How can citizens be honestly described as free and equal who are not, who never were, ‘free and equal’ in any reasonable sense of the phrase? How can they be even considered men, whose whole lives are governed by cast-iron regulations; whose every movement is circumscribed and restrained by penal threats—even whose secret thoughts are in a constant state of silent repression?
It is no apology whatever to affirm that the people themselves enact all laws they are commanded to obey. Even that statement is a falsity and if it were true, it would not justify majority dictatorship or any other kind of dictatorship.
The Constitution under which all other laws are born, was accepted, not by us but by bewigged individuals who are long since rotten. We are ruled, in fact by cadavers—the inhabitants of tombs.
Why should agreements made by coffined dead men bind and mortgage living, pulsing, breathing beings?
Their bones have long ago mouldered into ozone and fertilizers, who drew up and signed the Bill of Rights; Magna Charta, the Sermon on the Mount, the Declaration of Independence, our Glorious Constitution, etc., etc. Rotten are the brains that concocted them and the fingers that signed and sealed them. Equally rotten are their irrational and infantile philosophies. Rotten also in their heart, are the men who obey under compulsion voices from the tomb.
No doubt those old documents served their purpose at the time, but ‘new occasions teach new duties,’ and new ages require, not only new leaders, but new deeds.
Again, most acts of Congress are the Machiavellian work of eminent rogues, curse them whose very names are almost forgotten except by partisan chroniclers, and printers of public school histories.
As for the Common Law, it is an inheritance from those interesting old days, when Saxon and Norman earls (they were genuine noblemen then, for they had won their position by risking their lives in battle) administered ‘justice’ direct, per media of knotted clubs, hilted knives, and long handled cleavers. That was the only kind of ‘Law’ understood by our ‘uncivilized’ forefathers, for they had not been ‘educated’ into the profound conviction that governments and laws ‘derive all their just powers from the consent of the governed.’ Such an expression would have sent them into convulsions, and he who uttered it would be considered—a most excellent fool.
No doubt our ancestors were somewhat rude in their manners, somewhat deficient in sweetness and culture but in matters of frozen fact they were decidedly logical. They did not sneak to public meetings and swagger about ‘liberty,’ ‘justice’ and ‘equality of opportunity’ or ‘Rights of Man,’ when they knew full well that not only their lives, but everything they nominally possessed was ‘by leave’ of their conquerors and proprietors.
If they could come alive again how those old pirates and freebooters would stare in shame and scorn at the sight of their ‘tenderfoot’ posterity, walking up in solemn, horny- handed, hump-backed procession in shoddy rags before an idol-altar called a ballot-box, dropping into its gilded maw, printed invocations for Justice, Mercy, Liberty, ‘Peace in our time O! Lord!’—Protection,—cheap money,—‘more laws! more laws! more laws!’ How our blonde, clean-limbed ancestors would guffaw? Indeed, they would probably keep on guffawing, till they guffawed themselves to death again.
‘Oh!’ they would say:—‘to think that our seed should have sunk so low!’
6 replies on “Might is right, 20”
When I started blogging seriously in 2010, after awakening to the JQ, my visitors were mostly white nationalists: an internet movement I admired at the time.
A couple of years would pass before I was disappointed.
Many back then, years before Donald Trump came down the stairs to announce his candidacy, still believed in their Founding Fathers or the religion of their biological parents. I realised almost from the beginning that this was a non-starter.
Martin Kerr, heir to the organisation founded by G.L. Rockwell, told me something very wise: that since reading Nietzsche was complicated, a teenager should start by reading Might is Right.
The difference between a National Socialist and a white nationalist is so enormous that if we could see them from an eagle’s-eye view, we would see the normies and the WNsts almost side by side from above, and the National Socialists at a considerable distance.
That’s why we call WNsts here “neo-normies”.
A few thoughts…
I know it’s not in his American context, but I realise just how unfree I am in this country every day (i.e. still effectively a slave, if hoping to do something about that). I’ve had that argument with many other people over the past few months. Free for them always amounts to ‘free as long as you don’t break the law’ which, by the same process of reasoning that I assume leads people to see countries as a fixed notion also leads them to perceive this successive government-wrought System crap as an eternal, tangible part of the universe; in some way valid simply because it is written so. I’m tired of being told ‘but I’m certainly free!’. Oh, is that so? Try, just for a baby step, not paying your taxes then (the taxes that fund your total disenfranchisement and systemic murder!).
I think, in a strange primal sense, that was the little satisfaction I got from punching that asshole of a social worker I mentioned to you by email (even, if, ultimately it was a very unwise idea, and did not do me any favours later). I have learned to be more shrewd these days (though the metaphorical ‘punches’ still land thick and fast on them, in my personal dealings). I would spit on their law personally (just as they do in a sense), but I bide my time.
I hope you don’t mind if I print this segment off. Ideally teenagers would be suited to it… but in this case I’m afraid I’m dealing with an older man, with whom I am always looking for angles to broach my worldview. I think he’ll appreciate it (and hopefully not find it overly humourous).
Ultimately, I think the only devised law – standing distinct from the mere motion of the cosmos – is that of the Aryan race’s survival and it is one of force (albeit with a mind behind it to be most effective).
America has been a Christian-wrought sham from the start, and I anticipate it going down in flames. I often wish they had sunk on the initial crossing. Still, at least its end is as much as inevitable now, courtesy of traitor Trump and his truly global stupidity. That’s only the very start though.
As you know, I recently let a comment from Adunai, who is banned from this site, slide because I liked what he said: that he was praying for the war between the Americans and the Israelis against Iran to escalate to a nuclear level.
Countless times I’ve told myself in soliloquies and imaginary speeches that if missiles flew intercontinentally, the next day we would be free: at risk of dying from radiation, but free! We would gain freedom of expression, something that has been blocked in the West before and after WWII!
People are enslaved in a matrix of power whose prison walls they aren’t even capable of seeing. And even racialists are caught up in this, insofar as they are incapable of discussing things like exterminationism from the perspective of those who drafted the Master Plan East for example.
Why is he banned?
Because he is the opposite of the four-word priest: he believes it was perfectly fine to burn children alive in infanticidal rituals of the past, and he believes it is perfectly fine for the Chinese to torment animals these days.
They almost did. The Jamestown colonists, reduced to starvation, and even cannibalism in some cases, had ventured forth to return to Europe, but they met a vessel on the way back carrying provisions, and returned to America with that vessel. The Brutish Empire (2024) by Des Ekin covers this episode.