web analytics
Categories
Videos Vladimir Putin

May 9th

In his video today, Alexander Mercouris said:

This is a huge event and it is an event which Russians and others within the territory of the former Soviet Union take great pride in, and which by the way we in the West should be grateful to them for, though in truth and in fact we never are.

Mercouris is an idiot. Virtually all westerners are. Here’s a quote from another source:

Confirmation bias is not a quirk. It is not a bad habit you can fix with a motivational quote. It is a deeply embedded cognitive architecture that runs under every thought you believe is rational, every conclusion you believe is objective, and every opinion you believe you arrived at through careful consideration. The mechanism is simple and devastating: the brain actively seeks information that confirms what it already believes, and actively discounts, ignores, or attacks information that challenges it. Not occasionally. Constantly.

When a person holds a belief about their own competence—when they have decided, consciously or not, that they are smart, capable, and correct, the confirmation bias engine turns fully toward protecting that identity. Every piece of evidence that supports their self-image gets amplified. Every compliment lands with weight. Every small success becomes proof of their larger narrative. And every challenge, every contradiction, every piece of evidence that might suggest they are wrong gets filtered, reframed, or rejected entirely. Not through deliberate dishonesty, through an automatic process they never even see it happening.

This is how intelligent-sounding people hold profoundly wrong beliefs for decades without ever feeling the friction of being wrong. They are not stupid. They are not lying. They are running a program that the human brain runs in every single person—but they have never been handed the tools to interrupt it. And so the program runs unchecked. The beliefs compound. The blind spots deepen, and the confidence grows—not because the evidence supports it, but because the brain has been quietly curating a reality that does. Now layer on top of this the modern echo chamber, and you have one of the most powerful reinforcement systems ever constructed.

Content that confirms your existing beliefs triggers dopamine. Content that challenges your beliefs triggers cortisol… The social dimension of this goes even deeper. Human beings are tribal by design.

Challenging the beliefs of your group meant rejection—and rejection once meant death. That threat is no longer physical, but the brain hasn’t received the update.

When someone challenges a belief that is tied to your group identity—your political tribe, your professional community, your cultural circle—the brain processes it as a threat to survival. The rational mind goes offline. The defensive mind takes over. And suddenly a conversation about facts becomes a battle about identity, about loyalty, about who you are and which side you’re on.

This is why expertise doesn’t automatically win arguments. This is why data doesn’t automatically change minds. This is why you can show someone evidence that directly contradicts their position, and watch them walk away more convinced than before—a phenomenon researchers call the backfire effect.

I really hate normies…

Categories
Pseudoscience Psychiatry Videos

Bogus science

In the fourth question of his survey, Benjamin asked:

Is psychiatry really a pseudoscience? Is the etiology of schizophrenics/psychotics truly that of parental trauma victims? Are neuroleptics/psychiatric drugs detrimental to health? Do parents cause the vast majority of the DSM-5/ICD behavioural patterns labelled as distinct disorders? Is mental illness environmental in origin? Is the psychiatric genetics position scientifically bankrupt?

Ben and I exchanged a few words in the discussion thread, but he recently added via email:

By the way, on the final (closing) comment by you on ‘Survey’, on Greg Johnson’s inability—even as he proofread it—to take in the information… that’s something I’ve never in my life understood about people. I can see it would really bother you!

They read the extensive full-proof document and they still don’t agree. I can only assume it’s an intelligence lack/dogma thing—some type of faulty methodology that arises from lower emotional intelligence. There’s some type of screen in the way, like a cognitive dissonance, and they just can’t process the evidence (the orthodox bias imposed by society is too great; that or the psychological implications in their own lives of taking it seriously, that private life ‘can of worms’ I mentioned before…).

I mean, of all points you’ve discussed with me (usually me, as not many others participate) that concern psychiatry on WDH—of pretty much all topics discussed there—psychiatry criticism is the most comprehensively debunked by now, with a superb level of detailed evidence, all bases covered, and you still get people somehow not grasping it (or not seeing why it’s important).

The reason racialists block topics we should be discussing, but which are a kind of taboo (for example Nordicism, which wasn’t taboo among Anglo-American eugenicists before WW2), is that the human mind is a restrictive container. There are notions, such as saying, “a fraudulent profession (psychiatry) has been taught in medical schools”, that show that the mind of the normie, or neo-normie racialist, is blocked by iron walls: ideas that simply cannot penetrate the membrane of our reason.

We human beings fortify ourselves in our certainties: for example, that what is taught as science in universities is always science. Often, the “insignificance” of reality doesn’t cause us cognitive dissonance (e.g., that psychiatry presents its central tenet, that mental disorder is a biomedical entity, as an irrefutable hypothesis according to Popper’s litmus test for distinguishing between real science and bogus science).

Sight and hearing can annihilate the believer! That’s why the normie closes his eyes and ears to the harrowing testimonies of the trauma suffered by those who endured terrible abuse in their childhood, which led to their mental disorders as adults: a plain refutation of the psychiatric medical model of mental disorders that, lacking biomarkers (unlike neurology, which does study biomarkers), dogmatically blames the brains of those traumatised by their parents:

Categories
Art Videos

Eunuchs

Warriors who are also artists are rare. That’s why some call Prussia a mix of Sparta and Athens. Alas, due to the Anglo-Americans and their Second World War, all the territories that once belonged to Prussia—except for Kaliningrad—are now part of the European Union.

After the death of Nazi Germany there are no men left in Europe. Only lobotomized eunuchs. The visitor who hasn’t read my impressions of my trip to Europe last year can read them now.

Categories
Athens Videos

Athens!

This AI-generated clip of ancient Athens is beautiful, but it contains an inaccuracy.

Ancient Greece, at least in Homeric times (in later centuries they intermarried), was much blonder than it is usually portrayed.

See this article originally published in AmRen. My interpolations show how a Jewish scholar and a Black scholar obscured the pure Nordid ancestry of the inhabitants of ancient Greece.

Changing the subject, regarding the Iran war, it’s worth listening to what Pepe Escobar said today in the interview on The Duran channel.

Categories
Videos

Awakening?

Netanyahu and Trump share a kiss on West Bank wall mural.

The term dormition refers to the Eastern Christian tradition of a miraculous “falling asleep.” But Dominique Venner once used it in reference to his dream of Europe awakening from the catalepsy that has afflicted it since the end of WWII.

Remember that I named my book printing endeavour Daybreak Press when the PDFs of the featured article were available in print (I was deplatformed), in reference to the dawn we long for. Paradoxically, regarding the awakening from the Aryan dormition after 1945, we could say:

Blessed be Bibi and his lackey Trump!

It is well known that Jewry always overreaches itself. But thanks to this pair of idiots, this time the overreaching has reached the breaking point to such an extent that in this video a neo-normie like Scott Ritter says things like:

• “…it is Israel in its totality the most dangerous threat to peace and security in the world today”

• “the Middle East has been infected by a cancer that is, you know, the American-Israeli posture, and that cancer has to be excised”

• “you have to call a spade a spade, and right now the United States is facilitating the genocide that Israel committed against the Palestinians… Lebanon… Iran… We have seen evil, we know what evil looks like and it’s time for the world to collectively work to eradicate this evil”

• “Donald Trump has completely sold American interests to the state of Israel, 100%”

• “The number one threat to American national security is the state of Israel, straight up”

• “Israel is a parasite on the global community. It exists to suck the lifeblood out of the world solely for its benefit”

• “Israel is nothing more than a genocidal state wrapped into a tiny piece of territory with meaningless biblical reference”

• “[This biblical reference] is what, of course, Christian Zionists believe: Mike Huckabee, Ted Cruz and others, and we are exposing the perversion of their thought. So this war in many ways is a clarifying moment”

• “It is time to be brutally honest about everything… Because the people are tired of the lies.”

P.S. of March 6: Ritter used to support Israel before the genocide in Gaza.

Categories
Aryan beauty Videos Vikings

Norse hygiene

See 24-minute video here.

Categories
Tom Holland Videos

Scrivener

Our PDF on neochristianity, which extensively quotes passages from Tom Holland’s book, Dominion, is central to understanding this site. Therefore, I was interested in watching this video defending Holland against the criticism of a secular humanist, Stephen Woodford, even though the video’s author, Glen Scrivener, is a Christian:

I discovered the video because Richard Carrier, whom I’ve been discussing recently, has tried (here)—like Woodford—to refute Holland with a string of strawman arguments!

That doesn’t mean I agree with everything the Christian Glen Scrivener says about the atheist Carrier, whom he calls an “incredible fringe historian” because Carrier doubts the existence of the historical Jesus. Nor does it mean I accept Holland’s neochristian morality, who, in one of the clips within the video embedded above, says that the Judeo-Christian idea of man created in the image of God has given dignity to humankind. (Savitri Devi has written that this Judeo-Christian idea has caused animal abuse in the West by considering every wingless biped on the planet as brothers, at the expense of animals.)

However, Glen Scrivener’s video is relevant in showing how secular humanists distort Holland’s thesis because they are deeply troubled, and feel threatened, by the idea that Christianity gave rise to the secular values of the West today.

Why does it bother them so much? (here we see another atheist in a series of videos strawmaning Holland by quoting the Old Testament when Holland is talking about the New Testament). Keep in mind that secular humanists are not Nietzscheans. If they were, instead of embracing today’s Western values—such as equality (see my recent instalment of Might is Right)—they would repudiate them.

