web analytics
Categories
Aryan beauty Gaedhal (commenter)

Contempt

for physical beauty

by Gaedhal

 
As Richard Carrier now demonstrates, there really was no such thing as “Gnosticism”. All of the early Christian sects were Gnostics to one degree or another. “The Gnostics” were made up, essentially by orthodox apologists/theologians. Thus, the term “musterio”’, is never really translated in our bibles… it is transliterated into “mystery”. However, “musterion”, if translated, means: “secret”. Thus, the New Testament writers believed in secret knowledge, or musteria, and it goes without saying that the belief in secret knowledge is a hallmark of Gnosticisim.

“mustēria”, in Greek—thanks to how the neuter plurals of neuter nouns work, i.e. they sometimes act as a singular mass noun—could then be translated: “a body of secret teachings”. However, “mustēria” is never translated that way, as it would give the game away that early Christianity was a secret society, with a secret body of teaching only for adepts. This is why Jesus taught in parables. To the profane, they only got the surface meaning of the parables, however to the in-group, Jesus’s disciples, the true, often shocking import of what he is saying is only revealed to them. Thus, the non-adepts remain in their sins, for failing to understand the secret meaning of the parable. This is all most clearly spelled out in the gospel of Mark.

The term “gnōsis” appears frequently in the knew testament. Also, the term “pleroma”, which is Greek for “fullness” appears in the New Testament. The Pleroma is a Gnostic belief, as well.

Another hallmark of Gnosticism is the hatred of the physical world. Indeed, the physical world was created by the demiurge, or Satan, in the Christian version of Gnosticism. Thus, Jesus calls Satan “the god of this world” which is perfectly in line with Gnostic belief. Hatred of “the flesh” and “carnal wisdom” is more Gnosticism. “The natural man” is railed against: only the spiritual man can discern spiritual things.

Whereas in Greco-Roman paganism, the flesh profited much, such that the Gymnasia had as much to do with athletics as with the perfection of the mind—which is why secondary schools in Germany are called “Gymnasia” even unto our own day, in Christianity, the Flesh profited little. During the Christian era, the Olympic Games stopped. It was only in the 1800s, when Christianity began to lose ground to secular modernity that the Olympic Games were brought back.

And so, a contempt for physical beauty and physical perfection is the perfect element to spawn such a movement as fat acceptance. Christians are always on the lookout for lower and lower forms of lepers to uplift. Hence, all this talk about “marginalised communities” as if their marginalisation somehow conferred value upon them. Ayn Rand said that need is not a virtue; need is not valuable. In our day, she might have said that marginalisation isn’t valuable. It is only the Christian axiology that makes need or marginalisation valuable. And, of course, I am not a Randian libertarian. Rand, as a stopped clock, is sometimes right. I think that sentient beings should be treated ethically. Indeed, I concur with César that we ought to eliminate, as far as is possible, unnecessary suffering. As someone who has skimmed through Benatar, then if someone is brought to this hell-planet, against his will, then he/she/it ought to be treated ethically, and not tormented with unnecessary horrendous suffering. However, my instinct is towards pagan eudaimonia, or “well mindedness” or, as modern psychologists might put it: “positive mental states”.

I speak of myself. Whilst a traditionalist Catholic, I let myself go, physically, as my profile picture demonstrates. However, that profile pic is about 2 or 3 years old, if not more so, and I have actually lost a considerable amount of weight since then. I am still overweight, but perhaps not obese, any more. My BMI is now, probably, on the cusp or boundary between my being obese and overweight, however, more than ten years ago, when I was still a traditionalist Catholic, I was well well within the obese threshold. Partly, it didn’t matter. I was soon to enjoy the traditionalist Catholic version of the rapture: the “3 days of darkness” and the “tribulation” predicted by Fatima and La Sallette. When one deconverts, his scale of values shifts dramatically. One removes one’s eye from a mythical post-mortem eternity, and the here and now then becomes all important.

