Survey for WDH Regular Readers
by Benjamin
Please answer either “yes” to each question, or limit your “no” response to the best concise argument that you can make. These questions are not intended to be ambiguous.
- “The Nordic race is the pinnacle of human/Aryan evolution, and thus only Nordic bodies deserve to breed our future race”. Do you agree with both (or any) parts of this statement? If not, why not?
- Is miscegenation a crime against life? Are all non-Nordic Aryans subhuman?
- Is our adoption of Christian ethics the prime reason for our dissolution as a race? Are we as Aryans primarily to blame for our present historical conditions?
- Is psychiatry really a pseudoscience? Is the etiology of schizophrenics/psychotics truly that of parental trauma victims? Are neuroleptics/psychiatric drugs detrimental to health? Do parents cause the vast majority of the DSM-5/ICD behavioural patterns labelled as distinct disorders? Is mental illness environmental in origin? Is the psychiatric genetics position scientifically bankrupt? Do non-Aryans generally mistreat their children?
- Is vegetarianism/veganism a moral necessity? Is most non-human animal suffering unnecessary (excluding non-Aryans)? Is full veganism a beneficial goal for the future? Can most non-human animals feel pain? Are many non-human animals conscious?
- Are we required to reclaim our women by force in the manner of the Sabines? Are official public schools unnecessary? Are all our children to be raised solely by Aryan men after around the age of 7?
- Will current ‘non-Aryan re-migration’ initiatives likely fail? Are we required to kill our enemies? Are we required to kill our enemies to the level of an international genocide? Are we required to kill our enemies irrespective of their age?
- Are the British and American soldiers who fought in it to be held responsible for the consequences of the Second World War? Should both America and Great Britain cease to exist as nations in order to preserve Aryan life? Is the ‘Hellstorm’ Holocaust against the German people the greatest evil in the history of our race?
- Do you affirm the historical reality of the Jewish Holocaust? Was 9/11 an Islamic terror attack?
- Is politics obsolete? Is real-world non-political coordination necessary? Are we required to establish Syssitias or equivalent shared communal living areas?
“Enemies” = non-Aryan racial enemies/Aryan traitors. “I don’t know” is not an acceptable response to any question.
36 replies on “A Brief”
#1. Yes, and this is what’s wrong with white nationalists, so infected by the Christian ethics of loving every wingless biped, including those I call Neanderthals.
#2. Procreating with a non-Aryan is the sin against the Holy Spirit of life, and deserves justice in the hour I long for most of all: The Day of the Rope. I would like to see that day throughout the West (cf. how William Pierce’s The Turner Diaries ends).
#3. According to white nationalists, the primary reason is Jewish subversion, but they have never answered my question that throughout the entire American continent south of the Rio Grande, Iberian Europeans sinned against the Holy Spirit, creating a sub-race of humans while the Inquisition kept Latin American Jews in check. Therefore, we cannot blame them for miscegenation (it was clearly a papal bull in the 1530s that allowed marriage with Indigenous women). Interestingly, yesterday, while reading my ring binder about family anecdotes, I came across a passage from my uncle Damián Tort, who researched the Tort genealogy going back centuries. My handwritten note says something I had forgotten and reread yesterday: none of the Torts, as far as my uncle’s research went, had problems with the Spanish Inquisition.
#4. Here, white nationalists fail as much as in their repudiation of Nordicism. Despite the fact that several racialists have struggled with mental health issues, they don’t want to investigate the matter. The most pathetic case I know is that of your compatriot Joseph Walsh, a commenter on this site. When I visited him in London, I realised he was suffering from akathisia due to the psychiatric drug he was being given. I suggested he watch a video by Robert Whitaker about these dangerous drugs. He barely even looked at it. Now Walsh is locked up in prison for what he said on a radio show. If he had followed my advice, he would have been saved and would already be here, far from the Thought Police of his country, podcasting freely in my house in Tezoquipa with his friend Chris, who is also incarcerated. (Because he didn’t come with Chris, I stupidly allowed my siblings to sell that enormous house.)
#5. Another terrible failing of white nationalists, who flaunt the American Way of Life with barbecues in their yards. The first thing the Nazis did upon coming to power was to abolish vivisection, and Hitler planned to close the European slaughterhouses after the war. Alas, because of Anglo-Americans billions of animals are currently suffering worldwide! It’s obvious that American white nationalism is pure Neanderthalism compared to German National Socialism.
