web analytics
Categories
Newspeak

“Gender”

Gender is one of the most important words in contemporary Newspeak. Anyone who doesn’t understand this psyop won’t understand the psychosis that has been unleashed in the West to destroy the white race.

Benjamin to a penpal:

My perspective on the gender revolution? Well, I hope it doesn’t offend you—I’m very much not a progressive on it, though I think I’m more nuanced than your average conservative, i.e. right winger, at the same time:

I think ‘gender’ is a superfluous word; a creation no more than literary, that has no mapping to extraneous reality outside of the fantasies that invest so much in it. Like me inventing the word ‘feckewok’ and using it for advantageous purposes, making up a set of intrinsic properties from whole cloth to accompany this most abstract of ideas – perhaps whatever most appealed psychologically – like designing a ‘fun’, fan-made rule book update to Magic: The Gathering. Thus, I’d like the word ‘gender’ banned from the dictionary (unless one is dealing with the categorising of the nouns of foreign languages such as Latin, where you’d have masculine, feminine, and neuter; an entirely different—and valid—context).

I think the actual word we mean is ‘sex’, to describe the physical reality available on empirical evidence of there being males and females (and a handful of intersex, of which I really do mean a small handful legitimately, as the likes of Klinefelter Syndrome XXY’s are officially considered male; what I mean is, there’s very, very few genuine hermaphrodites).

I think it’s a trendy idea that has caught on because it effectively facilitates, promotes and normalises the cult of hyper-individuality that accompanies early 21st Century liberalism, mixed to the narcissism of the ‘lookit me!’ generations (millennials, and about half of zoomers).

As usual, I would say this destructive hyper-individual drive came about through the impact of historical Christianity on a race already primed to be fairly insular and non-cooperative at the best of times (where all must then be concerned in isolation with the saving of their individual soul; originally, only warped somewhat by the shift into godless postmodernism and secular ‘neo-Christianity’ post-French Revolution, the Enlightenment having been no more than a pseudo-apostasy).

Devastating to me, it also significantly lowers the bar on what can be considered evidence, and denies the physical world, at least as it can be objectively viewed. To remember Christopher Hitchens, positions put forward without evidence can be dismissed without evidence!

I don’t think it was a natural change. I think it was a calculated, civilisation-destroying move, of the Frankfurt School (etc.) variety, and generally, I think it is anti-white (in that in the long run it distracts from families and new life, instead pulling us into the cult of the self, a short circuit on fertility in historical conditions where we are under intergenerational population collapse—coupled to a morbid, materialistic, anti-natalist zeitgeist).

So yes, in a nutshell, I certainly do think they’re all deluded. Whether this comes about (at least in part) from child abuse or not is of great interest to me though, and I would like to know what percentage of cases that part is.

In general, when it comes to, just for example, transsexual individuals, I have a great deal of genuinely pity for them as I recognise them as trauma cases. If our society was not so stupid, ignorant, and pig-headed as to do nothing but encourage their increasingly legally-unfalsifiable (and unstoppable!) delusions, instead of digging beneath the surface a little (or actually, you know, asking them perhaps?!) it might be able to help them better.

Not help them to hoodwink the rest of society with obvious bullshit, under pain of draconian legislation; a sycophant’s most negative idealism. But help them to address where this bodily dissonance – this mental ‘dysphoria’ – comes from… what happened to them basically… it’s my personal theory that a great many were horrendously abused, and, as we know from the massive research contribution of independent psychologist César Tort, most abuse is parental.

Abuse victims need help, not persecution. I think the reason more do not come forward with this—true—understanding, is that they have repressed it to survive, and thus it has sunk into their subconscious, only to appear in other forms i.e. misdirected rage (at targets other than the perpetrators), thinking of the number of school shooter cases recently from this general ‘tranny’ demographic.

