genes?
Regarding the recent discussion with a commenter who claimed that psychiatry has a genetic basis for its claims, I would suggest listening to the audio recordings of Benjamin reading passages from genuinely scientific books, like the one pictured on the left (here).
If you want to listen to Jay Joseph directly, click here (it’s an audio interview that can be heard on YouTube).
6 replies on “Faulty”
As a normie, Joseph is an anti-Nazi, but his critique of biological psychiatry is sound.
I notice he mentions racism as a factor in mental illness, which I assume right wing critics just dismiss offhand as ‘leftism’. I think it runs both ways though, i.e. anti-white racism has a depressive effect on people perhaps, society-wide (extrapolating from the idea that bullying – which I’d count that as a form of – certainly seems in my personal experience to produce an extended stress/depression result, especially if parents/family don’t take it seriously, if not necessarily psychotic, which I think does require that extreme parental abuse influence). The difference being that nowadays, and post war in general, all racism has effectively been systemic anti-whitism (or hateful conduct towards whites conducted by foreign ethnicities) and anti-black racism simply doesn’t exist (sadly) on a significant scale. I’m sure his normie mind didn’t see it quite like this. But yes, I could buy that – did it exist – white racist bullying could depress blacks to some degree. It goes back to what I said in the NPD comments, basically: probably quite true, but so what – they’re still enemies so don’t deserve sympathy.
It’s a shame the left/Jews seem closer to the truth of this matter than the entire right wing. If it could be put to the right, and they had the humility to cope with that, it might be a good springboard for encouraging them to consider what else they might be wrong about long-term (which seems quite an extensive list by now).
Incidentally, I’ve had arguments with true leftists over the same point – those who really do big up environmental factors when it comes to generalised ‘oppression’, but are just as propaganda-fed and blinkered as the right when it comes to psychiatry, infuriatingly, granting these jumped-up ‘professionals’ a credibility they simply do not deserve (which I assume is primarily a submissive authority bias on account of them having a posh suit on, a university degree equivalent, and a job that makes them a lot of money/prestige – that arrogant presentation, superficial as it is, seems to blindside a lot of people, rather like those who assume Catholic priests deserve reverent respect on sole account of being priests, with all the usual papist accoutrements).
It might be worth mentioning, but when I was researching psychiatry, I exchanged a few emails with Jay Joseph. It was before my racial awakening…
Oh that’s interesting. I remember you mentioning that before briefly (I think it was by email to me). Can you remind me his opinions on schizogenic parents (if any)? From the audio interview you shared he seems like a mix of Whitaker and Read when it comes to discussing etiology i.e. he hasn’t applied an empirical ‘triage’ as to what’s the biggest factor (hence all the vague, weary leftism clichés – much as there’s some secondary impact truth to them).
I would have liked he had he acknowledged Colin Ross’ work on just why it requires your closest bond relative(s) to cause the most psychological damage (as in the case of David Helfgott), which as you’ve shown in your own YouTube videos is, unexpectedly perhaps, worse even than being tortured in a concentration camp by strangers due to the fundamental proximity.
I’m just finishing off listening to the audio.
As I’ve said elsewhere, contemporary critics of psychiatry are more cowardly than those who wrote about schizogenic parents in the 1940s, 1950s, 60s and early 70s. Joseph specialises in refuting psychiatric papers that blame genes for mental illness. But he doesn’t delve into what you say about Ross, much less into more direct research that resembles those of yesteryear, like John Modrow’s.
Thanks for sharing my website again. Just to reiterate, the new content is 9 new recorded videos by me (just trimmed slightly to remove overt National Socialist content – my website is monitored so I’m careful in what I can add) on the subject of all aspects of psychiatry’s folly, with a developing video argument in 9 parts (and some more postscript ones to arrive tonight).
There are no subtitles, and it’s done on the cheap, but the audio is clear enough, especially with headphones on, having tested it (and I can’t do anything about my missing teeth for the moment – also, I’m not cross-eyed: it’s the optical illusion of screen glare), but they should be ok for an English-speaking audience interested in content over style. They’re at the bottom of the page. I couldn’t embed them all (as I ran out of storage space) so the final 2 in the main 9-set are linked video windows. I recommend picking up the first set of books primarily though, previewed in the somewhat enthusiastic audio-only readings.
P.S. in case anyone wonders why I invoked the Nuremberg Code on the female psychiatrist in video 1, it’s simply because, since they don’t have any concrete genetic data (and don’t read/engage with critical studies, no matter how classic or up to date), and are completely lacking in independent curiosity/insight, they’re flying blind with the drugs’ effects, so it might as well be an ‘experiment’ each time as opposed to a treatment plan.