#6. Without abducting and raping the new Sabine women there will be no second Aryan Rome. It’s that simple. Chimpanzees are the closest species to ours. They don’t beg the females for sex: they take what they need. Our semi-human ancestors did the same. And that continued until the invention of marriage so that every beta male could have a female. Feminism annihilated this institution. But feminism can be destroyed overnight on the Day of the Rope. Once the patriarchy is re-established, it will no longer be necessary to abduct the new Sabines. We can behave like the gentlemen in Jane Austen’s novels.
#7. Once again: only a scenario like the one in Pierce’s first novel can save the Aryan (Pierce becomes foolish in his second novel, Hunter, because he didn’t realise that the Christian Question was more serious than the Jewish Question).
#8. History must not only be rewritten, but transvalued like developing a photographic negative: what appears white must now appear black, what appears black must now appear white; dark greys must now appear light greys and vice versa.
#9. Historians David Irving and Mark Weber, both German sympathisers, believe that a few million died, although the figure of 6 million is Jewish propaganda. Another flaw not only of white nationalists but of the reactionary right in general is believing conspiracy theories, which are nothing more than prolefeed to prevent the proles from rebelling as the Gods command (i.e., as The Turner Diaries advises us).
#10. Another flaw of white American nationalism is that they want to save the white race without repudiating their nation’s project (democracy, “human rights” etc.) and the religion that conquered the entire American continent: both north and south of the Rio Grande. That’s why I call them “neo-normies.”
Yes, veganism is a moral imperative in line with our wanting to eliminate as much unnecessary suffering as possible, and I say this as an omnivore. However, here, technology will probably come to our aid with lab-grown meat. As a carnivore, I acknowledge vegans as my ethical superiors. Indeed, technological solutions such as these are why I reject Dr. Robert Morgan’s Luddite-ism. I think that some non-human animals, if anything, are more sentient than humans. Cetations (whales/dolphins) often have bigger brains and more complex languages than humans. I would value the life of a blue whale over the lives of most humans. Better a thousand random humans perish than a single blue whale.
To be able to say this is to be free of the Christian psychosis of imago Dei. If gods there be, then a blue whale is more in their image than a congoid would be. In Christian Trinitarian mythology, God the father produces the son by contemplating his own perfections. The contemplative life of a cetation, like a blue whale, is more in the image of the Thomistic god dreamt up by Medieval Theologists than a Congoid.
Yes. and Yes. It is “the worst misfortune” as Hitler said in his table talks and it has “weakened us in every battle” as Himmler put it. Ultimately, yes, we the Aryans, are to blame for adopting this Semitic cult. Nobody forced us to, at least not for the first 300 years, and it hasn’t been illegal to reject Christianity since the 1800s. Our race is morally culpable for adopting it; for wasting our time, blood and energy on it for 1,000 years, and for not ditching the cult altogether in the 1800s, when it became legal to do so. As Bram Stoker put it: we allowed the Semitic vampire into our own house of our own free will.
1. Yes to the first part. Can’t the other races live in their homelands?
2. Yes, a sin against nature.
b) I’ll say yes
3. Yes to both
4. Yes.
b) yes
c) yes
d) yes to all..
5. No, Aajonus Vonderplanitz found the truth about nutrition in the last century. Half of his book “We Want To Live” was partly a book of memoirs and saving his son’s life.
For animal suffering, Dairy and eggs and honey don’t cause the animal to suffer. You could keep healthy on a vegetarian diet, with those foods uncooked. I don’t believe Hitler was fully persuaded like Goebbels on veganism or vegetarianism.
6. That’s not doable right now
b)yes
c I’ve thought definitely by the age of 15.
8. Yes
b) yes
c) I haven’t read hellstorm. I can only imagine the atrocities committed.
9.No
b) no
10) Yes to all three
Ah, I meant to space them out. That will be hard to read.
Thank you for replying to my survey, DA. That’s okay, I could read them I think!
I’m glad you’re predominantly in agreement. A very nice thing to read, for once!
I must ask though (speaking as a vegan myself, much as I acknowledge now that I haven’t read “We Want To Live”), what is it that makes you say eggs, dairy, etc. (but mainly eggs and diary) doesn’t cause them to suffer?
