refutes the WN and NS paradigm
Following up on what I said last Saturday, I would like to show how we differ not only from American white nationalism but also from German National Socialism.
We believe that Christianity is the primary cause of the Aryan decline, not a secondary cause as seems to emerge from Hitler’s conversations with close friends, or from Himmler’s lectures to the SS. Both knew that Christianity was quite a problem, but not the problem to be solved (that’s why they focused on Jewry).
There are no longer any German National Socialists who can speak publicly, due to the draconian laws of Germany and Austria. But in previous years, I posed a question to American white nationalists, who have their First Amendment rights, which they never answered: If Jewry is the primary cause of white decline, why did the Spanish ruin their DNA by marrying Amerind women when the anti-Semitic Inquisition reigned in New Spain (what we now call Mexico)?
I think they didn’t respond because they don’t have a coherent answer to my argument: that New Spain’s Catholicism—not the Jews who had no real power in New Spain—, was the obvious cause of mestizaje (racial mixing).
Juan Miguel Zunzunegui, who was born in the same city as me, is a Mexican writer and lecturer known for his Hispanist approach to Mexican history. Throughout his career, he has published several literary works and historical essays in which he attempts to demystify the Black Legend that has been used against Spain.
Zunzunegui recently published a book about Hernán Cortés, the conqueror of the Aztec Empire, whom he admires. I would like to use this short video in Spanish from YouTube to illustrate my point. The translation and transcription of the audio to text are mine. Zunzunegui said:
It’s quite nice when Cortés advances and signs pacts—for example, in the area that is now the state of Tabasco, where he meets the woman we now call Malinche, “Doña Marina”—Cortés is given twenty women, and they are not spoils of war.
That’s very important to clarify. From then on, it’s always the same: “We give you these women so that you may have children with them and we may be brothers” [i.e., Amerinds and Spaniards—Ed.]. What does Cortés do? He baptises them, gives them Spanish names, and marries them off to his men! And they have children with them. Where is the conquest there? Or at least it’s a different kind of conquest, right?
And when he allies himself with the Tlaxcallans—which is Spain’s great alliance in America—it’s the same thing, right?: “Take the daughters of the nobles so that you may have children with them and we may be brothers.” And that goes hand in hand with one of the last wishes expressed by Queen Isabella I of Castile shortly before her death in 1503: “Let Spaniards marry Indian women! Let Spanish women marry Indian men, and let us be one people!”
When you marry someone from another people and have a mestizo child, there are no longer two peoples. When Cortés and Doña Marina had their first mestizo child—note: Martín Cortés Malintzin had a Nahuatl surname—like Pedro de Alvarado, who married María Luisa Xicoténcatl, their children would bear the name Xicoténcatl. So, of course, Pedro de Alvarado’s son, one of the most savage men who came with Cortés, was married to the woman who would be called María Luisa Xicoténcatl, the daughter of the Tlaxcallan lord.
Look, the Tlaxcallans weren’t just conquered, they were also conquerors: they also took Tenochtitlan, and together they had a son. What was that son? Was he conquered or a conqueror? That’s irrelevant now. Those concepts dissolved as soon as we had children. Well, Hernán Cortés had a daughter with Moctezuma’s daughter, that is, Leonor Cortés y Moctezuma: Cortés’ daughter, granddaughter of Moctezuma. Was she conquered or a conqueror, considering that her descendants are grandees of Spain and live in Spain today?
What we have here is a migratory process, because, mind you: in three hundred years of Spanish rule in America, throughout all of America—well, all of Iberian America, from California to Patagonia; that is, from California to Argentina—, in three hundred years only 150,000 Spaniards arrived.
Unlike Jared Taylor, as a typical liberal Zunzunegui knows nothing about the difference in IQ between the various races. But that’s not the point. What I want to get at is obvious: the cause of miscegenation throughout the part of the American continent conquered by Spaniards and Portuguese—the latter also had an Inquisition—wasn’t due to Jewish subversion but to Christian universalism.