What this site looked like before WordPress censored it.
Yesterday I changed the subtitle of this site from “National Socialism after 1945” to “Priesthood of the Sacred Words.” I would like to explain why.
The thing is, a phrase in the email Ben sent me yesterday (“I don’t so much regret the Judeo-reductionist phase I went through, as it seems most NS go through that phase—and most WN indeed remain in it!”) catalysed a process in my mind that had been brewing for years.
It all has to do with wanting to rescue the ideals of Adolf Hitler to enlighten the darkest era for white men, which began in 1945. For some reason virtually all Aryans, after that year, entered into a psychosis against their ethnicity as aberrant as that of the self-harmers who have been committed to psychiatric wards.
What does that have to do with Judeo-reductionism: believing that all our ills are due to Jewry? This POV is relevant because it has failed after World War II (all of American white nationalism has been a comedy of failures!).
Let me explain.
It is true that Hitler, Himmler, Bormann and others were well aware of the Christian Question. However, that awareness definitely didn’t extend to realising that the Christian Question was a greater problem than the Jewish Question!
If Hitler had known this, he wouldn’t have launched Operation Barbarossa, much less a Jewish holocaust when the war reached its peak, since it would have been understood that the primary task was to educate the German people so that, step by step and over generations, this great nation would transvalue Christian values into pre-Christian values.
Did Hitler want to exterminate all the Jews in the world? No. Even the Prime Minister of Israel, Bibi Netanyahu, stated in a speech before the World Zionist Congress in 2015 that Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews, but only to expel them from Europe. In a world where Anglo-Americans hadn’t intervened, those mass deportations would have been done without the insane violence unleashed in World War II (for this very reason, I’d like to invert a famous phrase from Milton Himmelfarb’s 1984 essay in this way: No Churchill & Roosevelt, no Holocaust!).
I recently transferred the DVD containing the PDFs from the revisionist Holocaust Handbooks collection to my hard drive. I liked what Harry Elmer Barnes wrote in his 1962 pamphlet, Revisionism and Brainwashing. Barnes argued that there was “a failure to point out the atrocities of the Allies were more brutal, painful, mortal and numerous than the most extreme allegations made against the Germans” and that in order to justify the “horrors and evils of the Second World War” the Allies made the Nazis the “scapegoat” for their own misdeeds.
Very true! This is precisely what we have been saying on this site about the Hellstorm Holocaust perpetrated by the Allies against the Germans. Nevertheless, and despite the best attempts of the revisionists who, after Barnes, went much further than him and began to call the holocaust a “hoax,” it seems clear to me that approaching the subject objectively leads us to conclude that millions of Jews were murdered in World War II (as were millions of Germans, and millions of Russians, etc.).
Ironically, it is easier to rehabilitate Hitler’s image by accepting the historicity of the holocaust than by denying it, provided we also accept the historicity of the Holocaust of Germans committed from 1945 to 1947.
The reason I changed the subtitle is that, since my life was almost completely destroyed by my father’s Catholicism (see, for example, the first book of my trilogy), I gained a better understanding of what Christianity is than the anti-Christian consciousness of Hitler, Himmler and Bormann. Especially for Himmler, who was in charge of the holocaust machine according to David Irving, the Jewish problem was obviously much more urgent than the Christian problem.
I think the opposite: the Aryan collective unconscious is infected with Semitic malware (the New Testament). Removing this malware from the Aryan collective unconscious would solve the Jewish problem, since an Aryan without that malware in their head would no longer have moral scruples about solving not only the JP but also the Negro problem, the Spic problem, the Gook problem, etc.
In other words, in The West’s Darkest Hour I can no longer pretend that our point of view is identical to that of the National Socialists of the Third Reich because… it isn’t. It’s very similar to Hitler’s dinner table conversations, and to some of Himmler’s semi-secret conferences, true. But it’s not identical.
I believe that the primary task of the White Man is to rid his subconscious of the New Testament programming written precisely… by Jews for Gentile consumption! Jews are much smarter in this respect than white racialists and non-racialists alike. Let’s remember that Bibi himself invoked the biblical passage of Amalek (from Deuteronomy 25:17 and 1 Samuel 15:3) in a speech on October 28, 2023, where he urged the troops to remember “what Amalek did” (i.e., exterminate the Palestinians).