As for whether it was prevalent in the (Upper) Palaeolithic… I don’t think so (I can think of no fossil evidence that could verify this). I would suspect not. I think they had very firmly segregated gender (i.e. used in its strictest sense, as a synonym for sex, i.e. m or f) roles, and a real sexual dimorphism physically and culturally, particularly as the Levant populations (Skhul-Qafzeh) underwent to swift biological ‘revolution’ into becoming Cro-Magnon instigated by the predatory impact of the Neanderthals on them (i.e. females very female, males selected to be very, very masculine). The evolutionary biologist Danny Vendramini writes about this topic. It would basically have rendered them maladaptive to their environment to waste time on navel-gazing over whether their mental picture of their body matched the reality of their body.

Does this make sense? That last line kind of sums it up for me. Given that someone can be wrong, just on probability, I don’t automatically trust their self-reportage, no matter how vociferously they try and put it to me, or the meltdown they suffer in tantrum if I refuse to facilitate their lie. It’s a case of the emperor’s new clothes, if you remember that fable. I don’t think that has changed from the Palaeolithic right up until now.

I just don’t think its adherents and devotees want it to be empirically false, and would rather throw truth, empiricism, and biological reality out the window than be wrong—which does suggest severe malignant narcissism to me, or at least an infantile mindset with a psychopathology of some sort—and remember, I keep ‘mental health’ in the realms of the psychologically-imposed (the Trauma Model of Dr Colin Ross), and do not go in for dopamine/chemical imbalance bullshit-theories either.

As with the right on many of its issues, the left is equally dogmatic in my experience on this particular matter, so I wouldn’t usually expect anything more than doubling down. To me this just highlights how many people there are willing to self-delude in this country/planetary hemisphere, often simply in a fake act of being ‘nice’, or ‘tolerant’. I think I’d rather be honest.

Basically, if their mental picture doesn’t match the biological reality, why does it never occur to them that this could be because of a certain delusion? Surely that’s the basic definition of psychosis! And psychosis is the severest symptom of sustained environmental trauma.

I don’t think it’s kind of the corpus mentis crowds to mock psychotic patients. I don’t think it’s kind of them to validate them on their delusions either, if the want them to get better. I blame ignorant society very much as a whole for screwing up a sensible solution to this issue, which I think otherwise could have been nipped in the bud (an issue which I know does bring people some pronounced pain, if only behind their mask of proud frivolity).

In the future I’d hope for a more genuine trauma-based psychotherapy for anyone who came out with these ideas (currently unavailable as gender zealots and liberal ‘cultists’ have ruined the open-minded impartiality of clinical psychology in general).

Anyway, that’s my initial thoughts on the matter. Thank you for asking me.

Categories
Correspondence Miscegenation

Dear César,

I wanted to run something by you. Please tell me if you think I’m not thinking straight on this.

I was mulling over that article Grug shared a bit more.

Is it obtuse of me to say, in all honesty, that I don’t actually give that much of a shit about the Epstein issue, long term? Obviously I’m always glad when traitor politicians and wealthy influencers of an anti-white nature get dragged down a peg or two in public, and otherwise inconvenienced, but as for what they were doing, as I wrote to a gen-z leftist friend I had tonight to double check his own opinion on the matter also:

I make a firm distinction between him hosting what I have referred to in my journals as ‘trendy nymphet glamour parties for the super wealthy and corrupt’ and, say, the total non-white sexual torture-network degradation and abuse of the likes of Rotherham, Rochdale, and on and on from that. I see these Nationalists don’t seem able to make that distinction… I see a real gap between that horrible stuff and teenagers getting together with a man (or fellow teenager) for the purposes of new Aryan children, or indeed in this case, a pampered 17-year-old in the lap of luxury prostituting herself gracefully for more freebies and prestige and for the sake of horny middle-age billionaires.

I find myself wishing Kulak had not used Epstein for his title example (in relation to Jesus), and him and his rich pals throughout, many of whom appear to be white, and had instead referred to these brutal Pakistani rapists and individual Somali sexual muggers of Aryan women and young women. Surely the key issue across the Christian Problem front (and especially with the ‘token Christian’ Nationalists and Christian Nationalists we have discussed recently on WDH) —and this true as well historically across the fall of the West—is that of miscegenation, and of their being a firm set of racial enemies whom we are obliged to dispose of.

