Jung

I’ve been saying that the chasm that separates me from white nationalists is that they get stuck, and often take steps backward, in trying to cross the psychological Rubicon that leads us to National Socialism. A glaring example of this is that some of them like Hollywood movies. Given that Hollywood is dominated by Jews, and white nationalists claim to be aware of the JQ, it’s surprising that this obvious doublethink, or wanting to have it both ways, doesn’t seem to bother them.

Paraphrasing a quote from Blade Runner, yesterday I was saying that movie theatres are not my kind of place—with the exception of a couple of needles in a haystack like Pride & Prejudice and Sense & Sensibility. In general, Hollywood demoralizes Aryans to such an extent that they no longer want to have babies throughout the West. It seems obvious to me that if Hitler had won the war, most movies would be like P&P and S&S.

Before the United States perpetrated the Hellstorm Holocaust by murdering the European population that had just galvanized the Aryan collective unconscious, the Swiss Carl Gustav Jung had some notion of what was happening in Germany. Below I quote a passage from a 1933 lecture by Jung, which can be read in English in the tenth volume of the 1970 Princeton Edition of The Collected Works of C.G. Jung:

It goes without saying that this should not be a matter for naive self-deception; on the contrary, no psychotherapist should let slip the opportunity to study himself critically in the light of these negative psychologies. Freud and Adler have beheld very clearly the shadow that accompanies us all. The Jews have this peculiarity in common with women being physically weaker; they have to aim at the chinks in the armour of their adversary, and thanks to this technique which has been forced on them through the centuries, the Jews themselves are best protected where others are most vulnerable. Because again of their civilization, more than twice as ancient as ours, they are vastly more conscious than we of human weaknesses, of the shadow side of things, and hence in this respect much less vulnerable than we are. Thanks to their experience of an old culture, they are able while fully conscious of their frailties, to live on friendly and even tolerant terms with them, whereas we are still too young not to have “illusions” about ourselves. Moreover we have been entrusted by fate with the task of creating a civilization—and indeed we have need of it— and for this “illusions” in the form of one-sided ideals, convictions, plans, etc are indispensable.

As a member of a race with a three-thousand-year-old civilization, the Jew, like the cultured Chinese, has a wider area of psychological consciousness than we. Consequently, it is in general less dangerous for the Jew to put a negative value on his unconscious. The “Aryan” unconscious, on the other hand, contains explosive forces and seeds of a future yet to be born, and these may not be devalued as nursery romanticism without psychic danger. The still youthful Germanic peoples are fully capable of creating new cultural forms that still lie dormant in the darkness of the unconscious of every individual—seeds bursting with energy and capable of mighty expansion. The Jew, who is something of a nomad, has never yet created a cultural form of his own and as far as we can see never will, since all his instincts and talents require a more or less civilized nation to act as host for their development.

The Jewish race as a whole—at least this is my experience—possesses an unconscious which can be compared with the “Aryan” only with reserve. Creative individuals apart, the average Jew is far too conscious and differentiated to go about pregnant with the tensions of unborn futures. The “Aryan” unconscious has a higher potential than the Jewish; that is both the advantage and the disadvantage of a youthfulness not yet fully weaned from barbarism. In my opinion, it has been a grave error in medical psychology up till now to apply Jewish categories—which are not even binding on all Jews—indiscriminately to Germanic and Slavic Christendom. Because of this, the most precious secret of the Germanic peoples—their creative and intuitive depth of soul—has been explained as a morass of banal infantilism, while my own warning voice has for decades been suspected of anti-Semitism.

This suspicion emanated from Freud. He did not understand the Germanic psyche any more than did his Germanic followers.

Has the formidable phenomenon of National Socialism, on which the whole world gazes with astonished eyes, taught them better? Where was that unparalleled tension and energy while as yet no National Socialism existed? Deep in the Germanic psyche, in a pit that is anything but a garbage bin of unrealizable infantile wishes and unresolved family resentments. A movement that grips a whole nation must have matured in every individual as well. That is why I say that the Germanic unconscious contains tensions and potentialities which medical psychology must consider in its evaluation of the unconscious. Its business is not with neuroses but with human beings—that, in fact, is the grand privilege of medical psychology: to treat the whole man and not an artificially segregated function. And that is why its scope must be widened to reveal to the physician’s gaze not just the pathological aberrations of a disturbed psychic development, but the creative powers of the psyche labouring at the future; not just a dreary fragment but the meaningful whole.

Unfortunately, after the Allies won, Jung retreated back across the river, towards Normieland.