Today Arch Stanton said that Jack Halliday is probably a Jew (link: here). A few months ago he said the same about Spahn Ranch, another respectable commenter of this site. In that April (link: here) Stanton wrote:
I note your tone is considerably different than the “Spahn Ranch” that presented a civil war battle flag juxtaposed with a portion of the national socialist flag as his avatar. Do I detect a Jew troll hiding behind an identity theft? How typical of the cowardly Jew.
What had ignited the flaming was a monocausal comment by Stanton (link: here):
Considering Jews are the sole force behind the social programming that has led to the nihilistic, suicidal bent of the white race, how can the problem with whites be any more effectively addressed than the root Jewish problem?
As far as I can guess, what moves Stanton to do these accusations is his ideology of the single-cause hypothesis: that the Jews are to blame for white decline while the Aryans are, basically, innocent of their own decline.
I have discussed monocausalism elsewhere and won’t do it in this entry. But I must say that monocausal visitors of The West’s Darkest Hour who want to discuss their views must not accuse bona fide commenters of being crypto-Jews. I myself have been called ‘Jew’ in a Majority Rights featured article for not believing in the 9/11 conspiracy theories, and know how exasperating it is trying to prove my innocence before a dogmatic author or commenter.
Arch Stanton,
If you cannot provide reliable evidence that some commenters of this site are Jews, please abstain from further accusations if you want to continue to comment here.
Thank you.
42 replies on “On accusing commenters of being Jews”
Arch Stanton said that Jack Halliday is probably a Jew? I am shocked!! OMG!!!
Oh, the lengths that some will go to justify their own psychological inability to accept that Aryans very well may be at fault for their own decline
Notice how he even goes to the cowardly lengths to attack my sexuality as well?
What he ignores is that some of my quotes which he lists are actually taken from David Lane and James Mason. Is Mason also a paedophile according to him, or just those that attack the baby Jesus?
Fancying nymphets is perfectly okay.
Just to say something else quick before I blabber on:
Arch Stanton gives the impression that he is nothing more than a boomer, knee-jerk conservative. Notice how when I tried to understand my own thoughts and feelings he claims that I am trying to blame others? Biastophilia is a mental disturbance that was not a natural phenomenon to me, but the roots of which I am curious to understand. Trying to find its roots is not me blaming others for my own actions. Is the child who develops neuroticism from the “socialising” mode of childrearing victim blaming when he sees that it isn’t his fault that he has high levels of anxiety and depression, but due to the introjections of his environment?
It is this boomer conservatism of “man up and deal with it!”, this inability to face oneself that we are dealing with in Arch Stanton. He even told big bits of information about his life, and it is clear that he didn’t have the best of relationships with his Father. Many children who are beaten by their parents grow a mentality that everything is their own fault, that no one else is to blame if their past experiences fucks them up.
You know, I don’t care that Stanton calls me a Jew, and tries to back this up by effeminately attacking my sexual impulses. I actually find that part to be quite entertaining. What is absolutely unforgivable is that he has to bring Lilly May into this. She is innocent in this discussion and he has no right to use her to vent his own self-righteous paranoia. I was willing to forgive everything else, but now I can make sure that he earns a special place in hell when he kicks the bucket.
I’m a boomer too and I must tell that people of my age, even cousins or relatives, are completely incapable to understand the labyrinths of the inner soul. Not even when I give them a copy of my autobiographical Hojas Susurrantes they say a peep. It’s like their motto is the exact opposite of the words of the Temple of Delphi:
Don’t know thyself…!
“Notice how he even goes to the cowardly lengths to attack my sexuality as well?”
What sexuality would that be, ‘Jack’? The sexual relationship with your right hand, perhaps? ‘Cause you’re not getting any, and you never will.
Try to weasel yourself out of that one.
Meanwhile keep the jews shivering out of fear for your heroic attacks 🙂
“… but now I can make sure that he earns a special place in hell when he kicks the bucket.”
