web analytics

Month: January 2026

Categories
Axiology

Renée

by Gaedhal

I didn’t want to comment on the killing of Renée Nicole Good. First off, it has nothing to do with me. The only link Good has to Ireland, is that she was a missionary in Northern Ireland.

And the people who are shooting your ideological enemies in the face, today, are the same people who could very well be shooting you in the face tomorrow. Hence, the governor of Florida, Ron DeSantis (R) actually came out against this shooting. As I said before: one probably has to have a personality disorder to join either the police or the army. Perhaps police forces and armies are necessary in this world; however, in my view they are necessary evils.

In Northern Ireland, we have an anomoly. We have a police force that is secret; we have a police force that is armed; we have a police force that allows its officers to carry weapons, whilst off duty.

Now the police service of Northern Ireland is not ICE, not by a long shot; however, there are parrallels. All of the other police forces in the British Isles are mostly unarmed.

However, the term “U.S. Citizen” has suffered from hyper-inflation, due, in large part to immigration. When the U.S. was a white racial republic, the term “US citizen” actually meant something. The founders were explicit: the republic was founded for their posterity. However, a citizenship that anyone can claim; well, that becomes sorta worthless. If anyone can become a U.S. citizen, then U.S. citizenship is sorta worthless.

Liberals—those to the right of Leftists, in this context—largely turned a blind eye to non-citizens being denied constitutional rights, even though the courts said that the norms of the U.S. constitution applied everywhere that the U.S. was the sovereign or de facto sovereign power. Obama never shut down the concentration camp at Guantanamo bay. Although he did attempt cosmetic changes in an attempt to bring some of what goes on there in line with constitutional norms.

Also, in a polarized society, one’s political opponents no longer inhabit the same moral universe. At the beginning, the Left and Right, in America, had a shared vision of what America is was and should be, however, they differed on the issue of federalism or antifederalism. Today, there is no agreement between Left and Right on just about anything. Thus appeals to Renée Good’s being a “U.S. citizen” from the Left are utterly worthless, given the polarisation of America.

I really only have an expressable opinion on this one aspect of this controversy: appeals by Liberals and Leftists to Renée Good’s being a U.S. citizen, and why they are likely to fall upon the radical right’s deaf ears.

In Ireland, “Irish citizen” is actually a sarcasm, describing some invader who was magically alchemised into his/her becoming Irish by way of a magical piece of paper, to wit, an Irish Passport.

And, of course, as my good friend Alex, who has since gone to be with the ground, “magic paper” such as passports are merely the secular version of “magic water”. Indeed, the idea of a birth certificate might have actually come from the Roman Catholic Baptismal certificate.

Catholics believed that magic water could turn the inhabitants of Africa into Christians—i.e. civilized white men, but with a different skin tone—and Liberals believe that the alchemy of magic documents, such as passports, can more or less accomplish the same thing. Catholics believed in the magic of catachesis, and, as Revilo P. Oliver points out: Liberals believe in the magic of education. Education, very often, to Liberals, is a snake oil that will cure whatever ails society.

Thus, we are still under the tyranny of Christian axiology; of Christian assumptions; or, as Oliver might have put it, the reformed Church of Marxianism has superceded the unreformed Catholic and Protestant Churches.

Categories
Christendom NS booklets

Booklets, 3

As I’ve already said, I originally didn’t want to post my private comments on some booklets published under the auspices of the Third Reich because I didn’t want to openly criticise National Socialism: I kept those criticisms to myself. Now that I better understand the dark times, and considering that my duty is to yearn for a dawn in the Aryan collective unconscious, I believe I must exhume my notes written on the blank pages of these booklets.

On July 19, 2021, for example, in the booklet shown in the image, I wrote:

I barely see the first paragraph and a problem arises.

Since I am a priest of the Fourteen Words and not a Nazi, the likely fact that this booklet won’t be anti-Christian (cf. also my fundamental difference with white nationalists) suddenly occurred to me.

