web analytics
Ancient Rome Christendom Communism / Bolshevism Jesus Martin Bormann St Paul Table talks (commercial translation)

Uncle Adolf’s table talk, 192

Night of 29th-30th November 1944

Jesus and Saint Paul—Christianity, a Jewish manoeuvre—Christianity and Communism—National Socialism, the implacable enemy of everything Jewish.

Jesus was most certainly not a Jew. The Jews would never have handed one of their own people to the Roman courts; they would have condemned him themselves. It is quite probable that a large number of the descendants of the Roman legionaries, mostly Gauls, were living in Galilee, and Jesus was probably one of them. His mother may well have been a Jewess.

Jesus fought against the materialism of his age, and, therefore, against the Jews.

Paul of Tarsus, who was originally one of the most stubborn enemies of the Christians, suddenly realised the immense possibilities of using, intelligently and for other ends, an idea which was exercising such great powers of fascination. He realised that the judicious exploitation of this idea among non-Jews would give him far greater power in the world than would the promise of material profit to the Jews themselves. It was then that the future St. Paul distorted with diabolical cunning the Christian idea. Out of this idea, which was a declaration of war on the golden calf, on the egotism and the materialism of the Jews, he created a rallying point for slaves of all kinds against the elite, the masters and those in dominant authority.

The religion fabricated by Paul of Tarsus, which was later called Christianity, is nothing but the Communism of today.

Bormann intervened. Jewish methods, he said, have never varied in their essentials. Everywhere they have stirred up the plebs against the ruling classes. Everywhere they have fostered discontent against the established power. For these are the seeds which produce the crop they hope later to gather.

Everywhere they fan the flames of hatred between peoples of the same blood. It is they who invented class-warfare, and the repudiation of this theory must therefore always be an anti-Jewish measure. In the same way, any doctrine which is anti-Communist, any doctrine which is anti-Christian must, ipso facto, be anti-Jewish as well.

The National Socialist doctrine is therefore anti-Jewish in excelsis, for it is both anti-Communist and anti-Christian. National Socialism is solid to the core, and the whole of its strength is concentrated against the Jews, even in matters which appear to have a purely social aspect and are designed for the furtherance of the social amenities of our own people.

The Fuehrer concluded: Burgdorff has just given me a paper which deals with the relationship between Communism and Christianity. It is comforting to see how, even in these days, the fatal relationship between the two is daily becoming clearer to the human intelligence.


Consider obtaining a copy of the complete notes
published by Ostara Publications.

13 replies on “Uncle Adolf’s table talk, 192”

As mentioned elsewhere, German-speaking readers should purchase the following edition: Monologe im Führerhauptquartier 1941–1944 by Heinrich Heim and Werner Jochmann (1980).

It’s the most authentic edition of the Table Talks.

Interesting. Christianity was co-opted by Jews, practically at its inception. To honor Christ is to oppose the religious community founded by his anti-Christ Pharisaic enemies, whether Jewish or so-called Christian.

Islam is a later toxic blend of both, Marxist Leninism is a Jewish pogrom on the Goy, etc.

Islam is an independent force, Islam created it’s own empires and it’s own civilization. The Rashidun Caliphate, Ummayyad Caliphate, Abbasid Caliphate, Mameluke Sultanate, Almoravid Caliphate, Ottoman Empire conquered huge territories and unified all arab, berber, turkish, kurdish, persian lands under a single religion and under a single banner. Islam was a unifying force which made the people of the Middle East a terrifying and powerful rival and enemy to other races and ethnicities.

Islam is not original, nor civilized. It arose in the 7th century as an intolerant religion of war among polytheistic idolatrous Arabs:
-Pilgrimages, fetish worship of the Kaaba (a meteorite in Mecca), throwing stones at the Devil, consolidated worship of the Moon-God Allah, complete with sacred lunar calendar, etc.

These Arabs adopted many key concepts and legends from the Old Testament, Talmud, and Jewish folk sources:
-Young earth creationism, a flat immovable earth with giant gates at its ends, abominating images of the body, holy war, legalized piracy, rape and slavery, clean/unclean foods and practices, ritual cleansings, circumcision (i.e. genital mutilation), flying horses, God canNOT have a Son, man has no free will (God predestinates everything), etc.