Would that be the christian hell, Jack? Or an entirely different hell?
“sexual relationship with your right hand, perhaps? ‘Cause you’re not getting any, and you never will.”
Well, well, well, you just can’t get enough attention can you, ‘aryan son’?
Your levels of desperation here is absolutely tangible. You just can’t handle others making a fool out of you can you, ‘aryan son’? So, who’s never going to get any now, ‘aryan son’?
Let me ask: How is me having sex or not related in any way with my level of masculinity?
This is a whole new low for you. This is the type of insecure, childish little attacks I would expect from a fucking 10 year old, not a 53 year old. This just shows that you have a weak mind and an even weaker heart. I am sure that big-hands manly man ‘aryan son’ gets all the bitches every night.
I will reiterate one more time: It is not my fault that you are a failure and are bitter at everybody else in the world. It is not my fault that you have poor English skills and it certainly is not my fault that your arguments are weak and I shredded you to pieces yesterday.
My advice would be to seek help or at least man up a little.
I concur with Cesar, I’ve lived a large portion of my life with baby boomers and their mentality is one which is destructively individualistic.
@ Jack Halliday
Though that being said, you yourself have mounted personal attacks on commenters, both on this site and elsewhere – including making false claims about a person’s sexuality and reacting hyper-sensitively to any sort of criticism. You are easily-riled but you are protected by Cesar here, who blocks comments. You do not enjoy this protection elsewhere.
I don’t endorse Jack’s rowdy behavior sometimes in this site. And when have I blocked comments about Jack? (Recently I only did not let pass a couple of comments by Dr Morales and a comment from a new visitor who said he was a negro from Portugal.)
Yeah, just as I thought.
“Well, well, well, you just can’t get enough attention can you, ‘aryan son’? ”
Sure, Jack, that’s it, haha. And as an extra bonus I get you to type 37.000 words as a response. You’re so predictable.
“You just can’t handle others making a fool out of you can you, ‘aryan son’?”
I wouldn’t know, ‘Jack’, but I will as soon as someone does that. Hasn’t happened yet. Perhaps in your mind, but I have already established you’re delusional.
“Let me ask: How is me having sex or not related in any way with my level of masculinity?”
Let me explain something, ‘Jack’, little children don’t have sex, and then they grow up and have it. That’s what separates children from adults. And until you will have sex you’re not a man. It’s a universal phenomenon of nature. And apparently that is also your opinion, witness what you repeatedly told another commenter on this site. But now someone is confronting you with your own sexless life – not that it matters one iota to me – and all of sudden it is not related with your masculinity??? No of course not, real men don’t have sex, right? I wonder if those mentally healthy niggers you always refer to are real men, then, ‘çause they sure do a lot of fucking. Haha.
“This is a whole new low for you. This is the type of insecure, childish little attacks I would expect from a fucking 10 year old, not a 53 year old. This just shows that you have a weak mind and an even weaker heart. I am sure that big-hands manly man ‘aryan son’ gets all the bitches every night.”
Nice try, won’t fly.
“It is not my fault that you are a failure and are bitter at everybody else in the world.”
Sure, haha. How am I a failure then? Please enlighten me. If I am a failure, then how would you regard a little twerp like you who is too dumb to get some while there are thousands and thousands of girls available in the Western civilisation, the sexually most liberal habitat on this planet? Geez, no wonder the British girls are turning to niggers. I mean, look at their own pathetic males. Haha.
And who’s bitter? Not me. I actually enjoy my life, instead of wasting it sitting in a room monitoring a website 24/7 while blaming everybody for the exact same thing you yourself are doing about white decline, NOTHING. Oh yeah, sorry, I forgot, you are ‘attacking’ jews by heroically stating that you want them all dead. Well, ladida, a round of applause for Jack Halliday. Anyway, recently had a fantastic vacation in Italy and in three weeks I’m on a plane to the far East for a month. I have no time or need for bitterness.
“It is not my fault that you have poor English skills and it certainly is not my fault that your arguments are weak and I shredded you to pieces yesterday.”
