web analytics

Tag: Feminized western males

Categories
Feminism Film

Breaking

Bad, 2

I had promised a critical review of the series, but the YouTuber who reviewed it on his channel, which Mauricio transcribed and linked to in my midnight post, already covered the essentials. So, aside from this one, I won’t be posting any more articles: I’ll limit myself to saying a few things about some episodes from the first and second seasons of Breaking Bad.
 

Episode 2

In the first subversive message against Aryan sanity, we see Walter having breakfast with his family, who judge him with their stares. Remember that the right path would be to share meals in a Syssitia, not a nuclear family, but rather an extended family. Without the proper Männerbund restoring Aryan culture is impossible (women aren’t creators of great civilisations).

This lack of manliness, stemming from eating with a woman and a disabled lad instead of soldiers, is reflected in Walter having to kill a dangerous Hispanic man in Jesse’s basement. Walter first sees a knife, a hammer, the guns and a plastic bag but he doesn’t dare do anything because, like the rest of Western men, he’s feminized (compare Walter to Earl Turner from William Pierce’s novel).

Then there’s a funny scene. Walter tells Jesse that, to put the body of another dangerous non-white in two plastic containers to dissolve it with chemicals, they have to put the limbs in one container and the torso in the other: dark humour!

But in the second subversive message we see that Walter was expecting a baby girl, according to the ultrasound. What an idiot given that Walter Jr. is disabled and, in a normal world, the father should yearn for a male heir to replace the idiot (those values no longer exist in the degenerate West). Skyler, pregnant, confronts Walter and scolds him for smoking marijuana at Jesse’s house (remember that Walter dies of cancer). That probably wouldn’t happen in a Spartan home.

It was hilarious to see that when Jesse drags the already smelly corpse of the gook guy who tried to kill him, the body bangs its head on the steps as it’s carried down, and the ultimate dark humour came when the bathtub melted as the body dissolved because Jesse didn’t follow Walter’s chemical instructions. It made me laugh big time! But before that Jesse told Walter, “It’s obvious [Walter’s wife] wears the pants in the family.”
 

Episode 3

“Murder is wrong,” Walter writes during his internal struggle because he doesn’t dare kill the dangerous spic, who is tied up in Jesse’s basement. Is it possible to reclaim the Old US with such Christian morality? Then, Walter calls his wife to check in because it’s late and he hasn’t arrived, as if implying that she’s the one in charge. It’s inconceivable to become a Nazi with Americans like that. Of course, Walter coughs because cancer is eating him alive, but there are countless husbands who behave like that, even without cancer.

But then Walter regains his manhood and commits his first direct murder: he finally kills the Hispanic guy. How many of those who blog on racialist forums would commit such an act?
 

Episode 4

In the first scene after the episode’s introduction Walter is eating with his wife, his brother-in-law Hank, and Walter Jr. Part of the feminization of men—and this must be iterated—is the absence of a Männerbund. In a virile culture, there would be something similar to the laws of Lycurgus: forcing warriors to eat together to build the martial patriarchy. Instead, this bourgeois meal between two couples and a disabled son can only diminish the man’s warrior potential. Of course, the US has long been beholden to Judaism, and the only martial act permitted in that culture is defending Israel’s interests, but that is diametrically opposed to an Aryan culture and already changing among zoomers.

Watching the family scene in the Albuquerque, New Mexico, poolside on what appeared to be a relaxing Sunday, I thought to myself: What would the diners of a Spartan Syssitia (or its SS incarnation in Germany) be discussing at a table? Surely they’d be joking in the crudest way possible! Remember that Lycurgus ordered an effigy of the god of laughter to be placed in the dining halls of every Syssitia: coarse humour among warriors that would scandalize any little woman who dared approach such a place! Walter’s family is the opposite, and what’s worse is that white nationalists don’t even want to live together to create the necessary bonding within a small community of warriors (each Greek Syssitia consisted of relatively few men so that the bonds of friendship would be quite strong).

In contrast, upon hearing Walter and his brother-in-law talking on that family Sunday with their wives, the priest, preoccupied with the sacred words, can’t help but think that those families are talking rubbish—precisely because there are women present! (Remember that women infantilize everything because, psychologically, they are “between man and child” as Schopenhauer said.)

After revealing to his family that he has cancer, in the next scene we see Walter Jr. listening to degenerate music in his bedroom with headphones. After his family comforts Walter, in the following scene we see Jesse with two of his buddies: pure white trash. The priest has no interest in preserving people like that, but this white trash seems to be the current norm unlike, say, Norman Rockwell’s paintings (the image of Americans I was left with as a child watching old movies with my family).

The next toxic scene is that the oncologist, who charges five thousand dollars for a consultation and is one of the top ten in the country, is Black: typical of Hollywood, Netflix and HBO subversion.
 

Episode 5

There’s only one good scene when we see Walter with his family and Hank’s, saying he prefers quality of life to the misery of chemotherapy which would only prolong his life with terrible side effects.

Then comes a toxic scene, almost at the end: Gretchen, the Jewess wife of another Jew, Elliot Schwartz, takes pity on Walter and wants to help him financially. Walter, who needs a lot of money for his treatment, goes back to Jesse’s house and asks him, “Do you want to cook?”
 

Episode 6

Walter’s chosen alias for dealing with drug traffickers is mentioned for the first time: Heisenberg, in honour of the German who should have built the atomic bomb for the Third Reich. Now bald from chemotherapy, Walter has lost his fear of death and dares to go after the most dangerous Mexican distributor in town.
 

Episode 7

For the first time we see what would become the iconic blue methamphetamine that would make “Heisenberg” famous in the drug world.
 