The booklet is composed of ten articles by various authors. Then I read the following sentences from the first article, written by Erich Maschke. It doesn’t matter that the rest of the articles by the other nine authors didn’t contain passages I consider offensive. What I want to point out are the contradictions of National Socialism between those who represented its exoteric face and the more esoteric enlightenment on Christianity held by Hitler and his inner circle.

Erich Maschke wrote:

…the heathen Prussians. By force of arms must the Brothers subdue or drive out the heathen tribes… War against the heathen was the highest duty, the greatest sacrifice which a man could offer. [page 5]

…this forcible Christianizing of the Baltic countries of Prussia, Latvia and Estonia… The Prussian tribes were fought until they were subdued and accepted the Christian faith. [pages 6-7]

Maschke wrote these things apparently approving of the forced conversion of these Germanic pagans. On the blank page at the end of the booklet I wrote:

It’s worse than what I wrote inside the cover!

I was so surprised that it motivates me to start a new series for WDH, which we could begin with “Why Nazism Failed, Part 1.” And I would continue if I find this type of message in the other thirteen booklets I bought and will read (except for Sieg der Waffen which doesn’t have any bad messages).

I never expected this. It’s becoming increasingly clear that the priest is not a Nazi, although he still considers Hitler the man whose birth should replace that of the mythical Jew whom the fools of American racialism still worship.

Sometime later, I wrote on the back cover in black ink: “What I wrote in this booklet with blue ink [quoted above] is devastating. I’ll see now if I’ll report this to WDH…”

But I didn’t do it in 2021.

Categories
Charles Darwin Psychohistory

Groupthink

This is a response to Ben’s most recent comment.

Groupthink really shocks me. In private correspondence, Charles Darwin said that the Negroes would become extinct because, being inferior, white people would exterminate them. The opposite happened because he didn’t foresee how Christianity had conquered the Aryan collective unconscious.

The best example of monstrous groupthink that comes to mind is precisely that of Darwin’s wife, Emma. Like a typical stupid woman who conforms to the prevailing worldview, she once became upset about the criticism that the torture of hell wasn’t eternal (of course: she was taught the opposite as a child)!

The difference between Emma and Charles is fundamental to understanding what’s happening. The vast majority follow groupthink, whether it’s the aberrant theology of the past or the suicidal anti-racism of today. Modifying the archetype that possesses the collective unconscious is no small feat. And the sad thing is that no one is fighting it now except us. (White nationalists are still possessed by the current archetype, ortherwise they would become pragmatic exterminationists like Darwin.)

Incidentally, I was extremely bothered to see, on my last visit to the UK, how young whites fraternised with Negroes in restaurants and cafes.

Categories
Conservatism Nick Fuentes

Webbon’s

interview – 4

After the eighth minute Nick begins to talk about his ideology: “America First.”

Right away there’s the problem, because “America” isn’t just made up of white people, but millions of people of colour.

But of course: Fuentes is a Christian. Compare that to the priest with the 14 words, “The Aryan comes first,” which leaves no room for misunderstanding. But that’s not Nick’s starting point.

Some time later Fuentes said he might vote for a black man running for president.

Do you see why all that “America First” is rubbish, if not outright treason?

Shortly after, Webbon says that abortion is wicked, even for blacks; and before that he said there would be 25 million more Negroes in the US if abortion were prohibited! Nick agreed.

Compare this treacherous bullshit to the Nuremberg Laws.

In the rest of the conversation they said pertinent things about the JQ, but what was indicated shows that Christians aren’t useful for preserving the Aryan race from ongoing extinction.

Categories
American Revolutionary War Philosophy of history

Might is right, 18

Chapter III: The spinning of the web

Just as the spider weaves his silky web, to lure flies into the larder of his banqueting hall in order that he may at his leisure, pick the flesh off their bones, so deceitful ideals are cunningly woven by dexterous, political spiders, to capture and exploit swarms of human flies.

The 1823 facsimile of the Declaration of Independence.