This is beyond pathetic. Talking about living in denial. As you can read for yourself, I have excellent English skills. BTW, how many foreign languages do you command? None, I’ll bet, so pardon my French, but please STFU. Besides, Cesar doesn’t agree with you, since recently he complimented me for the way I countered some nonsense from another commenter, which not only proves my excellent English skills but also shows that my arguments are far from weak, except in your little delusional mind that is. Not that I am in any way fishing for such compliments but it seems appropriate to mention it now. I made a little joke about you not ‘engaging in coitus’ ( or something like that ) and the only response was some non-relevant remark about my English skills. And ‘engaging in coitus’?? Do you talk like that? No wonder you’re not getting any.
You didn’t shred anyone to pieces, Jack. But feel free to keep telling yourself that.
You will never be the man I am. I have my life very much together and exactly where and how I want it. So if I would be in need of help, what hope is there for you?
BTW, as usual you didn’t answer my question, despite the 37.000 word essay you produced.
As you can see, I always stick to the points any opponent brings up. You can learn a lot from me, and I see you’re already on the right track, using one of my lines ( “My advice would be to seek help or at least man up a little.”) and all that, haha. So please answer my question related to one of your intellectual pearls;
“… but now I can make sure that he earns a special place in hell when he kicks the bucket.”
Would that be the christian hell, Jack? Or an entirely different hell?
Good night, Jack.
“Sure, Jack, that’s it, haha.”
Yes, that is it.
“I wouldn’t know, ‘Jack’, but I will as soon as someone does that. Hasn’t happened yet. Perhaps in your mind, but I have already established you’re delusional.”
Says the sensitive-to-the-touch faggot, ‘aryan son’.
How old exactly? Is everybody 17 when they have sex? Is every 17 year old out having sex? Could you give me some examples. And if you use yourself as an example then I ask where has it gotten you? Stuck on the internet harassing strangers. You don’t strike me as a lonely old wash-out at all.
Only according to you. This is because you will look for the tiniest things to try to put others down, because you have poor English skills and a double digit IQ. I am actually curious as to how old you was when you “got laid”, and can you tell me why it makes you any more of a man than perhaps young germans sent off to die in wars, too young to have ever really been with a girl?
You clearly don’t understand how nature works. The wolf that dies a virgin is not less tough a wolf than the wolf that doesn’t
It clearly does. You are one of the most insecure human beings I have ever confronted. If it didn’t matter to you, you wouldn’t be using it to deflect from your own failings in your pathetic life. And as for “sexless”, the difference between me and you is that sex is not really that important to me at the moment. I don’t use it to project my downfalls onto others like a 10 year old. I am not unhealthily obsessed over it, unlike you.
Malicious strawman – never said that. Further proof that you are the personification of irrelevance and self-humiliation.
Compared to the weakling dried up old man, ‘aryan son’, yes: they are real men.
No, I never expected an elderly wimp to understand my words, as they can be very forward and candid.
Only failures lead unprovoked attacks upon strangers on the internet. Hence, you are a failure. And what girls are you speaking of? The STD, nigger-fucking whores who are useless marriage material? Think before you say things which you don’t understand, and stop acting like you are some big manly macho man. Having sexual intercourse with your whore Mother doesn’t make you a man, ‘aryan son’.
At least you have a mirror, ‘aryan son’.
Then there is something wrong with you and I recommend that you seek help. Get your Mamma’s maw off your dick.
Actually, no. Unlike you, I don’t comment here very much. I do not need attention, unlike you, who salivates over it.
Great story.
Oh good, you are finally ready to accept the fact that you are narrow-minded and are a walking failure.
LOL! And M. Night Shyamalan has excellent writing skills.
I am speaking of the English language here, you wimpy moron.
Whatever other language I can or cannot speak has absolutely nothing to do with my native one, understand?