Episode 8

Skyler scolds Walter for suddenly wanting to make love to her in the kitchen. On the other hand, Walter is becoming a man by dealing with tough thugs like Tuco, from the Juárez Cartel. But the screenwriter makes it clear that around his wife Walter behaves like a child: something that reflects today’s culture. Then there’s a scene with Hank and his own wife that also shows the crazy extremes of today’s feminism (I wouldn’t let a woman treat me the way this DEA agent did).
 

Episode 9

Walter and Jesse aren’t men yet. For a minute, they had Tuco Salamanca and the disabled Hector Salamanca, ruthless drug lords, at their mercy and they didn’t pull the trigger. This pair of white “heroes” wouldn’t work in the revolutionary times to come.
 

Episode 10

Nothing to report here except that feminism continues in the final scene, with Walter and Skyler in bed, Skyler not even letting Walter kiss her (compare it with the rape of the Sabine women: the foundation of Rome).
 

Episode 11

The episode begins with a subversive message: Walter tells Jesse in a small supermarket that he can’t cook right now because his wife worries if he’s gone for more than twenty minutes. Then there’s another subversive message in Walter’s breakfast scene with Skyler: the same old pandering! A great humiliation for the man.

What we see on Netflix are anti-role models par excellence, a true inversion of values: secular neochristianity taken to its apotheosis. Throughout the episode, the pregnant Skyler mistreats her husband. After Tuco’s death, all these family scenes are a tremendous anti-climax to Walter’s previous bravery with the Mexicans. And the heterosexual fag still apologizes! Can you imagine these anti-Spartans reclaiming all the territories occupied by non-Aryans in the US? “I love you,” Walter tells his wife: something we should never say to a woman.

 

Episode 12

Tough cop Hank has similar problems with his wife but l am fed up with these family dynamics and must stop here.

Categories
Degenerate art Feminism Film

Breaking

Bad, 1

What I said in yesterday’s post means that, from now on, I must take off the gloves on this site and start throwing hard punches at those to the left of the Nazi: whites in general and white nationalists in particular.

I’ve been looking at ratings pages for the most popular television series. Breaking Bad came out on top in several of the lists.

If Breaking Bad has the reputation of being the best series, that means it is a portrait of the American psyche of the 21st century, as novels such as Ben Hur and Uncle Tom’s Cabin were in the past (I was one year old when the movie Ben Hur, starring Charlton Heston, hit the big screen). Just as these novels completely sold out to Christian ethics were supertoxic to the Aryan DNA of Americans of yesteryear, so are all the Netflix and HBO series today. But let’s focus on just one, presumably the best.

Remember that in the final essay of On Beth’s Cute Tits I critically reviewed each of the 73 episodes of Game of Thrones (GoT) because of the crazy feminism of that famous series. Although I had already written an article about Breaking Bad in September 2022, I will now do the same thing I did with GoT with each of the 62 episodes of Breaking Bad. I am doing this because I have realised that only the punches of hatred in my writings cure me of depression (remember the words of Colin Ross, who coined the expression trauma model: “The best antidepressant on the market is anger”).

The first episode of the first season of Breaking Bad is titled:
 

Pilot

The first toxic message appears at the beginning of “Pilot”. Walter White, the main character, tells his wife Skyler White in a video he records that she is the love of his life. Remember that Savitri Devi said she would despise a man who put her before him. A real man shouldn’t idolise his wife. It was precisely unconditional love that made my father believe the slander my mother spread about me (eventually, because he believed those lies, he murdered my soul). A real man can love his wife, but never idolise her. A true man loves his race, and his primary bond should be with other men—Männerbund—and his firstborn son, who should inherit his worldview, scale of values and property.

Walter White’s only child, Walter Jr. (“Flynn”), who was born with cerebral palsy, would have been euthanised in Sparta. In the first episode, in addition to his wife, Walter also addresses a message to his son in the opening scene of the video, as before committing suicide he planned to send his family a video as a posthumous farewell message. That is the second toxic message of the episode: to love defective offspring because Christian ethics prevent us from performing the most basic euthanasia, something that the pagan Hitler wanted to transvalue with his Aktion T4 programme.

The following family scene shows that Walter Jr. is even a little shit. If Christianity prevented me from euthanising him as a baby, I would disown such a creature and let the female raise him without a penny from me. But of course: Americans, including the misnamed white nationalists, live under a culture, government and laws inspired by Judeo-Christianity, not the pagan Greco-Roman world.

Authorisation drafted and signed in October 1939 by Hitler for the euthanasia programme. The Spartans would be proud!

In the following toxic message, we see Walter White teaching a mixed class: boys with girls. This is a modern aberration: Boys should be educated to wage war (exterminate Neanderthals) and girls to procreate warriors. The reason American racialists don’t want to see the obvious is that, in reality, they don’t care about their race (see the book linked above that includes my critical essay on feminism).

We see the following toxic message at Walter White’s birthday party, where women and men are mixed. This didn’t happen in more civilised times, when men and women only mixed liberally at balls intended for finding a partner to comply with the 14 words (as in Jane Austen’s England). All the women at the party at White’s house have been empowered in the ethnosuicidal American society of our century (one or no children per woman, etc.), when in a normal world it is the man who chooses how many children he will have.

Hank Schrader is Walter’s brother-in-law and a member of the DEA. We see the next toxic message at the same party, where we see for the first time that Gomey, Hank’s right-hand man, is Hispanic: someone who should never have been an American citizen; and if there are millions of Gomeys in the US we owe it to the damn Christians.

