web analytics
Categories
Civil war Real men

Primorosas

nalgas

It’s been a few days since I posted “Survey” and I’d like to say a few things.

First, thank you to the commenters who have replied so far.

Since Stefan Molyneux’s YouTube account was taken down several years ago, Molyneux confessed on another platform that only a small fraction of his YouTube audience subscribed to the new one. I realised that of those five hundred million visits his channel had accumulated, the vast majority were mere voyeurs! They weren’t even folk like the half-Jew Molyneux, whom some at the time called “Alt Lite.”

Forget this guy… Without the proper Männerbund the Aryan will perish. And I see no other way to prepare, even decades before armed revolution, than for some of the men who believe in the sacred words to share meals under the same roof. If our Syssitia had a wealthy sponsor—I very much doubt he will appear!—, it would display sculptures of this kind:

It would be something like an intellectual vanguard of priests who could serve as a guide for the surviving young Aryans after the impending social collapse. But only after an armed revolution and the consequent transvaluation could the survivors have daily access to such exquisite buttocks, and millions of Aryan children would be born with this return to traditional patriarchy.

This is my dream: Sabine women will be abducted, but men who don’t want to participate in the struggle shall be excluded from the liberated zones. Yes: there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth for those who refuse to contribute to the Organisation’s fighting force.

Unfortunately, it’s just a dream. Since Harold Covington died in 2018, no one is thinking about revolution anymore (and Covington himself was a despicable person who slandered his colleagues believing that by slandering them, he would remain as the sole leader!).

Today’s racialists seem to have suffered, through their lack of manliness, a regression towards the Alt Lite. Therefore, there’s no reason to be optimistic. Only a dollar collapse and the consequences of peak oil (energy devolution), if they actually happen, could offer a chance to begin shifting the all-feminised mindset of today’s white man back to the warriors of old. But it’s not even clear that if these two catastrophes converge the white man will, finally, wake up…

Categories
Psychology

Survey

I see that no one else has responded to Benjamin’s survey. This motivates me to conduct an even shorter survey about what bothers visitors to this site, to the point that they frequently leave me talking to myself. What exactly bothers you—?:

– that I criticise white nationalists because, in general, they haven’t awakened to the CQ, much less transvalued their Judeo-Christian values ​​(which includes atheists)?

– that I was born in Mexico and therefore my native language is Spanish, and that it seems a bit surreal that a Latin American would dare criticise his northern neighbours? (Actually, since adolescence I’ve felt very different from the average Mexicans, as shown in the Metapedia photo of the lad I was.)

– that, according to the visitors’ POV, I don’t pay enough attention to the JQ? If this is the case, last week Nick Fuentes uploaded a video in which he spoke about, in his words, the “low IQ anti-Semites” whom we on this site have called monocausalists: those who see only subversives Jews under every stone!

– that I criticise the very foundations of the US as a nation? The truth is that I criticise the entire continent, since it was founded on the Christian religion (I don’t count the great pre-Hispanic cultures because they are extinct). Furthermore, south of the Rio Grande, the process of racial mixing began centuries before the Anglo-Germans of the north began to mix on a large scale, so I am far more critical of Latin America than of the US and Canada.

What bothers the visitors? Why are there so many visitors, according to my statistics page, who never comment? Are Europeans perhaps afraid of the draconian laws against freedom of expression in their countries? But if you fully agree with what we say here but don’t want to commit in writing, why not email me to make a donation (which doesn’t even require revealing your real name, as you can see in the sticky post)?

What bothers you, my open contempt for normies and neo-normies (those racialists who haven’t crossed the psychological Rubicon into National Socialism)?

If that’s the case, note that since I began my writing career speaking out about the hellish environment in my family that destroyed several people, I had no mercy in pointing out the perpetrators (my parents and their hired psychiatrist). If I’m capable of criticising my now-deceased parents like this, why expect a less critical or incisive spirit when I see similar shortcomings in other people?

What bothers you exactly (please tell me)…?

Categories
Adolf Hitler Kali Yuga Third Reich

On the need

to undemonize Hitler

Today I edited and expanded one of our featured articles, “On the Need to Undemonize Hitler,” and it’s worth reading its links this fateful May when the Russian idiots have celebrated the defeat of the Third Reich (something that, in their own way, Western idiots—whose incredibly nasty secular religion seems to be the extinction of the white race—also celebrate).

