web analytics

Category: Nick Fuentes

Categories
Conservatism Nick Fuentes

Webbon’s

interview – 3

Nick Fuentes says that, for St Paul, the “concession” was to marry in the sense that celibacy is better.

See the inferiority of Christianity to Judaism: the stars promised to Abraham were his future kike descendants without demonising sex. But in Judeo-Christianity sex is sinful for gentiles (i.e., white people from the Mediterranean). The god of the Jews “concedes” us marriage so that we don’t burn with lust, but the highest state is non-reproductive celibacy, and Fuentes even talks about monasteries.

Then Nick confuses marital masculinity with a feminised husband. Since I’ve been talking about Breaking Bad, let’s say that Nick confuses masculinity with a character like Walter White: a “man” who put his family above everything else. On the other hand, we see true masculinity in Sparta, pre-imperial Rome, the Goths, the Vikings and National Socialism where there is Männerbund, unlike the decadent 21st-century America so well represented in the gynocentric scenes of Breaking Bad.

In practice, Nick’s Catholic recipe is perfect for the dysgenics that has been perpetrated in Europe since Christianity was imposed on whites. This dysgenics (“Are you smart? Go to the monastery and don’t reproduce!”) caused the IQ of Jews to rise over the centuries while the IQ of whites dropped. This perverse eugenics / dysgenics reached the point where Jews now have the highest IQ: a genetic courtesy of Christianity that Nick and other racialists stupidly cling. Just look at Nick’s statement in his interview with Joel Webbon: “The priesthood, the monastic life is the most masculine thing that a guy can do…”

Above, Ascyltos, and Giton playing the role of Ganymede, in Fellini Satyricon. Zeus was capable of countless love affairs not only with goddesses but with women. On one occasion, he even fancied Ganymede and abducted him to see what the androgynous ephebe tasted like. But for Nick the masculine man is not represented by Zeus but by the Aryan humiliated with a ton of guilt—the monk—if he fails to love the Jewish god.

In sharp contrast to the Greco-Roman ethos, above we see Franciscan and Benedictine monks in the film The Name of the Rose.

Webbon then quotes Paul’s epistle to the Corinthians; he says that celibacy is a gift, and talks to Nick about “fleshy appetites” in the Christian sense. Compare this with the Greco-Romans. Their Gods were openly rapists; it was Christianity that made us feel guilty about that. Fuentes, incidentally, is a virgin as he recently confessed to Piers Morgan: something inconceivable to the ancient Greeks and Romans of his age.

Are you beginning to understand what the Judeo-Christian inversion of values was? For kikes sexuality isn’t sinful but Paul preaches something else to us, and these idiots—not just Nick but Christian racialists in general—are incapable of seeing the Jewish psyop!

A little later in the interview, Nick says that many put family above God (that is, above the Semitic god with his double standard for Jews and gentiles). That’s why Fuentes goes on to say that the pinnacle of masculinity is the celibate monk.

At minute 40, Nick says that since women are ultimate conformists to the System, they can betray you if you marry in this anti-white male era. Let’s illustrate this with Skyler who, in an episode of Breaking Bad, goes to a female psychotherapist who suggests Skyler to report her husband Walter to the police for drug trafficking. Walter had been foolish enough to confess everything to his wife in private, when you should never tell women anything about serious matters, such as committing illegal acts or having an affair with Ganymede: they are incapable of understanding the male drives.

Do you see why we should only have lunches and dinners with heterosexual soldiers? Even after the Spartans were married they didn’t eat with their wives but with other tough guys where they could talk as rudely as I do on this site.

Categories
Conservatism Nick Fuentes

Webbon’s

interview – 2

Nick Fuentes explains the history of Israel and how the neocons emerged; how their competitors, the paleoconservatives, were defamed and destroyed by the philo-Semitic American system, and how the myth of the post-WW2 consensus was created. Despite the nonsense Nick recently spouted on his podcast about another subject, unlike many racialists, both interviewee and interviewer concede that Hitler wasn’t a Christian.

It is a pity that neither of them seems to know anything about the Hellstorm Holocaust committed by the Allies from 1944 to 1947. However, interviewer Joel Webbon hit the nail on the head when he said that Western religion had changed from “pro-Christ” to “anti-Hitler.”

