For the 1909 illustration “The Man of La Chapelle-aux-Saints,” artist František Kupka relied on Marcellin Boule’s scientific interpretation of Neanderthal remains found in France.
I have referred to Neanderthals so many thousands of times in my soliloquies over the decades that I have abbreviated the word to “nerdels” (I use my Spanish expression, which doesn’t capitalise the word Neanderthals).
I want to clarify a point: even evidence by normies challenges the debunkers of Vendramini’s Neanderthal Predation Theory.
The book by George Constable and the editors of Time-Life that I finished reading today, despite subscribing to the current POV on Neanderthals, presents data that confirms what I said about the alleged debunkers: those who claim that Neanderthals lived in climates similar to those of present-day Europe.
Constable’s book states that the hominids who lived in Europe were confined by the seas during the Riss glaciation, and bands of these hominids had no easy way to escape to warmer regions. Later, the nerdels themselves were occasionally isolated during certain periods.
He adds that 75,000 years ago, this pressure acted with renewed force on the nerdels when, once again, the glaciers began to grow. This most recent glacial period, called the Wurm, wasn’t severe at first. It began with snowy winters and cold, rainy summers; however, open grasslands spread, and parts of Germany and northern France, once populated by forests, were transformed into tundra or a mixture of forest and tundra in open areas where mosses and lichens alternated with trees.
The nerdels, Constable’s book states, must have been first-rate hunters because the tundra regions offered little plant food to cover the lean days (exactly what Vendramini says). Many pages later, Constable states that even in the middle of summer, the weather remained rather cold, with average temperatures of ten degrees Celsius, and that winter storms would confine the nerdels to their smoky caves.
Although Constable and his editors fall into the fashionable fallacy of saying that the nerdels were human like us, at least they have the honesty to acknowledge that when nerdel and Cro-Magnon fossils are observed side by side, the difference seems enormous, given that the nerdel has a very elongated and low skull, bulging at the sides and with a protruding “bump” at the back of the skull. This creature had a protruding face, a wider nose and a broad jaw with no chin.
The book mentions the Skhul-Qafzehs fossils, which denote hybrids between nerdel and the hominids of the area: once again, this is in line with, and does not contradict, Vendramini’s NP theory. And on the following page, Constable’s editors mention the possibility that the Cro-Magnons exterminated them.
As I said in last month’s posts: we need academia to cleanse itself of its egalitarian psychosis in order to address Vendramini’s theory on its own merits. In the meantime, I find it sad that we only have Vendramini’s book (who is a liberal atheist) and my appropriation of his work in The West’s Darkest Hour.
4 replies on “Nerdels”
I was struck by the similarities of the 1909 illustration to Vendramini’s work. Just to alert you, I was scanning a further book, a big, thick illustrated tome titled Prehistoric Europe edited by the archaeologist Barry Cunliffe. It’s an Oxford University Press publication from 1994. Sadly, on account of this, it’s very politically correct, but on the photo page in between page 36 and 37 of my edition I notice they’ve included a (1957?) textbook illustration of a Neanderthal by ‘Burian’ which, though not quite as gorilla-like as the La-Chapelle-Aux-Saints image, still appears with a stooping, ape-like gait, and copious body hair (albeit being a bit gangly-looking, with a more human face). Cunliffe’s silly textbook makes sure to add that: “It owes more to the medieval imagination of wild men in wild places than archaeological discovery”. I’ll send you a scan of the single page anyway by email. I think the book’s quite good otherwise, but I find the Neanderthal conjecture in it frustrating. I’ve ordered a copy of Constable’s book. I’m waiting for some of the Victorian and early 20th Century ones to arrives also.
Joseph Walsh, who is now locked up in one of the UK’s prisons, hit the nail on the head with what he said about 1945. Westerners weren’t so crazy before. Their great psychosis began with wanting to do everything the opposite of Hitler, like this mania for loving all wingless bipeds, including Neanderthals.
It reminds me of that movie filmed in Australia with Nicole Kidman. There’s a line where she angrily said that there were no women who didn’t love their children, in the context of Australian Aboriginal women. The film was set in earlier times, when in real Australia—not “Hollywood Australia”—many Aboriginal mothers killed their children (bibliographical references to this appear in my book Day of Wrath).
The attitude of post-1945 prehistorians is like the character Kidman played: massively projecting their own psychoclass onto the nigger, the Aboriginal or even the Neanderthal. These atheistic neochristians seem to believe that this is how they fulfil their “ethical” mandates.
I must say, I completely agree with you (and Joseph) – I read The Child in Primitive Society by Nathan Miller a couple of months back, and it opened by eyes to non-white disregard for and brutality against their children. It’s a shame there aren’t more modern studies done on that, the same way there isn’t enough reference in animal welfare literature to non-whites being more cruel to animals even than Westerners (I think Green Heart by Sivakumaran Sivaramanan is one of the only exceptions to this, itself written by a non-white who is in the know over this in his Sri Lankan government position, and certainly a very graphic read).
Such studies of the former would go a long way, via the Lonnie H Athens route, towards explaining black criminality and poor mental health (as I put on that benighted Unz post that was 100% ignored some months back – they just seems clueless on the issue and unable to consider that potential).
I saw a set of bystander photos today of some mentally ill (looked like…) Afghan in Britain having just self-harmed badly, leaning out of a top floor window. The dissident right commentators who shared the video still seemed incredulous (as if weary of this ‘bullshit’) that he might genuine have mental health difficulties, something that not unobvious to me. If they’re this dysgenic to their children, it’s another reason (perhaps, bar the animal issue, the main reason) why they should be exterminated, beyond just posing a threat to us. That’s the best concession I can make to them. Their child rearing abilities are awful; total primitives.
Of course, one would have to also 100% promote the trauma model of mental disorders over whatever crap the DR (unwittingly in league with psychiatry) can churn out on this topic.
The four words are the ones that could potentially make exterminationism a very moral undertaking. It’s simply a matter of transvaluing Christian values for those of the pair of priests who already took their vows before the weirwood tree.