Like Tom Holland himself, all these atheists who criticize Holland are actually neochristians. Glen Scrivener is not a neochristian but an Anglican Christian. On this site, we are against both, but more so against secular neochristians because they have taken Christian ethics to the stratosphere, as Holland aptly demonstrates in the final chapters of Dominion.

Recall this site’s seminal article metaphor of the Red Giant (neochristianity) star that burns up all the nearby planets: a metaphor for ethno-suicide throughout the West. For example, in the video Glen Scrivener said that out-group altruism originated in Christianity because it didn’t exist in pre-Christian times. What Scrivener omits is that this deranged altruism—which we call Jesus deranged syndrome—, is precisely what is causing the English roses of his country to be sucking the dicks of some orc migrants in this very moment.

Categories
Kevin MacDonald Videos

Kevin & Joel

Yesterday we saw Joel Webbon interview Jared Taylor. Now we’ll see that he interviewed Kevin MacDonald too.

In MacDonald’s panoramic account of the history of Jews in the West, the professor emeritus omits a crucial fact: the Judeo-Christians who wanted only the god of the Jews to be worshipped in the Mediterranean were involved in the fall of the Roman Empire.

Then MacDonald says that Christianity began as a very anti-Jewish ideology (for example, that the Jews killed Christ). This omits the level of subtlety with which Jews make their psyops: by the time of Emperor Theodosius, all worship of Aryan Gods was prohibited, and the empire imposed Christianity while tolerating Judaism (proof of this is that no temple to Jupiter, Zeus, Apollo, or Athena survived after Theodosius’s edicts: only churches and synagogues).

In other words, for white nationalists it’s easy to cherry-pick facts like the verse in the gospel that the Jews killed Christ, but the situation needs to be viewed in perspective. And from a historical meta-perspective spanning centuries, it’s clear that only two religions were de facto permitted after the first Christian emperors: Xtianity and Judaism.

Later, Webbon asks an interesting question: what is it about white people that makes them so gullible, so susceptible to believing the psyops of Jewry?

Neither of them blamed the Christian ethics that took hold of the Aryan collective unconscious. MacDonald argued that white people are individualistic, but I get the impression that, like Jared Taylor, MacDonald also lacks a clear vision of what the European zeitgeist was like before Constantine.

Webbon agrees with the professor and talks about how Scandinavians, who are now the most individualistic, founded Minnesota (the recent protests against ICE were mentioned). But as always, they’re telling the story from the perspective of Christendom (the Visigoths came from Scandinavia and saw themselves as a group before Catholicism conquered ancient Hispania).

Then MacDonald talks about the migrant gangs that are causing havoc in Sweden, and argues that the Swedes can’t do anything about it because they don’t dare to acknowledge the problem.

Neither of them is thinking clearly. Do they honestly believe that the Vikings wouldn’t have acted decisively against sandnigger migrants who raped their young? (The racial right’s blindness to the inversion of values caused by Christianity seems to be universal.)

Then MacDonald says something I agree with: “We lost control of our culture,” and whoever loses that battle, he added, loses “the evolutionary race.” He said this in the context of the media and academia, controlled by the Jews. But when he specifically spoke about who created the moral values of modern white men, he didn’t dare say it was the rabbis who wrote the New Testament. In other words, MacDonald can’t have it both ways: his theory has a solid scientific basis, but Christianity has exerted more influence on us than media and academia together given its existence over two thousand years.

MacDonald speaks of “moral communities” as a characteristic of white psychology, and mentions the American Puritans who were abolitionists and how, once the value of slavery being unjust was established, anyone who believed in its validity could get into serious trouble (alluding to the Civil War). But even here we see that there used to be Christians who didn’t share antiracist morality (just as Russians and other Eastern Europeans don’t share Wokism). To understand the dark hour, it is necessary to recognize that a faction of Christianity imposed itself on the entire West after World War II, and that this wouldn’t have happened with, say, what the Nazis called “positive Christianity.”

It’s now too late for Webbon’s dream of establishing a kind of “positive Christianity lite” in the US for the reason I mentioned yesterday. To expel over one hundred million non-whites and crucify the traitorous whites who brought them here, we need anti-Christian governments (only pagan Nazis would do things like what we read in The Turner Diaries).

I’d like to end this post with a reflection on what MacDonald said about Tucker Carlson, whom we all appreciate for bringing the JQ to public attention, at least when criticizing the Israeli government and its American lackeys. MacDonald is right about this, but he also points out that Tucker is allergic to Aryan identity.

What the professor omitted in his interview with Webbon is that Tucker has said many times that he is not a white identitarian because of the Christian religion he professes.

Categories
Adam Green Richard Carrier Videos

Jewish psyop

Categories
Adam Green Christendom Videos

Christianity’s

role in eroding ethnic consciousness