The West’s Darkest Hour attempts to transvalue the values of the Christian religion in favour of Hitlerism. It is no longer possible to incorporate Christianity for the reasons I will be explaining in my new series on Third Reich booklets.

My dream would be to have a podcast with a background like Webbon’s studio, featuring similar furniture and even similar clothing (I share all this with Webbon, except for the canteen), but not from the perspective of Christian nationalism but rather post-1945 National Socialism.

For example, in this other interview Nick says he is against violent revolution because he subscribes to Christian ethics. Fuentes is not only ignorant of the history of the first millennium of Christianity. He inverts it, claiming that the martyrs convinced the Roman Empire to convert to Christianity through peaceful means: a pious myth (and by the way, most of the apostles were unhistorical).

Remember that, according to Origen (185-253 c.e.), a prolific writer who wrote approximately 2,000 treatises on multiple branches of theology, there were only about thirty historical martyrs. Christians not only invented countless hagiographies of unhistorical saints and martyrs. They themselves perpetrated veritable Holocausts in which millions of whites were slain! (for example, the exterminationist campaign of the Arian Vandals and Ostrogoths by Justinian I—see our abridged translation of Karlheinz Deschner’s Christianity’s Criminal History here and here).

Deschner’s ten thick volumes contain thousands of bibliographic references that support this secular reading of the first millenium of Christendom. As good Christians, Fuentes and Webbon grossly ignore the origins of their religion.

We can already imagine a National Socialist podcast with real historians discussing how Judeo-Christians seized power ever since Constantine handed the empire over to his Semitic bishops…

Categories
Nick Fuentes

Webbon’s

interview – 1

“For me, the overall result is the visible and systematic poisoning of the youth of our people through Christian education…” —Himmler to Bormann (see the bibliographic source for this letter in my article from yesterday).

Yesterday, the first hour of a ten-hour series of Nick Fuentes’ interview with Christian nationalist Joel Webbon was uploaded on YouTube.

At the beginning of the interview, we see that Nick is infinitely closer to Christian nationalism than to white nationalism (recall that in his interview with Tucker, Nick said he was a white nationalist but not at the level of William Pierce’s WN, his words). Obviously, neither Fuentes nor Webbon are National Socialists.

Shortly after, Nick says that the US should have a Christian government. Compare this to what Richard Weikart says about Hitler’s esoteric anti-Christianity, in contrast to the Führer’s exoteric image (prolefeed for the German proles).

Soon after, both say things that go against the US Constitution, such as that the government should not pass laws regarding the establishment of a religion. Then Nick mildly approves of the interviewer’s crazy idea of implementing blasphemy laws in the US: something that would overturn the First Amendment. Interestingly, as a gospel follower, Nick doesn’t want the death penalty for most murderers, but he does want it for those who desecrate the consecrated host or wine.

Only at this point does Nick speak about secular racialism, and they even briefly touch on the topic of our worldview, which we might call anti-Christian racism. Nick confesses that his Groyper movement was precisely a reaction against that secularized racialism: a step back towards American traditionalism.

The interview ends with Nick expressing his desire for an alliance between his America First ideology and his interviewer’s Christian nationalism. Their movement represents, in my humble opinion, the last-ditch effort of American Christianity.

Categories
Nick Fuentes Racial right

Rick & Nick

Four days ago, Richard Spencer interviewed Nick Fuentes again. In sharp contrast to my post this morning, after minute 24 Nick says he lives in a racially diverse city and prefers to live there rather than in a small town populated exclusively by white people—because it would be boring, Rick adds!

Around minute 27 Rick mentions WW2 without saying a word about the Hellstorm Holocaust, or that the bad guys won the war. But he is right at the 30-minute mark that in the previous century there was a window for fascism or communism to escape the System, but now everyone is a slave to capitalism and material comfort.

When they talk about Russia around the 50-minute mark, this pair doesn’t seem to distinguish between the American state (which is in fact anti-white) and the white American nation, which is dwindling every day. That doesn’t mean I’m a Russophile in the last, just that they don’t express themselves like 14-word priests.

Half a minute before the hour, Nick seems to like the universalist “compassion”—he used this word—of today’s woke Europeans (note the difference with us, who propose exterminationist hatred). Nick then goes on to say that he likes the European Union, omitting that it is an exterminationist entity, yes: but of the white man!

More than half an hour later, when they talk about Christian Nationalism, they fail to note that the racial factor should be our #1 priority (Christian Nationalism is not National Socialism with its Nuremberg laws, mass deportations, concentration camps, etc.).

When it was time for wrap-up questions, the first person to ask Nick a question noted that the Catholic Church is browning. Nick acknowledged this harsh reality but failed to suggest any cure, even saying that he liked both the current Pope and Pope Francis.

Rick then spoke about Greco-Roman religion, but he doesn’t seem to have read William Pierce’s history of the white race, Who We Are. Both admire the Roman Empire but are completely ignorant of how the empire’s miscegenation caused Rome to decline and fall (see e.g., this paper of a Swedish scholar).

At 1:50, it is clear that Nick follows Christian ethics. He is asked about the outcome of the Aryan dilemma in the future and responds that ethnic cleansing will not be practical in the US (i.e., expelling them to “Aztlán” as in Harold Covington’s futuristic novels) and Rick nods because, although he isn’t a Christian, he shares the Christian ethics of the Catholic Nick.

Compare all this with the Third Reich, which was determined to solve the problem of miscegenation (i.e., the destruction of the Aryan race) at any cost. I confess that after watching this friendly chat between Rick and Nick, it seems obvious to me that America, as an idea, must die in order to save the Aryan DNA north of the Rio Grande.

At 1:57, Nick voices the official Americanist POV on the war in Ukraine—nothing like what someone like John Mearsheimer would say on the subject! It’s incredible, and it’s the same POV as Rick’s. I say incredible because we need to humiliate NATO, the European Union and the US: the greatest enemies of the white race (remember that, during the US bombing of Serbia in 1999, the American who headed NATO declared that Europe no longer had any right to ethnostates).

I am by no means a Russophile, but Russia is certainly not the greatest enemy of the white man, rather this Western Leviathan. Given that Ukraine will certainly lose the war next year, it will be magnificent to see how this pair of blind Americans, who believe the official version of this war, react when the humiliating defeat for NATO, the European Union, the US and Ukraine finally comes.

From this angle, the American Michael O’Meara was much wiser than this pair. O’Meara published an article in Counter-Currents on 7 October 2013 entitled “Too Much Putin?”, in which he said:

US hegemony may be approaching its end. Once the world refuses to acknowledge the imperial authority of its humanitarian missiles [e.g., what Bill Clinton’s military forces did in Serbia because the Serbs were expelling the Muslims from Kosovo—Ed.], and thus stops paying tribute to its predatory model of the universe, then American power inevitably starts to decline—and not simply on the world stage, but also domestically, among the empire’s subjects, who in the course of the long descent will be forced to discover new ways to assert themselves.

But at 2:10 Nick said something humorous: that he can’t run for president because he’s too short “and not white enough.” At least I find that honest (I could say something analogous about me).

At any event, I believe that the future fall of the dollar will create the necessary gravitas for other American racialists not to get stuck halfway across the Rubicon, as this pair are. In the end of the video, both speculate about what we need without mentioning National Socialism (NS is the other side of the Rubicon, following my metaphor). Instead, Nick ended his speech by saying that what we need is “the Hellenised Jew, who is Christ, I suppose.”

The Hellenised Jew, right?

America delenda est!

Categories
Liberalism Newspeak Nick Fuentes

Glitch in the Matrix

A Spanish speaker posted the following on X, which I will now translate:

Piers Morgan (pure Boomer) vs. Nick Fuentes (radical Zoomer): the interview is a surgical X-ray of the generation gap. These guys speak completely incomprehensible languages and are driven by entirely opposing ideas.

One grew up in the era when the labels “Nazi,” “anti-Semitic,” “homophobic,” or “racist” functioned as an instant social guillotine: simply uttering them was enough to make the accused kneel, beg for forgiveness, and disappear off the face of the earth.

The other grew up in the era when those same words became badges of honour, war trophies, visible proof that you don’t kneel before the official religion of globalist progressivism. The Boomer tries to use them as a method of control; the Zoomer wipes his ass with them.

The Boomer tries, time and again, to activate the old control mechanism: he raises an eyebrow, raises his voice, launches the sacred accusation, expecting automatic submission.

The Zoomer smiles, shrugs, and basically replies, “Yeah, so what? Is that all you’ve got?” “Yes, I’m a Nazi, think what you want.”