No matter how many times you use others as human shields to inflate your own sense of importance, you will always be an elderly nothing with shitty English skills. The fact that somebody else has bad English skills doesn’t mean you have good ones, sorry to say.
You very clearly are.
It wasn’t a “joke”, don’t play coy. You was trying to be snide yet couldn’t articulate a proper sentence, so I asked what on earth you was even trying to say. It amuses me that you are acting as if your comment was innocent – Coward.
I am not just telling myself that. You exposed yourself on a battlefield and got hit. This is clear in the fact that you are harassing me in a 100% ad hominem attack, completely unprovoked on my part.
You don’t sound insecure at all, no sir.
Talk about self-denial.
You are acting as if this ridiculous waffle you have just typed isn’t long-winded and a desperate kamikaze attempt.
No, you really don’t, ‘aryan son’. If you ever stuck to the points, you would lose. Nobody buys the insane idea of living with Asians, ‘aryan son’, only you. You understand fully well that anybody could shatter you in an instant and so you attack their character instead.
It is the millennia-old tactic of using an opponents weapons against them. Quite useful, in fact. If you want me to emulate you, then you need to learn how to speak properly to people. I am rude as well, but I like to do so to those who start it.
Okay, let’s be serious here: I did not mean a literal hell. It really isn’t that important. I just got overly protective, that was all. I do not believe in hell, though I like to imagine that our enemies will suffer after their deserved deaths.
You too, man 🙂
Aryan Son, are you implying that sexual liberation *hasn’t* depraved many men of the ability to form families and have children and fuck? I am personally not a virgin, however despite what sexual success I have had I’ve scarcely met any women who were worth marrying, and really, I do not see a point in laying with them besides to merely sate your impulses in the short term (in this day and age, anyway)
I’m sure that there are a lot of relatively masculine men, probably even reasonably attractive ones, who have either never had sex or only done so once. I don’t think that their ability to lay with whores is indicative of their masculinity.
Also, you act as if the great differentiator between children and adults is simply intercourse and not merely maturing, sexually and mentally. Following your train of thought, many monks, vestial virgins and even Hypatia of Alexandria were effectively “children”. It is absolutely absurd to suggest as much.
In the end, I really fail to see how JH is immasculine. Would he be any more male if he went to a brothel and bedded a whore? Or went to a college party and entered some drunk white slut? Or does he have to make a girl cream her jeans and beg to lay with him? I’d honestly love to know what he’d have to do to satisfy your largely arbitrary standards.
Thus spoke the reclusive little midget, Jack Halliday, frightened to leave his room in his parental home. Keep it up ‘Jack’ , your going places LOL!!
Andrew,
Do only sluts have sex in your view? Or would you say that there are plenty of normal nice single attractive women out there who want to socialise and enjoy sex with men as a normal part of life? Sex is very healthy and natural and social. Wanting and having sex is the most normal thing on earth. To think otherwise is nothing less than a very hung up unnatural way of thinking. Kinda like devout christians are thinking for example. But everyone ‘s entitled to their own views of course.
And another thing, having so-called sex with whores is not the definition of manliness. I would say au contraire. But that’ s a man’ s CHOICE. Some sorry excuses for men are socially and/or physically challenged and ‘sex’ with whores is all they can get. But being UNABLE to get sex with anyone else but whores is not a choice but a social inadequacy and that’ s an entirely different matter. And all the so-called moral blathering of those in that category to cover that inadequacy up will not change that. As if enjoying life is something sinful. Now where did i hear that before?
Violence against women is a Jewish thing. Jews cannot seem to “get off” unless their sex victims are screaming in agony. In the Jews’ ancient, patriarchal society, women were owned by males, they had no rights, could not own property or enter into contracts. Jews have long viewed females in the same light as furniture.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dInR8B2GcQ
This is why there are so may stories like Jacob and Esau, where Rebekka sets up Jacob to steal his brother’s birthright. Esau, a hairy-chested man’s man, was favored by his father Isaac. Rebekka saw a very dim future with her sissy, faggot son Jacob as her representative, receiving no inheritance or birthright, thus leaving her out in the cold.
