web analytics
Categories
Conservatism Nick Fuentes

Webbon’s

interview – 2

Nick Fuentes explains the history of Israel and how the neocons emerged; how their competitors, the paleoconservatives, were defamed and destroyed by the philo-Semitic American system, and how the myth of the post-WW2 consensus was created. Despite the nonsense Nick recently spouted on his podcast about another subject, unlike many racialists, both interviewee and interviewer concede that Hitler wasn’t a Christian.

It is a pity that neither of them seems to know anything about the Hellstorm Holocaust committed by the Allies from 1944 to 1947. However, interviewer Joel Webbon hit the nail on the head when he said that Western religion had changed from “pro-Christ” to “anti-Hitler.”

The West’s Darkest Hour attempts to transvalue the values of the Christian religion in favour of Hitlerism. It is no longer possible to incorporate Christianity for the reasons I will be explaining in my new series on Third Reich booklets.

My dream would be to have a podcast with a background like Webbon’s studio, featuring similar furniture and even similar clothing (I share all this with Webbon, except for the canteen), but not from the perspective of Christian nationalism but rather post-1945 National Socialism.

For example, in this other interview Nick says he is against violent revolution because he subscribes to Christian ethics. Fuentes is not only ignorant of the history of the first millennium of Christianity. He inverts it, claiming that the martyrs convinced the Roman Empire to convert to Christianity through peaceful means: a pious myth (and by the way, most of the apostles were unhistorical).

Remember that, according to Origen (185-253 c.e.), a prolific writer who wrote approximately 2,000 treatises on multiple branches of theology, there were only about thirty historical martyrs. Christians not only invented countless hagiographies of unhistorical saints and martyrs. They themselves perpetrated veritable Holocausts in which millions of whites were slain! (for example, the exterminationist campaign of the Arian Vandals and Ostrogoths by Justinian I—see our abridged translation of Karlheinz Deschner’s Christianity’s Criminal History here and here).

Deschner’s ten thick volumes contain thousands of bibliographic references that support this secular reading of the first millenium of Christendom. As good Christians, Fuentes and Webbon grossly ignore the origins of their religion.

We can already imagine a National Socialist podcast with real historians discussing how Judeo-Christians seized power ever since Constantine handed the empire over to his Semitic bishops…

3 replies on “Webbon’s”

What can I say? Christianity and Christians are a weird and ignorant bunch. I should know, I used to be one. Deschner’s Krimi-series is a real eye-opener. Can’t thank you enough, Cesar, for introducing me to Deschner’s books. For sure, I’m gonna spread the word. The white race should give up all gods and religions already, methinks. World / Universe / Nature is interesting and wondrous enough without all the mumbo jumbo. Truth is the only thing that matters. Period.

I see what you mean about cucks. I watched the second interview clip. “They took the persecution…” – even if that had happened (I’ve read The Myth of Persecution by Candida Moss), what a cowardly response! To turn the other cheek and let your enemies wash over you! To sacrifice the lives of the entire race for an alien messiah. How manipulative also, to use that apocryphal martyrdom to build your cause; theirs is a cult of pacifist sadomasochism. Especially ironic given the bloodthirstiness of the actual forced conversions to Christianity starting with Constantine. What does he think of the massacres of Charlemagne also? He’s as suicidal as an liberal. In fact, I see him as a liberal, as happy referencing f**king Gandhi as ‘Jesus’ (Savitri Devi referred to Gandhi’s ‘non violence’ as “emotional blackmail”). There’s certainly nothing nationalist about him (let alone National Socialist), no real love for his people over and above the mad, self-defeating sub-demographic of them that subscribe to this idiotic foreign religion (along with the millions of non-whites).

I liked it when the guy interviewing him said “what’s the alternative, you know?” whilst looking quizzical (because there is no alternative). I was hoping he’d confront him a little harder instead of just nodding along. But I suppose I should have guessed – he didn’t look like a revolutionary type.

I can see us in future times coming to real confrontation with these people. I wonder if the situation going totally apeshit will be enough to make them question the principles of their faith and drop it altogether, or if the rot is just too deep, that member too far down their throats, and them enjoying the taste of ‘eternity’ too much. Again, f**king cowards. Selfish too. This is our home; this earth. Why are they not content with it?! Content to shape it for themselves and make it better! Their future does not seem to include their descendants! It’s like Gaedhal wrote recently. It’s insane that they try to escape it for something better fantasy, rushing through this life and spoiling it, instead of facing the here and now of their lives as a collective – as a race – and of their inevitable silencing deaths. Surely better to be remembered for brave and meaningful acts in life than to die a coward and ‘live forever’ as one.

P.S. I listened to the plug at the end for Right Response Ministries. They want “to help… to stop being insufferable… to stop being Zionist shills… not serving a foreign country at the expense of our own interest”: replace the word ‘Zionist’ with ‘Negro’ though, and the entire mission changes. After all, he’d marry his daughter to one if they were Christian. So he doesn’t want to serve a foreign country, but he’s totally find with serving up his own offspring to foreign racial strangers inhabiting his own! I don’t think he speaks at all for American (by which I mean Aryan) interests. That seems to be their cover… ‘America First’. No it’s not, as he says himself, it’s Christ first! They cannot reconcile the impossible, much as they’ve deluded themselves very well. I can only deduce that they really do want to live forever, or why, rationally (if they think about it at all) do they go along with it?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *