Last year I read Danny Vendramini’s Them & Us on Kindle. Now I’ve reread it in print.
Reading on Kindle should only be done with mediocre books. It’s astonishing how much information is lost in a screen-based read, unlike on paper where we can use a yellow highlighter and jot down numerous footnotes—a practice that helps us absorb the content.
The fact that Them & Us was one of the few books that greatly improved my worldview doesn’t mean it’s without flaws. Far from it! Vendramini is as liberal and anti-racist as other authors who revolutionized my way of thinking. I’m referring to Lloyd deMause and Alice Miller’s work on the mistreatment of children; how Richard Weikart demonstrated that Hitler was privately a pantheist highly critical of Christianity; and how historian Tom Holland showed that Christian values were transmuted into the ethno-suicidal ethics of contemporary Westerners.
It doesn’t matter that all these authors, including Vendramini, are archetypal liberals. What matters is that it’s perfectly possible to use their findings for the cause of 21st-century National Socialism.
Vendramini published his book in 2009, after Jorge Velasco and an associate of his, “Varg,” wrote their lengthy essay on the new racial classification. An abridged version of that essay appears as an appendix in The Fair Race’s Darkest Hour. But now that I’ve reread Vendramini’s book and better understood its content, I realise that Velasco and Varg relied on accepted wisdom about Neanderthals, who, according to Vendramini, have been anthropomorphised by naïve and politically-correct scholars to the point of being considered human.
František Kupka relied on Marcellin Boule’s scientific interpretation of Neanderthal remains found in France.
I’m writing this post because our point of view must be consistent, especially in the texts linked in the featured article. So yesterday I removed a couple of pages from Velasco and Varg’s essay, where the authors failed to notice that prehistoric Neanderthals resembled apes, not humans.
The February 2026 edition of The Fair Race can be read here, and it’s the one now linked in the featured article. However, the PDF of that appendix without this recent censorship is still available on this site, here.
2 replies on “Consistency”
I also reviewed the PDF Neanderthal Extermination, which I barely made any changes to (for example, I had forgotten to clarify that “NP theory” means Neanderthal Predation theory).
I’m under the impression than Vendramini’s research has been on the whole ignored by the scientific orthodox. Much as with the reception to Tom Holland (though the former is more well known) I put most of this down to his unavoidably ‘non-PC’ conclusions, much as he himself remains a liberal. However, I was just wondering, have you come across any official attempts to debunk him (i.e. print journal standard), not just those low tier idiots on YouTube? I’d be very interested to see what they tried to take him down with, and if there is any criticism of him stronger than a kind of ‘how could he say this about our primordial human brothers?’ Boasian nonsense i.e. is there any accusation of a flaw in his scientific approach, liberal ideology aside?
I ask this, as I side with his perspective on Neanderthals, and was just wondering what the true scope of the opposition was. You’d think he’d be much more well-known (I hope he’s still working at all and they haven’t destroyed him!). Currently, he’s about as overshadowed in my eyes as Mendel was in his day, if not more so – good theories get lost more easily in a modern world inundated with easy access ideas.
Perhaps I’m giving too much benefit of the doubt to their even being a respectable science these days, and the entire thing is irredeemably corrupt at official level. Either way, thank you for preserving his ideas. I enjoyed the detailed discussions on here on this topic some months back.