There’s no shame, no withdrawal, no fear. Only defiance and mockery. The slightest conventionality has been eradicated from the dialogue.

And that, exactly that, is what drives the old-school boomers crazy: discovering that their moral nuclear weapon, which they wielded for decades, is now a wet firecracker. That they, who were the servile lapdogs of Zionism, can’t leave their ideological sperm in the next generation, and that, at best, they’ll receive a: “Take your cheap ideology and die with it, leave us alone, boomer.”

The average person hasn’t processed it yet, but the message has been sent: the spell is broken. The fracture will be total and extremely painful.

The words “nazi” and “racist” are equivalent to “pagan” in the Early Middle Ages or “witch” in the Late Middle Ages. Compared to the old Greco-Roman world, these Christian words—the Newspeak of the time—only had power when the Church had its secular arm that destroyed the dissenter. What Europeans don’t seem to realize is that in the land of the First Amendment, a 27-year-old can say these things and get away with it because there isn’t a secular arm to remove the infected sheep so he doesn’t infect the flock, to use the language of the inquisitors of old (always remember that two former commenters on this site are serving sentences of eight and seven years in the UK for “thought crimes”!).

It must have been around 2010 that Greg Johnson said in his fledgling webzine that a heretical statement from a notable figure could cause “a glitch in the Matrix”. Nick Fuentes’ ignorance regarding the Hellstorm Holocaust (what Stalin’s Asian hordes did in Germany) may disgust me big time, but despite his ignorance the glitch has occurred.

Now, new voices must emerge online, more mature than Nick’s, to continue this tactic of accepting labels (which in the Middle Ages led to the stake and today to European prisons) as badges of honour.

Categories
Joseph Stalin Nick Fuentes

Greenhorn

After posting this entry, I will delete the previous one, which I had titled “Groyped!”, and move it to the comments section of this post.

The reason for this change is what Nick Fuentes said yesterday: that he admired Stalin much more than Hitler because he had won the war.

That line of reasoning is as stupid as saying we should admire the House of Constantine because it won the war against pagan Rome. I realised this twisted way of thinking ever since I read William Pierce’s history of the white race: We admire the figures of Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar without realising the immense damage they did to the white race. Except Emperor Julian, the same could be said of the emperors of the House of Constantine, who destroyed the Aryan Gods to impose the god of the Jews on us: something that literally transvalued our values to the values of the Jews.

Nick Fuentes is a greenhorn, and his perpetual immaturity reflects the fact that Americans haven’t suffered the way Revilo Oliver said they should before a true paradigm shift takes place. That gravitas, like that of the Republican Romans before Caesar’s actions started the Melting Pot empire, can only develop years after the dollar collapses and American society descends into utter chaos. We badly need the fall of this new Rome.

Until that happens, we will continue defending the Hitlerian faith on this site, even though very few people listen to me in the desert where I preach.

Categories
Nick Fuentes

Ultimately,

Nick Fuentes is just a neo-normie, as can be seen in his recent interview with Crowder.

Unless a Groyper can distance himself miles away from Fuentes, to our side of the psychological Rubicon, there’s no point in wasting our time with him. Only after a large-scale civilisational collapse will we be able to preach our faith. Until then, we can only preach in the desert.

Regarding what I said last month about Fuentes, I take it back. As the blogger Black Pilled has demonstrated, we no longer have time to infiltrate institutions as Nick recommends. See here and here but skip the first ten minutes.

________

Postscript: See also my November 25 article, “Groyper.”

Categories
Nick Fuentes Racial right

Groyper

Yesterday I tried to communicate with a Groyper on “X” but it was useless.

These people don’t read, as Greg Johnson complained.

They fail to understand that the mere bravado of guru Nick Fuentes is certainly good, but it lacks the depth of thought that William Pierce on this side of the Atlantic, or Savitri Devi on the other, possessed.

I told this Groyper that Nick had recently said that his Christian scruples prevented him from expelling the millions of non-whites who have come to the US in recent decades. Fuentes added that white Americans now have to adapt to that reality. I told the Groyper that such scruples didn’t appear in Pierce’s novel, and the guy (who could be half a century younger than me) replied that it was an academic discussion. Then he spoke rudely, and I cut him off for good.

It’s not an academic matter, but rather what I’ve said several times about our friend Joseph Walsh, who is now serving a seven-year sentence in the UK for thought crime. Walsh told me privately that all white people, including racialists, are committing suicide.