In the next toxic message, we see Skyler masturbating her husband Walter in their marital bed while Skyler is busy on her laptop: a distraction. In a normal world, serious instruments would only be used by adult males, say, the heads of households of ancient Greece with the right to vote.

In the next toxic message, after Walter is diagnosed with terminal lung cancer, we see Skyler scolding him because her husband used a credit card, presumably, for lab tests (the woman ignores he has cancer). In a normal world, only men would be in charge of family finances.

We see the next toxic message when Walter White and Jesse Pinkman, the second most important character in the series, begin cooking methamphetamine for the first time in the desert, far from the madding crowd. But the director chose degenerate music for the scene, inspired by the anti-music of blacks. That anti-music perfectly represents the corrupt soul of contemporary white men: not just gringos. When Walter flees in the van after chemically knocking out a gook and a spic who wanted to kill him, we hear niggers’ rap as background music. In the final scene Walter makes love to his wife with degenerate music, but this time apparently composed and played by white people.

It’s truly incredible how overt anger heals a depressed soul (something that applies not only to the fictional Walter White, but also to the author of these lines)!

Categories
Nick Fuentes Real men

Dry sand

When the Radio Free Mississippi interviewer asked Alex Linder what he thought about Kevin MacDonald a dozen years ago, Linder replied, “We need PhDs.”

Very true. But if a white nationalist didn’t make a career in academia, he should start infiltrating the world of American politics.

Yesterday I was thinking that, within the racialist movement, the only people I respect (as a professor emeritus, KMD is a special case) are those Groypers who are starting to follow Nick Fuentes’s advice: surreptitiously infiltrate the Republican Party. (To bring about the scenario in William Pierce’s novel requires more decades of suffering for the American population.)

To limit oneself to commenting, say in The Unz Review, is feminine behaviour. Real men fight in the real world. In Europe, it’s impossible because if you speak with the frankness of someone like Nick, they simply throw you in jail. In the Third World, where I live, there is more freedom of expression because the racial battle has already been lost (there are hardly any pure whites left in the country where I live; let’s say, the Orthodox Mennonites who haven’t yet mixed with the native population).

The series of videos I’ve started subtitling, thanks to Benjamin’s efforts, reveal where I come from: I’m trying to know myself thanks to religiously following the mandate of the Oracle of Delphi, something neither Christians nor atheists do. That’s why—in sharp contrast to the methods of academia—I constantly post autobiographical vignettes on this site.

One of them is precisely making public one of my soliloquies: “Which contemporary men do I truly respect?”

Until recently, I despised virtually the entire racial right because, as I said, despite their First Amendment rights, they behave like women (limiting themselves to posting comments on racialist forums). The case of Nick, or those who are beginning to secretly infiltrate political positions, is quite different: finally, some very young men are doing something manly in the real world. As I’ve confessed, I don’t care if they’re Christians. Unlike the vast majority of racialists who, following my old metaphor, are petrified halfway across the psychological Rubicon because of the eye of Medusa, the Groypers are slowly moving toward our shore.

Once we finish subtitling the series of videos in which I talk about what my parents and a Freudian follower did to me when I was a minor—something that has happened to millions of Aryan children; think, for example, of the millions drugged with Ritalin—, I will begin speaking directly to the Groypers so they continue advancing toward us. Of course, that can’t be done on YouTube because they would take down our channel; only on Rumble.

If just one Groyper realizes that the journey to the beaches of NS has much to do with becoming aware of the Christian Question, I’ll be satisfied. It’s extremely rare for anyone to touch the dry sands on this side of the river with the soles of their feet.

Categories
Turner Diaries (novel) William Pierce

In honour

of The Turner Diaries, 3

They have us vastly out manned and outgunned, but not one of their leaders is motivated by anything other than self-interest. They are ready to betray the System the instant they can see an advantage in doing so. For now, we mustn’t let them know that they are all inevitably headed for the gallows. Let them think they can make a deal with us and save their necks when the System falls. Only the Jews are under no illusions in this regard.

As for the public, it’s a little early yet to know what the spectrum of their reactions to today’s exploits will be. Most of them, of course, will believe just what they’re told to believe. Basically, they want to be left alone with their beer and their television sets. Their mentality is a reflection of the movie-fan magazines and the TV sitcoms with which the System keeps them saturated. (Note to the reader: The word “sitcom” apparently refers to a type of television program popular during the last years of the Old Era.)

Nevertheless, we must carefully monitor the public’s feelings toward the System and toward us. Although the great majority of them will continue to support the System as long as their refrigerators are kept full, it is from the public that we must draw our recruits in order to make up for our losses.

Our present inability to recruit is a source of great worry to everyone. Rumor has it that there has not been a single new recruit in the Washington area in the last two months. During that time we’ve lost approximately 15 per cent of our strength. I hope conditions aren’t as bad elsewhere.

Of all the segments of the population from which we had hoped to draw new members, the “conservatives” and “right wingers” have been the biggest disappointment [emphasis added by Ed.]. They are the world’s worst conspiracy-mongers [see, e.g., The Unz Review —Ed.] and also the world’s greatest cowards. In fact, their cowardice is exceeded only by their stupidity…

At the other extreme, the knee-jerk liberals have forgotten all about their “radical chic” enthusiasm of a few years ago, now that we are the radicals. They take their ideological cues from the “smart” magazines and columnists, and the “in” thing at the moment is to be solidly pro-System. In their own way, the liberals, despite their pretensions to sophistication, are as mindless and as easily manipulated as the conservatives.