For the sake of lambasting but one powerful and connected (and dead!) Jew operative, who has performed the action the red-handed whites allowed him to do by their carelessness, Kulak (and the entire right wing internationally!) has obliterated a sensible analysis of this matter at the scale that is required. I would have said the reality of the long-term destruction of these British girls by painful forced miscegenation in conditions of squalor—which leaves them traumatised and wrecked for their own futures, and future partnerships with fellow Aryan men—was a matter of such horror, and such importance, that it frustrated me that—for all his stern anti-Christian sentiment—he had made an error of false equivalence.

I’m sorry, I’ve been very tired for nights now, so my syntax and grammar are very sloppy. I hope my perspective makes sense to you enough to understand my thinking, for your evaluation of it.

Best regards,

Ben

Categories
Correspondence

Hi César,

Sorry to bother you. I just thought I’d write again. Being a ‘lazy day’ for me, I’ve spent a lot of it (bar my reading hours, generally in the bath) online, just scanning back and forth between my inbox, your site, and benighted forays across to YouTube and Telegram, desperately trying to see if anyone else is ‘out there’, so to speak, and worth paying attention to. As usual, the latter two came up empty. I don’t know a single decent UK-centric Nationalist or NS Telegram channel, and YouTube delayed me with a few minutes of current affairs courtesy of the channel of Connor Tomlinson (a ‘revolutionary’ Catholic zoomer with a certain weary intelligence, but a lot of normie hang-ups and a conservative mindset).

I wish someone else would comment on your site too. It’s been too many days now, and it’s a complete pain. I like chatting with you on there, but, as always, it’s back to the wondering why no one else has a mind/ideals/a spine. I think they’re a disgrace, after a while, a very big let down, considering what I had thought​ the radical end of the dissident spectrum could provide. I check periodically every day, just refreshing multiple times in between reading your profound new content, and it’s tiresome, like waiting for paint to dry, or a pot to boil. I like having multiple people to play off, and engage with—even if on the whole they do simply resent me and want to prove me wrong or put me down, or simply express more cold shoulder indifference, perhaps in the hope I myself will give up and go away.

I’m hoping René is still reading Consumption, and gets back to me when he’s read it. I could do with some honest feedback from a novel/additional mind. It’s just that no one really keeps in touch with me (bar you). I emailed an online acquaintance with some vegan stuff yesterday, filling him in on some old WDH discussions, and included a copy of your new Dominion refresher article to boot, but he’s ignored me. Do you still get a lot of correspondence daily from regular long term commenters and such? If so, do they have interesting things to say? I was wondering if the new Romanian you had highlighted to me had got back to you now also.

I think I’ll continue to scan your site periodically for the rest of the evening until bed, and keep my inbox tab open also in the hope the other guy eventually responds. I expect it will be a long wait, and perhaps not a worthwhile one, but I’m too tired now to embark on any more evening book reads. There’s so little to do in this tiny house in the winter bar general tidy-ups, mindless minutiae, endless daily diary & publishing edits, and scanning your site, the only real site online I pay any attention to.

To repeat, yeah, it’s disheartening that they’ve all dispersed… really disappointing. This is by far too regular an occurrence. I know I often speak of whites as a collective disappointing me, usually thinking of all the massed demographic compartments of various breeds of normies, and leftists, and Christians, and bourgeoisie. It annoys me that I have to widen the net on that, up to and including real (whatever that means) radicals. It doesn’t bode well for the future. If they can’t even abstractly talk about it, just vaguely, or philosophically… how on earth would they ever​, when pressed, carry it out? I know we say the circumstances would leave them no option but to. It’s just a shame that no one has that whim voluntarily in them as of the present. Two or three people, maybe. And a huge heap of confident showboaters, tailored very much to their own time and needs primarily. I always hope I’m wrong.

Sorry to be a broken record on this.

