The darkest hour of the West is due to the extreme degeneration of white men, especially those Europeans who swallowed the propaganda of the American Diktat after World War II.
On the other side of the Atlantic, what “white nationalists” are incapable of understanding is that, as Matt Koehl said, a race that rejects Hitler will perish.
Among the noblest civilisations that defended their race—the Aryans who conquered India, Greece, and eventually Rome; the Vikings; and the Visigoths who killed those who dared to intermarry—, after the Judeo-Christian infection only the National Socialists intellectually developed a model of nationhood that fulfilled the sacred words. The others fell so short that they eventually Christianized like the Norsemen, or a thousand times worse: they intermarried.
Although Koehl’s eight words (“A race that rejects Him will surely perish”) should be displayed in every home of the brotherhood we wish to create, that doesn’t mean I share Koehl’s faithful orthodoxy, as we will see in this series on NS booklets translated into English.
On July 22, 2021, when I read the booklet pictured above, originally published in German by Himmler, I wrote on its blank pages:
Upon reading page 7, I can’t help but think that I shouldn’t visit the WN websites again, which are garbage compared to this fighting spirit.
It is precisely because the US is founded on that materialistic phrase containing the deceptive word “happiness” that it makes Americans the antithesis of the Aryan hero. But there’s a problem.
The problem I was referring to was page 10, where the author of the booklet, whether Himmler or one of his associates, wrote “…so help me God!”
The problem with imagining the deity in the singular is that it’s done under the umbrella of Jewish monotheism. An Aryan who wants to refer to providence would have to do so in the plural, “Gods,” inspired, let’s say, by the inscription of the Oracle of Delphi. Although the National Socialists, especially the pagan SS, were transitioning from Christianity to Germanic paganism, there were Jewish remnants in pronouncements like this one.
Given that after 1945 Christian ethics exploded in a secular way like a red giant star burning Aryan DNA around the globe, it’s necessary to recognise that this evil persisted, albeit to a minuscule degree, in translated booklets like this one.
Had the Nazi leadership realised this, they wouldn’t have launched insane wars of conquest (like Operation Barbarossa) but would have instead dedicated all their power to educating the masses in a kind of neo-Nietzschean racism, beginning with essays similar to Eduardo Velasco’s on Judea and Rome. They didn’t because, unlike us, the Nazis failed to grasp that the JQ wasn’t the primary cause of the Aryan decline but rather the CQ.
That said, there are many things I appreciate about the booklet, such as the fact that there was a group of SS members who were professional musicians. And by music, we obviously mean non-degenerate music (one of the enormous failings of the American racial right is their inability to make this distinction): music that inspires the highest ideals, like what I recently said about the Eroica Symphony.
Page 66 of the booklet begins with these words: “German parents! Sooner or later your son will become a soldier.” Reading this in 2021 reminded me that even the most radical of American white nationalists, the late Alex Linder, opposed National Socialism because he subscribed to individualistic libertarianism.
Let’s respond to Linder.
One of the greatest damages caused by “introducing spiritual terror” (Hitler’s words) to the Aryan collective unconscious is precisely that it atomized it: from a collective, whites became atomized particles, “souls” whose main purpose was to avoid eternal torment in hell. The spiritual terror finished off the racial solidarity that had already declined in Imperial Rome.
Even anti-Christians like Linder never understood that it wasn’t enough to repudiate the dogmatic part of Christianity, but rather the axiological part as well: like this transition from collectivist societies like Sparta and Republican Rome to imperial degeneration. One of the most notable features of the decadent religions that arose in the Mediterranean is that, unlike their ancient predecessors, they were religions of personal salvation—and I’m not referring only to Christianity (cf. Richard Carrier’s work on the plethora of Mediterranean religions in the Roman Empire).
On page 87 of the booklet, which mentions many colours of Waffen-SS insignia, I learned that the colour used in concentration camps was light brown. As several visitors know, last year I visited Dachau outside Munich: a place I love because unlike, say, the feminized Groypers, the goal there was to eliminate internal opposition including rebellious Christians. Recall the words of a Christian I quoted last month:
He [Hitler] filled Dachau with Catholic clergy; hundreds were worked to death or died under medical experiments.
Bishops who preached against euthanasia faced arrest.