The Christians are a mixed bag. Some of them are among our most devoted and courageous members. Their hatred of the System is based on—in addition to the reasons the rest of us have—their recognition of the System’s role in undermining and perverting Christendom. But all the ones who are still affiliated with major churches are against us. [pages 63-64]
 

______ 卐 ______

 
November 30. In thinking over Saturday’s events, what surprises me is that I feel no remorse or regret for killing those two White whores. Six months ago I couldn’t imagine myself calmly butchering a teen-aged White girl, no matter what she had done. But I have become much more realistic about life recently. I understand that the two girls were with the Blacks only because they had been infected with the disease of liberalism by the schools and the churches and the plastic pop culture the System churns out for young people these days. Presumably, if they had been raised in a healthy society they would have had some racial pride.

But such considerations are irrelevant to the present phase of our struggle. Until we have in our hands the means for bringing about a general cure for the disease, we must deal with it by other means, just as one must ruthlessly weed out and dispose of diseased animals in any flock, unless one wants to lose the whole flock. This is no time for womanly hand-wringing… [page 77]

But how could our people—how could White Americans—be so spineless, so crawling, so eager to please their oppressors? How can we recruit a revolutionary army from such a rabble?

Is this really the same race that walked on the moon and was reaching for the stars 20 years ago? How low we have been brought! It is frighteningly clear now that there is no way to win the struggle in which we are engaged without shedding torrents—veritable rivers—of blood. [page 79]

Categories
Film Kalki Racial right

Sansa & Hound

I woke up early this morning and, instead of going back to sleep, I half-asleep asked myself: What do you prefer, business as usual (BAU) or that all the capitals of the West are already burning now that you have just woken up and are watching the news? (We have been in greater danger of apocalyptic war these past two days than when I was a little boy during the Cuban missile crisis—what a difference between Kennedy and Biden…!) Still half asleep, I thought it was better the apocalypse than BAU even though living so close to the US, in the next few weeks I could be killed by radiation or, if spared from radiation, nuclear winter would catch up with me in the next few months.

A good way to gauge what is being said about in the racial right is to take a brief look at the hundreds of comments at The Unz Review. As can be seen there, everyone complains about the situation but they do so as if they were women, never as men. The racialists complain without coming up with a revolutionary ideology to wrest power from the anti-white elites. As I quoted under the heading ‘Blackwater’ in the final essay of On Beth’s Cute Tits:

Sansa: ‘I´ll be safe here. Stannis won´t hurt me’.

The Hound: ‘Look at me! Stannis is a killer! The Lannisters are killers! Your father was a killer! Your brother [Robb, recently called the King of the North] is a killer! Your sons will be killers someday! The world is built by killers’.

Nothing truer. But unlike all their ancestors, white nationalists who ‘want’ to create a white nation don’t talk about killing the enemy. They are like the ladies sheltered in Holdfast praying to the old and new gods that the city doesn’t fall. And I don’t mean that they must fight right away. They haven’t even begun to devise a revolutionary ideology to encourage civil war in the future.

One of the advantages of the day after the nuclear apocalypse is that not only would freedom of speech return as all anti-white governments would have been decapitated, but the law of the jungle would also return for the few survivors. The American flags that so often appeared behind Donald Trump would become meaningless (as well as the American Constitution and everything else that has been destroying the white race).

That thought that woke me up before my usual waking hours reminded me of a passage in The Turner Diaries in which the revolutionaries launched the missiles at the Russians precisely to handicap the American government, as the Russians would respond. It also reminded me of those neochristian racialists who were shocked by those pages of the Diaries because they still think like the ladies locked up in Holdfast while the men were fighting the battle of Blackwater.

There are no longer males in the West, only feminised men. Therefore, only a nuclear catastrophe that wipes out almost all of humanity (Kalki!) is what these lobotomised eunuchs need to regrow their balls. When the antiwhite zeitgeist destroys the Aryan (think of the blue jobs happening this second between mixed couples!) it is obvious that we need a race-wide shock therapy to reboot, in the Aryan collective unconscious, their primordial survival instincts.

After finally waking up I found out that the trumpets of the Kalki apocalypse have not yet been blown! BAU is still winning. If things continue without the trumpet blast, tomorrow I will start a new series about an article by Alain de Benoist. Unlike the American racial right, so reluctant to repudiate the new testaments written by Jews, de Benoist opposes Christianity, the Declaration of the Rights of Man, representative democracy, egalitarianism and what he sees as embodying and promoting those values: the United States.

Categories
Eduardo Velasco Real men

Tough replies

by Eduardo Velasco, 2

Pedrito said:

You are a case of supreme intellectual perversion. They should hire you at Libertad Digital or COPE.
 

NT (Velasco) replied:

Oh, yes, my dear Pedrito-ito-ito, I am a pervert, a very perverse pervert, and even the Antichrist himself would do well to hire me and have me at his side when the time comes. Cuchi cuchi cuchi cuchi, the pervert is coming to tease you!

If you have no sense of spelling, at least you have a sense of humour… very flat, that’s for sure.

Okay.

And now fuck off from my blog to the Paris metro at 3 am to preach how much you like the good vibes of the multi-culti movement.

Your failed, lapsed, ageing, wrinkled, atrophied and malfunctioning generation has uneventfully ended its insipid, grey and pathetic reign, OK? So face it. You have no ability to influence or participate in an issue or have art or part.

The future world belongs to the young, and I’m sorry to tell you that the young don’t give a shit about your pacifist, hippiesque, sedative rubbish. We care about other, nobler things (like, for example, ourselves).

Modern youth have much higher goals than your leftist bubble. Like, for example, fucking, partying, getting drunk, getting high, fighting, making money, buying stuff, sinking into the most hedonistic material joy and living comfortably.