What are the grandiose paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence, but the weft and woof of a dazing spider-web? And what are the American People but the flies that have been cleverly entangled in its gossamer meshes? For over a century this ‘Declaration’ has been the parchment divinity or all public orators, from the curbstone dervish at the street corner, to our Elective Monarch in the White House. Every 4th of July, Americans habitually scream themselves hoarse over its sounding generalities: making the welkin ring with tin-horns, giant fire-crackers, flag-idolatry, brass bands, toy pistols and herd- bellowing generally. Although the great majority of them are mental and physical dwindlings, poverty-stricken, and property-less yet how insanely they delight in amusing a sardonic world with their loquacious flamboyant charlatanry. ‘We are sovereigns and equals’ is their everlasting Barmecide chorus. ‘Sovereigns and Equals!’

In all lunatic asylums may be found inmates who fancy themselves kings and queens, and lords of the earth. These sorrowful creatures, if only permitted to wear imaginary crowns and issue imaginary commands, are the most docile and harmless of all maniacs.

As for the American People of today, Is not their written constitution but a cunningly constructed straight-jacket—their moral codes, padded prison-cells: their statute laws handcuffs and leg-irons—their Captains of Industry keepers and turnkeys in clever disguise? One hundred years ago they ostensibly commenced ‘independent’ operations with the richest continent on earth as their private property—their subscribed capital; and during the whole of that period, have they not been as busy as so many relays of draught beasts-of-burden, pumping the tremendous natural wealth out of their home soil, and pouring it over-sea, into the cess-pools of Europe?

Is not that the work of lunatics? They smashed and splintered the wooden political yoke of an English king and then proceeded to rivet around their necks a brand new yoke of bolted steel, which they forged especially to fit themselves: and which they dignified under the name of ‘Constitutional Freedom’.

Is not that also the work of lunatics? Cursed indeed are the harnessed ones! Cursed are they even though their harness be home-made—even though it tinkle musically with silver bells—aye! even though every buckle and link and rivet thereof is made of solid gold.

How absurd of men to hurrah over their ‘glorious political liberty’ who have not even been able to retain possession of the substantial products of their own laboriousness. After a century of ‘constitutional progress,’ ten per cent of the population are absolute owners of ninety-two per cent of all the property.

Now, O reader, Are not these things the outward and visible sign of organic dementia?

Categories
Degenerate art Film Kali Yuga

Netflix, etc.

Since my sister lent me her Netflix account so I could watch Breaking Bad, I decided to watch the first few minutes of other series and movies filmed during the darkest period in Western history.

Seriously, anyone who watches that stuff regularly as if it were legitimate entertainment is a person with a xenomorph in their brain, so I had a daring idea that I won’t carry out: to start reviewing each of those things and, at the first subversive message, stop watching.

For example: there’s a series about Latin American drug traffickers that begins with a scene of the drug lord Pepe Escobar. I barely watched the first few minutes and I thought to myself: “Those lands should be conquered by pure Nordics. Since the writers don’t propose turning Latin America into New Scandinavia, the series’ message is bad”, and I stopped watching it in the first scene of the first episode.

Something similar happened to me with one of the most famous Batman instalments: a film that even some white nationalists love (that’s why I said yesterday that they too have the xenomorph amalgamated in their brains). The moment I saw that they want to prosecute a gang of criminals through the American legal system I interrupted because, in a sane world, they would simply be executed like the Nazis would (the American Constitution, its laws and legal institutions are, naturally, xenomorphic).

I could say something similar about other films or series, of which I only tolerated watching a few minutes of each. But with what I’ve said, it’s clear what my reviews would be like for 100% of what’s shown on Netflix, HBO, in theaters, on free or pay television channels, not to mention the millions of accounts on various social media platforms.

Do you finally understand what I’m saying in the featured post?

The aspirant to the priesthood of the sacred words will find it hard to swallow, but only the day after tomorrow belongs to us, as Nietzsche would say; some of us will only be born posthumously…

Yes: we priests are premature births of a future yet to be verified: a future whose arrival is uncertain, but which I will strive to bring about through my work (that’s why I named the publishing house I hope to found Daybreak).

Categories
Film Racial right

Breaking

Bad, 3

Tucker Carlson asks a beautiful blonde who is behind the destruction of the white race through mass migration. Neither of them knows the answer.