The Gestapo dissolved every independent Catholic youth organisation in Germany. Catholic newspapers were banned, publishing houses seized, and confessional schools closed or converted to state use.
The Concordat he signed in 1933 was violated before the ink dried.
In his own recorded words, he called Christianity “an invention of the Jew” and “the heaviest blow that ever struck humanity,” declaring that the Church would be eradicated once the war was won. His inner circle confirmed the plan was total.
Pius XI answered with Mit brennender Sorge, the only encyclical in history smuggled into a country and read from every Catholic pulpit on the same Sunday, condemning the idolatry of race and blood, and National Socialism itself, by name.
Condemning “the idolatry of race and blood”! Actually, it was magnificent to have condemned the worshipers of the god of the Jews, those rebellious Christians, the true idolaters. Loving your blond sons and blue-eyed daughters isn’t idolatry!
Do we finally understand what Nietzsche meant when he said that Christianity had inverted the values of the Greco-Roman world? If I were the dictator of the US and an insolent disciple of Nick Fuentes rebelled publicly against these types of measures, I would undoubtedly send him to the American incarnation of Dachau.
On this second day of the year, I would like to elaborate a little on what I have been saying recently about depression.
If Kali Yuga is pure poison for the priest of the sacred words, how can one find some encouragement?
Encouragement comes naturally through dedication, but only when that work is aimed at preserving and advancing the 14 and 4 words, which define the purpose behind my struggle. What happens when virtually all Aryans have degenerated, and no one is properly fighting for those words?
I can entertain myself for a few minutes a day on X, as there are several neo-Nazis who speak as I usually speak. But all of them lack a plan for how we are going to take power. For such a plan, we would need to live very close together, always eat together as in the Spartan syssitia, and conspire on how we could wake other whites from their catalepsy.
That alone would lift the spirits.
But I have no one in this third-world metropolis with twenty million non-whites to talk to. And the saddest thing is that Western racialists living in predominantly Aryan towns also have no one to talk to in their cities or villages.
A normie works for more comfort: his deity is the god of riches, Mammon. For us, if there is such a thing as following the decrees of providence, these are the sacred words.
But what can a priest do in the darkest hour?
Basically, get depressed because white nationalists are, as we have seen, de facto conservatives and have no plan to take power in their nations.
If Russia’s entry into Kiev fatally disrupted the traitorous European governments, my spirits would rise because that could mark the beginning of the end of Kali Yuga.
But that’s not happening yet…
The horrible dilemma that a priest on the other side of the Atlantic and I suffer from is that it is impossible for us to wait passively for that collapse because that wait leads to exasperating depression.
What to do then?
If there were already several priests, even if we didn’t live together, we could try to do something on Rumble. The West’s Darkest Hour has already been exhausted in the written word, but audio-visual communication, if it were every day, would reinvigorate this blog.
But even that is not possible due to the language barrier (I write in Spanish and then convert the text into English with a free online translator; then I correct the software’s syntax).
That condemns me to a purely textual blog, although if I already had young pupils aspiring to the priesthood, they would be using A.I. to translate my audio-visual monologues into English. But I have realised that I don’t work well when I’m just talking solo to the camera. I need at least one other person to interact with verbally.
It seems incredible, but for a Kalki apprentice like me, what would lift my spirits the most would be a nuclear exchange between Europe and Russia so that the System would be destroyed in a single day, even though in the coming months I could die from nuclear winter if the US committed the stupidity of intervening.
Nuclear fantasy aside, what would lift my spirits stratospherically would be to live with people who think like me. I couldn’t live with the Groypers, for example, because they have no plans for ethnic cleansing in the US. It has to be someone who religiously believes in the 14 words. And if another man also believes in the 4, he would be a brother, a soul mate.
What to do in a city where one is a sort of Diogenes going out with a lamp in broad daylight to find a single man and never seeing him? How can one not get depressed if we add to that the fact that white nationalism is phoney (unless someone vehemently believes and speculates in scenarios like The Turner Diaries)?
Every single day becomes a struggle against the noonday demons, for which I am not in the least bit to blame. The culprits are the millions of Aryan males who are doing nothing: lambs to the slaughter of the anti-white System that covers the West.
Would a way to entertain myself in the coming days be to offer constructive criticism of the Third Reich pamphlets I own? Years ago, I realised that the exoteric part of National Socialism lacked the depth of the esoteric part.