Best regards,

Ben

Categories
Autobiography Child abuse

3rd edition

by Benjamin

Editor’s note: This is one of the new segments from the third edition of Ben’s autobiographical book (for context, see here):

 

______ 卐 ______

 

In time, my Mum ceased trying to defend me. Perhaps she changed her mind and began to doubt herself. More likely, she gave up in nervous strain under the force of Dad’s charming dishonesty and intellectual manipulations of the dialogues. I know around thispoint she had to start taking antidepressants herself, and, though she had put many complaints in to the doctors over their written words and their professional treatment of her, none were ever listened to. Part of me wonders if she turned a blind eye to my suffering in the house, desperate for her own sanity that it was not true.

Either way, despite the strain of defending me, my mother betrayed me in the end by this cowardly abandonment of her duty towards me, much I do see how tough it would have been for her. These days she has gone back to her familiar patter of, “oh, his life has always been good, nothing ever happened” and “I simply don’t remember those days you mention”, if an outsider inquires after my home life, or if I turn to her and demand she account for Dad. Perhaps it is easier on her to exist in complete denial. Either way, it drives me to intolerable rage, knowing that there was a time once when she did stand up for me, only to have her spirit crushed out of her again by the cold, dispassion of idiotic medical staff. I pity her very much, but I cannot forgive her. She was my only hope.

For her part, the young therapist did not seem to mind so much that I was not in the family meetings. She noted down my “hostile and aggressive” manner, and continued with Dad, ladling pejorative labels on me, and mischaracterizing my “poor” behaviour, with me never there to defend myself, or to correct Dad’s second-hand reportage each week. The sessions continued weekly for over six months. Why on earth did she think I might be upset?! Was she stupid?! If she didn’t have the natural compassion to take my side as her patient and sole charge, why was she even working in psychological healthcare?! I cursed the day I had ever been put forward for them. By now though, the constant shaming I was subjected to, and the faulty opinion-making was beginning to take its toll, and my mind was indeed starting to come apart, my ego shattered, and my sense of cognitive calm fracturing at the edges. I felt divorced from the world, hanging in the cold, dim edges, like in fog, teetering on the abyss of something vast and deep. Most days I would cover this over, but the heightened anxiety was persistent, and, eventually, one day, I just cracked

Sitting again on the chair by my computer desk, in the middle of a dull, clouded afternoon, during a light rain storm outside, once more I took a strange fascination in my healing, much-abused right arm. Long-accustomed as I was to bending down and biting away at the area when in my lower moods, this time I approached from a far odder, more mechanical angle. To this day, I cannot remember what might have stressed me, if anything, worryingly. I think in general my life around that point was more than enough, even without anything specific to obliterate my mental wellbeing.

I had just finished eating my lunch for the day, an oven bake pepperoni pizza of the kind I had begun to consume on a regular basis for ease of preparation, and still had a sharp kitchen knife on my plate; one suitable for severing the crusts of my pizza, as well as a standard fork, and a teaspoon I had been using to gently separate the melted cheese (which I had never been much of a fan of long-term) from the base. Upon finishing my meal, something drew me again to my arm, not feeling any great distress, but somehow preoccupied, as if enticed.

Taking the relatively-sharp kitchen knife, I pushed down until the flesh popped, and carved deeply into my forearm skin, feeling little pain, perhaps on account of the severed nerve endings from long before, or maybe just from my daze itself, continuing in long grooves to shape out a rectangular ‘box’ around the outsides of my main healing area. When I had finished my ‘masking work’, blood trickling a little down my arm as it always did, I began to partition the flesh inside into cubes, cutting the little squares of epidermis into neat blocks, like a piece of raw tofu, but still attached to my lower dermis layers, and to the muscle underneath. No one came to disturb me that day, and so I worked slowly, for what felt like well over an hour, delineating the rectangle’s contents into neat parcels of meat, all in a line.

