your child’s soul
In November, The Occidental Observer published one of the chapters of this book, How to Murder your Child’s Soul: the complete English translation of which has just been released and is available here.
Hitler and the National Socialists had limitations. And I am not referring only to what I said in my article yesterday: that the Christian problem is more serious than the Jewish problem. The Nazis also failed by believing in biological psychiatry; specifically, that mental disorders are due to genetic deficiencies.
That is false, and this semi-autobiographical book proves it conclusively.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank Benjamin for his corrections to the English syntax. It is always difficult to write correctly in a second language.
Those racialists who have had mental health problems should read this book. It is liberating in a very specific sense. They must rid themselves of the demoralising idea that there is something wrong with their bodies, when in reality, the only thing that happens to those who suffer from disabling mental stress is that they have been martyred by their parents.
Incidentally, the cover image is a drawing my father made the year before I was born. It’s a copy of a Gustave Doré engraving that now hangs framed in the studio my father left behind.
11 replies on “How to murder”
How to Murder (a hardcover of 168 pages) is the English translation of the second of five sections of Hojas Susurrantes. Hojas Susurrantes, in turn, is the first volume of my trilogy, which totals 1888 pages.
Those who read Spanish can obtain a copy of Hojas Susurrantes and the rest of the trilogy here.
Sorry I didn’t read all your articles about child abuse, but isn’t banning a child from having a phone, stopping them from academic education, banning TV, and making them unable to keep up mentally with this era also child abuse? If you were in a first-world country and did this to your child, you’d be held legally accountable.
I hate to break it to you, but based on the passage above, I realise you’re a “body snatched pod”, and I don’t think you should comment here again.
What you mention above as natural is precisely what has corrupted young people. Only a “Pod” person can believe that adopting the System’s lifestyle–cellphones, TVs, brainwashing schools, Pod friends, etc.—is good for children.
Furthermore, you apparently have no idea what “child abuse” is. The psychohistorical passages of my trilogy about child abuse can be read in the central chapters of this translation; and a case of real abuse, Benjamin’s excerpted autobiography, can be read here.
I didn’t watch the original 1956 nor the 1976 Body Snatchers, but the 1991 version of the movie had a scene where they subverted racial cohesion.
In the new version, the white Pods tell a nigger non-Pod that “We are stronger than you humans, because we understand it’s the RACE that’s important, not the individual.” Notice they incorrectly used the term ‘race’ instead of ‘species’. It’s another subtle mental firmware update for normies, by equating ethnocentrism with an evil alien hivemind.
Robert’s comment reads like the White Nationalist types I’ve spoken with in the past, when I bring up radical suggestions like going off-grid and cutting ties with non-racists. They all rejected them.
But on the topic of child rearing, responses varied.
Some believe they can raise little Spartans within the System.
Some even want their kids to be tech-savvy System dwellers.
They are selfish pricks with a stunted sense of empathy; they are so fixated on their own ego that the thought of inoculating a child from modern degeneracy seems like not letting the kid ‘have some fun once in a while’. They can’t acknowledge the very rot in themselves.
With these Pods, these closeted boomer-wannabes, if you reveal to them the abuse you’ve suffered through as a child, they’ll give vile retorts such as “it’s not that bad, could’ve been worse” and “stop victimizing yourself”.
True: but anyone who reads the excerpted passages of Ben’s autobiography linked above, will see that we’re talking about a completely different order of magnitude of abuse—another dimension altogether!
Mauricio’s comment reminded me of talking with my old acquaintance ‘friend’ (he isn’t someone I get on with too well anymore, not since childhood) Alistair.
