“It had to happen to someone. There is nothing exceptional about you, any more than there is about the first neutron that starts the chain reaction in an atomic bomb. It simply happens to be the first. Any other neutron would have served—just as Jeffrey might have been anybody in the world. We call it Total Breakthrough.”
― Arthur C. Clarke, Childhood’s End
I’d like to say something about my seemingly mysterious comment yesterday to Thomas (“if people like you and me could reactivate the Cro-Magnon teem…”).
I was inspired by the 1953 novel quoted above, where two mutant children unleash a chain reaction with apocalyptic consequences for the world.
Of course, the quote in Clarke’s fantastic novel refers to developing paranormal powers, and I’m referring to something quite different. But the metaphor is clear: two priests of the sacred words could potentially infect, with their newfound faith, dozens, hundreds or thousands of Aryan males in the future—a chain reaction—, and the consequences would also be eschatological.
For many years, Childhood’s End was my favourite novel. That ended when I awoke to the fact that the Aryan race is dying. But following the metaphor of the quote, it is possible to reactivate the Cro-Magnon teem (an exterminationist archetype): the goal of this site.
Regarding the person who developed teem theory, this morning I couldn’t let a comment criticising him because it’s clear he hasn’t read Them & Us. This commenter, who had already been banned, claimed that Neanderthals were capable of weaving clothes.
Let’s remember that just as neochristian anthropologists have massively projected their evolved selves in a quixotic undertaking to humanise their noble savages, many of whom were cannibalistic infanticides (cf. my book’s chapter here), neochristian paleoanthropologists do the same: they project their own psychoclass onto the prehistoric past so massively that it borders on psychosis: like putting diapers on a doll representing a supposed Neanderthal child in a museum. It’s crucial to understand how more serious scholars debunk things like Neanderthals weaving clothes or carrying flowers to their burials (a critic of that claim said that pollen found in a cave could have been carried there by an animal, not for ceremonial obituaries).
It’s a terrible mistake to believe that academics are lying about recent events like BLM (“the rioters cannot be infected by Covid viruses,” etc.), while believing that they are honest when writing their papers about the prehistoric past. They are the same usual suspects, and what motivates them is not objective science but anti-white hatred, the idealisation of non-whites and the defamation of the latter.
I’ve also received emails complaining about the author of the NP theory, which show that the correspondent hasn’t bothered to read Vendramini’s book. They remind me of another banned commenter who recently dismissed Tom Szasz’s critique of psychiatry because he had a Jewish ancestor, or Michel Foucault’s critique of the same profession because he was homosexual: perfect ad hominem arguments, very common in the racial right. One of the problems with the new generation of racialists is that they don’t read books, even though it’s impossible to think deeply about a subject without reading them. But all this is beside the point.
The point is creating a community of priests of the sacred words from where it’s possible to try to produce that chain reaction that would infect the white race with a Cro-Magnon-like exterminationist passion that ensures its survival.
In these communities we would have temples like the one pictured above and rituals to baptize newborns in the new faith that commemorate those who bravely, though unsuccessfully, tried to force the eschaton into history. Following Savitri Devi’s philosophy, Hitler was not the equivalent of Jeffrey Agnus Greggson in Clarke’s novel, only his precursor, although every ritual within the new post-Christian temples would commemorate his official photograph and symbols.