Himmler in letter to Bormann on how Christian education has poisoned our youth:
“We already have the best contact with the Reich Youth Leadership. But I think the report is so important that I didn’t want to withhold it from you. For me, the overall result is the visible and systematic poisoning of the youth of our people through Christian education, which we obviously do not provide enough positive ideological education for in our youth, especially now in wars.” [1]
Part of my depression stems from the despair that more than eighty years ago the Germans had hit the nail on the head. In contrast, today’s American racialists (Europeans are punished if they dare to speak out, as happened to Brigitte Bardot) cling to Judeo-Christianity: the primary cause of white decline.
__________
[1]Source: NARA, RG 242, T-175, Roll 131 p.640, National Archives.
Early marriages of joyfully consented racial selection, to raise sexual relations […] had one aim and one alone: to breed, out of the best Germans, a nation of supermen in the Nietzschean sense of the word; a nation of ‘heroes like unto the gods,’ to repeat the words of Homer.
And, as I said before, the Führer pursued that aim not just because the Germans were his people, but because his, more-than-political, nay, more-than-human insight pointed them out to him as the only people sufficiently pure-blooded and, at the same time, sufficiently militant to be the saviours of the Aryan race, here and now, in its present-day emergency, and to become the instruments of its regeneration and survival, beyond the stormy end of our Time-cycle.
The well-known National Socialist policy of German expansion towards the East is the logical consequence of Adolf Hitler’s efforts to raise not only the biological quality of his people (through racial selection) but also their birth-rate, while doing all he could to avoid coming in conflict with England i.e., while refusing to claim, for Germany, colonies overseas. It was as clear and consistent as could possibly be: if every healthy and pure-blooded German was to have as many children as he or she could—the more the better—(and that was what the National Socialist State was urging them to do), then surely that yearly increase in population was to live somewhere and somehow. And if emigration overseas was to be discouraged (in order to avoid all economic rivalry with England, in those days in which there still existed a British Empire) then the growing millions had to find another outlet, for Germany was anyhow, and already before Adolf Hitler came to power, too small for the population she had. The new outlet was to be ‘the East’—the rich corn-lands of Ukraine, and further still: Russia’s illimited expanses.
This policy has been misunderstood […]
In order fully to understand both, one has—again—to consider National Socialism from the standpoint of cosmic evolution and to recognise, in it, the great Movement ‘against Time’ […].
[…] in order to overrun the earth with his own brood of poorer and poorer quality. That sinful will, coupled, as time goes on, with positive hatred for the eternal, natural Order, has found its latest main expression in the system of false values […]
[…] to organise the every day more enormous Menschenmaterial for the benefit of the Forces of disintegration. These, i.e., their agents, tend, admittedly to do away with the vast international slum which the world has become, but… only in order to drill the slum-dwellers—ultimately—into factory robots with one ideal: work, work, work; ‘production,’ ever more production, and cheap enjoyment—ever more enjoyment—quantity, and ever more quantity… till more and more millions of bastardised world-citizens have completely killed Nature for ‘man’s’ sake […].
In the eyes of the believers in quality, however (in the eyes of those who deplore that broadening disparity between actual life and its divine pattern, which characterises evolution in Time), any healthy tree, any perfect sample of manifested Life—is worth far more than an ugly,—degenerate human bastard. […]
That is, I repeat—one can never stress the point enough—the deep opposition between National Socialism and Marxism, nay, between National Socialism and all man-centred, equalitarian creeds, of which Marxism is merely the latest in date and the most consistent. It is the opposition between the Golden Age ideal of quality at all levels of existence, and the Dark Age dream of organised human quantity, submerging all life, until it itself finally sinks into chaos and death.
But we are, now, in the Dark Age—and, which is more, near the end of it. This is a fact which nothing can alter. And just as ‘tyranny can only be broken through greater tyranny, and terror through terror’ (Mein Kampf, p. 507), so can quantity only be crushed through quantity.