With the elderly Issac soon to cross over into sheol, Rebekka would be at the mercy of her son Esau whom she had no control over. So domineering, Jewish bitch that she is, Rebekka sets up her sissy, faggot son Jacob to steal Esau’s inheritance.
Later, Jacob winds up with a dislocated hip from a midnight wrestling match in his tent with one of god’s angels. Midnight wrestling match in a tent with a guy whose mother dressed him in beautiful robes? Hmmm.
And lest we forget, there is the story of the murdered concubine in Judges 19 where a Jew allows his concubine to be murdered and then cuts her up and send out the pieces to the other tribes. Funny how all those Jewish feminist seem to overlook such stories.
Tamar, Sari, Hagar and virtually all the other stories involving Biblical women are all same attempt to assure the woman of a male representative as without a male to represent her, the Jewess of antiquity was reduced to slavery or prostitution. But then isn’t this the very thing that makes the Jew male cream his genes?
In light of all this, the following should come as no surprise.
https://justice4poland.com/2016/07/21/world-wide-white-slave-trade-centred-in-israel/
Israeli Jew’s not only enslave women, but male and female children as well. As slaves, these victims are subjected to rape, torture and murder. And who might think that many of the customers for this trade are rabbis? But then who might suspect rabbis are the primary movers of the drug
“ecstasy?” https://www.healthyplace.com/sex/date-rape/ecstasy-as-a-date-rape-drug.
http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-atrocities-blood-libel.html
Funny how all those Jewish feminist seem to overlook these facts.
Perhaps Cesar would elaborate on these heinous Jewish atrocities of torture and murder against women and children.
Esoterisisms,
Thinking that only whores and sluts are having sex is not a sign of good mental health.
The complete JEWISH Study Bible
https://www.hendricksonrose.com/the-complete-jewish-study-bible/9781619708679/pd/708679?event=WL|1012823
“Without a basic understanding of Jewish customs, it’s easy to miss important lessons. But, most Bibles do not include Jewish insights. Imagine having one that does!”
Funny thing, I have been saying this all along.
“How do Jewish customs point to Jesus? From the feasts of the Bible to the Tabernacle and Torah, easily see how the Old Testament points to Jesus and quickly get a handle on all major Jewish customs.”
“The Complete Jewish Study Bible pairs the newly updated text of the best-selling Complete Jewish Bible with detailed notes and comprehensive study material to help both Jewish and Christian readers understand and connect with the essence of their faith—God’s redemptive plan for his people. Readers will be enriched through this Jewish reading of Scripture and the revelation of the long-awaited Messiah, Yeshua, throughout both the Tanakh (Old Testament) and the B’rit Hadashah (New Testament).”
Christianity has been thoroughly usurped by the Jews and reintegrated into their global plans for the destruction of the goyim, but of course it was their religion to begin with.
Can you say Judaeo-Christianity boys and girls?
“No Jews. Just right”
@aryan son
I would respectfully disagree with at least some of what you are saying about manliness. I strongly dislike Jack Halliday, but even if he has not had sex, that is not an indicator of a lack of masculinity.
Caesar will know more about this than me, and may wish to correct me, but my understanding is that virginity is a concept to be applied to women, not men. Women are meant to be chaste, men of course are meant to provide for families, but it doesn’t follow that men who do not are unmasculine: the notion is unrelated.
Men cannot be ‘virgins’, as such, and there is nothing at all shameful for a man in not having had sex. Jack Halliday needn’t have any worries on that score.
@C.T.
This is your site and whose comments you let through and who you decide to block, etc., is entirely a matter for you. I simply make the point that it is hypocritical of Jack Halliday to complain of attacks while at the same time attacking others himself, especially when he hides behind a degree of protection from the site owner. We have been discussing manliness. I would think this is one area where some manliness is needed. Never mind whether somebody has bedded a slut or not.