As I said, if Hitler had thought like me, he wouldn’t have invaded the Soviet Union, as the general population hadn’t yet cleansed itself of the programming of unconditional love for every wingless biped. Since the German people never ran antivirus programs on their collective unconscious, so to speak, Hitler never imagined that if he lost the war… that Christian infection would end up demoralising the defeated Germans to the point of accepting ethno-suicide.
The current subtitle better reflects our point of view than the one I used to use. Even so, I still believe Hitler was the greatest statesman in all of Western history.
4 replies on “Subtitle”
It is indeed a shame Hitler was rash with Operation Barbarossa. Had he had time to properly educate the German people to inculcate them against Judeo-Christian influences, I feel that after the war was won, with Britain and America subdued (or otherwise in alliance, as would suit their underlying racial background), he could have returned to mop up remaining Jewish populations so much more easily, presenting a united front. It’s a lesson for us these days against acting too soon. The same with revolution – unless we transvaluate our morality from a (neo-)Christian perspective, no matter how ‘hard’ we may otherwise fight, we are likely to be defeated, on secondary values also outside of pure ruthless war – our society is still heavily infected with malware across the board: how we respond to our women for just one example.
I see no problem with affirming the Jewish Holocaust. Rather than looking for ways in which he did not succeed at that, more time and attention should be paid by Aryan (revisionist) historians to what he did accomplish in that regard. It’s hard to tell now, although I am sure he managed some millions, for which, among other things, he should be praised. Generally, I prefer to accept the orthodox perspective, if only for the prestige it grants him, rather like with Netanyahu quoting Amalek.
As I noted to you by email, It occurs to me from now on… rather than blaming any exterior source for our misfortune as a race, we should instead blame ourselves for our evident inability to respond to that threat in the manner of our Greco-Roman (or better, Cro-Magnon) ancestors. Not ‘the Other’… not the underlying environment of our world as if it were a bogeyman of its own… either we act as sole units and only then up from that to resolve the difficulty (and are trained to act by our betters over time if we can process such), or we shoulder all responsibility for the negative circumstances arising from a lack of response, even given that the original difficulty is imposed on us (and that does not mean we cannot assist each other – it’s just that initial responsibility). Surely that is struggle. I think this keeps a mind in action, as opposed to clutching at ever-present enemies, as if hoping somehow for their sympathy or acknowledgement, deflecting blame the while. I note further the example you gave regarding psychiatric patients – if they will not ever reach out of their own accord – their example of extended will – to consider there may be a genuine solution outside of biomedical psychiatry, what hope is there for them?
Oh yes: what you alluded to about the Joseph Walsh case is painful…
Before his arrest, he had already begun to say that he had lost all hope in Aryan salvation, and that the best thing to do was to hasten the extinction of white men (although, of course, he was arrested for saying another thing: that in a revolutionary action, the prince of his country should be executed for having fathered a mudblood kid with his mixed-race wife).
I remember that our friend Joseph started listening to Robert Whitaker’s video (I recently embedded one of those videos on this site) while I was in his flat’s bathroom. But he didn’t listen to the whole thing!
I don’t know if, despite my advice (to stop taking the iatrogenic psychiatric drug he was taking), he heeded it. But one thing seems clear to me: if he had followed our path, he would have been more prudent in today’s totalitarian UK, where you can be thrown in jail for almost anything “incorrect” you say.
A 7-year sentence for what he said about the royal family! (he already has served a year of that sentence this January).
Hitler, indisputably, was the greatest statesman in modern western history. But I think the ethical apostasy from Christianity by Aryans was at least, partly, epitomized by the attempts at holocaust.
While we aren’t ideologically identical to the German National Socialists we are their ideological descendants. We are what they had to become. Because now the enemy is not the alien. The enemy is your friend, your neighbor; every white who refuses to come to terms with our reality and instead persists in their Semitic delusion.
Hi Emperor,
It looks like your email is not legit. Please, use a genuine email when you comment on this site…