I see that no one else has responded to Benjamin’s survey. This motivates me to conduct an even shorter survey about what bothers visitors to this site, to the point that they frequently leave me talking to myself. What exactly bothers you—?:
– that I criticise white nationalists because, in general, they haven’t awakened to the CQ, much less transvalued their Judeo-Christian values (which includes atheists)?
– that I was born in Mexico and therefore my native language is Spanish, and that it seems a bit surreal that a Latin American would dare criticise his northern neighbours? (Actually, since adolescence I’ve felt very different from the average Mexicans, as shown in the Metapedia photo of the lad I was.)
– that, according to the visitors’ POV, I don’t pay enough attention to the JQ? If this is the case, last week Nick Fuentes uploaded a video in which he spoke about, in his words, the “low IQ anti-Semites” whom we on this site have called monocausalists: those who see only subversives Jews under every stone!
– that I criticise the very foundations of the US as a nation? The truth is that I criticise the entire continent, since it was founded on the Christian religion (I don’t count the great pre-Hispanic cultures because they are extinct). Furthermore, south of the Rio Grande, the process of racial mixing began centuries before the Anglo-Germans of the north began to mix on a large scale, so I am far more critical of Latin America than of the US and Canada.
What bothers the visitors? Why are there so many visitors, according to my statistics page, who never comment? Are Europeans perhaps afraid of the draconian laws against freedom of expression in their countries? But if you fully agree with what we say here but don’t want to commit in writing, why not email me to make a donation (which doesn’t even require revealing your real name, as you can see in the sticky post)?
What bothers you, my open contempt for normies and neo-normies (those racialists who haven’t crossed the psychological Rubicon into National Socialism)?
If that’s the case, note that since I began my writing career speaking out about the hellish environment in my family that destroyed several people, I had no mercy in pointing out the perpetrators (my parents and their hired psychiatrist). If I’m capable of criticising my now-deceased parents like this, why expect a less critical or incisive spirit when I see similar shortcomings in other people?
What bothers you exactly (please tell me)…?
16 replies on “Survey”
A European national socialist, afraid that the state could see his emails, could go to an internet café, open a new email account and contact me if he wanted. But he doesn’t…
He could even send me articles in German or any other European language so we can translate and publish them in both languages. But he doesn’t…
Or is it that there’s no such thing as a European National Socialist anymore? And what about the Americans, who have their First Amendment and, in theory, shouldn’t need to hide? Why don’t you comment here more often, even to criticise what I say if you disagree??
There is a conditioning here in the USA I’d say where people self-censor. The 1st amendment protects them, but there is a fear about being discovered and then character assassination. You have much more courage Cesar than those I have been around here in the USA. The comfort level is still too high here I’d say too which means the motivation to doing anything revolutionary is lacking to non-existent.
As far as Benjamin’s survey I will have to scroll down and give my answers.
The Christian problem up here is bad, I’ve heard Europe is better than here when it comes to that issue. But obviously, there are other issues over there. I have noticed that the right wing parties over there seem to be led by women. France it’s Marine Le Pen, Germany it’s Alice Weidel, Italy it’s Giorgia Meloni. I see the emasculation here in the USA too, just doesn’t seem to be quite at the level of Europe yet.
You mention that European National Socialists seem to be non-existent and I think there’s a serious lack of masculinity. I was watching a video the other night about how IVF has exploded in the past 20 years and that women are simply freezing eggs and then hoping a male sperm donor impregnates one of the eggs. Then if successful, they have the child for themselves.
I see a lot of that here now with the lack of masculinity, there are women just simply spending their money on this procedure rather than even attempting to be a wife. Obviously, the patriarchy doesn’t exist here or this behavior would not occur.
The reprogramming of men to be more masculine may take time and a syssitia would be a great place to start. Men are acting almost like pets when I see them in relationships now. On numerous occasions I have overheard women talking about their boyfriends or husbands and describing them as being good boys or good listeners in the same way one would describe the family dog. How can there be a revolution when men act this way?
Contemporary Aryans are worse than Jews.
I notice it even on the online right.
For example, on Twitter there are many posts from the racial right using Newspeak: they call heterosexual nymphophiles or ephebophiles “pedos” (paedophiles).
