web analytics
Fair Race’s Darkest Hour (book) Judea v. Rome

Important PDF

Hopefully, yesterday’s accident in Dow Jones doesn’t get worse, especially now that I’m reviewing Evropa Soberana’s Apocalypse for Whites that will be available as soon as its syntax is corrected. (It will appear with its original title: ‘Rome vs. Judaea; Judaea vs. Rome.)
I’ll be busy these days correcting it. If a native English speaker wants to proofread the penultimate version of the text, so that it may appear in the 2018 edition of The Fair Race’s Darkest Hour, let me know.
Once the final version of this important text is available, I’ll link it in the hatnote of every single forthcoming translation of Kriminalgeschichte des Christentums.

16 replies on “Important PDF”

Of course. And by the way, it’s the only text in British orthography in The Fair Race (a couple of months ago I switched from American orthography to English orthography).

I have sent you a Word document thru email.
Incidentally, our friend at the Radio Aryan site has just told me, in the comments section, that Mary, Jesus, Peter, and Paul were not Jews!
Is he CI or something similar?

P.S. See what Sven Longshanks just told me:

Ive just finished reading the entire works of Flavius Josephus for the second time if you want to know some references for why the modern Jew is the enemy of the Old & New Testament & proof the whole area was White.

I won’t discuss anymore with this guy. CI-like WNsts are dishonest beyond belief.

what makes flavius josephus anymore credible than say julian? i care not that he reportedly lived close in timespace to the mythical jesus. josephus still builds his case on the fundamentally flawed premise that unfounded beliefs constitute ultimate truths.
at least julian embraced the idea of multiple gods. yet julian’s thinking was flawed in his tenacious ritual pursuit : massive animal sacrifice/ cruelty chasing gods who yet remained anonymous.
perhaps a key reason christianity took root with the ancients and flourished to become the monster that it is was that it eliminated actual sacrifice as essential ritual, replacing it with symbolic sacrifice, while still requiring tithe. all in all the christian worship was less messy while still mystical. and with some convenient cognitive dissonance, it still permitted cruel imposing and genocide of nonbelievers.
i recently read How to Talk with Your Angels by Kim O’Neill. i’d love to have a relationship with my guardian angel as she defines it. though i refuse to follow a ritual, reducing mutual respect [between entities] to recipe. and i won’t invent a one-sided relationship with an anonymous being.
kim presents an appealing hypothesis. that she can call on good — not evil — astral beings and make requests for issues that these beings can address with their larger pool of astral contacts. say my friend is desperately lonely and always lived in austerity. so i ask my guardian angel to send her a man who truly loves her and appreciates her giftings and has the means to indulge her material wishes while respecting her personhood? something i can’t do. what’s so wrong with making a such a request to a good astral being? (just wish kim’s hypothesis was true.)

The argument regarding ‘pagan’ sacrifice is commonly used by WNst Christians to prove that Christianity is a superior, and more healthy religion. The problem is, this is extremely superficial.
As horrible as the animal sacrifice that was supposedly practised by the Hellenists were, it had actual, sound roots to them. Compare this to Semitic animal sacrifice, which was blatantly cruel and which they had no reason to perpetuate.
The burying alive of the vestal virgins was simply because: if you have these girls who are supposed to look after the sacred fire (a symbol of purity), while being pure virgins, who then lose this purity at their own choice, then that girl is spitting upon the purity of the Gods and the Earth itself.
The child exposure was just a crude form of Eugenics, so I have no need to rationalise away that one. That was sound and just, reflective of a healthy society.
The Hellenic Gods are strange, as they are known to do quite awful things, and have extremely flawed, human personalities. The constant rapes practised by Zeus and Ares are just a few of many examples. This does not matter though, as the pantheons’ Gods were archetypes from the collective unconscious of the Indo-European mind. The Greeks and Romans knew better than to follow in the footsteps of Zeus and rape as many little reds in their nation as they felt like.
Sven is just a waste of time. If you see the comment thread again, I make longer comments, asking him to give me evidence for everything he believes (Jesus was White, Table Talks are fake). He is completely ignoring this and name-calling. He is beyond help. It would be a waste of my life to continue with him. I was talking to him on another thread called: The Daily Nationalist: o n this day in history – He is an uninformed loser. He just resorts to name-calling when faced with facts.
The fact being that he should be in an Asylum.

It always appears for me. Notice that he requested a Skype talk? I see you refused, but this is common among people like him. They ask that you waste hours of your time while they never really get to the meat of the issue.
I could imagine a Skype hangout between you and him – it would be an audio version of the uninformed nonsense exactly what he says in the thread.

As for your above question – yes, he is C.I. But I think that is clear as a bell, right now. No point talking to him. I concede on my point that he is popular. The people who are worth getting myself banned by are Matt Heimbach. I will link new Criminal Christianity posts on his comments section.
What is strange is that Sven is English. He sounds a little bit like Chris White. I always thought that the Americans were the only ones capable of C.I beliefs.

Americans don’t have the monopoly of stupidity:

British Israelism (also called Anglo-Israelism) is a movement which holds the view that the people of England (or more broadly, the people of United Kingdom) are “genetically, racially, and linguistically the direct descendants” of the Ten Lost Tribes of ancient Israel.[1] With roots in the 16th century, British Israelism was inspired by several 19th-century English writings, notably John Wilson’s 1840 Our Israelitish Origin.[2] The movement never had a head organisation or a centralized structure. Various British Israelite organisations were set up throughout the British Empire as well as in America from the 1870s; a number of these organisations are still active today. In America, its ideas gave rise to the Christian Identity movement.
The central tenets of British Israelism have been refuted by evidence from modern archaeological,[3] ethnological,[4] genetic, and linguistic research.[5]

Quoted from Wikipedia’s ‘British Israelism’.

Sven still keeps engaging me in meaningless antics – The words of a sick mind.
On the other comments thread on his site:
I was just having a hilarious back and forth with one of his lemmings. This lemming kept deflecting and putting words in my mouth. He would not answer a single question of mine, and, freaked out when confronted with my violent rhetoric.

The linked article starts with these words, ‘Jez Turner joins Sven Longshanks for the first Daily Nationalist of the week…’
Jez Turner is an SSPX traditional Catholic that I met personally in his London Forum meeting in 2014. See what I say about Turner in my article ‘SSPX ethnosuicide’. He’s the one that I refer to as ‘a gentleman’ because I didn’t want to name him.

Comments are closed.