I can get into this in a minute, with my own evidence, I just wondered generally if you were accounting for factory farms, which seem to have monopolised Western food production, or if you meant small-scale projects/’free range’ (whatever that means these days)?
I don’t deny they’re good for you, by the way – outside of the Blue Zones points, and the major inconsistencies already covered in debate on here a while back. My arguments aren’t really primarily nutritional ones.
P.S. I personally don’t want the other races to live in their homelands in case they multiply and cause a problem for Nordics in future, or indeed all Aryans in the present.
Regarding your postscript, they cannot live in their homelands because whites, even after a hypothetical Fourth Reich, could revert to their old ways with remnants of neochristian or universalist ethics and marry mudbloods.
Even I find myself attracted to some of the dark-skinned women I sometimes see in Mexico: the very young and very thin ones. But as a priest, I have principles.
Aryans in general aren’t priests. Therefore, non-whites must be exterminated as a prophylactic measure so that the madness of the second half of the 20th and the first half of the 21st centuries cannot be repeated.
Thank you for a fuller response. I read ‘other races’ as ‘non-Nordics’ in my initially reply, taking it to its fullest conclusion (for example, by Nordic standards I’m a subhuman, albeit a principled one), but I think the basic principle holds for both interpretations.
Tell me if I’m being too harsh. I wouldn’t have all non-Nordic Aryans killed. I think I’d have them sterilised though (just for racial perfection reasons), or, in the more noble ones, at least a signed contract/written pledge that, though they could surely adopt Nordic children, whey wouldn’t breed any kids of their own.
All non-whites must be exterminated.
I’m in favour of exterminating non-Aryans, but that’s going to be very difficult (by the way, why do you say you’re non-Aryan? I’ve seen your photos, and you look like a typical Englishman).
In the case of the Chinese, who have many nuclear weapons, there’s no other option but to take a gamble: take advantage of one of those weeks when solar radiation overwhelms satellite signals and, during that window of blindfold opportunity, drop a thousand megaton bombs on them, with the idea of creating dozens of Chernobyls in China’s 62 operational nuclear power reactors (of course, the first attacks have to be on the silos and Beijing so they don’t order submarines to counterattack).
With Russia, which is full of mudbloods, it will be more difficult (although one would expect Chinese radiation to affect them). With the Russians, given that they have the most nuclear weapons, we would have to conquer the entire American continent first, and racially transform it into New Scandinavia (that is, of pure Nordic lineage or pure English blood—no Meds allowed). The same applies to Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. This Greater Fourth Reich would try to convince those Russians who survive the Chinese radiation to eliminate the mudbloods without violence, simply through Nuremberg-style laws where only the pure-blooded Nordids will have the right to marry.
I see that as a gigantic challenge, and it would have been ten thousand times easier for Himmler and his henchmen to have fulfilled the Master Plan East throughout Russia. Now these Russian brutes are going to celebrate their great patriotic war in a few days for what happened in May 1945. I think these mudbloods (cf. Pierce & Kemp’s histories of the white race) will be the toughest nut to crack, but an already Aryanized world—Africa, Europe, North- and Latin America (Asia would be too radioactive for centuries to come)—could exert great ideological pressure to bring the surviving Russians to their senses.
Where there’s a will, there’s a way, and however difficult things have become for sacred words after the fateful year of ’45, our will must be directed toward that goal.
The book We Want To Live isn’t being printed anymore since the author died, so it’s expensive and hard to find. It was a big realization for me to find his works back in 2021.
But, I merely mean milking the cow isn’t causing pain. Or collecting eggs.
If you own the farm, what you say is true. But here in Mexico, for example, the exterminable Neanderthals have even gone so far as to throw live pigs into boiling water to sell their skin as pork rinds, now hairless rinds…
I agree with you too. I think at this point it becomes more abstract for me… personally, I just don’t like taking from them, at all. It wouldn’t cause them pain (either physical or psychological – I wouldn’t imagine so at least; although I don’t know the research on the latter). It just feels icky to me effectively stealing their potential young from them, or drinking what their bodies evolved to produce to feed their own species. I know not all eggs fertilise anyway. I suppose it feels basically transgressive to me regardless. It would be down to the conditions we kept them in when we were doing that too – don’t get me wrong, if you have a farm I’m sure you’re not cruel. Again though, I get this weird feeling off animal domestication/animal husbandry in its entirety. It’s very hard to put. I think its the commodification of another living life form. Or mild exploitation. I don’t think they automatically owe us anything in return for being looked after.
