In this video uploaded today, Megyn Kelly appears accompanied by Tucker Carlson at a public event to talk about his decision to interview Nick Fuentes.
Tucker proves the whole point of this blogsite, The West’s Darkest Hour! He used the term “Christian ethics” to explain why he isn’t an anti-Semite; said that a Jew, Paul the Apostle is “my personal hero” and regarding neochristianity he added: “That’s where the idea of human rights comes from”!
He also explains that when such Xtian ethics are removed from the Aryan collective unconscious, exterminationism arises (which he calls “genocide”).
Thankyouverymuch!
3 replies on “Thanks Tucker!”
I’m glad for this interview. I can present it to any sceptical friend or acquaintance from now on whom I’ve had the ‘(neo-) Christianity chat’ with who hasn’t believed me so far for whatever reason.
There’s something in practice I’ve never understood about individualism (which, by metaphor I’d call ‘a logical error in that god’s thinking, if he wants to be effective at people management’). Yes, the person may be not as bad as the other person/people evaluated, after all, not everyone is legally/criminally innocent in human terms, but surely that just means that if you’ve got rubbish human waste individual a and rubbish human waste individual b (and they seem to have this in common), and you work on down that line, you come to pretty much the same conclusion anyway, if you’re paying any attention that is. Pattern-matching, and the like. Letting the human intelligence faculties come to the fore.
I might as well consider individualists as ‘NAXALT-thinkers’ as that seems to be their desperate whim – as well as grossly optimistic/naïve about racial (what I reluctantly have to call ‘human’ for this acknowledgement) natures. Really, if you’ve noticed an early trend, and run with it, and examined so much of any population, and you have these ‘individuals’ (who do seem identical) all in a box, and they’ve all got either the psychological characters to, albeit only in advance, or the pre-existing criminal/monstrous history to have done exactly the same thing, is he really doing to have the realistic time, once he’s finished working down that huge line of surrounded people (and found each atomic body to be less individual than could be wished for, though still an individual to him by default, to some degree) to argue the case why the very last one – just for my thought experiment’s sake – is also an individual, seeing as the rest all aren’t (or if they are they’re identical individuals, seemingly separate in intrinsic nature now only by the thin air), and does his conscience think this the safest approach, given that at least one of those box-full of self-defined individuals is a criminal/enemy (or at least someone worse than another person, as established at the start, him not being the Liberian cannibal warlord, for example)? He’d need a god to deal with this sort of sloppy, human logistics nightmare!
At what point do they give in? At what point does reality come streaming through? He says himself he likes “understanding what people think”. Perhaps by the end of his life – these type of Christians generally excluded from this – he might have the reflective capabilities to assess that, on the whole, that little bunch all thought pretty much the same, didn’t they (a bit like Democrats)? All this time wasted on this has prevented him learning about biology in the background also, and classic anthropology, and genetic evolution. He might even die thinking “oops… did I make a mistake there maybe?”, as with his Iraq war anecdote. He goes to the grave with a fake god to forgive him. I don’t. What of all those Aryan lives he’s sacrificed for this stupid, idiotic point, all the time in the background, when the real enemies came charging in?
I wouldn’t share the dense, pedantic argument above with my atheist friends – who do think like him the while – but thanks again for this wonderful example of ridiculous moral wishful-thinking. Ideology taken to its furthest linear abstraction and used to beat down basic observation and empirical common sense.
I think the sooner his West thoroughly ends the better.
Regarding Tucker’s worldview, he—and Nick Fuentes—are wrong. European Civilisation (e.g., the Greco-Roman world) is not synonymous with Western Christian Civilisation. Francis Parker Yockey made this sistinction (in this blogsite, see e.g. the seminal post “The Red Giant”).
Thank you for putting that succinctly. That’s exactly what I was implying in the last sentiment. Sorry I didn’t spell it out more clearly. It’s a shame that bloated horror has lasted so long, dragging us into our darkest hour with it.