The truth which Adolf Hitler gave his people, so that they might become and remain the bulwark of Aryandom against the impact of a bastardised world drilled in Marxism (the latest Jewish revolutionary creed ‘in Time’), can be condensed in a few simple sentences: “We Germans are the only possible leaders of Western Aryandom. That is our ‘God-ordained’—Nature-ordained—mission. We are, therefore, valuable—irreplaceable. Therefore we must live; live and thrive; become numerous, at the same time as we breed an élite. Numerous at any cost (in this Age, in fact, pure-blooded quantity is the raw material out of which, here and there, quality emerges; great men are often born in large families.) Therefore, become a pure-blooded quantity; produce as many healthy Aryan babies as possible! But we are a nation without space. And we need space for the many babies; space in order to live and fulfil our mission. We don’t want to become England’s enemies. The English are, like we, of Nordic blood (or mostly so). People of the same best blood should collaborate in view of the same lofty aim: the rule of the best of their common best blood. It is the original intention of Nature; the spirit of the eternal Order, against which we do not wish to sin. England can be (we hope) converted to this standpoint. But Russia has become the citadel of Marxism—that hated Jewish snare. It is, apart from that, a broad, rich land; can provide plenty of space for us, and all possibilities of our growing into a huge people. Huge, and of exceptional quality, therefore invincible; the lords of this earth along with our Nordic brothers, the English. Therefore: expansion towards the East—Ostpolitik!” […]
[…] if only England had not betrayed her own blood and deliberately started the Second World War.
The fact that all Adolf Hitler’s efforts to avoid the war—or to end it speedily and victoriously, at least honourably—remained fruitless, proves by no means his inefficiency as a statesman or as a strategist. It only proves that the forces of disintegration—the coalesced forces of our Dark Age, embodied in all-powerful international Jewry—were, in spite of his insight, in spite of his genius, too strong for him; that it needed a still harder ‘Man against Time’ than he, in order to break them; in other words, that he is not the last Man ‘against Time.’
Emsdetten in Westfalen,
Germany, 4th May, 1955.
______ 卐 ______
The Lightning & the Sun by Savitri Devi (Counter-Currents Publishing, 2014, unabridged edition) can be ordered here.
Editor’s Note: A visitor of this site sent me this some time ago:
______ 卐 ______
This book is available on Amazon.
Germany and the United Kingdom are the two European countries where animal protection has undoubtedly had an earlier development. In the German case, though, the animal protection and nature conservation provisions, at the centre of the first legislative measures taken by the Nazi regime, were characterised by a non-negligible degree of detail and systematization. Indeed, the animal protection and nature conservation agenda was first developed in 1933, with Adolf Hitler’s ascension to power and the institution of the Reich’s Association for Animal Protection (Reichstierschutzbund). Undeniably, the resulting laws covered aspects that were only touched upon much later by similar EU legislation, such as welfare measures during transport or at the time of slaughter. This shows the validity and scientific character with which the Nazi animal legislation was planned.
Whilst Nazi symbology disappeared, dragged along by the damnatio memoriae of a regime that imposed a heavy burden on Germany’s international reputation, the animal protection legislation, although repealed like the rest of the laws enacted during the Nazi period, have proven as a foundation for the current animal protection laws of Austria and Germany. This constitutes a good proof that said laws were a faithful reflection of a mentality deeply rooted in the Germanic spirit.
______ 卐 ______
After the seizure of power by the National Socialists, new hopes aroused and German conservationists lobbied for new pieces of legislation to protect the Heimat (homeland), its animals, and its nature.
Indeed, in the first two years of the National Socialist regime, from 1933 to 1935, the government enacted a wide series of specific animal and nature protection laws. Extensive new legislation came into force in the fields of animal welfare, hunting and environmental law, while forest law has never been completed. These could be built on the existing legal bases at the level of state laws and local decrees, as well as on the draft laws of the Weimar Republic.
The first legislative steps of the Reich’s government aimed to finally settle the debate on animal protection with a comprehensive legal text. It is impressive, in terms of speed and promptness, that the Nazis were able to emanate three pieces of legislation regarding animal welfare and protection, namely the Law on the Slaughter of Animals (RGB1139/1933), the Amendment to the Criminal Provisions (RGB1 156/1933) introducing the provision on animal abuse, and the Reich’s Law on Animal Protection (RGBII 132/1933). Within less than a year, from April to November 1933, the Reich’s Cabinet ended the long lasting issue and promoted the new legislation with extensive propaganda measures.