Andrew, I ask out of genuine curiosity: Who are you? What is it I have done for you to say that you strongly dislike me? Are you a Christian? What other sites have I commented on that indicates that I attacked other peoples’ sexuality? How many of these attacks could be considered unprovoked?
As for “hiding behind a degree of protection from the site owner”, I am not in charge of the rules the administrator enforces. If you believe that I have special protection then I will have to say that you are incorrect and I have never asked for anymore protection than anybody else. I would not hide behind Cesar Tort or any other site admin.
@Jack Halliday
I am not a Christian. I have never believed in any sort of god, having been a strong atheist since about the age of 7 or 8, when I was required to attend Sunday School and reacted with barely-suppressed mirth at all the Bible stories.
Regarding the Ten Levels topic (https://westsdarkesthour.com/2018/08/30/how-awake-are-you/), you’ve closed comments, so I will add my views on it here.
I would make a formal distinction between the White Question (WQ) on the one hand, and the Nordic Question (NQ) – what this site would call the Aryan Question – on the other. Basically I agree with you that there are white people and then there are White People. Likewise, even within the societies that are White proper, there will be a delicate social ecology and hierarchy to maintain.
The NQ (AQ) is a technical and philosophical inquiry: where does the pathology and degradation come from? Etc. This leads on to the CQ and potentially other ‘Qs’.
The WQ is a problem of policy: who is White proper and therefore within the ambit of the NQ? Then, how should non-Nordic whites be regarded?
Before the NQ (or AQ) can be grappled with, the WQ must be understood and resolved.
But the WQ is also the macrocosmic counterpart of the NQ (AQ). The same questions that we ask of non-Nordic whites must also be asked of Nordics, especially less-than-pure Nordics like the British.
Your framing of the White Question (WQ) is that most whites are junk or rubbish essentially, and 40% (the non-Nordic white men) should be killed outright. I know that maybe puts it more crudely than you would like, but that seems to be the essence of it. I would frame it differently and say that most whites represent what we may call ‘democratic genetic material’. Like most racial groups, whites breed their best randomly out of their worst. As a result, sociologically you see assortative breeding patterns break down and re-form over successive generations. When this happened in England, it degraded the wider society because the Norman-Carolingian feudal system was fairly rigid. Hitler was aware of this problem and planned to establish a ‘meritocratic aristocracy’ in Germany.
While I agree that most whites are worthless, this is worthlessness only in their own lives viz. higher goals, and is a fairly mutable state of affairs anyway. Even the most worthless ones still have racial value due to the genes they carry, and for that reason, they must be permitted to live and allowed to chance to breed. I am not arguing against eugenics and culling, as such. Clearly attention must be paid to pruning away the obvious medico-genetic defects, but beyond that, caution should be exercised due to the danger of losing valuable racial material on the basis of undesirable but mundane epigenetic traits.
I’ll let Mauricio answer this as your above link was his article.
It was intended more as a minor critique on the PoV of this site, using Mauricio’s post as a starting-point – given that he has clearly been influenced by it.
Let me just say that I have no problem with killing all (or virtually-all) non-whites, both actively through conquest and passively by letting them starve, and I would happily commence the task this afternoon. The obvious exceptions to this necessary culling process would be isolated sympathisers like yourself and Vox Day, whom I would regard as valuable contributors (notwithstanding that the latter is an incorrigible god-botherer).
But I don’t personally believe it will be necessary to deliberately cull any non-Nordic whites. This is one of the points on which we differ. I don’t accept the premise that only a few ‘good’ whites deserve to live. Where I do agree with you is that there are only a few good whites, the rest are mediocre, but my point is that the mediocre majority serve a purpose. They are rubbish, but they are also not rubbish: they are the genetic material from which the ‘good’ minority emerge.
Not that I am suggesting I am one of the ‘good’, in fact my own life is an unmitigated failure, but my IQ is MENSA-level (I am a member), yet my own parents were ordinary blue collar workers without any intellectual distinction, and my ancestors were the same. My mother is barely literate. The exceptional qualities of the White Race – whether it is intellect, creativity, nobility, integrity, beauty, or whatever – emerge from the lumpen mediocrities.
