Frost

I think I’ve finally figured out why this site gets so few comments compared to a dozen years ago when it got quite a few. It has to do with my criticism of white nationalists, whom I contrast with the National Socialists of the last century. Because I’ve been so abrasive in my prose, visitors don’t like it, as they’re under the impression that American white nationalism is more or less immaculate.

I realised this because on Twitter I’ve been commenting on white nationalism without being so abrasive, and sometimes I get a lot of likes. What am I doing wrong here? Should I stop speaking ill of American white nationalism the way I didn’t a dozen years ago?

The problem is that even back then, there were Americans who were aware of the contradictions within American white nationalism. For example, in 2015 Jack Frost said something that really caught my attention in the comments section of The Occidental Observer, so much so that I quoted him in a post titled “On turning Americans into Nazis.” Frost commented:

In order to accept being called a racist or a Nazi with equanimity, normal American whites would have to reconcile that with their country’s history of being violently opposed to racism of any kind, from the Civil War forward. They would have to admit to themselves and to others that all of that bloodshed in trying to stamp out racism had been shed in vain, and in fact, worse than in vain, in an evil cause. They would have to admit that their ancestors were evil, and that they themselves had also been evil [emphasis added] before they saw the light and became racists.

It’s safe to say the chances of that happening on a mass scale are almost zero.

Bingo. If you realise you have to hate your culture to save your race, where will you get the quorum? What webzines like Counter-Currents do is not go for the jugular of American culture, but rather publish articles that don’t offend sensibilities: articles that a conservative can tolerate.

But that’s not what I do—I call a spade a spade! That means money will flow to sites like Counter-Currents, a webzine whose ideology I highly doubt will save the Anglo-Germans of the North (I live in Mexico) from their impending extinction, and that I count on few donations even though my ideology potentially could save them…

That’s why Michael O’Meara caught my attention so much, a revolutionary writer on Counter-Currents, unlike the merely reactionary ones who comment there and on other racialist forums (O’Meara may already be dead since nothing has been heard from him in several years).

Frost hit the nail on the head. Sometimes a single comment on a racialist webzine is worth more than the “serious” articles being published on those forums. And if Frost is right, for The West’s Darkest Hour to receive more donations and comments, visitors would have to realise that their grandpas were actually the bad guys, and that they themselves are bad for not honouring Hitler (despite his mistakes).

Changing the subject, since I’ve mentioned the American historian Mark Weber more than once this month, I’d like to link to one of his articles in which Weber disagrees with the consensus on the Second World War, here.