I’ve read in a few places now that factory farming accounts for roughly 99% of Western food production. I wish it didn’t. If you don’t know the details on that, I’ll share them properly some other time (it’s grisly – very disturbing). Tails clipped off without anaesthetic for easier access to udders… milked till they bleed, break legs, or prolapse… repeat forced pregnancies then calves taken away from their mothers at birth (and killed for whatever)… beak filing on chickens to prevent fighting in the conditions we ourselves instigate… tiny crates and cages and darkness… deliberately starving them so they molt and egg-laying rate is increased… machines grinding most male chicks from the egg-laying strains to death… all this sort of thing. I can’t think this could be justified.
But I do agree with you. I don’t find anything wrong in the ‘ethical farm’ perspective. I just approach from a slightly different angle, personally.
These soldiers are now in their 90s and in their hundreds. I would be inclined just to let them die off in peace. I think that America and Great Britain are already ceasing to exist as nations. America will probably fracture into competing loose confederations, and “Great Britain” is actually four allied nations, with Northern Ireland not even on the island of Great Britain. I think that the Yookay (United Kingdom) is already beginning to cease to exist as a nation. The four allied nations that comprise the Yookay are drifting inexorably towards independence, in my opinion. Only ethnicity, really, was the gel that kept these four allied nations together in a single sovereign state, and now that this shared ethnicity is evaporating, there is really nothing holding the UK together, any more.
The war against Germany; yes, a tragedy. Germany was the centre of learning and culture such that “German scholarship” in fields such as Classics, Biblical studies… even the Irish language!, was held to be a league apart from other scholarship. In a sense, the GIs and redcoats who destroyed Germany only destroyed themselves. The British Empire is no more, and it was World War 2 that killed it. In a sense it is almost punishment enough for the GIs and Redcoats who destroyed Germany to watch as this destruction followed them home. There is something unbeseeming to watch nonogenarians be tried as the Jews do with their Holocaust lawfare trials.
Thank you for this response Gaedhal (and all of them – I loved your thoughts on blue whales, and lab-grown meat is something I would consider a viable alternative for those who can stomach it rather than plants, which may not appeal to all…). You’re right, I think, and your final line is poignant. One can quietly hate them in this case, or just let them be to die. I perhaps should have said ‘accountable’, to leave it in the abstract, as opposed to seeking punishment for them through ‘responsible.
I must remember to memorise ‘Yookay’. I have fondness for Northern Ireland.
Personally, I don’t see any countries (save for their white inhabitants and their sub-cultural offerings), I just see parcelled masses of the same land – at root all land – that has worked for centuries for some, and failed for others. If it worked for them then, it would work for their similar superiors, and some sub-culture is sublime. I remember our conversation on Imperium (I think we’ll just have to see how it goes… I surely can’t read the future, and the precious, thus far discrete, folk materials and offerings by them to a broader folk feel too precious to lose). I’m glad for your insights.
I got “Yookay” from other pro-white radicals. They feel that the term: “Yookay” is synonymous with post-white Britain, whereas terms like England, etymologically, can only refer to the land of the Anglo-Saxons. Even: “Britain” is an ethnic term, etymologically: “The land of Brythonic Celts”. The “Great” is a geographic term. I think that when England annexed Wales, the resulting polity became Britain. Indeed, in Irish, Wales is: “Breatain Beag” or “Little Britain”. When King James I effectively annexed Scotland in a personal union, he called the resulting polity: “Great(er) Britain”. Geographically, the Great in Great Britain is meant to distinguish this island from lesser Britains like Wales and Brittany. I think that the Breton are likewise Brythonic Celts. Some Breton Separatists were allied to the Irish Republican Socialist Workers’ party, the political wing of the INLA, a group that splintered off from the Official IRA.
The Brythonic Celts, who would eventually go on to be Welshmen and Cornish were Britain’s original inhabitants prior to the Roman, Anglo-Saxon and Norman invasions.
P.S. P.S. to César (sorry for the delay, my internet connection is severely playing up, and this might post twice) – I am pure Aryan (if still not the greatest specimen of that; for example I have light hazel/amber eyes, an Armenid nose, and natural black hair). Sorry, I didn’t mean to confuse you.
