Yesterday we saw Joel Webbon interview Jared Taylor. Now we’ll see that he interviewed Kevin MacDonald too.
In MacDonald’s panoramic account of the history of Jews in the West, the professor emeritus omits a crucial fact: the Judeo-Christians who wanted only the god of the Jews to be worshipped in the Mediterranean were involved in the fall of the Roman Empire.
Then MacDonald says that Christianity began as a very anti-Jewish ideology (for example, that the Jews killed Christ). This omits the level of subtlety with which Jews make their psyops: by the time of Emperor Theodosius, all worship of Aryan Gods was prohibited, and the empire imposed Christianity while tolerating Judaism (proof of this is that no temple to Jupiter, Zeus, Apollo, or Athena survived after Theodosius’s edicts: only churches and synagogues).
In other words, for white nationalists it’s easy to cherry-pick facts like the verse in the gospel that the Jews killed Christ, but the situation needs to be viewed in perspective. And from a historical meta-perspective spanning centuries, it’s clear that only two religions were de facto permitted after the first Christian emperors: Xtianity and Judaism.
Later, Webbon asks an interesting question: what is it about white people that makes them so gullible, so susceptible to believing the psyops of Jewry?
Neither of them blamed the Christian ethics that took hold of the Aryan collective unconscious. MacDonald argued that white people are individualistic, but I get the impression that, like Jared Taylor, MacDonald also lacks a clear vision of what the European zeitgeist was like before Constantine.
Webbon agrees with the professor and talks about how Scandinavians, who are now the most individualistic, founded Minnesota (the recent protests against ICE were mentioned). But as always, they’re telling the story from the perspective of Christendom (the Visigoths came from Scandinavia and saw themselves as a group before Catholicism conquered ancient Hispania).
Then MacDonald talks about the migrant gangs that are causing havoc in Sweden, and argues that the Swedes can’t do anything about it because they don’t dare to acknowledge the problem.
Neither of them is thinking clearly. Do they honestly believe that the Vikings wouldn’t have acted decisively against sandnigger migrants who raped their young? (The racial right’s blindness to the inversion of values caused by Christianity seems to be universal.)
Then MacDonald says something I agree with: “We lost control of our culture,” and whoever loses that battle, he added, loses “the evolutionary race.” He said this in the context of the media and academia, controlled by the Jews. But when he specifically spoke about who created the moral values of modern white men, he didn’t dare say it was the rabbis who wrote the New Testament. In other words, MacDonald can’t have it both ways: his theory has a solid scientific basis, but Christianity has exerted more influence on us than media and academia together given its existence over two thousand years.
MacDonald speaks of “moral communities” as a characteristic of white psychology, and mentions the American Puritans who were abolitionists and how, once the value of slavery being unjust was established, anyone who believed in its validity could get into serious trouble (alluding to the Civil War). But even here we see that there used to be Christians who didn’t share antiracist morality (just as Russians and other Eastern Europeans don’t share Wokism). To understand the dark hour, it is necessary to recognize that a faction of Christianity imposed itself on the entire West after World War II, and that this wouldn’t have happened with, say, what the Nazis called “positive Christianity.”
It’s now too late for Webbon’s dream of establishing a kind of “positive Christianity lite” in the US for the reason I mentioned yesterday. To expel over one hundred million non-whites and crucify the traitorous whites who brought them here, we need anti-Christian governments (only pagan Nazis would do things like what we read in The Turner Diaries).
I’d like to end this post with a reflection on what MacDonald said about Tucker Carlson, whom we all appreciate for bringing the JQ to public attention, at least when criticizing the Israeli government and its American lackeys. MacDonald is right about this, but he also points out that Tucker is allergic to Aryan identity.
What the professor omitted in his interview with Webbon is that Tucker has said many times that he is not a white identitarian because of the Christian religion he professes.
2 replies on “Kevin & Joel”
I had a dream this morning.
It was quite pleasant actually (bear with me…) – probably the equivalent of how your nuclear annihilation daydreams make you feel. Just a brief visual reflection on something I’d said to a racialist commenter a while back, about deliberately driving our enemies back down to the coasts of the island, methodically executing them on the beach or the clifftops, piling up the bodies into huge mounds periodically along the water’s edge of the southern shore (I was thinking of that famous photo of the bodies at Dresden), and torching them like bonfires, to the point that it created a psychologically unsettling first impression to any further ‘new arrivals’ appearing by boat, visible as it would be from the opposite shore of the channel at night, and indeed from the air, in columns of thick smoke, to anyone petulantly continuing to fly in.
A natural burning ‘wall’ also, itself quite a useful physical border defence, or indeed soft cover, at least at an amateur level. I think that was what I saw actually, I’m not sure (as my dreams can often be fairly abstract). Perhaps it was my mind reflecting on these ‘grooming gang’ (I hate that cutesy expression) criminals and assorted rapists I referred to yesterday.
Surely that would teach them a damn lesson! I seem to recall a commenter telling me at the time that it couldn’t be done, but I feel he was just being typically defeatist. As usual, my only concern is that it might affect the local marine life ecosystems, so I suppose one would have to be quite judicious in how they went about that. I can’t see that the Vikings would have found a problem with this low key solution, although I imagine it would be hard to coax Nationalists here into accepting it.
Since MacDonald recently published an article of mine on his webzine, I don’t want to dwell more on him; I’d rather return to Jared Taylor.
Taylor is the paradigm of a neochristian. In the 19th century, several states in the American Union prohibited interracial marriage. But as we saw on Sunday, Taylor is reluctant to reenact anti-miscegenation laws! Behold the grandfather of the contemporary racial right saying this in an interview uploaded to YouTube this month!
Do you understand why I consider white nationalism to be a dead end? The title of Holland’s book says it all: Dominion: How the Christian Revolution Remade the World. The dominion that Christian ethics exerts over the secular white man is total; absolute (only Hitler and his followers attempted to break away from it).
To save the Aryan from its ongoing extinction, one must repudiate all these pretenders and develop a new ideology based on the transvaluation of those values.