Once I had finished this task, I took the point of the knife again, and slit the hypodermis under my closest blocks away from the muscle layer, releasing little globs of subcutaneous fat – a grisly process where much pressure and repetition was required, and where I was obliged now and again to stop so I could snap down and suck up any excess blood. Eventually, the skin still sticking to the muscle in various places, I was able to stick my teaspoon under the excised flaps, and lever each cube up and off my arm, sometimes with a terrible tugging, and a fresh new splatter of blood.

Eventually, I was left with another wide hole in my arm – not desperately deep, but dark and bloody, in an expanse of ravaged veins, and ripped hair follicles, and otherwise the white strands of mangled flesh and fat – and beyond that, a heap of around forty small, soft, pinky-coloured guerdons, each just under 1cm x 1cm, sat on my plate in a pool of blood and clear-yellow bodily fluids.

With my fork, I proceeded to pick up each morsel of severed skin, and, in grisly auto-cannibalistic fashion, popped them one by one into my mouth, chewing for a long time on the gristle of each lump, like a mixture of pork rinds and stale bubble gum, and sucking the sweet, wet, sickly flavour out of the pieces of my own arm. Cooling blood trickled down past my chin. I don’t think I was thinking anything at all.

True, I had bitten my arm before, many times, but never had I stooped to actually consuming my own body, preferring instead to merely leave bite wounds or otherwise allow the skin to fall away unaddressed, and thankfully, this particularly gory and disturbing incident was never to be repeated.

When my mother did come in later and discover me, I cannot remember what was said. I can guess my parents’ reactions would have been total horror, an alien sensation. All I do remember is that I was taken down to the local surgery for an examination, and from there swiftly to Broomfield Hospital again, almost a second home to me by now, and of a similar surgical quality. Sitting in a waiting room to be examined by the doctors, it was as if in a surreal film. “So, why is the patient with us today?” I heard one of the ward staff say to another. “Oh, he cut off and ate a bit of his arm, apparently” was the seemingly unconcerned reply. Perhaps they too found it hard to register.

In the end, I was dressed, and sent home again (without psychological evaluation), and further notes made for my case-file, but, bizarrely, despite the severity of this hideous personal action, nothing was ever said of it to me in aftermath, and I do not remember my then psychiatrist ever taking any particular interest. There are a great many ‘blips’ like this in my record; times I would have thought pertinent to make at least brief mention of, if not to scrutinize intently. I can only assume they too would like somehow to brush them under the rug, surely some niggling opposition to their ‘it’s a brain disease so just take your meds and you’ll be fine’ argument. As it stands today, my prior history of extreme autophagia is never mentioned by any new psychiatrists I come into contact with, and certainly not by any of their day-to-day care workers. It’s as if they’ve purged it from my history, and like none of this ever happened. I find that a great, telling, frustration.

Categories
Correspondence Exterminationism

Dear Cesar,

To answer your question regarding your latest post, I agree with you in that I too think (lawful? as if that would be allowed!) secession is not enough, and would be better achieved itself through violent aggressive revolution.

There are too many enemies otherwise, and they cannot be left alive, as with their grasp on modern technology, and, as the quotation of extermination says, in paraphrase, what if 10, or 10,000 aren’t enough, and you need to eliminate nigh on 10 billion. One can only do that through long-term—perhaps intergenerational—Turner Diaries-style insurgency. Secession feels a little like these ‘prepper’ hippies who retire to the woods in cabins and think that is enough to save them from civilisation’s degradation, with the problem unsolved all about, just over their horizon, or indeed Covington’s effective ‘Murka II’, where, without ideological fanaticism and stringent adherence to iron rule patriarchal norms, it slips back into just another (feminist) democracy.

As you commented on the final author saying—revolution being a state of mind, I think I go with the former commenters (I can’t remember if it was originally Greg Johnson, Larry Auster, or Alex Linder) that the fanatic attitude of hatred as much as the mythological ideals of what our race was and should be​ thinking of Cro-Magnon point for a historical example—coupled to the 4-words is enough for me to feel there is already revolution, even if not among many people; even if they are simply waiting in frustration for an opportunity.