Then in 1934, and again 1935, the legislator’s focus shifted from farm animals and pets to wildlife, as the main concern started to be the extinction in Germany of animals such as bears, wolves, bison and wild horses. In fact, unlike governments overseas and in other European countries, in 1934 Germany became the first nation in modern times to place the wolf under protection.
The objective was to create conservation and breeding programmes and pass new and more uniform laws on nature and species conservation, as well as hunting. This objective was met on July 3, 1934 and on June 26, 1935 when the Reich’s Law on Hunting (RGBI I 73/1934) and the Reich’s Law on Nature Conservation (RGB1 I 68/1935) came respectively into force.
German Romanticism
Of utmost importance for the construction of the German national identity were certain notions and theories regarding man’s connections to nature and animal life that were expressed by the German romantic poetry, music and social thought. Being at the height of Romanticism, the German Volk was longing for the absolute, ready to subordinate the welfare of the single individual in the battle for life.
Collective identification was conveyed throughout the cult of genius, the veneration of nature, nostalgia for the remote past, the exaltation of passion, the suspicion of science, and salvation through art. [emphasis by Ed.] These ideas shaped Nazi thinking. All late Romantics—from Charles Darwin, or better Ernst Haeckel in Germany, to Richard Wagner—had venerated nature as an inexorable power that produced storms and earthquakes that annihilated entire species and peoples; industrialisation reached that point where human beings began to claim such power for themselves. Rather than a social movement, nature conservation was to be considered a sentiment.
According to the German biologist and environmentalist Walther Schoenichen, member of the NSDAP since 1932 and Head of the Reich’s Office for Nature Conservation until 1938, “The idea of conservation is essentially an outgrowth of Romanticism.”
In this context, the thought of Friedrich Nietzsche was influential. His works had been adapted and selectively used by Nazism, especially his rejection of intellectual culture and the embrace of the animal instinct in humans. In particular, great importance on the animal origin and character of man, was placed on Nietzsche’s conception of the “blond beast” or Raubtier, namely of man as a predator. By celebrating the beast in man in a mythical way, as a type of “secret idol” with qualities like vitality, unscrupulousness, blind will, and obedience, the new Germans were to be part animal, rejecting a certain side of their humanity. The compassion normally reserved to humans was to be redirected toward animals[Wow! This sentence sums up my ethics in a nutshell! —Ed.], and the cold aggressiveness of animal instinct became the model rigorous German. This was, in fact, part of the intent of the animal protection laws.
Another important argument was the one regarding the moral status of animals—a preoccupation that influenced Nazi thinking, calling for a remedy to early wrongs towards animals and calling for the protection of nature as a moral imperative. To this extent, the critique of Ernst Haeckel —German biologist, zoologist, philosopher of the late 19th and early 20th century, and highly influential populariser of Social Darwinism (he wrote at a time when the application of Darwinism to psychological and social phenomena was still in its infancy)— “religion is emblematic to understanding the Nazi transposition of this idea.” Haeckel attacked primarily Christianity for putting man above animals and nature, and for isolating man from nature and generating disrespect towards animals. He believed that man and animals had the same natural and moral status and that much of human morality stemmed from animals. Furthermore, he maintained that humans had much to learn from animals, like using the laws of nature to reform human society, the function of which—like animal societies—was to survive and biological fitness was essential to both. Not surprisingly, he supported “racial hygiene” through euthanasia.
Clearly, Hitler and other exponents of National Socialism endorsed and adapted this, as well as other main theories of the so-called Social Darwinism. Heredity, struggle, and natural selection were fundamental to their conception of both the natural and the social realms. It was the task of Nazism to create a community in harmony with the eternal laws of nature. As Goebbels commented in his diaries:
Man should not feel so superior to animals. He has no reason to. Man believes that he alone has intelligence, a soul, and the power of speech. Has not the animal these things? Just because we, with our dull senses, cannot recognise them, it does not prove that they are not there.
A third significant Romantic concept, particularly expressed by philosophers such as Richard Wagner, promoted synthesis over analysis, unity and wholeness over disintegration and atomism, and Volk legend over scientific truth[compare Wagner’s approach with American “race realism” —Ed.]. According to this view, an organic unity should not be mentally analysed and physically dissected. Therefore, mechanistic science was perceived as destructive for dissolving the whole into fragments, thereby losing the invisible force that makes the whole more than just the sum of its parts.