I’m just not Nordic. That’s what I meant by by ‘subhuman’ point. In my internal classification scheme (which is quite stringent, based off TNRC, though could be idiosyncratic – tell me if my system is wrong), all non-Nordics are to some degree – it’s a relativity thing – ‘subhuman’. I.e. only compared with Nordics. Perhaps it would have been better to say ‘lesser Aryan’, just to keep the Nordic distinction clear.
Compared with all other races (which I see as non-human animals) I are Aryan, i.e. human, and I will try to leave it at that (though there’s no real internal equality as I don’t see racial equals so much as racial similarity cases within a single race, and not just for phenotype reasons). Basically I’m entirely hierarchical about it.
But pragmatically, as long as one is Aryan, it doesn’t really make much difference (especially not for the moment).
I read and liked your comment a little while back over allowing a few exceptions from the non-Aryan set (provided they are priests of the holy words, and do not breed).
Well, perhaps you already know this: In my travels, the most beautiful women I’ve seen are the English roses. It’s obvious that they will be the Sabine women for my Parrish utopia, and that we need many pure Englishmen to impregnate them on a grand scale so we can have Jane Austen worlds like those in the 1995 S&S or 2005 P&P films, not only on the island, but throughout the Aryan world (have you seen already both movies by the way?).
I agree :).
I’ve seen both movies (I watched them with my partner, as by your recommendation). I thought P&P was very pleasing in its settings (although I slightly preferred the older version for its actors), but I particularly enjoyed S&S. The latter was most reminiscent of my ideal world and I found it generally slightly higher in aesthetic qualities. They were both lovely movies (and I found she enjoyed them too – it set off a lively, light-hearted discussion).
This questionnaire needs to be more organized and subdivided into items (what the Spanish call ‘párrafos’). One question per topic, several points per question.
1) Yes I agree. Nordics/Aryans are the best humans. Only Nordics should breed with Nordics.
2.A) Yes. Miscigenation is a crime against life; against Nature itself.
2.B) In Non-Nordics, or impure Aryans, subhumanity is not a yes/no Boolean value, it’s a spectrum. I consider a human with less than 80% Aryan genes a subhuman.
3.A) Yes. Christianity is the main reason for Aryan racial dissolution.
3.B) Yes. As Aryans, we are responsible for having allowed Christianity to grow, and we continue to avoid our responsibility to eradicate it.
4.A) I assume psychiatry is mostly fraudulent. I am anti-drugs.
4.B) I don’t understand this question.
4.C) I am anti-drugs.
4.D) I assume parents are mostly responsible for causing disorders in their children.
4.E) I assume mental illnesses are mostly environmental/extrinsic.
4.F) I assume genetics must have a small role in mental illness.
4.G) I assume Non-Aryans mistreat their children more than Aryans.
5.A) Vegetarianism is a moral necessity. Veganism is self-inflicted malnutrition.
5.B) Non-human animal suffering by humans is unnecessary.
5.C) Full Veganism is impossible.
5.D) Yes, non-human animals can feel pain. I’m not sure about insects.
5.E) Yes, non-human animals are conscious, and human animals have a higher consciousness.
6.A) Yes, we must reclaim our women by force.
6.B) Yes. Public schools are necessary, but the students should be segregated by race and sex.
6.C) In a hypothetical future Agoge system, yes, Aryan boys should be raised by Aryan men only.
7.A) These ‘re-migration’ initiatives in Europe and America are already failing.
7.B) Yes, we must kill our enemies.
7.C) Yes, we must genocide our enemies everywhere.
7.D) Yes, we must kill our enemy’s children, men, women, and elderly, with ruthless efficiency.
8.A) Yes, just like the Russians.
8.B) Yes, the UK and USA must to be destroyed and ‘scorch-earthed’, so as to not to be left as spoils to the enemy. Carthago/America Delenda est.
8.C) Yes, the Hellstorm Holocaust was an unforgivable racial betrayal of unparalleled magnitude.
9.A) Yes, I affirm the Jewish Holocaust, and I am saddened that it was so small, and I wish that many more Jews had been exterminated.
9.B) I don’t care.
10.A) By ‘obsolete politics’ do you mean the democratic system? If so, then yes, politics is obsolete, and there are no political solutions, i.e., there’s no voting out of this mess.
