Considering that I discovered white nationalism when I was already half a century old, and that before I used to read, think and write about the psychological damage my parents caused to their first three children (a taboo subject—besides me, what other autobiographer does the visitor to this site know?), from time to time I obviously make psychological forays into the subject of The West’s Darkest Hour.
Over the last few days, I have been reviewing my old diaries and confirmed something I already knew.
What breaks the spirit is precisely what Thomas said yesterday in the comments section of this site: the feminised pettiness of virtually all contemporary racialists (in addition, of course, to normie males).
The very recent conversation between Richard Spencer and Nick Fuentes, the thread where Thomas commented, exemplifies this. But we could say the same about the rest of the American white nationalism forums (I’m not counting Europe because if you dare to speak there, they put you in jail).
Privately, I told Thomas that white nationalists were responsible for my horrible depression and anxiety that eat away at my soul after I lost my home this year.
Let me explain.
A few years ago, a young white man contacted me because he was desperate for fascist action in the real world. I told him that it wasn’t possible at the moment (look at what the American government did to the protesters in Charlottesville), and that he should prepare for the collapse by watching Chris Martenson’s YouTube videos on energy devolution.
But that wasn’t what this young Aryan, with all the hormones of his youth, wanted. He wanted action in the real world!
I would like to give him a better answer belatedly.
Europeans like Thomas and I are waiting for the dollar to collapse so we can buy a house in Mexico (the European Thought Police can’t molest us here) and form a kind of ecclesia for the priests of the sacred words (“We also need temples, enclosures for re-connection, as I call them”—Manu).
It’s true that the important thing is to reproduce (women), but until we take power the feminist, ethno-suicidal laws will be against forming healthy families.
The idea, so that celibate priests don’t get depressed while waiting for the revolution, is to have rabid podcasts where we can vent all our repressed hatred—something far more virulent and Nazi than the podcasts of Fuentes and company, as the goal would be to galvanise Aryan men to behave like the heroes of Pierce’s novel!
Everything else is utterly depressing, crushing to our spirit! Everything else, as I replied to Thomas yesterday, is behaving like the refugee ladies during the Battle of Blackwater!
White nationalists aren’t real men. We are. And if we don’t fight, it’s because there aren’t enough revolutionaries yet. There is not even talk of a future revolution in the forums of the American racial right. If I remember correctly, when Greg Johnson published some articles promoting Harold Covington’s revolutionary novels, Johnson’s then sponsor at TOQ Online (was it Sam Dickson?) freaked out. And that was just Covington’s fiction!
It needs to be repeated ad nauseam: White nationalism is a gross misnomer because they are really de facto conservatives, not the warriors and heroes who truly want to form a new nation so that white families, like the one above, can flourish once again.
15 replies on “Gross misnomer”
The West is not just gone. It has been obliterated. Its spirit was erased without anyone noticing and fully replaced by the spirit of Jews and non-Nordics alike.
Can I ask you something, if you don’t mind? When are you planning to adopt two Aryan kids?
Without the dollar collapsing, I can’t do anything. Only if it hyperinflates will I have the purchasing power I need to get around.
There are only about 0.4% of Aryans left in the world. Why don’t Aryans use IVF technology to give birth to millions of Aryans?
Because they’re committing suicide due to believing the lies about WW2. If all Aryans read Hellstorm, they’d be cured of that mental illness.
Their birthrate just needs to increase and selecting for people with predominantly Nordic blood or a strong Nordic racial influence would work too. But this has to happen along with a spiritual restoration of mind-body unity otherwise contra selection against Nordics will happen again.
Eugenic methods, racial selection, etc., are needed.
Nowadays, it’s not a reliable indicator; hopefully, the small percentage of white people won’t commit ethno-suicide.
I think everything’s gone to shit.
Eugenics is reliable if we tweak a few things. One eugenics should strictly be about selecting for people who are healthy and capable in both mind AND body. Selecting for people who can readily accept and internalize the concept of mind-body unity and people who have strong influences of Nordic blood. They do not have to be pure-bred Nordics just men and women who exhibit strong influences of this race and then continuing this selection with future generations until the Nordic racial element predominates (it becomes the dominant genetic makeup of the people).
A dominant makeup which maintains itself when seeing the poor examples of dependent morality and tendencies towards the development of bodily and mental sicknesses among racially mixed populations due to generational carelessness of human selection and reproduction enacted by the degradation of the human body particularly the female human body.
Dear Robiul,
Again, I partially agree with you – at least with the basic thrust. I was just a little confused though and wanted your opinion to clarify.