I added the following passages to the article:

“In almost any war one side can be dishonestly demonized even by a truthful enumeration of its crimes, if the crimes of its adversaries are suppressed.” —Irmin Vinson, writing about the Third Reich.

How can we stop seeing Hitler as a demon? Simple: the Allies killed more German civilians—millions between May 1945 and 1947!—than the Germans killed Jews in the Second World War.

Westerners ignore this because, as the Croatian intellectual Tomislav Sunić says, World War II is not over yet: We remain immersed in an omnipresent propaganda war—especially lying by omission (cf. Vinson’s epigraph above)—, even in the year I am reviewing this article: 2026.

Categories
Videos Vladimir Putin

May 9th

In his video today, Alexander Mercouris said:

This is a huge event and it is an event which Russians and others within the territory of the former Soviet Union take great pride in, and which by the way we in the West should be grateful to them for, though in truth and in fact we never are.

Mercouris is an idiot. Virtually all westerners are. Here’s a quote from another source:

Confirmation bias is not a quirk. It is not a bad habit you can fix with a motivational quote. It is a deeply embedded cognitive architecture that runs under every thought you believe is rational, every conclusion you believe is objective, and every opinion you believe you arrived at through careful consideration. The mechanism is simple and devastating: the brain actively seeks information that confirms what it already believes, and actively discounts, ignores, or attacks information that challenges it. Not occasionally. Constantly.

When a person holds a belief about their own competence—when they have decided, consciously or not, that they are smart, capable, and correct, the confirmation bias engine turns fully toward protecting that identity. Every piece of evidence that supports their self-image gets amplified. Every compliment lands with weight. Every small success becomes proof of their larger narrative. And every challenge, every contradiction, every piece of evidence that might suggest they are wrong gets filtered, reframed, or rejected entirely. Not through deliberate dishonesty, through an automatic process they never even see it happening.

This is how intelligent-sounding people hold profoundly wrong beliefs for decades without ever feeling the friction of being wrong. They are not stupid. They are not lying. They are running a program that the human brain runs in every single person—but they have never been handed the tools to interrupt it. And so the program runs unchecked. The beliefs compound. The blind spots deepen, and the confidence grows—not because the evidence supports it, but because the brain has been quietly curating a reality that does. Now layer on top of this the modern echo chamber, and you have one of the most powerful reinforcement systems ever constructed.

Content that confirms your existing beliefs triggers dopamine. Content that challenges your beliefs triggers cortisol… The social dimension of this goes even deeper. Human beings are tribal by design.

Challenging the beliefs of your group meant rejection—and rejection once meant death. That threat is no longer physical, but the brain hasn’t received the update.

When someone challenges a belief that is tied to your group identity—your political tribe, your professional community, your cultural circle—the brain processes it as a threat to survival. The rational mind goes offline. The defensive mind takes over. And suddenly a conversation about facts becomes a battle about identity, about loyalty, about who you are and which side you’re on.

This is why expertise doesn’t automatically win arguments. This is why data doesn’t automatically change minds. This is why you can show someone evidence that directly contradicts their position, and watch them walk away more convinced than before—a phenomenon researchers call the backfire effect.

I really hate normies…

Categories
Individualism Schutzstaffel (SS)

Weak souls

Viele Menschen werden dich fragen, was du wirklich mit deinem Leben machst, doch diese Menschen haben eine so schwache Seele, dass sie einen Kampf, der größer ist als sie selbst, nicht begreifen könnten.

Many people will ask you what you are really doing with your life, but these people have such weak souls that they could not comprehend a struggle greater than themselves.

Categories
Psychiatry

Ty

I’d like to add an anecdote to my comment today on the previous post, “Bogus Science.”

My finances took a hit, as I mentioned the month before last, due to the scam involving my sister, who owed me money and was paying me back monthly: something she can no longer do after her account was emptied by the scammer. I’ve just come from my bank to clarify something. Since I had to wait in line to speak with an executive, I brought one of my journals to keep me entertained while I waited my turn.

So I happened to see that on January 18, 2018, I had written something about Tyrone Pattern-Walsh, who used to sign his emails “Ty”: a commenter I visited in London who was imprisoned by the government last year for what he said on his friend Chris Gibbons’ podcast, whom I also met in London. (The poor Englishmen lack a First Amendment, and any truly incisive comment against the System can have very serious legal consequences!)

