A quotation from John Martínez’s:
“Why Christianity and not Judaism
is the Enemy #1 of the White Race”
“Blaming Christianity is a sort of taboo topic in most of the English-speaking White Nationalist blogosphere.”
It is a taboo topic in the whole WN blogosphere, Chechar.
These folks are ready to speak the unspeakable about race differences and the Jewish Problem. But they refuse to take the final step and face the fact that, if it was not for Christianity, perhaps we would not have to be discussing all of these problems now because they might not have happened in the first place.
How can someone advocate for the dignity and self-reliance of the White race while operating within a non-White, Levantine cult?
How can these people expose the Jews and their race supremacist cult while worshipping a Jew (!) and making extensive use of the Jewish mythology and the Jewish Weltanschauung?
It is mind-boggling…
My view about the core problems facing the White race today is that Judaism, Christianity, Islam and Communism are Semitic and therefore alien, extraneous ideologies that should be consigned to the trashcan of History. The differences I see among them nowadays are close to irrelevant as far as our interests are concerned.
Bluegrass comments here:
America was the preeminent racialist country before any European equivalent arose, but it was always held back from completely securing the existence of the European race by the mitigating power of our Christian foundation.
No Christianity means no Puritan proselytizing and universalism within the American psyche, which means no ideological foundation to tolerate the presence of Africans, Indians, or any non-White immigration.
Christianity always made it “uncouth” to be overly racialist. European America was able to implicitly secure the genetic stock through immigration restrictions, segregation, and what have you, but it was always a precarious position.
This semi-implicit racialism, always pervaded by the Christian sense that it was not necessarily the most dignified of ideologies, was easily destroyed by the Jewish culture of critique.
From then on, without the sounder minds to shepherd the flock our universalism (Coolidge etc) took hold and our religion became the realization of the proposition nation.
Of course, to realize that dream the destruction of White genetics has become a necessary sacrifice.
A personal note:
When I was translating to Spanish “Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy,” chapter 7 of Kevin MacDonald’s Culture of Critique, I suspended the translation when I hit this 1924 sentence about Israel Zangwill:
Mr. Zangwill spoke chiefly on the immigration question, declaring that if Jews persisted in a strenuous opposition to the restricted immigration there would be no restriction. “If you create enough fuss against this Nordic nonsense,” he said, “you will defeat this legislation. You must make a fight against this bill; tell them they are destroying American ideals. Most fortifications are of cardboard, and if you press against them, they give way.” [emphasis added]
If most fortifications in 1924, when supposedly American ethnocentricity was still very robust, were “of cardboard,” I told to myself, there must be an underlying factor that prevents us from defending our ethny, a primary infection.
Most nationalists act under the assumption that the Jewish Problem is the primary infection. My working hypothesis is that the JP, if compared to the most common HIV-related infections, is not the virus that is killing us but something like a bacterial disease such as tuberculosis, pneumonia or septicaemia: a deadly opportunistic infection that the HIV virus allowed to thrive.
Kill all the bacteria if you want. I have no problem with that. But if we want to save ourselves from extinction we really must go after the primary virus that weakened our defenses in the first place.
Jewry is Enemy #2.
For my collection of articles
dealing with Enemy #1 see here.
12 replies on “We’re definitively doing it to ourselves”
Borrowing from the Christian mythology one could concisely illustrate this point with this image: Judaism, Christianity, Islam and Communism/Leftism are the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse of the White race in the figures of the Semites Abraham, Jesus, Muhammad and Karl Marx.
(Add this to the end of the post as a Post Scriptum if you will, Chechar, I think it is quite effective as far as wrapping up the gist of the ideas in discussion here are concerned)
Zionists hate Christians, Christians (Evangelical variety) adore Jews.
How can you win by turning the other cheek?
One could write thousands of books on Xtianity, but its fundamental problem can be expressed by a 10-year-old in 10 sentences.
The fundamental problem with Xtianity is that it preaches the love, help, and admiration of the weak. What is weaker than a starving Negro baby, a bullied homosexual, a homeless Indian, or a Forrest Gump-style retard, intellectually hopeless but so nice one can only love him?
A society that idealizes this kind of persons can only, in the long haul, accept them in its homes and accept them as friends and mates. You can’t both love them and reject them when they ask to go in your house or marry your daughter.
There is strong evidence that European priests and bishops, already in the 1200s, offered shelter and food to passing gypsies despite opposition from the layman population.
Xtianity idealizes the weak and considers the strong with an everlasting suspicion (a wealthy man has stolen his money through exploitation, being handsome does not count because only the soul matters, an emperor is necessarily a tyrant).
It therefore also discourages people from searching power and strength, since it is immoral to do so.
I must add that I do not necessarily view Christianity as a bad, stupid or evil thing.
A world without Christianity would be far more cruel and unforgiving.
But it does not stop me from recognizing Christianity can pose a threat to our existence: Nature is cruel and unforgiving, after all… and only her laws apply in the real world.
Excellent point, now available in Portuguese.
Except of course that evangelicals are 1) highly segregated and 2) on average have larger white families. Why? Apparently it is because they adopt a doctrine (meme) of “accountable free will individualism”. [link]
Hunter Wallace put it this way today:
Christianity is an other-world religion, Judaism more secular.
Reblogged this on Parasitoid Resistance!.
This morning when I was waiting at the dentist I was re-reading Faye’s Why We Fight?, and there, in page 39, he agrees in that the flaw is whitin ourselves:
OT: Reading about eugenics, I’ve found another quote that might be of interest:
Which can be roughly translated as: “The world was dying of judaism and from that judaism’s sickness that is the faith in Jesus”.
Such a great quotes that I edited them a bit (adding blockquote templates, etc). Thanks!
YW. I couldn´t put the blockquotes for some reason.
So good Faye quote in fact that I’ll use it as a coming entry.