By defining it as the “curse of vivisection”, Wagner urged the closing down of laboratories and the removal of scientists and as both evil and Jewish, and associated it to the capitalists torturing the proletariat.
Nazis assumed a critical attitude towards science and opposed to this particular approach to it, which was attributed to the Jews, because it represented the separation of man from his connections with nature and ultimately from his own spirit. As Arnold Arluke and Boria Sax state, Nazis wanted a science that was influenced more by Goethe than by Newton. A science closer to poetry and art:
As Man stands to Nature, so stands Art to Man. When Nature had developed in itself those attributes, which included the conditions for the existence of Man, then Man spontaneously evolved. In like manner, as soon as human life had engendered from itself the conditions for the manifestment of Art-work, this too stepped self-begotten into life.
Rejection of anthropocentrism
The Nazi traditions of nature preservation and their romantic longings can be recollected into one essential aspect, which explicitly characterised their strict provisions on animal protection, i.e. the rejection of the anthropocentric view[this is very important to grasp our religion of the four words! —Ed.]. Animals were not to be protected for the sake of human interests but for their own sake. However Nazi ideologues apparently replaced the anthropocentric conception with a hierarchical one, which not only met the Nazi requirements of organizational efficiency but was also a way of fitting into the cosmic order, a way of being part of a whole.
According to the Austrian biologist Ludwig von Bertalaffny’s philosophy of biology, organisms were, by definition, organised things. As the founder of the General Systems Theory (GST) and member of the NSDAP since 1938, Bertalaffny related his views to the totalitarian ideology of Nazism and to the Führerprinzip in particular.
More concretely, his theory developed a new scientific doctrine of “wholeness”, replacing the philosophical Theory of Categories. He considered it indisputable that sociological phenomena, thus the human society, should be ordered in a hierarchical manner, like nature. He also praised the law enacted by Hermann Göring, which placed all decisions regarding the administration of nature under total centralised control.
______ 卐 ______
It is not a coincidence that in a famous caricature, Göring is portrayed as the liberator and leader of all lab animals that give him the Nazi salute in sign of gratitude. On this matter, he is remembered for another extreme political statement:
I […] will commit to concentration camps those who still think they can continue to treat animals as inanimate property […]. The fairy tales and sagas of the Nordic people, especially the German people, show the spirit of close contact, which all Aryan people possess, with the animals. It is the more incomprehensible, therefore, that justice, up to now, did not agree with the spirit of the people on this point as it did on many others. Under the influence of foreign [i.e., Jewish] conceptions of justice and a strange comprehension of law, through the unhappy fact that the exercise of justice was in the hands of people alien to the nation […] the animal was considered a dead thing under the law […]. This does not correspond to the German spirit and most decidedly does not conform to the ideas of National Socialism.
Editor's interpolated note: The hatred I feel when I hear a Judeo-Christian say that God (the nonexistent god of the Jews) put animals in the world for our benefit, makes me write my "four words".
Hitler once declared:
I have always known to be of the opinion that there is nothing better than being a lawyer for those who cannot defend themselves. In the Third Reich there must be no more animal cruelty.
______ 卐 ______
Their vision of the future included a world where animals would not be unnecessarily harmed. Hunting became a symbol of the past civilization, meat eating became a symbol of decayed peoples, and vegetarianism became a symbol of the new, pure civilization that was to be Germany’s future. We also know from direct testimonies, that Nazi leaders took pride in presenting themselves as friends of the animals; as Heinrich Himmler—the Reich’s Head of the SS (“Reichsführer-SS”)—stated, Germans were:
[…] the only nation of the world with a decent attitude towards animals.
Also Hermann Göring was of the same opinion, when he stated that:
The German people have always shown their great love of animals and the question of animal protection was always near their hearts. For thousands of years the German people have always looked upon their household and farmyard animals as their companions, in the case of horses as their fighting companions… To the German, animals are not merely creatures in the organic sense, but creatures who lead their own lives and who are endowed with perceptive facilities, who feel pain and experience joy and prove to be faithful and attached.