No kidding, those petty and abject aspirations are much loftier and more logical goals than the pathetic, tiny, anaemic motives of the modern 30-50-year-old bourgeois, and they constitute a positive change.

We have made some progress, yes. Now real physical drives, based on biology and base instincts, have taken the place of an abstract entelechy preached by four half-witted Jews. The next step is higher instincts.

Progre-shitheads = Bruaaaaaaaaargh (retching, cramping and, finally, vomiting). Go to your graves, poor shadows of yourselves.
 

Pedrin said:

Let me get this straight. You have an emotional schizophrenia that perverts your thinking. And your skill for rhetoric and sophistry (clearly visible to the eyes of those who read you) makes you even more gone.

Ok, I agree with you that the recycled bourgeoisie (read progressives) is trash. But your hatred of it makes you only think with your left (look at you, left) brain hemisphere.
 

NT replied:

Schizophrenia is not telling truths like American fists, but (for example) calling each other Pedrin by day and Natasha by night. Stop with the ad hominem attacks and concentrate on arguments like in the biological quality post.

You’re not a progressive, good for you.

My advice to you is to wander through my blog without renouncing to wave your flag of morbidity, breathing deeply and inhaling the perverse vapours emanating from my perverse schizophrenia emanating from my left hemisphere. After Nietzsche and Jung, my blog may become the cornerstone of your irreversible Nazification.
 

Pedrin said:

[Long comment quoted below by Velasco:]
 

NT replied:

Look at Daoism (Taoism) and Confucianism. Ethos and pathos. Pure dualistic thinking, and therefore false and shallow.

You lightly dismiss two extremely ancient and profound doctrines. Taoism is, so to speak, a jewel. No philosophy has reached even a fraction of its knowledge of the human body, its hidden springs and techniques of inner alchemy (Hinduism and Buddhism are comparable). Dualism is not synonymous with simplicity. There are dualisms of conciliation or separation, and there are interesting examples in both cases. Manichaeism is 100% dualistic and yet I consider it to be extremely profound and complete.

All the vigorous macho men I’ve known were at heart pussies on the psychological level.

I get the feeling that’s what the weak in character and body try to tell themselves to overcome the trauma of not being that way. So ‘deep down’ they were pussies. Did you explore the cerebral cortex of each of them to come to that conclusion, or were you perhaps guided by prejudice? Did you slap each of them on the ass to see if they would let out a ‘ha-ha’? Was Achilles a pussy? Leonidas? El Cid? So what are you proposing? That instead of vigorous macho men we should be weak damsels? What’s wrong with being a vigorous macho man? Is it better to be like a Zerolo? What would Nietzsche or Jung think of Zerolo? Hmm, I’m intrigued, pal…

Violence for violence’s sake is an armour.

Yeah, tell that to Attila, Genghis Khan or Tamerlane, and see what they say.

First of all, the most insecure children are precisely those who have felt little maternal warmth. It is indispensable in the first years of life.

I never said otherwise, read well. The maternal-filial bond materialised in the cord and breastfeeding is important in the first years of life. But at a certain age, the child must be emancipated from that influence. In societies as far apart as Sparta and the chivalric orders of the Middle Ages, that age was 7.

In patriarchal society, the consummation of this symbiosis is prevented, the mother-child dyad is ripped away to create mindless warriors.

At 7, the symbiosis is more than complete, and a prolongation of it would produce a spoiled and capricious child. On the other hand, if Leonidas is a ‘brainless warrior’, well… we need more ‘brainless warriors’!

Don’t confuse matriarchy with matristics. There have never been matriarchies (where women rule), that is an anthropological aberration. There have been matristic societies, which is different.

Anthropological aberration? Male chauvinist! We’re all equal and blah blah blah. Just kidding. We use different terms. I call gynecocracy what you call matriarchy, and I call matriarchy what you call matristic.

It is in patriarchy that women rule in the pussy that hides behind the warrior, and where the manipulative woman appears.

Examples? Bullshit, this archetype of the manipulative woman appears in matriarchies, in pseudo-patriarchies (Jews, Gypsies, Islam) or in already decadent patriarchal societies (Sparta, Rome). See the case of the Roman Poppea Sabina, or in the Sultanate of Women during a certain phase of the Ottoman Empire.

Very documented and flowery everything you say, but they are falsehoods, contradictions, and shallow thinking.

The good thing about having an opinion is that it’s free. Or as ZP would say, ‘I’m glad we disagree, that’s the greatness of democracy, ñaña’.

But I don’t believe in democracy. You think you’re right, I think I’m right and, in the end, only one of us is right.

(Needless to say, that one is me, and the other is you: the one who is barking, braying and yapping.)
 

Pedrin said:

[…] [Omitted by Ed.] And I would like to know what is a ‘pure’ patriarchal society and what is the ‘pure’ race for you, and from this I can criticise it. I know what the Aryan race is, but where is the purity of the Aryan race? It seems to me that as Plato was looking for the highest good, you are also looking for an ideal that does not exist. What is a pure Aryan? I don’t quite understand.
 

NT replied:

If you think that aggressiveness is only for defending yourself, fighting for females, food or territory, you don’t know yourself. Aggressiveness and violence are perfectly healthy and perfectly natural, and a man who doesn’t have them is a sick disgusting creep.

If you want to know what a pure patriarchal society is, read this post.

If you want to know what the Aryan Race is… you’ve gone to probably the only place in Spanish where this is explained understandably, so I don’t know why you’re not wandering around the blog (particularly in the ‘Nordicism’ topic) or scratching your head.
 

