women are masters and men are slaves. The institutional power a woman now has with sexual harassment allegations—which do not need to be proved with evidence—is absolutely tyrannical. Men live in terror of the unrestrained power of women.
Anyone who defends women, at all, in any way whatsoever, while this power imbalance exists is a simp. Citing ‘chivalry’—as if you are a literal knight in shinning armor—is gay and retarded in any context, but in this context, where you are defending literal fat, half-naked street whores, it is beyond the pale.
You should feel bad.
This individual then started quoting ancient Greek philosophers at me, and explained that actually, he is in a very good relationship with a woman, and he has a secret method of keeping a woman in check—he ‘establishes moral authority’.
Firstly, I have the decency not to quote ancient Greek philosophers at you, and I’d appreciate it if you would do me the same basic dignity.
Secondly, calling you a ‘gay retard’ was not ad hominem or slander, but a simple statement of fact.
Here’s another statement of fact: if your marriage to your ‘fiance’ goes through, it is going to end in divorce. She is going to take your kids and your money, and purposefully humiliate and destroy you out of sadism as a result of your weakness and simply because she can.
You have no idea what is going on. Of course you are in a ‘serious relationship’ with a ‘fiance’. You are blinded by your own brain dumping sexual reproduction hormones on you, which are overpowering your ability to reason, making you into a gay retard. Therefore the need to overcompensate by literally quoting Greek philosophers at me.
‘Moral authority is all that is needed to put women into their place’ is right up there with ‘vaccines are safe and effective’ and ‘Ukraine is winning the war’ among the stupidest statements I’ve ever heard in my life.
Here’s reality: look around you. Look at everyone you know, in real life. Ask yourself: whose marriage is working out? If you have any examples at all, then I can guarantee they’ve been together less than 5 years. Many people here do not even have one example they can point to of men who are in apparently healthy marriages. Maybe they did ten years ago, but the grandparents of millennials are all dead now […].
It’s not my business to tell you not to get married, just as it is not my business to tell you not to become a contract killer or a free solo rock climber. You’re a grown man, capable of making your own decisions. However, you are living in a state of utter delusion, and I would advise you to understand the risks of the endeavor you are undertaking, which may lead you to taking more appropriate precautions.
______ 卐 ______
The rest of the article can be read on Anglin’s site. I would translate his last line (‘Anyone who is defending women is trying to destroy you’) into my words: Anyone who is defending feminism is trying to destroy you. The same with Anglin’s term ‘gay retard’. I much prefer my own term: ‘heterosexual fag’.