However, what I mean most to talk about in this email is that there are a quarter of a billion Nigerians in this world? Thanks, Christians!

This is what happens when you believe that Africans have infinite dignity. This is what happens when every featherless biped is imago Dei, made in the image and likeness of God. As César points out: were it not for Christianity, blacks would probably be extinct by now, as predicted by Darwin. Instead of this, we have a quarter of a billion of them in a single African country! As I said before: the human virus is now consuming more than what the planet can sustain. Calling humans infinitely valuable, as Frankenpope did, is like saying that locusts or mosquitoes are infinitely valuable. Locusts, like humanity, are a consumptive plague too, aren’t they? And of course the go-to sight for all things overpopulation related—and Christianity’s extreme culpability in this regard—is church and state dot org dot uk.

Imagine James and the Giant Peach (written by the Nordic atheist antisemite, Roald Dahl). For a time, they had to eat parts of the peach to survive. Now, let us suppose that this peach was a magically self-healing peach. And now let us imagine that James and his crew began to eat more of the peach, per day, than what the peach could self-restore unto itself. This is where we are today. Humanity is a consumptive plague that is destroying the planet—and itself, ironically enough, into the bargain—and Christianity blinds us to this reality. It is spiritual toxoplasmosis. It causes us to worship what is destroying us.

And for those who say that “oh well that isn’t real Christianity”. You seem to forget that Archbishop Lefebvre was the papal delegate for all of French-speaking Africa. The overpopulation crisis in Africa is partly the fault of a man largely credited with founding traditionalist Catholicism. Bob Pope and Frankenpope are not saying anything new when they call the human plague “infinitely valuable”, not just as regards the mass of humanity in total, but each specimen is, in particular, “infinitely valuable” according to Dignitas Infinita.

Most of our social problems are caused by the fallout of Christianity. As I said before: “woke” is the residue that remains once the supernaturalism of Christianity evaporates. Revilo P. Oliver called woke “the Marxian Reformation”. (although the term “woke” did not exist in his day, he was describing precisely what the term “woke” encaptures).

Categories
Aryan beauty

Visual

Since pure Aryans were infinitely more beautiful than the Semites of the early centuries of our era, when the Judeo-Christians seized Rome, the first thing they did was destroy the temples and statues that displayed Aryan beauty.

One visual way to understand the “transvaluation of all values” we propose—an improved National Socialism—is to put statues of naked Aryans back in the ethnostate: a proposal I haven’t heard in any racialist forum, except for a statement made by Greg Johnson about a dozen years ago.

Categories
Aryan beauty Exterminationism

Architects

I’ve barely mentioned it on this site, but a discerning reader would have noticed that my priesthood of sacred words doesn’t apply to all white people, only to the most beautiful.

They are the ones the priest would like to preserve.

If, in the future, the social architects of a fourth Reich were to decree mandatory beauty on the planet, they would choose only the most beautiful specimens of Homo sapiens.

“For many genes are called, but few are chosen.”

In ancient Greece, before they committed the sin against the Holy Spirit (miscegenation), there was already something of this, and it is precisely for this reason that their art reflected that spirit.

Categories
Ancient Greece Aryan beauty

Männerbunds

“As Murkan whites become ever more minuscule in their Neanderthal country, old instincts will kick back in. They will form Syssitias and Männerbunds”Mauricio.

A week ago, last Thursday, I said:

In these communities we would have temples… and rituals to “baptise” newborns in the new faith that commemorate those who bravely, though unsuccessfully, tried to force the eschaton into history.

In the comments section I added:

This site must impact more than two enriched souls to continue the chain reaction. The big question is, which third “atom” that allows its Self—a Jungian term—to be struck will appear, thus continuing the reaction (see the featured article)?

Categories
Aryan beauty Videos Vikings

Norse hygiene

See 24-minute video here.

