Did you mean to post this comment in the other thread (about ‘might is right’)?
What I have been trying to say for years with these New Testament (NT) posts is that white nationalism is too primitive a movement as far as Christianity is concerned.
For example, even a Catholic apologist for resurrection dogma like the British Ian Wilson, with whom I have, by the way, exchanged some correspondence in the past, was able to recognise the analysis of the NT that has been made of it since Reimarus in Enlightenment times.
White nationalists, on the other hand, have ignored that work which is centuries old and which now culminates in scholars who have abandoned the Christian faith such as Dennis MacDonald and Richard Miller (both of whom were fundamentalists in their youth and were educated in Divinity Schools learning ancient Greek, since the original NT is written in that language).
The fact that American white nationalists have been unable to at least acknowledge the existence of a whole field of study—the exegesis of the NT since the Enlightenment—is emblematic of why I am so critical of them. After all, if the Jews wrote the gospel that ought to raise our alarm systems!
To take just one example: MacDonald, who, I reiterate, began his career as a fundamentalist and ended up a rationalist, deduced that the motivation of the evangelist Mark seems to be to put Jesus above the Homeric heroes Hector and Odysseus. He even goes so far as to use the word ‘transvaluation’, which we have used here in the sense of the inversion of values! (I mean how Christianity transvalued the healthy Aryan values of the Greco-Roman world to the subversive Semitic values of the Jews.)
3 replies on “Hi Jamie,”
Hello Her Caesar,
No, I meant to put my comment there intentionally since the conversation of those commenters reminded me the ones I had with several thinking people around me.
They understand that the system is wrong, and even might criticize the abrahamic religions, but they are cowards when I merely bring up the topic that the strong impose its ideologies and, if they ever want to be heard and taken seriously, they must be ready for the use violence.
For them this is aberrant, as they see as nonsense to impose your ideology like that, despite the fact that the system keeps pouring right into our mouths degeneracy that is killing us, and all they can do is talk about it.
They do not embrace the fact that the strong is the one who takes the loot, therefore they remain weak and passive. The subversive values of the jews that holds them tight.
Ultimately, the victors takes it all, and the trend is believing the illusion that the loser is the one deserving anything.
“After all, if the Jews wrote the gospel that ought to raise our alarm systems!”
This one sentence should make every Christian WN drop their heads in shame. They want to start a movement that elevates anti-Semitism to a major pillar of dissident politics but they still want to believe in the religion that is spawn of the Jewish God of Abraham. Its pathetic.
“He even goes so far as to use the word ‘transvaluation’, which we have used here in the sense of the inversion of values!”
I caught that from the video. MacDonald stated explicitly that Mark wanted to show that Jesus “was better” than Odysseus by which he meant kinder. Slave psychology indeed.
Finally, someone gets my point! Because of this kind of thing I feel extremely isolated among the racialists of other forums…