The purpose of the mediocre majority is to spore and guard the exceptional few and provide them with a safe harbour where they can pursue the necessary efforts that propel our Race forward. That holds good both within the Nordic Race and without it among non-Nordic whites; and, my understanding of Hitler’s intentions for the Slavs and eastern Europeans was that Germanisation would be about cultural improvement over a very long time, not racio-biological extermination.
Of course, here I adopt a premise of my own that is open to attack/falsification: I am assuming that non-Nordic whites are still whites. If I am wrong on that score, then my case collapses and you are right. Certainly, I am quite dubious about the racial status of Russians, let’s say.
Anyway, that’s my take on it. Thanks for letting me comment.
AndrewS,
I could respond directly if you comment on my exterminationist views in my books, some of which has been translated for this site. In practical terms, I don’t differ much from what Hitler planned, including the welfare of animals.
What moves me are the 4 words and the 14 words. Yes, there are silly whites but if their genes produce English roses I treasure those genes.
If you want to become familiar with my thought directly, take a look at e.g., Day of Wrath.
@ AndrewS
The Ten Levels list was a sort of hierarchical guide to know which topics to discuss when attempting to morally enlighten Whites, whose morality depends (mostly) on how many historical facts they already know. Hence the title – how awake are you?
I gather from your posts you’re on Level 9, like me, and you’re searching for a policy to discern which Whites should be allowed to live (true humans), and which ones should be exterminated or sterilized (defective humans), in order to fully embrace Level 10.
That’s where the Aryan Question lies within the White Problem, and I don’t have an answer. Perhaps it’s the ability of some Whites to mentally re-shape their values and priorities, no matter the circumstances; to overcome materialistic greed and this virulent ethno-suicidal xenophilic altruism that Xtianity exploits so well. I have tried before to look at the WQ from a genetic/bio-reductionist angle, but Cesar advised me against it, and I can see why.
Himmler wrote of how blurred the lines between phenotypes and nobility-of-soul have become in his wonderful ‘Voice of our Ancestors’. As you can attest, true humans can sprout from defective humans. But they are rarities. The fact is we are living in a world replete with defective humans, and the only attempt in History to cultivate true humans as a collective effort was the Third Reich, and it was destroyed by race-treacherous untermensch.
Humanity needs a ‘Reset’ button. I wouldn’t prioritize pure Aryan genes above consciousness, but those genes are the closest biological manifestation of hypermorality that I know.
tld: I’d say if a White man has reached Level 6, he’s exempt from the Death Squads.
Re: ezra91
Level 12 is destroying ALL animal life on this planet; via nuclear apocalypse or some such.
Every other level is pussyfooting around the reality that life on this planet is inherently evil?
Nuclear-apocalypse would be man-made. Life is NOT ‘evil’. There is nothing either good or bad but thinking makes it so. However, it is demonstrable that human beings in their vast majority are cowardly, weak, indifferent, sensless, stupid, careless, selfish, distracted, grass grazing creatures with no deep reverence towards the awe-inspiring gift that is life.
So fuck human race(really who the fuck cares about a species so low as to invent christianity?), but keep water life(the most mystic), insect life(the best engineered), animal life(always take the worst feline over the average human) etc.
Also, lets imagine this case: Third Reich won WW2 and throughout the centuries would have created the most flourishing biocentric civilization imaginable and one day a big, big asteroid would collide with the planet and bang, no more human life, no more beauty, no more civilization, everything gone forever; who is to blame in this case? Nobody! And that is the very hazardous nature of things. Human efforts can not only be deceived by History, but also by the very nature of the Cosmos.
Who can tell the end of the endless changes of things? – Li Bai
My ideal scenario for the future is a world of Nordish-like whites who treat animals with kindness and the males have the luxury of being physically androgynous (as males appear in Parrish’s paintings) because non-whites have already been exterminated and war is a thing of the past.