Categories
Aryan beauty Athens

Athena

Hail Pallas Athena, born from the head of Zeus,
Goddess of the city, giver of glorious victory.

Categories
Aryan beauty NS booklets

Booklets, 2

Several years ago, I received several booklets in the post that I had bought from an American distributor. Some time later, I wrote on the blank pages of the following booklet (my Spanish-English translation):

SS Leitheft, year 7, issue 2b.

After all this time, I am returning to reading these booklets because only now have I matured enough to criticise this naive NS who was never openly anti-Christian. Note that I am not criticising Hitler, but the German people who had to write these politically correct things so as not to break completely with tradition.

But I am having second thoughts. I think I should first read Richard Weikart’s book on Hitler’s anti-Christianity and only then return to these booklets. Otherwise, it’s like putting the cart before the horse.

The fact is that the Nazis Lite [who wrote it] weren’t like Hitler. Perhaps my new series should be titled “NS Lite 1,” “NS Lite 2,” etc., after reading Richard’s book.

In stark contrast to what I said today in the thread whose article features a nightmarish drawing by degenerate Swiss artist H.R. Giger, in this booklet we read:

What We Find Beautiful—That is Race!

There were once strange people in Germany. Their slogan was—and in the jewized Anglo-Saxon world it is still screamed at the top of the lungs—the assertion of the equality of everything that bears a human face. These strange preachers, erring lunatics and intentional liars, should have marched with us, when we entered the ghettos of Lublin and Warsaw, or when we drove together the first black prisoners in the west! Then these equalisers would have had the right material for observation, and we would have gladly allowed them to voluntarily mix into the ranks of their crooked-nosed, flat-footed “brothers” or among the thick-lipped Negroes. That such thinking could ever find any place at all among our folk, is because within a clan many really consider it a coincidence, if the children come into the world sometimes black-haired, sometimes blond-haired, sometimes tall, sometimes short, sometimes slender, sometimes chubby. Even our peasants, who are refined breeders of farm animals with precise knowledge of breeds of domestic animals, appear to have forgotten everything within their own home and think human breeding is nonsense, if not immoral.

It has already been a success that the concept of race is expressed in our folklore at all.

But long is still the path to the implementation of the consequences that must be derived from the scientific knowledge for all and each individual.

And it is ever more difficult to affirm the working of the laws of race in those spheres that appear to be so far removed from the physical-external that they are considered a private matter. And even if the equality of the countenance is no longer believed, many still want to think that men are the same when it comes down to feelings, love, aversion, beauty and justice. [pages 7-8]

Although I read the passage in the printed booklet whose image we see above, to avoid typing I copied and pasted this passage from Renegade Tribune (specifically, here). I’ve known about that site for a long time and love that they put Goodrich’s Hellstorm at the top. But until today, I didn’t know that Renegade Tribune has excellent NS material, including links to Bitchute of our Führer’s after-dinner talks. The booklet continues:

Many Folks—Nonetheless One Ideal!

When, for example, the soil of the ancient world, hence the Hellenic-Roman folks of the time two thousand years ago, today reveals marble statues, then it is as if one of our brothers, indeed the best looking one, is there chiselled into stone. Only a few externalities of the ancient figures seem strange to us, but without hesitation we take them as paradigms, and for centuries the German world, lacking it own supreme masterpieces, admired the Greek artworks as an ideal […].

The word “race” gives the key to the explanation. And if we had nothing more about the Greek works of art, no text and nothing written—from these portrayals we could see they were men of Nordic blood, immigrants and descendants of the great tribe that even today still fills our land with its blood.