10.B) By ‘non-political’ coordination, do you mean secret societies? If so, then yes, it is necessary that we work and coordinate together without any affiliation with political parties, and stay ‘under the radar’ of the system, so to speak.
10.C) Yes. Without proximity, companionship, mentorship, brotherhood, we are weak, alone and lost. Vis Unita Fortior.
Thanks Mauricio, a very good reply (from my perspective). I particularly like that you answered it all. Thanks for clearing up 2(B) for me. And yes, you interpreted my 10. questions as I meant them.
Just out of interest, by recent studies some insects feel pain (and can process it as discomfort past nociceptor-type responses, i.e. are conscious), and some don’t seem to. Quite a few now have been shown to have emotions. Cephalopods and lobsters too. A lot of metazoan organisms have some response. Single-cell are more of just environment responsive (though still seem to move against ‘thermal noise’).
I could accept that veganism can cause malnutrition. I’d need to investigate the nutritional studies more, impartially. With the aid of small does of B12 vitamin tablets, I was under the impression everything else was covered to some degree (though it takes a lot of micromanagement). I don’t deny that costs can be prohibitive – and it’s harder to find some of the stuff. The only main reason – as I think I tried to express above yesterday – that I say veganism is necessary (currently) too, is on account of factory farm style egg/diary/honey operations (the latter I re-researched last night; it’s not great for the bees to take their food source, and our artificial hives are not an adequate replacement for nature. Bees are one of the insects first shown to be in possession of a range of both positive and negative emotional responses, beyond feeling physical pain that is.) As long as those factory farms (animal torture gulags) still exist as a concept, and still monopolise food output, I’d rather take the risk with veganism (for pure moral reasons, as by the vegetarianism imperative) – I haven’t tested as malnourished so far, but it’s difficult currently to get a fair reading due to neuroleptic overlaps. The population will indeed have to be quite small for non-factory farming to be a viable way to feed everyone. Just as stubborn personal choice, I think I’ll stick to it – I’m already 40 these days (and envy younger people who will get to fight).
@ Mauricio,
Good responses.
I liked especially your words “Yes, the UK and USA must to be destroyed and ‘scorch-earthed’, so as to not to be left as spoils to the enemy. Carthago/America Delenda est”—because of the Hellstorm Holocaust!
P.S. sorry to flog a dead horse. I should have put in my original reply… I don’t just rely on vitamin supplements for the B12 (although I still like C and D just by routine). Just on the subject of this vitamin/nutrient alone… given the recommend daily intake is 2.4mcg, I find you get a reasonable dose out of Tempeh, nori (sushi seaweed), and nutritional yeast (and there’s a supermarket in the UK called Tesco’s that does a really good brand of fortified cornflakes for this purpose). Obviously beef liver and sardines have the most, but eggs have 0.9mcg/100g, and milk has 1.2mcg/100g, whereas an average cup’s worth of Tempeh has 2.8mcg. I can’t remember it for all the other ones, but it’s a reasonable amount. There’s still a trace amount in most veg and fruit. But please don’t consider me an expert on dietary arguments… I’m usually keen to learn, more than anything.
And thanks in general… I must re-configure the survey so as not to be Boolean/prescriptive.
@ Benjamin,
Regarding your questions about psychiatry, did you know that Greg Johnson said less than a week ago that he believes in the relevance of psychiatric drugs to combat, say, depression? (listen to what he says in this audio after the second minute).
Greg overlooks that, in the long run, these drugs are iatrogenic (that is, their effect is counterproductive)—precisely as Robert Whitaker’s videos demonstrate: the very videos I wanted Joseph Walsh to watch!
Greg obviously hasn’t read books like Your Drug May Be Your Problem: How and Why to Stop Taking Psychiatric Medications (Amazon book reviews here).
It shows the dangers of approaching from the logic-based ‘pure reason’ angle (I couldn’t listen to much of it)… It’s funny he says ‘several kinds of people the drug would not work on…’ and then goes on to wildly speculate, given that (if I may quote a segment from my new book):
I also like Joanna Moncrieff’s The Bitterest Pills: the Troubling Story of Antipsychotic Drugs.
I notice he was big on ‘cognitive therapies’ i.e. their desire to fix faulty thought processes. I didn’t hear him mention trauma, and specific trauma responses. I think CBT is a crock of shit (and can put why).