Nick Fuentes recently corrected them. Although he acknowledges that Epstein’s group was perverse because they were Jews taking advantage of young Aryan girls, Twitter users call even whites who like teenage girls “pedos” (I myself would be a pedo according to that Orwellian definition of the term).
As you know, I call contemporary Westerners lobotomized eunuchs.
Their self-inflicted lobotomy is a consequence of their being eunuchs.
For example, precisely because I am not a eunuch, since 2009 I have begun to unplug from the matrix that controls the Aryan by assimilating the message of TOQ Online’s Michael O’Meara and, the following year, that of William Pierce.
That saved me from the lobotomized state I was in before 2009, and I owe it to my balls for assimilating the message of the true dissidents of the System.
Conversely, western men today have so internalized the notion of sin, atheists included, that even acknowledging their impulses toward teenage girls freaks them out so much that they not only deny them (like medieval monks denied their impulses or else—eternal damnation). They demonize themselves for having such impulses, and some of them project that demonization even in legal cases of nymphophilia or ephebophilia (say, a 35-year-old man asking for the hand of a 15-year-old girl: such marriage is legal if the parents consent).
Andrew Anglin is one of the few who has pointed out this kind of thing among the racial right.
I like some words from Lincoln Rockwell: “If you don’t fuck you won’t fight.”
Contemporary racialists don’t grasp what they need—regular sex with pretty young flesh. They can’t grasp it even as a mere academic exercise! (“We shall abduct the Sabine women when the system collapses and every family shall have 5 to 10 Nordid kids”).
No. They’ve bestially internalised the Christian notion of sexual sin.
I don’t want anything to do with those people. I only want to associate with Aryan men who haven’t feminized themselves beyond repair.
It’s easy for you to demand a brood of children from every woman, César. You don’t have to go through the agonising hell of childbirth. You don’t have to watch your pristine body change beyond recognition. You can have a pretty wife or you can have a bunch of kids, but you can’t have both. The maternal condition is absolutely ruinous.
Something that strikes me about my mind is that, even though you and Adunai are supposedly banned, I occasionally let your comments slide…
It’s precisely because of this POV you hold (the very individualistic POV that’s killing the white race) that you’re a perfect paradigm of ethno-suicidal decadence.
It’s not even worth refuting in detail, but it’s obvious you’re offering up Middle-earth (Tolkien’s island where you live) to the orcs who are prolifically reproducing.
At least some visitors will realise why I don’t let most of your comments slide. And to be honest, at least you have the guts to offer your opinion. I prefer that to the “silent ones” who visit this site and just snoop around, never commenting, so I can’t figure out exactly what bothers them about The West’s Darkest Hour.
So, ironically, thanks for commenting, but don’t think I’ll be accepting most of your comments again. This site is for those whose religion is the sacred words, which naturally implies procreating a large number of Aryan children.
When I first saw this blog back in 2016, I waited about 2 months to read all previous articles, before I wrote my first comment.
It was a time of change, when I was restructuring my worldview and re-evaluating my morals, after I undemonized Hitler.
Then I reached a crossroad. The question was “Christianity. Yes or No?”. I sought answers. Whether I was going to accept this creed or if it was antithetical with National Socialism and Race Realism, I needed to know.
And this site provided all the answers.
My take is that these visitors are too weak, too comfortable. It takes strength to admit to oneself they’ve been wrong for so long; that their parents are selfish degenerates; that their grandparents are the real ‘bad guys’ of WW2 and betrayed the West’s last chance to survive this modern age; that their ancestors, for the past three centuries, are all fools who built a race-mixing constitution; and for the past two millenia, believed in a jewish god.
It takes immense strength to accept the burden of having to hold the line in a spiritual war, and for that, I admire you greatly, C.T.
These cucks and cowards that can’t even dedicate 5 minutes to read an article, much less write a comment, are the feminised cattle-masses who only respond to pain and fear.
Wow! That’s a true portrait of them! (and thanks for the compliment). It’s precisely because of this “portrait of the common racialist” you’ve shared, like an oil painting by a great artist that captures a person’s soul more than a casual selfie, that I’ve repeatedly quoted these words of Nietzsche!
Cesar,
I discovered your site in 2012, looking for answers in psychology. You introduced me to Alice Miller: good writing style — clear , concise and sharp as well as good info, stuff that I need and wanted with a lot of extra verbage.