Among our Germanic ancestors, it was the opposite. Their artworks, presumably carved in wood, have long since perished in the damp German soil. But here the witness of the fairy tales, sagas and heroic songs speaks a clear language. Where beauty and manliness are portrayed there, we read the adjectives “strong, tall and blond”. Women are praised because of the shimmering white of their skin, their tenderness and the rose colour of their cheecks. The kindly goddess of Germanic man, the older example of “our dear wives”, is Berchta, whose name downright means the “light one”, the “radiant one”. [pages 9-10]

But on that same page 10 and the next, we see a monocausal slant: mentioning Jewry, but not Judeo-Christianity which has rammed the Jew’s dick down the white throat (see Giger’s drawing). Although Renegade Tribune does acknowledge the Christian Question, it doesn’t present it as the primary source of Western decline.

In the next chapter of the booklet we see a beautiful poem, although translated from German into English something must be lost. It seems to portray in verse what I have conveyed on this site in images with the paintings of Parrish and other artists:

So sings Walther von der Vogelweide:

Sweetened through and flowered are the pure women:
There was never anything so blissful to look at
In the skies, nor on the earths, nor in all the green pastures.
Where one sees a beautiful woman, that can moisten sad disposition.
And dissolves everything sorrowful at the same hour,
When her sweet, red mouth dearly laughs in love,
And rays shoot from plating eyes into the base of the man’s heart.

This reminds me of an afterthought attributed to David Lane about the second 14 words: that female beauty turned out to be a lie. That’s relative. It’s only a lie when it comes to the millions of Pod women mentioned in my comment on “Damn Christians.” But it is not a lie if we reinstate patriarchy to the extent of transvaluing Woke values to the world of Jane Austen in terms of sexual morality. “Women are automatons,” a friend just told me. I would add that they would behave only if men reclaimed their manhood (something I will discuss in one of my next comments on Breaking Bad).

On the next page of the booklet’s poem, we see a reproduction of an image of the Virgin Mary in Freiburg Cathedral as an example of nobility of soul. True, but let us remember that the Church only allowed this type of artistic eulogy to Aryan women in the context that they were Semites: something false insofar as those Christians didn’t know what the kikes of first-century Palestine looked like! The editors of the booklet do not seem to have realised that their POV was ambivalent, and even less did they know that after 1945 the Semitic side would triumph decisively over the Aryan, to such an extent that the body of the Aryan woman is now only venerated in a culture that thoroughly degrades it.

In a blank space in this booklet that I read years ago, I wrote:

In my post, I will say that Richard Wagner was a stepping stone. And so were these booklets: another stone from Christianity to ancient paganism.

I do not criticise them, because it was natural to convince the German people step by step. Now, in The West’s Darkest Hour, only the ultimate truth must be told.

Regarding the “stepping stones,” I was referring to my metaphor of crossing back the psychological Rubicon to Greco-Roman values.

Categories
Aryan beauty

Nymphs

Nymph of yore.

Nymph of today.

Categories
Aryan beauty Neanderthalism

Slogan

Categories
Aryan beauty Film Marriage

A question…

I recently mentioned the film The Village, and yesterday I watched the most exquisite scenes.

What impressed me most were the shots of the lead actress, and how she acted, perfectly imitating 19th-century mannerisms: how American women used to behave. I kept telling myself, awestruck, that this woman was absolutely beautiful, and I imagined what it would be like to marry such a creature and constantly gaze upon her! The story is simply a fairy tale, but what’s worthwhile is that only white people appear in the film, and the director’s artistic virtuosity is evident in quite a few shots.

In the end, I was surprised that the director—an Indian man!—was also the producer and writer of that 2004 film. It’s true that one of my two favourite films for the sacred words, P&P (2005) and S&S (1995), both based on Jane Austen novels, was also filmed in this century. But both were filmed in England. As for LOTR, it was filmed in New Zealand.

Aside from The Village, written, produced, and directed by an Indian man, is there an American film from this century that stars a young woman whose mannerisms overwhelmingly inspire a man to marry someone like her, but filmed by a white man? It’s not about beautiful women appearing on the big screen. It’s about any movie inspiring a white man to marry someone like that heavenly creature.

Does such 21st century American film exist…?