And yes, they are deeply iatrogenic. Thank you for sharing this to me. It makes me wonder if there’s anything they’ve got right!
Sorry I couldn’t listen to the rest too effectively… I didn’t know how long he was going to go on about the topic for, and the ignorance was off-putting from the get-go.
I didn’t listen to the entire audio, only segments of it. It seems Greg was answering a variety of questions on diverse topics, and only mentioned psychiatry at the beginning.
Racialists, in general, are ignorant of the criticism levelled at the profession since the time of Daniel Defoe, the author of Robinson Crusoe (although the profession wasn’t yet known by that name, Defoe complained that sane women were being locked up in asylums by their husbands).
IIRC, in the discussion thread on The Unz Review about my article against Freud, there were some commenters familiar with the criticism of psychiatry. But of the very prominent racialists, only Alex Linder told me by email that he had read Tom Szasz.
Let’s see what happens now that my book, How to Murder Your Child Soul (with the help of a psychiatrist), reaches Kevin MacDonald…
P.S. he’s read a ‘vast amount’ of this literature. I see he hasn’t considered the other side at all though.
The guy really is an unintuitive oaf. If talk-therapies don’t work, I’d say it’s the specific talk-therapy’s fault, and the model they’re using.
I agree with him that a patient friend (or indeed a bartender, etc.) works better than a professional therapist though.
What Greg ignores is that psychotherapy is fraudulent not because biological psychiatry is scientific, but because psychotherapists do not use the trauma model (cf. Jeffrey Masson’s books).
I also didn’t like the fact he naively asked a psychiatrist for his opinion/evidence, and took it blindly on face value, without expecting an internal bias in the professional and a conflict of interest – of course the psychiatrist’s going to say something like that…
It really bothers me that I’ve been criticising psychiatry and publishing important essays of my own in Daybreay and Day of Wrath, available for free as PDFs for years, and people like Greg simply ignore my years of work, even though I used to be a regular commenter on his webzine. (Incidentally, Greg even read and proofread my “Why Psychiatry is a False Science” piece. But it seems to have made no dent on his worldview at all!)
1. Yes
2. Yes to the first question, no to the second question
3. Yes, but what Savitri Devi called the “superstition of man” i.e anthropocentrism predates our adoption to christ-insanity and I would say that is a big part of the worldview which led to our decline.
4.Yes, but I have never looked into it myself, only through this website
5.Yes, although I don’t know if full veganism is viable, lacto ovo vegetarianism might be a better goal.
6.No force won’t be required, you are overestimating women. Mandatory public schools are unnecessary, but non-mandatory ones can exist. Children don’t need to be raised solely by men.
7.Yes
8.No, individual soldiers can’t be held responsible. America and Great Britain will probably cease to exist whether we like it or not.
9.No
10.Yes, if by politics you mean democratic elections
@ Bob,
I have replied here.
Thank you very much, Bob. I realise now, having gained lots of responses, that my study was flawed (I lacked nuance, and railroaded some perceptions + I made that tasteless/pedantic ‘subhuman’ categorisation error). I’m glad you also answered all the questions. I don’t know if full veganism is viable either (but I know the food system as it is currently needs a radical overhaul, in line with animal cruelty research). I think your point 3. answer is fascinating. I hadn’t considered that to date. The schooling points are also something I’ll keep in mind. I’d only (tacitly) blame the soldiers if they personally participated in anti-German war-crimes (thinking of Savitri again and her words on stupidity when all of Creation is at stake), but as I acknowledged to Gaedhal’s response, they’re very old now, and so must die peacefully. The ‘rape of the Sabine women’ point isn’t something there would be any biological need for me to personally participate in. I’m unsure (beyond being full darkness) how the future will pan out specifically. It’s refreshing you have the fortitude to answer yes to 7.
Ideally, meat consumption should be limited and only for white people. This would prevent the senseless slaughter of animals to feed non-whites.
Had Hitler won the war, the slaughterhouses would now be prohibited throughout Europe…
Were the Vikings a bunch of vegan soyboys, César? I don’t think they were.
The autism in your response is obvious: I’ve never claimed they should have been vegan. The emergence of a higher “psychoclass” only began with Hitler. And not even he demanded that his henchmen convert to vegetarianism right away because he knew that it would be a rather slow, step-by-step goal after winning the war.