Why do you say we could use non only pure-bred populations but those with some strong Nordic traits too? I mean, surely, despite the tiny purebred population (as above acknowledged), a Lebensborn program would want the very best of the best? I thought due to Mendel’s Law of Dominance (where Nordic traits are on the whole recessive) that, if there is any initial imperfection, this will only magnify in subsequent generations. Is it even possible eugenically to bred perfection from imperfection? How could one breed a healthier future population if one does not begin with the very best of evolution’s progress, selected very judiciously (as by the poster Heinrich’s standard some months back)?
Also, I do not deny that I wonder if such things as dwarfism, and certainly mental retardation, as well as a host of genetic diseases stem from mixed race populations, as has been covered in a number of older physical anthropology textbooks on hybridity (I think it was clearest in Philip Jones’ Racial Hybridity), but are you using ‘mental sickness’ to represent ‘mental illness’ also, and, if so, are you claiming the latter is hereditary (as we have showed at great length a fiercely dichotomous position on this site), backed up by all modern research – or rather, decades of buried psychological research coupled a thorough lack of it on the parts of the mental health genetic determinism set? After all, torture anyone, no matter the purity, schizophrenogenically, and you will get the same basic result.
Is the mind-body unity (soul-body unity) really a concept to be taught, as an ideology is imparted, or is it more of a simple biological fact, observable empirically only in those of Beautiful (and ideally increasingly Beautiful) form?
I echo César’s thoughts (although broadly I agree with you). Why breed more if they turn out as numbskulled and useless as the current generation? I am reliably informed (by a noble-spirited pure Nordic man, one among a few comrades) that even many of his own comparative purity have fallen, and are thus worthless meat – and it does hurt me to type that, as a lifelong idealist. No, breeding more alone is necessary, but not enough, not in Kali Yuga. It’s about what is imparted to them in the ensuing interim; that true European warrior instinct (and they will have to be: should want to be). Mind-body unity is indeed achieved through breeding pure with pure, continuing the only European breed, but I put a great deal down to what they are informed on also, and how they are raised. It’s no ‘deus ex machina’ to be Nordic alone, in this Dark Age. And it is a shame for the historical conditions to be like that.
I was inspired recently by words on this blog. Enough of the defeatism. I for one (and I don’t know about the rest), no longer want to read what cannot be done, or how dire our predicament is (do we not already intuit?!), or what is forever lost. I am glad that parody that was all there was to the West is fallen. What can be achieved should be our focus. Not abstractly; not fatalistically. I myself long for some form of action in my lifetime. What I gathered from the main post is that César, as with his young Aryan comrade, is tired of hand-off, stalling word games, of more imparting of dead facts.
* What can we do now, so far, if anything yet?
* If not, when can we move (and we surely are able to, or why this will at all!))?
*Primarily, when – where seems given, at least in one possibility – can we meet (as opposed to this wasted, indiscreet, computer game of f**king modern communication)?
(not ‘why not’, not ‘all is lost’, or ‘what has to happen’, not yet more abstract theory from a multitude of dead prophets and wise men, and not more fact-relaying, and pronouncements of the preternaturally foreseen end, the latter subversive, whether pedantic or malicious)
These are the questions I ask others in general.
What, practically – us; us few here, not the ‘White race’ in general – can we do?
I am losing patience myself, and I am not prepared to devolve into mute capitulated stoicism for the sake of others’ hesitancy (I will not go as far here as to imply cowardice). I cannot last another generation in this putrid limbo, and I cannot be the only one who thinks this. Even if I am, damn it, I require more…
What is the Aryan but that will to conquer? For what is good, and great, and what will always be so. We are bound by honour to reclaim our race, because we are here to do so.
I will personally that more join César’s proposed syssitia, no matter how arduous that interim, for all the petty sacrifices. The first step is always to be able to speak…
Bingo!
Those who refuse to live together in the real world, to plan something serious, are not true priests of the sacred words. They are atomised whites, like lambs in line for the slaughter, waiting their turn…
I will no longer visit any of these pretenders’ forums. We need real men.
Except for those who marched with torches in that Charlottesville night, this describes white nationalism pretty well!
You mirror my sentiments well. I’ve lost interest in effectively all right wing content online, as they all just seem the same to me.
No real anger. No genocidal instinct. No plans or decisions. No yearning to meet in the real world and perform ‘missions’.
Just more and more commentary (often febrile) on a slew of hot potato current affairs issue that cannot be changed by words. Talking because they love their own voices.
Listening to Fuentes and Spencer talk about ‘the American project’ I could have sworn I was listening to anti-racist liberals, for all the concessions they made! They don’t seem genuinely put out about the situation at all! I was more than angry at them, the traitors – two traitors speaking like complacent political slobs, insulting me to my face, and insulting their race.
When did 100% of white nationalists become conservatives? It’s incredibly infuriating.
Perhaps now you understand why I use the word “Neanderthal”—i.e., non-emergent humans from the psychogenic POV—when referring to those who aren’t true priests of the sacred words (I don’t even count the women: I’m referring to Aryan men in Kali Yuga)!