This is a response to Ben’s most recent comment.
Groupthink really shocks me. In private correspondence, Charles Darwin said that the Negroes would become extinct because, being inferior, white people would exterminate them. The opposite happened because he didn’t foresee how Christianity had conquered the Aryan collective unconscious.
The best example of monstrous groupthink that comes to mind is precisely that of Darwin’s wife, Emma. Like a typical stupid woman who conforms to the prevailing worldview, she once became upset about the criticism that the torture of hell wasn’t eternal (of course: she was taught the opposite as a child)!
The difference between Emma and Charles is fundamental to understanding what’s happening. The vast majority follow groupthink, whether it’s the aberrant theology of the past or the suicidal anti-racism of today. Modifying the archetype that possesses the collective unconscious is no small feat. And the sad thing is that no one is fighting it now except us. (White nationalists are still possessed by the current archetype, ortherwise they would become pragmatic exterminationists like Darwin.)
Incidentally, I was extremely bothered to see, on my last visit to the UK, how young whites fraternised with Negroes in restaurants and cafes.
One reply on “Groupthink”
Every time I read apologetic Nationalists (and again, the following reasoning is common in the prominent UK ones… Collett, Laws, Traditional Britain Group, etc.) making the ‘we deserve our own homeland because…well… everyone else has one! They all deserve theirs, so why can’t we have ours? It’s only just!’ argument I see this nefarious groupthink in action… more levelling, as if appealing in submission to their very enemy to play fair.
Ours is a homeland to claim that covers the entire earth, I’d think would be more like it, and that certainly involves cleansing our own ancestral turf as much as wiping them off theirs.
So yes, as you say, WN are idiots (I’ll class ‘ethnonationalists’ as synonymous, as that seems to be the European term for this bunch, on the ‘dissident right’).
That said, I think you’d have slightly more luck modifying them on an individual level… women, on the other hand, would all switch at once, going with the flow, I’d imagine, once of course we could claim suitable power to turn them on that conformist decision.
I get bothered too when my male ‘friends’ hang around non-whites. I tell them off for it quite regularly, but total normies are more like women… it never sinks in.