Groypers

This Monday I continue writing about what I said yesterday.

I have been watching my autobiographical videos that I recorded in Spain sixteen years ago about the devastating abuse I suffered at the hands of my parents as a teenager, and I realise that I don’t look so bad on camera. True, I am not white in the American sense of the word, which refers to Anglo-Germans north of the Rio Grande, but by Mediterranean standards I couldn’t say I looked too bad at fifty, when those videos were recorded. However, since I don’t know anything about software that can translate me into English, I will continue using text today.

The idea behind creating a channel is simply so that the Groypers can see me on Rumble, because I very much doubt they visit The West’s Darkest Hour. The urgent message I would like to convey to these young people so that they finish crossing the Rubicon towards NS is not hard to understand. But first of all, I would like to reiterate why I think it is a good idea to try to communicate with them.

If visitors remember what I said about my trip to Europe this year, which I recently linked to with a picture of me in Dachau, they will see that if Europeans are emasculated, it is simply because they aren’t allowed to speak. Giving my friends Chris and Joseph eight and seven years in prison for Thought Crime in the UK for what they said on Black Wolf Radio seems excessive even by the standards of Europe’s so-called soft totalitarianism! (and Canada and Australia are no much better when it comes to freedom of speech). Americans have a huge advantage: they are allowed to speak. That is why racialist webzine forums have flourished although, as Hitler well knew, that intellectual phase only fertilises the soil for the seed to germinate, whereas only the power of oratory can catapult a racialist to power.

From this angle, only Nick Fuentes is using oratory for this purpose, as seen in this YouTube video uploaded yesterday.

The reason I would like the message of this site to reach the ears of at least some Groypers is that, although I admire young Nick as the only orator at the moment, his message is contradictory due to his Catholicism.

Please understand me correctly. An American politician cannot be openly anti-Christian, as he would lose the votes of Christians if he wanted to come to power as Hitler did (and upon reaching it, eliminate superstitions such as parliamentarianism, etc., as Savitri Devi rightly said).

However, the new Führer must be aware of the Christian Question. And this, even though Hitler only spoke out about the CQ to his inner circle.

In Tucker’s interview with Fuentes, he asked him if he would ever run for president. Fuentes said maybe. But it is not the same for a Catholic like Fuentes to become president as it would be for a Groyper who thinks like Hitler: show yourself to the masses as a devout Christian, but reveal to your friends your true colours as a pantheist. And from this angle, it is necessary to criticise Fuentes.

Yesterday I saw a video uploaded a couple of days ago to YouTube. It shows part of Candace Owens’ interview with Fuentes, and I was struck by the fact that from the outset Fuentes admitted that, as a Catholic, he couldn’t oppose interracial marriage. Fuentes then spoke about Jared Taylor-like race realism, a point on which Owens is as ignorant as most Westerners. But even in that cordial segment of the interview—as cordial as the interview with Tucker—the contradiction between Fuentes’ Christian ethics and his racial realism is more than evident.

Considering what I recently said to my interlocutor Benjamin in the comments section, that crossing the psychological Rubicon is done step by step (even I took time to cross it since I recorded those videos about child abuse in Spain), the ideal situation would be for someone like Fuentes to become president. We can already imagine the difference between a Fuentes presidency and Trump’s abject international politics!

But what would happen to the country’s laws? Fuentes has said that power should not be relinquished (just what Hitler did when he became chancellor). Is it possible that in the future Fuentes, or someone like him, could become the first dictator of the US? Even in this fantastical scenario I see serious problems due to Fuentes’ Catholicism, and that is what I want to communicate to the Groypers.

Let’s suppose that Fuentes is the dictator of the US. If we take into account what he said to the negress Owens, will there be Nuremberg Laws in his dictatorship? And the thorniest question: what about the 100 million non-Aryans living in the US? A true Christian cannot expel them, right?

If I, a true Hitlerist, were in power, it is clear what I would do—as any reader of William Pierce’s first novel can imagine. But the dictator Fuentes, because he constantly says that in the US he imagines the first thing is “Christ King,” would never dare to take that step… and over the centuries, with other Christian dictators, white Americans would become extinct. The dictator Fuentes and his successors would only have delayed the process that the Jewish zeitgeist is now accelerating: a boiling frog that doesn’t know it’s being slowly killed because of Xtian ethics.

This is what the Groypers who continue to take baby steps towards our side should know.