Nick Fuentes and Tucker Carlson.
Listen to another Nick Fuentes interview just for 50 seconds starting from this moment.
It is clear that, due to Christian universalism, which drives Nick to love all humans including Neanderthals (compare it to our exterminationism), Fuentes will never be the American Führer who saves whites from extinction. He, with his million followers, is a man of his time (the Christian Era). I, with Ben, am a man against our time (the Hitlerian Era).
2 replies on “Fuentes”
I know what you’re saying. What an idiot – that was my only real reaction, recoiling in distaste as I listened to him (for a few minutes; as long as I could last). I think his true conservative colours came to the fore with this traitorous statement as he ‘flings open the gates’, surely – really – what motivates them all [spoiler: it’s his wallet]:
“Well… I think that, the most important thing to consider about immigration is… it’s just the volume, the numbers. I don’t have a problem in principle with immigration at all! If we brought in a million – or, maybe not a million – if we brought in, let’s say, 300,000 people every year that are like you… that are intelligent, productive, that are going to be generative…”
All I really see is him justifying the vacuous, nihilistic mindset of Homo Economicus, where the highest good in any society is dictated by its economic success (not that even that would occur in practice were our current society not bending over backwards to pander to and artificially bolster the productivity of a vast mass of demonstrably dangerous, inept, lazy, low IQ, fundamentally incompatible foreign scum, to which a handful of equally alien-to-us ‘midwit’ outliers make not a shred of difference at all).
He’s certainly a Christian, then, much as it seems the godless materialism is subtly prominent in his mind also. Truly the exact opposite of real thinkers, like Hitler, or Himmler, or Savitri Devi, with their understanding that (an unblemished, pure, Aryan) race is rightly of paramount importance, and not just for any economy, but for culture, for life quality, meaning, and future well being.
Outside of his bank account, and the accounts of his back-patting cronies, what really is Fuentes fighting for, for whom? I can’t see any valid relationship between him and his folk (and to be honest, I question his own phenotype also, as someone surely not very white, and so, in tandem with all the rest of his mental antics, disqualified from even making ‘leader’ decisions over those who are nothing much like his people, those who deserve better than to be thrown under the bus by him, this snake-oil selling, subhuman zealot. No wonder race is not his top priority. I would say he was perhaps – surely a little – jealous over it).
Another one on the ever expanding list that I hope someone (and I wouldn’t mind if it was the left or the right) works around to assassinating, and before he brainwashes too many more gullible, pre-loaded cult devotees, taking valuable racial bodies out of the system, only to render them as mentally deficient, double-crossing, and, ultimately, useless to white survival as himself.
If we return to Joseph Walsh’s point—that all white people, including racialists, are ethno-suicides—let me tell you something.
As you know, the conservative Swede’s essay on the “Red Giant” was seminal for my site. What I omitted when quoting him is that once he said it wouldn’t be a bad idea to import a few Italians to Sweden, given that it’s “too Scandinavian.”
Another case. When Richard Spencer was famous, he said in an interview that some mulattos could stay in the ethnostate, as long as there weren’t too many.
Another ethno-traitor, since it’s obvious that over time these niggers and sandniggers end up sleeping with white women!
Fuentes, the Catholic, is of the same ilk as the Swede and Spencer, both of whom are readers of Nietzsche.
And let’s not talk about typical white nationalists. None of the most prominent among them has openly repudiated their parents’ church (insofar as all churches admit niggers to the altar of marriage with white women).
Put another way, for a WN not to be an imposter, he must first have rejected not only Christianity, but the French Revolution’s notion of human brotherhood (neochristianity). For example, the Swede even used the word “psychopath” in 2009 when I confessed in the comments section of Gates of Vienna that my exterminationism dated back to my early childhood.
After Charlie Kirk died, Fuentes became the most popular racialist in social media. That’s why I had to mention it on this site, which tries to bring the ideals of National Socialism to their logical conclusion.
Fuentes-style antisemitism is not enough. We must also consider the CQ.