When you posted about WWII and the Germans, i liked that your take was not the Hollywood Hitler but rather the real Hitler.
I guess I’m suspect by nature and generally don’t accept the collective line. Your writing mostly follows that line.
Thirteen years later, I still read every post of yours. Alas, I’m older and more tired. Which is why I rarely comment .
I kid myself that if a good leader appeared that offered to lead a hands on charge against, I’d likely join his band of brothers. And lay down my life. Likely not going to happen.
I’m recall Walt Disney’s, remark to close the group discussions, “Time for action and stop the talking.
Without a warrior leader, there’s really very little I can and want to do to further the cause.
@highrpm,
Thank you, R.M.
You should know that I quoted one of your comments in my trilogy: as an epigraph, in fact, in a prominent place.
Greetings from down the Rio Grande!
What bothers me is that a nuclear Barbarossa is brewing with Poland invading Russia under Anglo-French nuclear missiles, yet you choose to crow about the peak oil meme from 2008 and listen to deranged CIA Kremlin shills of Napolitano. Just why… Can any actual Hitlerian anticipate the coming of WW3 without the glownigger BRICS talking points? My question to you has for some time been – what if America nukes Russia and China and wins WW3? Is it good or bad?
After what Alexander Mercouris said on May 9th, I became so upset that I no longer watch not only him but also Judge Napolitano.
I would recommend most non-active or unknown people to not post on “WN” websites.
WDH is one of few actual “far-right” web sites, also the psychological themes on this site are a surprise and taboo area for many.
Online monitoring is very real and now AI automated to easily build up connections for everyone.
Sometimes not commenting on a thread or post means that there is nothing further to add.
Dear Berk,
I understand your reasoning – I myself am very worried about online surveillance usually, and try to read up on it when I can. However, given that that’s the case, how are WN (etc.) supposed to discuss ideas, to coordinate, to arrange to meet, if they can’t even chat online (or air their views in a shrewd, legal, academic manner)? I can’t think of a single known WN – as in publicly recognised – who has anything truly sensible to say on Aryan survival (or the 4 words), to a necessary revolutionary degree. They are, perhaps unanimously, cowards.
It may not be legal in my draconian country, but as we’ve mentioned, the US has the 1st Amendment, much as some there still are worried about the social impact/fallout of being doxxed, or whatever. They could meet in real life maybe, but without online confirmation that they’ve assimilated the WDH ideas, what sign do we have that ensures they have assimilated the information correctly to pass on in real-life, given that even on here with those who do comment, there is usually quite a bit of disagreement, misunderstanding and ‘variation’, even from those who have otherwise read all the texts? They might as well be ‘unknown [WN] people’ in their heads, if they can’t group with others (online at first), as they would lack all efficacy. I think we have to be bold and take the chance with the surveillance, otherwise nothing ever can be sorted online. The collective movement against existential threat is worth more than the safety of any individual, and our situation is desperate. One should not live up to being a slave just because it is imposed on them.
This response would apply the most to a few of my Survey questions, but there were two follow-up posts commenting on psychiatry where we/I tried to directly solicit answers, or at least confirmation that the materials presented thus far have been assimilated, and, as César and myself predicted in the background, it devolved into the usual 2-person back-and-forth, where not a single other site user felt they could engage (and that matter would not have been one of legalities). Regardless of how surprising the position is, enough has been said on it by now to at least prepare others for the sort of responses they could give that would appear sensical. I think sometimes we can premature in deciding that there is nothing further to add, as these are deep, open areas of research.
If ultimately the taboos are too much for them (even before surveillance is considered), I have no other choice but to consider the silent (and as much as silent) commenters weak and pathetic, in the manner put forward by Thomas, Mauricio and César.
We do not want normies and neo-normies here. Perhaps they could go the full hog and not comment at all (as opposed to sporadic milquetoast responses), ceasing to browse the site as it is evidently not for them, thus avoiding the insult to the site owner and the decent commenters of sneaking back in 2 months later as if nothing had happened here these past two weeks. I’d wish them the best of luck in real life. It’s just that probabilistically, without thorough discussion, the chances are they’d pass on incorrect perspectives, if they had the opportunity to pass on anything at all.