Personally, I find the (second half of the) 14-words harder to fight for, almost a given to me, and harder to feel passion over (perhaps it’s because I have a long-term partner, so am in some sense complacent, small-minded or selfish over that). But to answer O’Meara’s point then, it’s not about inheriting the Leviathan as much as de-fanging and de-clawing it permanently, and tossing the remains into that ‘ashpit of history’, so nothing like our current situation can ever arise again, a real scorched earth tactic psychologically, and only then could I realistically think descendants could plan for a peaceful pure Aryan society in aftermath, having that opportunity awarded automatically to then, as the only survivors, left then to expand across the globe in further war, and wipe out remaining enclaves of enemies. At the moment, there’s too much war in my mind to think of a simple dislocation.

I hope this gives my basic thoughts reflecting on your latest piece.

Best regards,

Ben

Categories
Catholic religious orders Correspondence Sponsor

Marcial Maciel

— my antipode —

When I read William Pierce’s Who We Are years ago, I was struck by Pierce’s assertion that forming a society requires people deeply committed to the cause—what we here call the priesthood of the sacred words. Without such committed individuals, he argued, a lasting society cannot be formed.

That is very true: and the only way to form it would be, as Lycurgus ordered, for the meals of that religious-military order that was the Spartans to be communal in order to achieve adequate bonding between men.

No one now follows the precepts of Lycurgus, although it is more than obvious that there should be a group of us living very close together, always eating together, to get to know each other better. As Benjamin said in his email today, “It’s the same with all the rest of them online! None of them seem to want to get to know each other on a more personal basis, so all proper male bonding is out the window, and thus an organization can’t form”. He added:

It’s been ages since someone said something substantial in the comments on The West’s Darkest Hour! (I’d say, just out of politeness to make an exception for Jamie, Jorge and Vinster though). There’s a reason I privately call them the hyenas. The lions have all decamped, or been killed off spiritually, and now it’s just these asinine feminine predators, circling, in a more distant lurker/helicopter visit crowd of what might as well be f**king flamingos.

As soon as it can ever be achieved, in desperate need, I think one of the first steps of a real revolution would be to send every current dissident right leader and popular ‘far-right’ website grifter the way of those university professors I mentioned in a recent comment. There’s no other way to upend the current order all across the right. At least rough them up; make them worried.

Ditto!

Yesterday and today I watched selected passages from the LOTR trilogy by Peter Jackson. While my featured article used an image from Game of Thrones (John Snow and Sam), the analogy of Frodo and Sam is actually more accurate for my argument. Alas, unlike LOTR Benjamin and I find ourselves completely alone in pursuing the goal of destroying the “One Ring”—i.e., gold and Christian ethics—that corrupted the Aryan spirit. Our effort lacks a “Fellowship of the Ring” because it was destroyed during the Hellstorm Holocaust (see my post this morning).

In the following century after the Hellstorm Holocaust, except us there is no one like Frodo and Sam, determined to walk for days in that horrible, rocky and volcanic landscape. No one I know wants to put the ring into the lava as resolutely as Ben and I: which obviously means working intellectually every day (on the other hand if an aspiring priest is employed by the System, he could still donate to the cause).

Today, I also watched the recently released HBO Max series Marcial Maciel: The Wolf of God. I find it odd that there is still no article about this miniseries on Wikipedia. Incidentally, I have sat down several times to talk with one of the interviewees in Marcial Maciel: The Wolf of God. I am referring to Don José Barba, who still lives in Mexico City.

As my earlier points in the featured article suggest, Ben and I are men against our time. It will be tough to find another man willing to take vows for our cause. By contrast, Marcial Maciel thrived as a man of his time: he drew thousands of children to his Catholic schools and amassed tremendous institutional power. Notably, his Legion of Christ at one point generated annually double the Vatican’s income: $600,000,000 dollars!

