Hunter hunts Ben

“Everyone will truly be equal, no matter their Race or gender…”
A completely artificial reality will have replaced Nature. It’s the Biblical vision come true, because in the Bible, Nature is the domain of Satan, full of temptations (Luke 4:1-5; John 12:31). Nature is an adversary, to be subdued by man (Genesis 1:28). Equality is the goal (Galatians 3:28).
This leveling effect is why Christianity is such an excellent ideology for a technological society.
“Soon after an Earth like this comes into fruition, we will see no point in the animals, and in all of nature.”
The 1972 movie “Silent Running” depicted this.
The hell of it is though, in a Darwinist reality, there is no alternative. “Progress” is forced, because if you don’t do it, someone else will, and then they will gain an advantage over you. For example, Putin has recently said that whichever country masters AI will rule the world, and he is likely correct. All of the white man’s worldly triumphs have been due to his superior techniques — the ensemble of techniques whereby he gets from the world what he wants, and reshapes it however he wants, which taken together we can call the global technological system.

“It’s money, Mammon worship, the ultimate culprit, as behind tech lies gold over blood policies.”
Nothing lies behind the technological system. It goes where it has to, with whatever technique is more efficient. As I previously mentioned, efficiency was the reason both Alexander and the Roman Empire didn’t base their expansion on blood purity. If they had been obsessed with blood purity, they would have exterminated all the peoples they conquered rather than incorporating them into their system. It would have caused them all sorts of problems, Plutarch says this in his De Fortuna Alexandri:

For Alexander did not follow Aristotle’s advice to treat the Greeks as if he were their leader, and other peoples as if he were their master; to have regard for the Greeks as for friends and kindred, but to conduct himself toward other peoples as though they were plants or animals; for to do so would have been to cumber his leadership with numerous battles and banishments and festering seditions.

So for efficiency’s sake he adopted assimilation as his technique instead of extermination. The gold he got from selling slaves and concubines from conquered populations was another bonus, one that gave him more power. Further, his choice was forced, because if he didn’t use these methods, someone else would have, and then they would have been able to acquire the power he disdained, and defeat him.
As a thought experiment, I agree that we can indeed imagine a world where someone values blood purity more than power, but then — unsurprisingly — they lose out in competition for power. Arguably, this is why the Third Reich didn’t succeed. If Hitler had put less stock in blood purity, and more in “Jewish physics”, then perhaps it would have been Germany instead of the USA that first developed the atom bomb.
But the problem is, no one can really foresee where the technological system is headed. Nobody directs it. It’s like a train rushing headlong into darkness. Phenomena such as the computer consciousness represented by transhumanism or AI were entirely unforeseen developments until very recently; as unexpected as was the development of the A-bomb at the start of WWII. Further, if you are a determinist, as a scientific view of reality requires, then it follows that whatever happened had to happen. Inferior techniques are ruthlessly discarded by the system, just as, in nature, species lose out to more efficient species in competition for survival. The idea that you (or anyone else) can take over the development of technology and direct it in any direction you wish is just mistaken, an illusion propped up by the culturally Christian idea of free will.