Arthur Clarke depicted such a world in his first novella before he took a wrong turn in his personal life (pederasty with non-whites at Sri Lanka): of which I’ve written at the end of my second book in my native language.
Really, I do not see why or how men even appearing androgynous is something to strive for. Aryans are very physically impressive, the average white woman has greater grip strength than the average Indian male. We are certainly built for war, I think that it is part of our psyche and something we ought not to avoid and even if we were to avoid war altogether I don’t think allowing our men to even appear immasculine is insulting to our racial soul.
I am talking about the far future. Have you read Clarke’s Against the Fall of Night? Or taken a closer look at the details of the painting I embedded above?:
https://eliminatedleaves.wordpress.com/2005/08/25/parrishs-garden-of-opportunity/
I understand that the society you dream of is thousands of years away, however even at that time I really do not believe that androgyny is anything to strive for, even with any and all threats eliminated.
I did scrutinize the painting quite thoroughly. As for Clarke, I have never read any of his literature but I was unaware that he was a sodomite.
Clarke is the author of 2001: A Space Odyssey.
Problem with aggressive, masculine males is that they become unnecessary in a Utopia (ie., after the battle has been won). As we have already said elsewhere, cf. The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance.
The bumbling city slicker (James Stewart) wasn’t up to the job, the town had to be saved by the violent, marginal brute (John Wayne).
“It’s about the idea that civilization depends on men who use violence, but that civilization, once it is founded and secure and no longer needs violent men, ignores and derides the very men without whom it wouldn’t exist.”
Stewart looked more androgynous as a teenager than Wayne.
C T,
Why do you assume war would be a thing of the past when there were only whites around? For milennia Arayns have fought ‘civil’ wars. Besides, life is by definition struggle. So there will always be wars.
One has to ask oneself when is project ‘perfect world’ over? In my view the vision the Fuhrer had was, and still is, enough. It did not involve exterminating 95 % of humanity. A lot of primitive humanoids living in the wild are part of their habitats’ flora anf fauna. There are ( potentially )
truly civilised humans, then then are barbarians and there are also wild humans like niggers, amazon indians or papua’s, and some more, and ( trying ) to civilise them like the ‘good’ christians did serves no other purpose than to undermine the position in the natural hierarchy of the truly civilised humans. Aryans at the top of the natural hierarchy is where things should be, and without the vermin jew to corrupt the ( entire ) natural aristocracy things would be like that. After all, once, not too long ago it actually was like that.
Concentrate on the jew.
When Adolf Hitler came to power, not nearly all Germans stood behind him and NS. And even when 99, 99% of them was behind him the majority didn’t have a good grasp on what NS was really all about. They got ‘with’ it in the first place because Hitler actually delivered and improved their lot tremendously in only a few years. But for a volck to really understand what this break with the previous paradigm means and become true overmen takes a lot longer than a few years. Hitler and NS Germany simply were nipped in the bud before it could establish this new paradigm.
Like another commenter also already said, we have the blueprints ready, all the questions have been answered. How to establish the perfect society – as far as we can – on this planet t isn’t a secret at all. The problem is the enemy is very succesful in hiding it from the masses, rendering it a secret.
I’m talking of Clarke’s novel.
“Androgyny” overlaps with “pedomorphism” or “neoteny”. See this article:
LINK
Forget the article and see Parrish’s paintings.
Even despite the fact that we may not need violent men in the future, once all has been won, would it not be a disservice to our women for them to have to bed feminine males? Wouldn’t failing to ensure the masculine qualities of men inevitably lead to dysgenic selection and the degradation of the race?
Have you seen The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance? James Stewart as the husband of the girl that John Wayne could not have is not dysgenic (Stewart also appeared in classic Hitchcock & Capra films). But the point is that aggressive males become obsolete in a Utopia.
I don’t know if you read the whole thing; but the last 4 paragraphs seem to correlate with the point you made right?