by Heinrich
If you’re a young Nordic person who wonders what could be done in today’s world for our cause, legally and peacefully, without getting yourself into trouble, and without ruining your personal life, wonder no more, we have the solution. Too good to be true? Keep reading and see for yourself.
Who are we looking for: In terms of location he should live on mainland Europe. He shouldn’t be much older than 30, nor younger than 15. (we can show some flexibility here) He has to be physically fit, someone who can at least run 3-5 kilometres (not jog, run) and move his own body weight in exercises like pull-ups and push-ups smoothly. If for whatever reason, you don’t meet these at the moment, but you have the determination, you can develop these capacities, and contact us when you are ready.
In terms of hereditary traits: he should be at least 176cm in height fully grown. Shape of the skull should be dolichocephalic, with a projecting occiput, looking elongated from the side and narrow from the front. Hair light to golden blond or reddish-orange, texture soft, and slightly wavy. Eyes blue, a lighter greenish undertone could still work but should have that crystal clear look effect, not muddy water effect. Skin pinkish white, fine if it can tan to a bronze colour, but baseline should be white with a pinkish undertone on body parts that get no sun, more reddish looking skin that cannot tan at all is accepted as well. Nose has to be straight with a high and narrow bridge, either with a sharp and pointy tip, or a more fleshy tip is okay if it looks well-formed and in harmony with the face, nostrils narrowly positioned close towards the centre. Lips thin with a pink to reddish colouring, chin prominent, should project to at least in line with the lips when viewed from the side, jaw rectangular and strong, forehead near vertical, with prominent brow ridges, eyes sitting deep set, eye sockets rectangular. No hair loss or greying at this age is accepted, no grown together eyebrows, slanted eyes, noses tending even slightly towards flat or hooked shapes, wider nostrils puffy lips, olive skin, dark hair, brown eyes, brachycephalic skulls or receding chins would be accepted.
If someone feels like he stands close enough to this description he should contact us in the following Telegram group: @ZEROILLEGALITY
The name is not a joke. There is nothing illegal here, we don’t spread our views, which could be considered hate speech, we don’t hurt anyone, nor do we plan anything dangerous, violent or illegal, and if anyone suggests such a thing he will be kicked immediately. What we do is simply constructing a private circle of friends who happen to look like us and think like us. Is this going to fix everything overnight? No, but it’s a step into the right direction. Feel free to share this to people wo share our views and fit our expectations.
4 replies on “Lebensborn”
Strictly speaking off-topic, but not entirely unrelated to the implicit eugenics program of this call for application I would like to know what you, C.T., make of Dr. Robert Morgan’s rather skeptical (if not dismissive) responses to Skrbina’s essay “On the Need for Eugenics?”
For example, Morgan states there that “[t]he alternative [to a permanent worldwide collapse of the technological system] — making man into an engineered product better suited for life in a technological society — leads only to dystopia.” His counterexample, supposedly proving the “wrongness” of eugenics, is Stephen Hawking. Morgan argues that “[s]ince the motor neurone disease from which he suffered has a genetic component, presumably he would have been screened out, and prevented even from being born, thus depriving society of a great genius.” Morgan even adds that “because the technological environment into which he was born could save him, he not only lived to the ripe old age of 76, he prospered and had 3 kids! So he was in fact very well-adapted, very fit!”
It seems, thus, that Morgan rejects eugenics outright because, if politically endorsed, it would presumably lead to “dystopia” (Morgan, alas, does not elucidate which kind of dystopia) and deprive technological society of genetically diseased, but at the same time “very fit” geniuses (if and how this use of “fitness” gels with the neo-Darwinist foundation of eugenics, I am not entirely sure).
On top of this, Morgan faults Skrbina (!) for evincing “Christian thinking.”
But what, one feels impelled to ask, could possibly be more Christian than providing life-long medical care and nursing for a genetic cripple incapable of living life on his own?
I haven’t closely followed what Morgan says in the comments section of The Unz Review, and to be honest, I barely skimmed Skrbina’s article (originally published in The Occidental Observer).
If Morgan were to comment here on eugenics or another topic, I would respond.
Personally speaking, Stephen Hawking elicits nothing but disgust in me.
I’m not well versed in the subject of physics but theoretical physics is 90% (or more) bullshit in my opinion. It’s just another racket. And Hawking is just one of those characters (like Einstein) propped up by academia and the media. There is very little in practical terms that they contributed to society, on the contrary, some argue that Einstein caused us to go astray for 100 years, actually halting significant progress.
What did Hawkins actually invent, besides theoretical, mathematical constructs that are entirely meaningless?
So this guy is to be the poster child against eugenics? Do we actually want and need a crippled smart-ass windbag like that? Even if he was that smart and useful as they claim, does this one instance justify untold amounts of suffering and degeneration that comes from ignoring genetic health? I’d rather have 100 healthy peasants with good genes than 1 ‘intellectual’ who bloviates about ‘space’ all day long. Space is irrelevant as long as our survival – and that includes genetic health – isn’t secured on *this* planet.
Ditto.