He’s one of these people who naturally assumes – and is convinced that – the hardest thing one can ever experience in life, or go through daily, is having a job, and feels himself very hard done by on his 20% a year pension and 93K salary, and looks down on me terribly for being unemployed and on a disability benefit (although he doesn’t seem able to acknowledge that it’s for legitimate psychological difficulties preventing me working lifelong either). By the by, he’s extremely anti-welfare in the UK, indiscriminately i.e. he’d throw the natives under the bus, whom he indeed considers the biggest problem, and comes from a very affluent, seemingly (big C) Conservative, effortlessly bourgeois, borderline upper middle class background. He wouldn’t donate a penny, and Mammon is his god. He’s never read my autobiography, for free, despite it being proffered to him, and suggests to me “but I know it all already!” even though he’s aware of not a single psychological family home detail, and has never acknowledged this, and has never once of his own accord asked in almost 40 years, and thus I’ve never wasted my time broaching the subject to him. He literally hasn’t noticed all this time that anything’s been wrong. It reminds me of that counter-currents article on the guy with his librarian murderer ‘friend’ that I dissected some months back.
After all to him I “just sit there and don’t do anything”. This man has never tried to create Art. He has no real productive hobbies. He doesn’t/can’t read. He has no interests in anything academic or cultural. All he has is his work (as an engineer), and it makes him arrogant, and sanctimonious.
Beyond that, he’s totally ‘colour-blind’, and surrounds himself with a circle of immigrant friends, from India and Sri Lanka, and tries to date foreign women, and I consider him both a traitor and a hypocrite, every time I talk him half-heartedly into remembering his race, and his own people, and putting them first (which he gives me platitudes on, and goes along with in conversation, but refuses to change fundamentally to put this awareness into practice). For him we are all interchangeable economic units to be plugged into a (selfish; failing) system. That’s the all of it. All he cares about for evaluating worthiness and character in a person is ‘does the person have a job?’/’how much do they earn?’. “Get a job!” is his only solution to anything. I can’t say I’ve ever received any emotional solidarity or support off of him, no fraternal aid.
I’ve drifted away from friendship with him in the last year. He’s got too much for me. There’s no way one could ever put a different reality to him. I find the brute, knee-jerk assumptions of ‘pods’ intolerable.
What surprised me most when I discovered racialist forums was that, for Italian fascists, Nazis, Francoists, Lincoln Rockwell, and more recently the Greek neo-fascists of the Golden Dawn, the bourgeoisie were far worse than rabid communists!
At least the latter could be converted, say, in Weimar Germany, to a nationalist-type socialism: something inconceivable with the worshippers of Mammon, or simply middle-class people who believe you must be a cog in the machine (I don’t know if you remember the case of therapist Luis Cuevas, which I recount in the final book of my trilogy).
Dear César,
Congratulations on publishing your book in English. It was a pleasure to proofread and I appreciated the previews. I shall pick up a copy in the next few weeks.
This is truly a vital issue, and one that isn’t discussed enough in right-wing circles (the latter have in fact made the problem worse on the whole, by their pig-headed adherence to dogmatic ‘genetic science’, where there is still never any evidence, and never will be or can be).
I wish your book success in the English-speaking world.
Best regards,
Ben
Hi Ben,
I’ll be receiving two proof copies.
I’m not sure what would be best: sending you one with a few words written on the blank first page, or sending it to Kevin MacDonald since he approved some pages of this book for his webzine.
Don’t buy your copy because it might be best if I don’t keep either, thus avoiding this dilemma. I’ll just look at the images, which sometimes come out darker in the printing, to see if I can make any changes to the manuscript and send them to both of you by mail.
César
Thank you very much, very kind of you.
I meant to ask, you promised me a gratis copy of the new release of The Fair Race’s Darkest Hour a little while back? Is that offer still on? I didn’t know if you posted it already.
As I said before, I’d be happy to make a donation for both copies. I hate feeling like I’m freeloading, much as you’ve been very kind. At very least, I could (also) send you a book in return: a big, thick paperback of my Schism year diary for 2025, just compiled emails and thoughts and such. It’s not on general release, and is, shall we say, slightly contentious in places, or at least very candid in my regular admittances, gripes and condemnation.
Of course! I have my last copy of FRDH here, reserved for you. (As you know, medical expenses these past few weeks drained my funds, which is why I haven’t sent it to you.) I could send you both books in one package, and I would love to receive yours.