Why? Recall Walsh’s words in the featured article, “1945 was the year of the total inversion of Aryan values into Christian values.”

The point is that before 1945, white people were capable of exterminating entire populations of inferior humans, as they did in Cuba, Tasmania, and as the Germans planned to do in the Master Plan East. The aftermath of that fateful year represented a psychotic regression toward the purest evangelical message: a folie en mass of the Aryan collective unconscious, leading them to love every wingless biped (a psychological affliction even Fuentes suffers from).

These callow Groypers are incapable of engaging in a simple discussion on the matter because, like some teenagers, they are too arrogant. They think they can reinvent the wheel. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: Without an ethnostate, even with several Groyper dictators in the US over the course of a century, the white race would become extinct because miscegenation is inevitable.

Walsh was right: All white people commit suicide, even racialists with very rare exceptions (those we call priests of the sacred words). In short, a devout Christian—and the Groypers are Christians—will never be capable of ethnic cleansing, as the Gods command. Unlike the Nazis, a Groyper obeys the commandment to love one’s “neighbour”: a commandment of the god of the Jews who wants to exterminate him.

Ultimately, a Groyper will still be a loser even if he becomes President of the US.

Categories
Nick Fuentes

Heated

DEBATE about Nick Fuentes’
flaw (universalist Xtian ethics).

Incredible! A woman, Rebecca, seems very wise next to the Judeo-reductionist Dave.

Dave believes the struggle is “America First” when in reality the only way to achieve it is “Make America white again.”

It is precisely the existence of monocausalists like Dave that I blog. They are so ignorant of history that they will never see the utterly obvious: Latin America became mestizo when the Inquisition kept the Jews at bay (i.e., even without JQ, the CQ decimated the white man south of Río Grande).

Categories
Nick Fuentes Real men

Dry sand

When the Radio Free Mississippi interviewer asked Alex Linder what he thought about Kevin MacDonald a dozen years ago, Linder replied, “We need PhDs.”

Very true. But if a white nationalist didn’t make a career in academia, he should start infiltrating the world of American politics.

Yesterday I was thinking that, within the racialist movement, the only people I respect (as a professor emeritus, KMD is a special case) are those Groypers who are starting to follow Nick Fuentes’s advice: surreptitiously infiltrate the Republican Party. (To bring about the scenario in William Pierce’s novel requires more decades of suffering for the American population.)

To limit oneself to commenting, say in The Unz Review, is feminine behaviour. Real men fight in the real world. In Europe, it’s impossible because if you speak with the frankness of someone like Nick, they simply throw you in jail. In the Third World, where I live, there is more freedom of expression because the racial battle has already been lost (there are hardly any pure whites left in the country where I live; let’s say, the Orthodox Mennonites who haven’t yet mixed with the native population).

The series of videos I’ve started subtitling, thanks to Benjamin’s efforts, reveal where I come from: I’m trying to know myself thanks to religiously following the mandate of the Oracle of Delphi, something neither Christians nor atheists do. That’s why—in sharp contrast to the methods of academia—I constantly post autobiographical vignettes on this site.

One of them is precisely making public one of my soliloquies: “Which contemporary men do I truly respect?”

Until recently, I despised virtually the entire racial right because, as I said, despite their First Amendment rights, they behave like women (limiting themselves to posting comments on racialist forums). The case of Nick, or those who are beginning to secretly infiltrate political positions, is quite different: finally, some very young men are doing something manly in the real world. As I’ve confessed, I don’t care if they’re Christians. Unlike the vast majority of racialists who, following my old metaphor, are petrified halfway across the psychological Rubicon because of the eye of Medusa, the Groypers are slowly moving toward our shore.

Once we finish subtitling the series of videos in which I talk about what my parents and a Freudian follower did to me when I was a minor—something that has happened to millions of Aryan children; think, for example, of the millions drugged with Ritalin—, I will begin speaking directly to the Groypers so they continue advancing toward us. Of course, that can’t be done on YouTube because they would take down our channel; only on Rumble.

If just one Groyper realizes that the journey to the beaches of NS has much to do with becoming aware of the Christian Question, I’ll be satisfied. It’s extremely rare for anyone to touch the dry sands on this side of the river with the soles of their feet.