All this said, I still stand with the Syssitia idea, and I do agree with you in that, in general, we’re reaching a point where it should be real world interactions (enough perhaps has been said in overview, and the finer details can be threshed out in reality). I think, if it happens, that’ll be by the people who had the fortitude to comment on here the most though, or in the most decisive manner. I’m currently saving for that eventuality myself, and have laborious plans in place.
Editor's note: this is Ben's survey:Agree with both. Much of the best blood has been extinguished over the years in various wars. Preservation of what’s left is failing. Eugenics is really the number 1 topic. The lesser outbreed the greater. Whenever breeding became a conscious decision instead of an unconscious act, that was the beginning of the end.
Yes. Sadly though, fully explicit racial consciousness has been rare (NatSoc Germany, Sparta, Early Rome?). Every battle in this war has eventually been lost.
I think it’s a big part of the dissolution. However, the dissolution began prior to christianity and its ethics. Pretty much every scenario where organized complex civilization has occurred has equalled slavery instead of extermination and the subsequent miscegenation. The blame lies in the mirror, yes. Alexander The Great Miscegenator has been the rule, not the exception. Miscegenation is undefeated.
Yes. I will never be more than a novice on this topic. However, everything that has been written at WDH on this topic is interesting and undisputable in my opinion.
No, but industrial animal ag is nasty. Sure. No. Yes. Yes.
Yes. Yes. Yes.
Yes. Yes. If avoiding extinction is the goal, yes. Yes. Just seems extinction is not a concern for the white masses. Into the multiracial slop pit we go.
No. Yes. One of many, Roman slaughter of Gauls, Saxons and Germans seems comparable. Charlemagne’s slaughter in contention also.
Hoax. Yes, but easily could have some additional foul play in the background.
Yes. Will to power. Necessary for what? I don’t see bottom up revolution as feasible in the form of The Turner Diaries. If you want to, I don’t see it as particularly impactful on any kind of needle moving scale. Seizure of power at the top during a moment of crisis seems to be the only way to win.
Yes.
I fully agree!
Regarding the revolution, I don’t believe anyone in the upper echelons of power will ever promote our interests. Our only chance is what I said in my post today: energy devolution (an idea from the Canadian Sebastian Ronin).
Generally, I think many are just in denial that they can’t reform the system. In extremis, they’re conservatives. Conserving things that are long gone or truly never were. It’s delusion on a level that’s difficult to put into words. A conservative is aligned with the status quo. They are their wallet. Like Linder said, they are the enemy, not a potential ally. It’s like they truly do not care about extinction. Just think about how ridiculous American Patriotism is, this is who you are dealing with and it’s hopeless.
Biblebrain is powerful medicine, yes. You cannot compete with blind faith. Fuentes, Webbon, all these dudes are christ first. Christian nonwhites > non-christian whites. Some christians are white first though. However, even those totally reject the premise of the CQ. They generally aren’t interested in discussing how their blind faith and values are an impediment. Christianity is their identity.
I don’t think this is really an issue. Look at the following Fuentes has accumulated. He’s 1/4 Mexican. Very few young people (under 30) read, they zombie out on Fuentes video slop. Old people are generally set in their ways even if they know deep down that their ways are shit. They don’t want to get blown out in a debate on your site. They don’t want to take the time to read your 15 years of content. They don’t want revolution. They are tourists. They just want the empty promise of soft reform from their conservative president Donnie Boy.
Monocausalism is easy. No mirror. Again, your viewpoints are very difficult to debate and not get steamrolled. Their arguments are weak. They don’t want to comment and get blown up. There is no hope for additional engagement.
‘MERICA!!! This is probably the biggest beef they have. That their country’s founding principles sucked from day 1 is a tough pill to swallow. That it was never a nation shatters identity. Frontier, colonies, empire. Nations value blood. Empires value money. Nations are socialist. Empires are capitalistic. Nations are ethnic. Empires are slop pits.
The casual visitor that you are mentioning just doesn’t care. Donating to your cause has no value to them.
They are normies and neo-normies, so yea. You overestimate the value of even the higher quality whites. “They will do anything to avoid the giving or receiving of fatal battle strokes.” “White man, you are a defeated comical slave, laughed at by all the world and scorned or used by your own women.” “Civilization has ended, this is war.” Civilized to death is where we are.
Keep on keepin on.