What an eloquent way to distinguish someone who trained priests in a multimillion-dollar fraternity that worships the god of the Jews and I, who aspire to the modest Aryan temple of which I posted an image yesterday. And the temple would be a luxury. I’m missing the most basic of all. In recent months, I have been suffering agonies since my siblings sold the house where I lived!

Behold a man against his time—that is, against the Christian era—and a man of his time like Maciel, so perfectly integrated into the calendar that begins with the mythical birth of J.C. Perhaps because of all this, we can understand Benjamin’s words in his email today:

I’d like a list in my head: what requires one person [committed to the sacred words]; what requires two people; what requires three people to achieve, etc. —currently I’m stumped.

I too am perplexed that there are only two of us who believe that the “ring” is what is worth destroying (the JQ is just the consequence of the kings of the West wielding the slave rings to the One Ring).

Metaphors aside, even a single person with a modest job could do us a favour with a modest monthly donation. Someone who is unemployed and aspires to the priesthood of the temple could also contribute greatly (for example, by dedicating himself to preaching our philosophy in the comments section of other racialist forums). But for the moment, there are only two of us priests.

It is curious that Maciel—who created a fabulous empire—and I—who now even suffer from terrible anxiety at the possibility of becoming homeless—have lived most of our lives in Mexico. Although the paedophile is now dead, we were, and spiritually are, perfect antipodes.

Categories
Correspondence

Mail

by Benjamin

“The silence of the site frustrates me too. You’ve put up consistently excellent material recently (and indeed from over the last year) and it’s all been ignored. It’s agony for me to process that, unfathomable disappointment. I think the reason it disappoints me so much is that I know the threat we’re under, and thus, knowing there aren’t any good people gives me less hope of a solid Aryan pushback”.

Categories
Correspondence

“I hate…

…nothing more than sitting in my study office, day after day, as the weeks pile up, feeling impotent, raging, and yearning to be able to make a difference, yet knowing that one person is simply not enough, and that not enough people so far are this angry, and this embittered against our many enemies, not knowing how to proceed (and not for a lack of imagination)”.

Categories
Conservatism Racial right

WN is dead

by Benjamin

Thank you for sharing these key posts by the late Alex Linder. I’ve now read them all…

It leaves me asking the question, given that (as I think he also recalls somewhere in the posts) most of the latter-day—and indeed historical—converts to White Nationalism, and from that to National Socialism, come from those already affiliated to a greater or lesser degree with (Anglo-American) conservatism, how are we to gather new members who are suitably radical, seeing as standard bourgeois conservatives, whether bog-standard racialists, with all the trappings of the individualist WASP work ethic, or worse evangelicals, simply will not do (for a number of reasons covered a myriad times on this site and elsewhere)? Did it make any sense before when I inquired as to the practicalities of trying to ‘turn’ leftists?

I’m just hoping for your new generations—the zoomers—currently. It’s clear White Nationalism, at least in any mainstream capacity, is dead, and those remaining big-name gatekeepers are holding tightly onto too many of the stragglers who have yet to to realise all of this. Dead in that there is no real-world progress and it has become a stilted money-maker, akin to a relaxed social club. Until exterminationism, in a practical sense, is assimilated psychologically, I don’t think any progress can be made.

It infuriates me that people aren’t angrier. I hate just having to hang around impotently, as what could be the rest of the decade or more wears on.

Categories
Racial right

A thorn

by Benjamin

A boy extracting a thorn from his foot.

It’s interesting that no one [among mainstream racialist forums] acknowledged Alex Linder’s death properly on those sites. I wasn’t aware until now [click on the above link]. I find it quite disrespectful and petty of them actually… we’re meant to be on the same side! But the second he’s dead and OD is criticising him…

I take it they saw him the way I assume they see you/us, as a thorn in their side—as opposed to the truth: a better source of information and inspiration on Aryan survival.

By their own stubborn, head in the sand cowardice, these supposedly pro-White sites have made themselves our enemies (they’re a lot more unreasonable with you than you are with them). It’s good that you’re starting a radio show again, albeit solo. It will give you greater reach (against them).