An Argentinian said:

Nordic: if you are as manly, violent and phallic as you say; if you would like to clash swords against the flesh of others and taste the blood of the defeated; if you would like to be led in a political direction by kicking the boots of uniformed men in the ass… Why don’t you go live in Cuba?

If you are so handsome, post a picture of yourself so that your schoolmates and your parents (who probably don’t know that you have this idiocy in your head) know about the reading you resort to for recreation. We are in the 21st century, and we have to have a more critical vision than those who came before us. Get rid of your prejudices and find your true voice. Don’t be left with the first impression of power or violence. Underneath the mask is the true face of control and aggression.
 

NT responded:

Please point me to the exact spot where I say I am ‘violent and phallic’ and that I want to taste the blood of my enemies (you’re out of your mind pal, ha ha) or all the nonsense you just said.

So think before you write, you oaf.

And what schoolmates? I haven’t been to school for a long time, and when I was in high school, I was a skinhead and my whole fucking town knew I was a Nazi, besides my parents.

Yes, this is the 21st century, the century of the cowardly, mechanical, ant-like, unnatural, degenerate and ungodly man. You understand I look back to times when life was pure, man almost perfect and justice simple.

You are invited to read this blog. You, a Judeo-Christian morbidly curious about Nazism, you repressed Argentine Nazi. 🙂

Categories
Eduardo Velasco Feminism Real men

Tough replies

by Eduardo Velasco, 1

Regarding the article I translated yesterday, below I include some comments from Eduardo Velasco’s defunct site and Velasco’s responses that appeared under the pen name of ‘NT’ (Nordic Thunder). The comments I now translate into English date from December 2008 to March 2010. The thread is so long that it will take me many posts to translate Velasco’s responses to commenters on his articles. The ellipses mean that I have omitted many paragraphs from the commenters, which can be read in full in the original language (here). On Velasco’s old site—
 

Juan commented:

I think that humans suck, they educate their children one way up to a certain age and then they take care of corrupting them (including the parents). I don’t see the day when the end of the world will come and put an end to this hypocritical race.
 

NT (Velasco) replied:

To talk about ‘humans’ is to generalise. To give you an example, I often hear things like ‘HUMAN BEINGS are curious beings because they are capable of creating art, cathedrals, philosophy and music, but they are also capable of performing ablations, cannibalism, etc.’

Wrong. Let’s talk properly: ‘There are human beings capable of building cathedrals and blah blah blah (let’s call them A) and human beings (let’s call them B) capable of creating Marilyn Manson etc.’ As good racists, we should wish that the ‘end of the world’ (which will be nothing but a new beginning, a full stop) will take away all the B’s and keep the A’s. People who are carriers of a higher potential in their blood must survive.
 

A woman commented:

It’s scary to think that there are people like you, intellectually deformed, and with such an inferiority complex that you can’t take on other ways of looking at things. Vagina envy is what you have and a horrible fear of being found out as vulnerable and stupid as you really are. I hope no woman ever loves you, (nor any man) and that you never procreate.
 

NT replied:

Haha.

But where the fuck do you think you’re going with that loud and annoying orchestra in a Nazi blog, you dumbass? Aren’t you afraid of being mocked from head to toe? What do you think, that this is Maria Teresa Campos’ set?

Watch out: the brave, 45-heeled, stainless steel, the pure survivor gets scared of us, and that’s why she enters a patriarchal blog to kick, to tantrum, to get hysterical and to piss on the floor.

You’re right to be scared, you stuck in the ’60s and out of touch with the real world because, with the thing that’s about to hit the West, I’d be scared too if I were an ugly, hairy, bitter, masculinised, fanatic-pathetic feminist trucker, frustrated by her sterility, childless, ‘culturally’ nurtured on tabloids and other oestrogenic swill, and with no chance of ever being taken care of by a guy who dresses down to his feet.

Vagina envy, yes… similar, perhaps, to your camouflaged, subconscious phallus-phobia-morbid phallus envy, quite superior to your little clit?

Your ‘hopes’ are in vain, you pity-worthy little twerp, but I, on the other hand, wish you luck ‘surviving’ in the torrent of testosterone about to be unleashed. Remember, you still have time (if you’re under 45 and not ugly, which I highly doubt) to get fit, diet, exercise, wear pink, snag a guy to take care of you, give birth, cook and scrub, before Islam puts a burqa on you. You’ll never be able to compete with those 20-something girls now, who kick the shit out of you, but hey, you screwed up when you had the chance, so pass on getting on our backs, okay?

Here’s a picture of your beloved ideological acolyte, Jewish feminist Andrea Dworkin, who brags (!) about having been raped. [link added]

What more could you want, you arctic sperm whale!

What a sack of gelatinous shit. I couldn’t even shake her hand if she pulled a kilo of Viagra, 8 gallons of beer, 37 litres of Afrodiasiac, 20,000 mg of intramuscular testosterone enanthate, 38 consecutive Spanish National Team victories over France and 88 years in prison.

Hey, I think I know why that cetacean became a feminist.

Because no guy paid any attention to her and of course: she started hating men, tired of seeing how they flirted with female specimens as the Gods command, tired of seeing lovebirds couples and tired of seeing happy mothers pushing a trolley with 2 babies.

Go survive somewhere else, you bitter and soured seal.

Thus spoke NT.
 

Gonzalo commented:

That ‘vagina envy’ thing really got to me XD…
 

NT replied:

Ernesto Milá’s blog is a mine.

I interpret this in the sense that the times of real crisis and violence are going to end with this estrogenic bubble of sanitary towels with wings, which we have the imbecility to call ‘Western civilisation’.

