interview – 8
This episode was about race. Fuentes calls himself a race realist, and he starts his interview well, as if he were a reader of Jared Taylor.
But after the ninth minute, Fuentes says that the biggest problem is individualism. Here begins the eternal blindness, since we have already said that individualism is an epiphenomenon of the “spiritual terror” (Hitler’s words) that Christianity introduced into the Aryan collective unconscious, especially in its Anglo-Saxon version. Not seeing the beam in one’s own eye is a leitmotif of Christians like Nick Fuentes and Joel Webbon.
Then Fuentes began to talk about black Americans. When Webbon intervened speaking about the various religions, he openly said that for him, “religion would trump race” and that the racial factor is not deterministic, although he is sympathetic to racial realism.
I think this dialogue shows why the Jared Taylor school of racialism has failed: it isn’t anti-Christian. In the real world, it’s impossible to expel people of colour with such a lukewarm philosophy. It’s no wonder that when I discovered white nationalism (I was living in Spain), a Swede said that this American movement was weak. Paradoxically, Webbon then said a great truth: that all contemporary whites are (1) suicidal, (2) suffer from toxic empathy, and (3) are cowards. He added that that’s why the West is falling apart. I couldn’t agree more!
Unfortunately, shortly after, Webbon, after saying that blacks are generally impulsive and lazy and Jews are subversive, states that as a Christian he shouldn’t hate them or deprive them of certain rights. And everything Fuentes says afterward in his dialogue with Webbon doesn’t suggest a National Socialist-type racism. It’s the same old timid crap we see throughout the American racial right. At 39:50, for example, Fuentes gives the example of a black family, albeit educated, moving nearby and asks the rhetorical question of whether any of us would have a problem with that. Like a good Christian, Webbon answers no, and then Fuentes gives the same example with a Chinese, Indian, or Mexican family.
It couldn’t be clearer. Fuentes and Webbon are also suicidal, suffer from toxic empathy, and are cowards. Nick is somewhat aware of this, as he goes on to say that this dynamic ends up with 90% non-white people in a neighbourhood that was previously all-white. But he doesn’t seem to realise that Christian ethics caused the problem in the first place; that 10% is similar to not worrying about the first cancerous cells in your body and only starting to worry when metastasis takes hold.
Then I was surprised that when Webbon asked Nick how the races originated, Fuentes mentioned Adam, and that the various races arose from him. Is Nick a Catholic fundamentalist (liberal Catholics believe in Darwin)? The fact that they then talked about Cain, the Tower of Babel, and Noah’s offspring, as if all of that were historical, doesn’t even warrant a response from me.
Then, at this point, Fuentes says he is completely against racial hatred. Compare this to what we recently said about Cro-Magnons hating Neanderthals. (By the way, my next article will be about Vendramini’s book, which I’m about to finish reading for the second time.)