Indeed, the Holocaust itself may have depended on this unique cultural conception of what it meant to be human in relation to animals as a metaphor of what it meant to be Aryan in relation to other races. From this newly acquired perspective, one can conclude that what is considered to be as cruel and inhumane behaviour toward human beings by today’s standards, was seen by the Nazis as acceptable behaviour toward “subhumans”. What may be regarded as paradoxically humane behaviour toward animals, in light of the human tragedy, was seen in Nazi Germany as quite consistent given the belief of a common stem of certain higher humans and animals and their special bond with nature. Therefore, racial and eugenic laws on one side and the animal protection and nature conservation normative complex on the other, did indeed have a common denominator, which is mostly visible when studying the emanated laws in the context they were created in.
It is evident that the Nazi German identity relied on the blurring of boundaries between humans and animals, as well as constructing a unique phylogenetic hierarchy that altered conventional human-animal distinctions and imperatives. This blurring was visible, for example, in the abolishing of moral distinctions between animals and people, leading to the result that animals could be considered “higher” than some people. This was also apparent in the highly-debated concern for animals held by many prominent Nazi Germans.
On the one hand, animals were considered virtuous, innocent, and embodied ideal qualities absent in most humans, to the extent that to hunt or eat animals was defiling, a sign of decay and perversion. People, on the other hand, were seen with hatred, dread, and disappointment. In fact, to kill certain people was part of the quest for purity. Additionally, this blurring was evident in the Nazi alliance with animals, both portrayed as victims of their Jewish oppressors, i.e. the vivisectionists and slaughterers.
Finally, this blurring was visible in the animalization of German Nazis, in how they represented themselves as well as other humans. To cope with what they considered as the threat of genetic pollution of their pure, holistic, natural Volk, Germans were encouraged to fight with the same hard-headed determination as any other species in nature.
Heinrich Himmler formulated this as the watchword of the Schultzstaffel (SS), an organisation that eventually became a vast organisation ranging from the staff of the concentration camps to the Gestapo and SD, to the Waffen-SS and Hitler’s personal soldiers. Above all else, Himmler and the rest of the NS leadership stressed the importance of loyalty to the Reich and the Führer.
“When American Whites become a minority in their own country, that will not be the end of the racial struggle—rather, it will be the real beginning.” —Matt Koehl, quoted in the Fall 2025 issue of NS Bulletin (the official newsletter of the NEW ORDER).
Before the ten links below this #0, and regardless of anti-Nazi propaganda—the Western religion of our times—, we must ask ourselves: What really is National Socialism? An article by Martin Kerr explains it admirably well:
(This last article mentions a series of real dreams. An American repeatedly dreamed that Hitler appeared to him. That series of recurring dreams shows, in my opinion, that Rockwell has been one of the noblest Americans that that distant land has produced.)
The norns Urðr, Verðandi and Skuld beneath the world tree Yggdrasil (1882) by Ludwig Burger.
I continue to quote some passages from my binder. Incidentally, when it got wet, not only did the ink from my notes run, but it also bled through to the other side of the pages. Fortunately, it is still legible.
______ 卐 ______
Once on the plane, when I no longer wanted to be in Zapatero’s Spain and was preparing to live in Mexico, on 12 September 2009, still on the ground but after midnight, I began to read the articles printed in my binder of The Occidental Quarterly Online (TOQ Online from now on).
The first one I read on the plane was “The Seven Pillars of White Nationalism” by Yggdrasil (I would later learn that this was John Gardner’s pen name). I was stunned to see that among the readings Yggdrasil recommended was Himmler’s Posen Speech!
Unlike what I had been reading in Larry Auster’s View From the Right, the contributors to TOQ Online weren’t Jews. Since I was just beginning to familiarise myself with white nationalist literature, I would not wake up to the Jewish Question until the following year (February 2010, to be exact). But on the plane, still grounded at the Gran Canaria airport, I had no way to awaken to the JQ, and I wrote in the binder something in Spanish that I am now translating. When I came across Yggdrasil’s recommendation of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, I wrote: “Wow, wow, wow. So these guys are totally paranoid?”
