My books deal with a subject that is the greatest taboo of all. Throughout human history no society has awakened to the fact that, in our species, some parents drive their children mad. Demonstrating this requires not only the creation of a new literary genre, but that dense autobiographies such as this one multiply in posterity.
That said, I must confess that I didn’t fully understand what had happened in my family until, at the end of 2008, I finished Hojas Susurrantes and in my researches I changed the subject radically: from child abuse to mass migration of Muslims into Europe. It was only in the following years when, after discovering racialist intellectuals on the internet, I located the tragedy of my family from a new paradigm. The best way to crack an annoying cipher is to abandon it for a good season and re-approach it from a broader meta-perspective on what is happening in the world.
My fundamental discrepancy with the internet movement known as ‘white nationalism’ is the diagnosis of the darkest hour in the West. White nationalists blame the Jewish quarter of white decline. I blame the Aryans themselves who let Jewry appropriate their media and a good part of the academic and financial sectors of the West, especially in the United States.
The tragedy in my family began when, during my adolescence, my mother went crazy and began to think and say crazy things about me. But that was not what destroyed the teenager I was. What destroyed him was that, over time, my father began to believe those slanders to the point of traumatising me in the most heartbreaking way you can imagine. Over the years, my parents would do the same to my sister, who now rests in peace.
Similarly, white people began to believe the lies of the New Testament two millennia ago, a process that culminated in the destruction of the classical world and, even after the Middle Ages, in an inverse narrative about who were the martyrs and the perpetrators. (See the literature that I mention in the Introduction after this foreword.) What I want to arrive at is a very simple concept. We should not blame St. Paul so much for having burned ‘pagan’ books in Ephesus but the imbecile whites who followed his example to the degree of destroying, from the 4th to the 6th century, the Greco-Roman world. If the traitor is worse than the subversive, in our times the Aryan who subscribes to the axiological system of the Bible—ethnocentrism for me but out-group altruism for thee—is worse than the Jew.
The following is the scheme of how some parents drive their children mad. On the one hand, there is the donor who provides a delusional system (your son is the devil); on the other, the receiver that over time subscribes to such a system. In my family the great crime was committed by my father, for having swallowed a slanderous vision of his eldest son. In this dynamic of folie à deux the role of the receiver is what counts most. Otherwise, the spouse who raves about her child would simply be considered the nutty of the family. Although having such a mother would harm the son’s morale, she wouldn’t destroy it by herself. It is the shared madness between wife and husband that makes the couple soul murderers.
In the same way, Jewry alone would not be able to destroy the West. The Aryans are responsible for believing the lies of the Jews, beginning with the ethics advocated by the New Testament (out-group altruism) and ending in the secular subversion we see in Hollywood and the American media.
Remember that I didn’t fully understand what happened in my family until I abandoned the subject for a few years, to reopen it after I became much more mature. I suggest that the nationalists read my texts to find, in them, a kind of microcosm of what has been happening, on another scale, in the West. Just as I didn’t understand myself until I turned to other interests, the nationalists would understand better if they could take an intellectual vacation. By reading my eleven books, they would learn that what happens in some families is worse than the Holocaust tall stories with which the Jews have demoralised us.
(*) Today I declined to include, in my translation of the first book of Hojas Susurrantes, this text and preferred to put it here.
6 replies on “Aborted prologue to the English edition *”
I can relate a similar story of myself, but perhaps not as extreme as yours. I do not know if our parents were over-socialised or if mother was seeking attention or power through disruptive fantasises that would influence my father. Learning of “folie-a-duex” explained some of it to me, and my mother was also brought up catholic as yours I believe.
I now believe most of it was due to over-socialisation and peak-christianity of the boomer generation, but I am over it and have moved on trying to understand them. I hope this is some help to other people who have also been confused by their parents actions.
There’s a difference between dysfunctional families and destructive families: a distinction that the overwhelming majority of people fail to see. Of the few sections of Hojas Susurrantes that have already been translated to English, have you read ‘A class with Colin Ross’?
‘A class with Colin Ross’ was interesting, the great sadness is when victims end up blaming and harming themselves due to their dependence attachment to the perpetrator, as child to parents. Your writings are useful as they don’t fear to look at the evil darkness underneath these situations that modern social theory ignores.
It is the greatest taboo of all.
Racism was not a taboo until World War II. But putting abusive parents on the bench because of their children’s psychosis, is.
I am glad that you liked Ross’ ‘class’. It’s very didactic.
Have a nice Yuletide, CT.
(By the way, I just visited my mother and told her that I would not be sitting tonight at Christmas with my sister who hates hearing my political opinions. Also, neither my mother nor my sister wants to open a communication about what I say about them in my autobiographical books.)