web analytics
Categories
Alexander the Great William Pierce

Pedestal

I’ve been noticing on X that a couple of clueless white advocates admire Alexander “the Great.”

Do you see why what I said recently in “Flaming” is vital?

Taking not only Alexander, but Caesar, off the pedestal is fundamental because whoever controls the past controls the future. William Pierce put Alexander and Caesar in their place in his story of the white race, where he showed that in both reigns whites began miscegenating with mudbloods (neither Alexander nor Caesar understood anything about racial preservation).

A son well-treated by Pierce would have aimed to publish and promote his father’s book and would have cured future racialists of this enormous historical blind spot.

But Pierce mistreated his son, and his legacy had no good custodians when he died in 2002. For example, as far as I know, Who We Are still hasn’t been properly published.

5 replies on “Pedestal”

I know it’s basically well-known, obvious trivia, but I’ve got a segment in my new book update dealing with Alexander. I haven’t got round to reformatting this chapter yet, so there may be further updates, but, having the 2024 edition handy, what I wrote at the time was (I was using the term ‘European’ rather than ‘Aryan’ in this account):

For an empire to succeed, it cannot be multiracial, if indeed a purely European empire can survive at all without excising sub-racial inadequacies (a final, future success rendering the term ‘empire’ inaccurate), the former example displayed by the spectacular historical failures of Alexander the Great, control of his vast, incoherent Eastern empire dying with him as he drunk himself to death, leaving communication channels open for the spread of more Oriental philosophies and corrupt attitudes into Europe.

His political adoption of Persian habits and customs, such as proskynesis – a self-deification alien to traditional Greek spiritual thought, requiring his court advisers to prostrate themselves before him and kiss his hand – had rendered him unpopular with his soldiers.

The constant demand for fresh troops to be sent East significantly weakened Macedon, leaving it open to subjugation by the Romans after 168 BC. Unsurprisingly, his Hellenic army eventually mutinied in North India, refusing to march further East. A reckless, greedy, anti-European commander, mass marrying his reluctant senior officers to Persian noblewomen, their marriages rarely lasting a year, him going so far as to regret his prior burning of the Persian ceremonial capital of Persepolis, an open-hearted pity inappropriate for a true conqueror.

His campaigning effectively ended the Hellenic Age and the power of Greek civilisation in the Mediterranean.

The one good thing about the film version was, to me, that that picked Colin Farrell, an actor I dislike in general. I thought his face seems, subtly, suitably naïve, arrogant, and bumbling – very much a yokel look, like the village idiot. I think that would suit this ignorant maniac well. I notice the dissident right (especially in the UK), has quite a lot of idiot historical characters they admire, and take pseudonyms from. Charlemagne is another popular one for this treatment.

In The Story of Philosophy, Will Durant said:

When, in 399 b. c, Socrates was put to death, the soul of Athens died with him, lingering only in his proud pupil, Plato. And when Philip of Macedon defeated the Athenians at Chaeronea in 338 b. c, and Alexander burned the great city of Thebes to the ground three years later, even the ostentatious sparing of Pindar’s home could not cover up the fact that Athenian independence, in government and in thought, was irrevocably destroyed.

alex-map

The domination of Greek philosophy by the Macedonian Aristotle mirrored the political subjection of Greece by the virile and younger peoples of the north. The death of Alexander (323 b. c.) quickened this process of decay. The boy-emperor, barbarian though he remained after all of Aristotle’s tutoring, had yet learned to revere the rich culture of Greece, and had dreamed of spreading that culture through the Orient in the wake of his victorious armies. The development of Greek commerce, and the multiplication of Greek trading posts throughout Asia Minor, had provided an economic basis for the unification of this region as part of an Hellenic empire; and Alexander hoped that from these busy stations Greek thought, as well as Greek goods, would radiate and conquer.

But he had underrated the inertia and resistance of the Oriental mind, and the mass and depth of Oriental culture. It was only a youthful fancy, after all, to suppose that so immature and unstable a civilization as that of Greece could be imposed upon a civilization immeasurably more widespread, and rooted in the most venerable traditions.

The quantity of Asia proved too much for the quality of Greece. Alexander himself, in the hour of his triumph, was conquered by the soul of the East; he married (among several ladies) the daughter of Darius [mudbloods, a very bad example for ancient Greeks--Editor]; he adopted the Persian diadem and robe of state; he introduced into Europe the Oriental notion of the divine right of kings; and at last he astonished a sceptic Greece by announcing, in magnificent Eastern style, that he was a god. Greece laughed; and Alexander drank himself to death.

Caesar did something even worse: he committed a holocaust of pure Aryans in Gaul while the Romans were already intermarrying with mudbloods. Another guy we priests of the Fourteen Words must take down from his pedestal!

By Post Author

As Kyle Hunt points out, he also exterminated 1 million Celts. Hunt claims Irish Ancestry, and said that Caesar “exterminated my people”. Caesar also burned the library of Alexandria. Christians would finish the job when they would burn the serapium, where the books that escaped the fire were stored. We must remember that Classical Greece and Rome is the swamp where the poisonous algae that is Christianity bloomed. Nietzsche I think had an inkling of this. He says that Classicists often lump in Socrates with Homer, because they both spoke Greek, whereas Nietzsche considered Socrates the antithesis of Homer. To Nietzsche the Heroic age died with Socrates, and the Heroic age needed to die for the anti-heroic sect of Christianity to have a clear run in what would become the Roman Empire.

Always this need for ease(or convenience), ease of labor, ease of pussy, ease of finance, etc. conjoined with shortsightedness has left the Aryan(or Adel/Adelman in honour of Adolf Hitler) into one catastrophe after another. Always inviting or enslaving some darkie flesh to work the pits(mines or their vaginas,etc.) leading to more and more bastardisation and loss of living space. Without defeating this inclination for convenience; all our efforts will be in vain.

That’s why the Visigoths burned at the stake any Goths who procreated with mudbloods: more civilised times…

By Post Author

Comments are closed.