As I also recently mentioned in another of our recent discussion threads, I was struck by the fact that when I recommended to Ty in his London flat that he watch one of Robert Whitaker’s videos (I embedded a Whitaker video in my previous post yesterday) to help him stop taking the drug that was causing him akathisia, he basically ignored me.

Well, although my intention in queuing at the bank had nothing to do with Ty—I opened my 2018 diary simply to pass the time entertained while waiting—, I stumbled upon a passage that illustrates why it’s really foolish not to be interested in the topic:

By the way, Ty admires Charles Manson but not the critics of psychiatry I quote [in The West’s Darkest Hour]—even though he’s a victim of psychiatry! [my Spanish-English translation]

I wasn’t just referring to the akathisia from the drug he was taking when I noticed those symptoms in his apartment (always moving nervously, almost reflexively), but also because in the previous decade, his parents had committed him to a psychiatric hospital where he suffered terribly.

Would Ty be in jail if, instead of admiring the madman Manson, he had admired Whitaker?

I don’t think so: without akathisia and with his cathartic testimony of what his parents had done to him in auto-biographical books, as Benjamin and I did, he wouldn’t have been so reckless in his revolutionary pronouncements on Black Wolf Radio, run by Chris. (You simply cannot talk about racial revolution, even in a purely academic way, on that Orwellian island!)

Photos from the UK Thought Police when they arrested Christopher Gibbons (left) and Tyrone Pattern-Walsh (right). When Ty commented on this site, he usually did so under the name “Joseph Walsh”.
Categories
Pseudoscience Psychiatry Videos

Bogus science

In the fourth question of his survey, Benjamin asked:

Is psychiatry really a pseudoscience? Is the etiology of schizophrenics/psychotics truly that of parental trauma victims? Are neuroleptics/psychiatric drugs detrimental to health? Do parents cause the vast majority of the DSM-5/ICD behavioural patterns labelled as distinct disorders? Is mental illness environmental in origin? Is the psychiatric genetics position scientifically bankrupt?

Ben and I exchanged a few words in the discussion thread, but he recently added via email:

By the way, on the final (closing) comment by you on ‘Survey’, on Greg Johnson’s inability—even as he proofread it—to take in the information… that’s something I’ve never in my life understood about people. I can see it would really bother you!

They read the extensive full-proof document and they still don’t agree. I can only assume it’s an intelligence lack/dogma thing—some type of faulty methodology that arises from lower emotional intelligence. There’s some type of screen in the way, like a cognitive dissonance, and they just can’t process the evidence (the orthodox bias imposed by society is too great; that or the psychological implications in their own lives of taking it seriously, that private life ‘can of worms’ I mentioned before…).

I mean, of all points you’ve discussed with me (usually me, as not many others participate) that concern psychiatry on WDH—of pretty much all topics discussed there—psychiatry criticism is the most comprehensively debunked by now, with a superb level of detailed evidence, all bases covered, and you still get people somehow not grasping it (or not seeing why it’s important).

The reason racialists block topics we should be discussing, but which are a kind of taboo (for example Nordicism, which wasn’t taboo among Anglo-American eugenicists before WW2), is that the human mind is a restrictive container. There are notions, such as saying, “a fraudulent profession (psychiatry) has been taught in medical schools”, that show that the mind of the normie, or neo-normie racialist, is blocked by iron walls: ideas that simply cannot penetrate the membrane of our reason.

We human beings fortify ourselves in our certainties: for example, that what is taught as science in universities is always science. Often, the “insignificance” of reality doesn’t cause us cognitive dissonance (e.g., that psychiatry presents its central tenet, that mental disorder is a biomedical entity, as an irrefutable hypothesis according to Popper’s litmus test for distinguishing between real science and bogus science).

Sight and hearing can annihilate the believer! That’s why the normie closes his eyes and ears to the harrowing testimonies of the trauma suffered by those who endured terrible abuse in their childhood, which led to their mental disorders as adults: a plain refutation of the psychiatric medical model of mental disorders that, lacking biomarkers (unlike neurology, which does study biomarkers), dogmatically blames the brains of those traumatised by their parents:

Categories
Rape of the Sabine Women

The Rape

of Polyxena

In the sixth question of Benjamin’s survey published yesterday, he asks: “Are we required to reclaim our women by force in the manner of the Sabines?”