Contrary to the deluded feminists, who believe that we live in a patriarchy and are moving towards a matriarchy, I maintain that we have been living for decades in a pestilent and unnatural matriarchy that nullifies the virile element and that the difficult times will lead us headlong to the establishment of an iron and totalitarian patriarchy.

Categories
Men Sword

Eunuchs

In a discussion thread on this site today, Benjamin said:

I tend to just hope there are more decent people hidden away in the woodwork, unannounced and unpublicised, thinking deeply together about what to do next. It’s very hard, post-childhood, to encourage anyone to change or develop, and often impossible if they have not had the seeds in them to do this independently all along. I hope very much that there are enough pre-existing people though.

Rephrasing Dominique Venner, Michael O’Meara once said that the European in history is best seen as a warrior carrying his sword as a symbol of his will, adding that the Hellenes made their debut in history by refusing to be slaves.

But the white man has dropped his sword since 1945. What we now have are lobotomized eunuchs.

Categories
Racial right

On eunuchs

A Eunuch’s Dream (1874, Cleveland Museum of Art) depicts a eunuch who wanted to marry a harem slave. He experienced a vision of her while smoking his opium pipe, but her little companion holding a knife dripping with blood reminds us that the eunuch’s anatomy precludes the fulfillment of his dream.

 

______ 卐 ______

 

I started the Crusade Against the Cross series, now a book, a month ago. Before I return to what I used to do, quoting Simms’ book on Hitler, I would like to say a few things about the racial right. I never tire of analysing the subject precisely because of what I was saying yesterday about how Europeans lost their manhood.

On this side of the Atlantic, whites also lost their manhood, although at least some of them still defend some of it with the Second Amendment. But that’s not remotely enough. What racialists need now is to shift their paradigm: from believing that the Jewish problem is the primary cause of white decline, to realising that the Christian problem is that primary cause. And to do so requires balls: intellectual manhood that racialists on this side of the Atlantic still lack.

Recently, for example, Counter-Currents (CC), one of the most representative sites of American white nationalism, surveyed its visitors. I was enthusiastic about this initiative and answered the survey questions myself.

In doing so, I noticed that the survey taker asked many questions from the System’s POV. For example, he asked the respondents whether they considered themselves to be male, female or a third sex (we can imagine a survey of imperial Germans if the Third Reich had won the war!). Likewise, the CC survey asked whether the respondent suffered from autism or ADHD.

For years I have complained that racialists haven’t realised that psychiatric labels like ADHD are relatively recent, and have been used to tame brave male children with drugs. I brought this to Greg Johnson’s attention himself, as he read my article ‘Why psychiatry is a false science’ in an expanded version in which I included some passages about ADHD and white children.

The problem with the kind of questions like the one in the CC survey is that they don’t adequately rebel against crazy or pseudo-scientific fads (that there are more than two sexes or that there is such a thing as ADHD). But that wasn’t the worst of the survey. It would have been fascinating to see how many of the respondents were Christian, or sympathetic to Christianity for example. But on Saturday, Johnson published an article saying that he will keep some of the poll results to himself! What a disappointment. And we cannot know if any CC readers were upset, because Johnson is known to sometimes not let some comments through (I gave up trying to comment there when he wouldn’t let me discuss Nordicism).

Now let’s turn to another of the most respected sites on the American racial right: the one chaired by Kevin MacDonald. Tobias Langdon is a featured author at The Occidental Observer. On Sunday, Langdon published an optimistic article that opens with these words:

“The West is doomed!” “France is finished!” “Britain is over!” I’ve never understood expressions of despair and defeat like those. They’re obviously self-indulgent and harmful things to say, so how could people with any common sense and self-control utter them? Unless those people aren’t what they pretend to be, of course. No genuine friend of the West should announce that “The West is doomed!” Or announce the same of any part of the West, whether they happen to live there or not.

Langdon goes on to say that fortune favours the brave and that defeatism has been a capital crime in wartime. But he omits one small detail! No one in the mainstream articles of today’s racial right is saying what, a dozen years ago, Michael O’Meara was still saying about an eventual armed revolution. And it is precisely because of this lack of revolutionaries, albeit at the moment only at a theoretical level, that it makes perfect sense to say that France or Britain are finished (David Lane had said so in ‘Open Letter to a Dead Race’). But of course: like CC, Langdon writes for an audience of eunuchs.

There was one commenter who took issue with Langdon and posted this. Remarkably, another commenter defended Langdon Christianly, even talking about the god of the Jews as if (1) that god exists, and (2) capitalising the word ‘God’ as implying that we Gentiles must worship it. That’s fairly common on that supposedly Jew-wise webzine!

Before this site gets back on track, I must quote from the last page of Crusade against the Cross, actually a quote from the last page of Nietzsche’s Der Antichrist:

Law against Christianity [1]

Given on the Day of Salvation, on the first day of the year one (30 September 1888, according to the false calculation of time).

War to the death against vice: the vice is Christianity

First article.—Every type of anti-nature is a vice. The priest is the most vicious type of person: he teaches anti-nature. Priests are not to be reasoned with, they are to be locked up.

Second article.—Any participation in church services is an attack on public morality. One should be harsher with Protestants than with Catholics, harsher with liberal Protestants than with orthodox ones. The criminality of being Christian increases with your proximity to science. The criminal of criminals is consequently the philosopher.

Third article.—The execrable location where Christianity brooded over its basilisk eggs should be razed to the ground and, being the depraved spot on earth, it should be the horror of all posterity. Poisonous snakes should be bred on top of it.