In January 2014, when I reread this article, my old notes and I had already awakened to the JQ, I added a postscript on the same page of the binder: “Look what I thought four years ago… I remember reading this on the plane and feeling that it was an evil trait of the author and of all TOQ in general—just the Pavlovian reaction that everyone who takes a look at my current blog for the first time must feel…”
When I started blogging in 2009, in the first incarnation of The West’s Darkest Hour I hadn’t yet awakened to the JQ, so in 2014 I was referring to the second incarnation of my site; the present one is the third incarnation after WordPress cancelled my account. Incidentally, the Spanish word actual (translated as current) is underlined in my binder; above I put it in italics.
In his article Yggdrasil also recommended The Turner Diaries, a novel I was not yet familiar with, and on the second page of the article on recommended readings, I read this sentence by him:
Surprisingly, I was unable to find any coherent and helpful works in English translation from The Third Reich explaining how National Socialism might save us. Most of the major works of that period, including Rosenberg’s Myth of the Twentieth Century and Hitler’s Mein Kampf are dreadful tomes, which fail to recognize our basic predicament. The best explanation I can find of National Socialism is Lincoln Rockwell’s White Power.
I have complained a lot about this: there is no good book from the Third Reich that explains National Socialism; at most, there are inspirational booklets and, after 1945, Hitler’s readable after-dinner talks that can be read one a day (as David Irving recommended). But during the Third Reich there could be no frank books because that would have meant revealing the profound anti-Christianity of NS. It would have been political suicide to reveal that esoteric aspect to the masses. So, while I do not blame Hitler or his intellectuals for the absence of such an educational book (as Mein Kampf is a dreadful tome as Yggdrasil rightly says), our anthology The Fair Race could now be considered an introductory book (unlike the 1930s, in the new century the esoteric aspect of NS must become exoteric). Yggdrasil continues:
The prosperity that followed WW II has reduced the inclination of Euros to resist the human equality mania en-mass, resulting instead in localized witch hunts, including war crimes persecutions and hate crimes laws.
That is why what I long for most of all is for fiat currencies to collapse and, subsequently, for energy devolution to eliminate billions of Neanderthals. Only then will the degenerative effects of material comfort evaporate, like morning dew, among the surviving whites. Yggdrasil continues:
And you cannot interrupt the flow of social reinforcement by adopting a low status label—by claiming to be a KKK member, for example—just to gain the attention of the media. Adopting emblems and symbols that the controlled media has invested billions of dollars stigmatizing as low status merely serves to reinforce the belief among the outer party that their displays of the egalitarian delusions confer precisely what they seek—the opinion of their neighbors that they are “good people.” Thus, in order to interrupt the status transmission mechanism, the outer party must value your opinion of them. You must appear to be just like them. That means you must avoid markers of low status.
Sixteen years after I read the article, we see that even that isn’t possible in the darkest hour of the West. I have been watching many videos about Charlie Kirk, who was murdered this month by a homo, and it hurts that someone as good as him—good by normie standards—, so incapable of the slightest hatred, was slandered as a hater not only by the murderer but also by the progressives who applauded the attack. So it’s not enough to appear to be a good guy, as Yggdrasil recommended, to prevent crazy people from calling you a Nazi. I prefer to show my true colours: red, white and black so that at least a few visitors will want to become priests of the sacred words (cf. our featured article).
Yggdrasil’s article was published on 6 September 2009. Unfortunately, TOQ Online no longer exists. That’s why it was worth printing the articles that started my ideological transformation.
Those were different times. Online I never, ever insulted White Nationalism at that time! Incidentally, only one brief comment appeared in the comments section, from Michael O’Meara, who subscribed to white nationalism but not to NS. O’Meara commented: “I feel about the world in a way different from Yggdrasil, but at the same time I think every important idea of my WN comes from what I learned from him.”
Greg Johnson was then editor of TOQ Online, and I was surprised to discover in my binder that the previous article Johnson had published in that webzine was titled “All-Time Leading Hitlers”.
Why do you think Hitler created National Socialism? Because German-Christian culture wasn’t enough to stop the Jew, it had been taken over by the Jew (everything Kevin MacDonald writes about kikes was written by Germans long before 1900—because Jews don’t change their tricks). Nazism was the one time in history when Whites discovered how to defeat Jews.
Regarding post-1945 National Socialism, I’ve previously recommended the site of Martin Kerr, the heir to the old guard: George Lincoln Rockwell and Matt Koehl. Now I would also like to recommend the new guard: the Volkish podcast Manifest Destiny.