It combined these with Christian concepts:
-A carnal paradise for martyrs, fiery hell for unbelievers, Jesus a prophet born of a virgin, who did NOT die on a cross (Docetism: Jesus is in the crowd laughing that some poor slob up on the cross was mistaken for him), an end-time Messiah, etc.

Islam appeals to the raiding Arab’s inbred tribal mentality (40-70% marry 1st cousins, uncles marry nieces, polygamy), giving them a unified purpose and moral rationale for ambushing and plundering outsiders. These Arabs enriched themselves by plundering, and destroying surrounding civilizations, and enslaving and raping millions of whites over the ensuing centuries, which accounts for its rapid rise followed by centuries of stagnation.

If you really want to see the truly destructive force that calls itself Islam (submission/servitude) in action, watch videos of the Taliban defacing Buddhist monuments, and destroying archeological sites and treasures, wherever they find them. Watch the Islamic State take slaves, rape, pillage and murder the more civilized people they encounter.

“…relationship between Communism and Christianity. It is comforting to see how, even in these days, the fatal relationship between the two is daily becoming clearer to the human intelligence.”

This is so wrong and does not take into account centuries of history. Communism is openly atheist and secularist. Communism is no religion, but a secular ideology of modern times. Communism is a side effect or by-product of the enlightenment and the industrial revolution. Christianity is far older. And besides, Christianity in early Middle Ages became the established faith among all white peoples, almost all of them. Did any of you wonder why? Christianity is very attractive to white european people, because the christian faith fits perfectly the noble, altruistic, virtuous and decent character of white european peoples. Jews rejected Christianity, most middle eastern and asian peoples rejected Christianity, but all of Europe accepted it and embraced it. 90% of German people in 1939 still declared in the census their faith to be either Roman Catholic Christian or Protestant Christian. Christian churches in the 19th century overwhelmingly supported monarchism and nationalism.

It is not wrong. You have to listen to all the talks to grasp Adolf’s point. Remember that these are only the last pages of the book. Suffice it to say for the moment that Revilo Oliver also said that: Bolshevism and Christianity are so similar.

Also, have you read the section about the “Christian problem” in The Fair Race? Oliver and others are extensively quoted there.

I attended a Roman Catholic university and there they taught me that there would not have been a white european civilization without christianity. My professors there were not as anti-white there, but they taught that all of Europe was referred to as the Christendom. Roman Catholic Church in the past was for expulsions of jews and Roman Catholic Church even in the 19th century supported european colonial expansions into africa, asia and the new world. Roman Catholic countries such as France and Spain ended the Barbary Coast piracy and enslavement of white europeans in the 19th century. Actually, white race became extremely advanced and civilized and powerful due to the renaissance, enlightenment and industrial revolution. And during those periods christianity was seen as part of europe’s identity.

You have been taught a one-sided story of our parents’ religion; and did not answer to my question if you have read the book. Here’s the intro to a more accurate history of Christianity; and you must read also the passages about that religion in William Pierce’s Who We Are and in Arthur Kemp’s March of the Titans, some of which you might find: here.

And dont forget that plenty of Roman Catholic Christian clergy admired and favored fascism of Mussolini, and nationalist falangism of Franco and Salazar.

It should be mentioned that the very idea of German Nationalism and of German volk was invented by a German enlightenment philosopher Johann Gottfried Herder. The term nationalism and the idea of German Nationalism was invented personally by him. There was no German volk before Herder technically, because before that in the 18th century or the 17th century Germans saw themselves as Prussians, Bavarians, Saxons, Thuringians, Badenites and Wurtembergers. It was Herder who invented the idea of the German fatherland. The idea that there was nationhood during pagan times is wrong and false, because nationalism is an enlightenment idea of the modern times. Johann Gottfried Herder taught there is a united German volk and would eventually unite in a single state under principle of popular sovereignty. But I found no evidence that idea of nationalism existed before the enlightenment philosophers of 18th century such as Herder. Other examples of German nationalism were the formation of the Economic Union Zollverein and German nationalist ideas of Otto von Bismarck. Herder taught Germans to have national pride, and he proclaimed a national message within the language sphere, language in Herder’s view determined nationhood and culture.

Over half of the men in Central-Northwestern Europe, including Germany are paternal descendants of one man who lived about 5000 years ago. He is our real Abraham, or “high father.” It is simply false to say we are not one nation, in the sense of genetic stock or race.

Comments are closed.