Fourth article.—The preacher of chastity is a public incitement to anti-nature. Contempt for sexuality, making it unclean with the concept of ‘uncleanliness’, these are the real sins against the holy spirit of life.

Fifth article.—Eating at the same table as a priest ostracizes: you are excommunicated from honest society. The priest is our Chandala, —he should be ostracized, starved, driven into every type of desert.

Sixth article.—The ‘holy’ history should be called by the name it deserves, the cursed history; the words ‘God’, ‘saviour’, ‘redeemer’, ‘saint’ should be used as terms of abuse, to signify criminals.

Seventh article.—The rest follows from this.

Friedrich Nietzsche – The Antichrist

I quote this just to show the gulf that separates me from the typical American racialist. Unlike Langdon’s goofy optimism, I am convinced that to save the Aryan man it will be necessary to implement the ‘Law against Christianity’ when we revolutionaries come to power. There is no other way to save him since it’s precisely Christian ethics that has been screwing the Aryan mind.

______________

[1] Nietzsche’s ‘Law Against Christianity’ has been eliminated from numerous editions of The Anti-Christ: A Curse on Christianity because the editors simply cucked before the Judeo-Christian ethos of the masses.

Categories
Degenerate art Philosophy of history

Lost manhood

Since the conflict in Ukraine, the lectures of John Mearsheimer, professor of political science at the University of Chicago, have become fashionable. I have seen quite a few of his interviews, including some recent ones. Despite co-authoring a book on the Israel lobby, Mearsheimer is a normie in every sense of the word, though he can see international relations in a much more realistic way than the vast majority of Westerners do. Mearsheimer’s insights have made me understand the dynamics of how states interact with each other. But his greatest contribution to my understanding of the West’s darkest hour was one of his pronouncements on Europe.

It had been a mystery why this site receives hardly any feedback from Germans, even though I touch profoundly on Germany as we recently saw in Crusade against the Cross. But it’s not just them: why have the men of the countries that in the past played crucial roles in Western history—besides Germany, England, France, Italy and Spain—lost their manhood?

Let it be clear that Mearsheimer is not only a normie, but a patriotard. In a recent interview, a Dutchman asked him whether Europe could become (again) a regional hegemon. Mearsheimer replied that no, that Europe would do well to remain subordinate to his country, the United States. However, thanks to that and another of his recent lectures, I believe it was the one in Australia, Mearsheimer, using very different words from mine, explained why the French and the Germans have lost their manhood.

This is a psychological phenomenon.

Readers of my anthology On Beth’s Cute Tits will remember a passage in which we said that, in an environment of great abundance, males tend to become feminised: what we might call the empire of yin, like the bonobo apes (as opposed to chimpanzees, in whose environment there is no such abundance of fruit and the more aggressive Yang reigns). The point is, and here Mearsheimer helped to enlighten me, that for seventy-five years NATO has served as Europe’s sole gorilla, and the once proud European nations have, since the end of World War II, accepted their role as vassals protected by NATO’s military umbrella so that they could devote the bulk of their GDP—oh heroic materialism!—to worshipping Mammon. As I said, Mearsheimer used very different words, but I am translating his message into a much rougher language.

Yesterday I was saying that my blood boiled when I saw ‘walking tours’ supposedly on Sparta and other ancient Greek cities. The human figures they put there to brainwash us—or rather: to aggressively lobotomize us—have skin the colour of the Mexicans I see every day on my walks. On today’s walk, I even saw a whiter and lighter-haired woman than the women with negroid features that they show us in those videos of the ‘classical world’ (and I live in an area of brown people!).

Those popular videos denote the level of the most abject psychological conquest to which the Europeans have been subjected. NATO dominance is the key, I said, because, parallel to the worship of Mammon, the explanation of why Europeans fail to protect their ethnicity is clarified by the presence of the gorilla.

If Mearsheimer is correct, and it seems to me that he is, we might deduce that when the dollar collapses and American military bases have to be dismantled and their men returned to the US, Europeans will be forced to rebuild their armies while NATO and its epigone, the European Union, disappear. That will be the beginning of Europeans regaining their manhood, and if Russia feels threatened in the Ukrainian war and gets tough by nuking bases in Poland or Romania that host menacing F-16s, much the better!

The punishment that future history has in store for Europeans who let themselves be castrated and lobotomised for the sake of a bourgeois life must be apocalyptic so that they wake up from the treacherous ultra-feminisation in the yin empire they have created for themselves. As we have already said, the sins of Westerners are such that only an Indo-European Kalki could save us.

I would like to end this entry with some words from the Spaniard Eduardo Velasco that I have quoted more than once:

Let us compare today’s Europeans with the Spartans. We are extremely dismayed when encountering such physical, mental and spiritual degeneration! Such stultification! The European man, who used to be the hardest and most courageous on Earth, has become a weakling rag and degenerated biologically as a result of comfort. His mind is weak; his spirit fragile, and on top of that he considers himself the summit of the creation! But that man, just because of the blood he carries, has enormous potential.

The rules on which Sparta was seated were eternal and natural, as valid today as yesterday, but today the dualistic mens sana in corpore sano has been forgotten: the physical form has been abandoned producing soft, puny, deformed monsters; and the mental poisoning has produced similar abominations in the realm of the spirit.

The modern European knows no pain, no honour, no blood, no war, no sacrifice, no camaraderie, no respect or combat; and thus he does not know the ancient and gentle Goddesses known as Gloria or Victoria.

Passages from ‘Sparta and its Law’, one of Velasco’s essays in The Fair Race’s Darkest Hour.