As I have already said, if the Aryan male so desired, he could destroy feminism overnight during the racial revolution.

Before feminism, our 19th-century ancestors had more contact with our pre-Christian past than today’s feminised racialists, who find the idea of abducting the contemporary Sabines to found a new Rome appalling: an empire that would resemble Hitler’s dream much more than ancient Rome. But since feminism has already taken over our post-Christian, neo-Christian culture, we will have no choice but brutal solutions:

In the Loggia dei Lanzi in Florence stands this sculpture known as The Rape of Polyxena by the artist Pio Fedi, created between 1855 and 1865. Polyxena is considered the Trojan version of Iphigenia, daughter of Agamemnon and Clytemnestra.

As a commenter on Twitter recently said, “it is a breathtaking marble celebration of abduction, power, and zero consent!”

Unwertuung aller Werte!

Categories
Miscellany

A Brief

Survey for WDH Regular Readers

by Benjamin

 
Please answer either “yes” to each question, or limit your “no” response to the best concise argument that you can make. These questions are not intended to be ambiguous.

  1. “The Nordic race is the pinnacle of human/Aryan evolution, and thus only Nordic bodies deserve to breed our future race”. Do you agree with both (or any) parts of this statement? If not, why not?
  1. Is miscegenation a crime against life? Are all non-Nordic Aryans subhuman?
  1. Is our adoption of Christian ethics the prime reason for our dissolution as a race? Are we as Aryans primarily to blame for our present historical conditions?
  1. Is psychiatry really a pseudoscience? Is the etiology of schizophrenics/psychotics truly that of parental trauma victims? Are neuroleptics/psychiatric drugs detrimental to health? Do parents cause the vast majority of the DSM-5/ICD behavioural patterns labelled as distinct disorders? Is mental illness environmental in origin? Is the psychiatric genetics position scientifically bankrupt? Do non-Aryans generally mistreat their children?
  1. Is vegetarianism/veganism a moral necessity? Is most non-human animal suffering unnecessary (excluding non-Aryans)? Is full veganism a beneficial goal for the future? Can most non-human animals feel pain? Are many non-human animals conscious?
  1. Are we required to reclaim our women by force in the manner of the Sabines? Are official public schools unnecessary? Are all our children to be raised solely by Aryan men after around the age of 7?
  1. Will current ‘non-Aryan re-migration’ initiatives likely fail? Are we required to kill our enemies? Are we required to kill our enemies to the level of an international genocide? Are we required to kill our enemies irrespective of their age?
  1. Are the British and American soldiers who fought in it to be held responsible for the consequences of the Second World War? Should both America and Great Britain cease to exist as nations in order to preserve Aryan life? Is the ‘Hellstorm’ Holocaust against the German people the greatest evil in the history of our race?
  1. Do you affirm the historical reality of the Jewish Holocaust? Was 9/11 an Islamic terror attack?
  1. Is politics obsolete? Is real-world non-political coordination necessary? Are we required to establish Syssitias or equivalent shared communal living areas?

“Enemies” = non-Aryan racial enemies/Aryan traitors. “I don’t know” is not an acceptable response to any question.

Categories
Donald Trump Narcissism

Trump’s NPD

Regarding how I ended my essay about Marco, which I uploaded to this site on April 26, by saying that nutsy people like Marco only hurt themselves but that there are narcissists in the highest spheres of power, let’s listen to what Scott Ritter said in an interview uploaded to YouTube today:

We have to stop viewing this problem [Trump’s crazy policy in the war against Iran] from the standpoint of traditional geopolitics because you’ll never get it right. This is about a mentally ill president. When I say mentally ill, it is a mental illness. When we speak of narcissistic personality disorder, it is literally a mental illness. And this man has an extreme, malignant version of it [Marco’s condition!]. He is literally psychotic. You saw the tweets: eleven posts in a handful of hours, stuff that […] any military person would be relieved of command […]

We’re dealing with a literally insane person, who has surrounded himself with people whose job is to sustain the insanity […] They’re there to stroke their president’s ego which is the worst thing you can do for a narcissist but that’s what happened.

I hate Ritter’s opinions about Hitler, but I like what he says about Trump.