The typical white nationalist would say it is the Jews, but that doesn’t explain things like white suicide in the Roman Empire through gradual miscegenation that culminated in Constantinople, or what the Spanish and Portuguese did in the Americas since the 16th century. Nor does it take into account the beginning of the repudiation of anti-miscegenation laws in some US states long before the Jews took over the country.

As I have already said, to understand what archetype has taken hold of the Aryan collective unconscious, it is necessary to look at the cultural aspect, specifically bestsellers. Ivanhoe in the 19th century idealised Jewry; Ben-Hur portrayed the Romans as the bad guys and the Jew as the good guy, and Uncle Tom’s Cabin portrayed the black man as the good guy and the Dixie landowners as the bad guys. These super-bestselling novels have something in common: they weren’t authored under Jewish influence but by Christians who vehemently subscribed to Christian ethics.

In our century, the above-mentioned novels have lost their power to X-ray the soul of the contemporary white man. But now we can do so with the television hits that the white masses loved: the zeitgeist of our century.

Yesterday I finished watching, skipping what I already remembered from the first time I saw the series, Breaking Bad including the sequel movie, El Camino: where Jesse Pinkman is the main character (Walter White had died at the end of Breaking Bad). I don’t want to dwell much on my repetitions but, like the novels mentioned (one European and the other two American), the good guy in the film perfectly portrays what I have called neochristianity on this site.

The scenes that bothered me the most were when Jesse, in a fit of St Francis-like madness (Francis gave away the clothes his father made to the poor of Assisi), gave away to the people on the street the millions of dollars that Walter had worked so hard to earn. But worst of all is that, prior to that neo-Franciscan fit, half of Jesse’s millions were destined, as he asked his lawyer Saul, for a Hispanic woman and her mestizo son…

There’s the answer to Tucker’s question!

As I said, regarding Tucker’s question a white nationalist would automatically blame Jewry, exonerating the white man. From our POV, one must take into account the great hits of Western culture as X-rays that portray the particular archetype that has taken hold of the Aryan psyche. And it is clear that this archetype is Christian ethics, which, although authored by rabbis in the form of the New Testament, has been internalised by the Aryan to the very core of his being (which is why I recently used the image of the xenomorph stuck deep in the throat of a white man).

This is what white nationalists don’t want to see. But if they don’t see it they will become extinct.

There is no point in criticising Jewry if one doesn’t perform a radical operation on one’s own soul to remove the xenomorph (the Bible in a nutshell: “Old Testament exterminationism for me; universal love for thee”). And this is done, of course, by transvaluing all Christian values including things like raping the Sabine women to create not a New Jerusalem but a New Rome; genociding the people of Jerusalem without Titus’ contemporaries feeling the slightest remorse, and even the (occasional, not normative) recreation with ephebes for centurions who haven’t seen their wives for years and want to take certain liberties with their cupbearers before battle.

All of this—mass rape of women to found Rome, occasional acceptance of pederasty, or having feelings opposite to those of Jesse Pinkman in a genocidal campaign—is completely alien to white nationalists precisely because they have the xenomorph embedded in their brains.

For Americans, who unlike Europeans were born into Christianity, it will be very difficult to transvaluate Xtian values.

But it is the only path to salvation.

Categories
Ancient Greece Ancient Rome

All values

The concept of transvaluation is not fully understood. I doubt that even the Christian and neochristian (i.e., atheist) racialists who visit this site understand it.

If we take into consideration what I recently said in my previous post in the context of Greco-Roman pederasty, we could educate visitors with this reasoning:

During Rome’s wars against Judea, Titus was given the responsibility of putting an end to the rebellious kikes, a task he carried out successfully after besieging and conquering Jerusalem in 70 c.e., whose temple was looted and destroyed by his troops in the burning of the city. His victory was rewarded with a triumph and commemorated with the construction of the Arch of Titus.

They even made a statue of him modelled on Polykleitos’ Doryphoros (79-81 c.e.), which is in the Vatican Museum. As can be seen in the statue, a pope didn’t tolerate penises and ordered all the statues in the Church’s custody to be “castrated”.

The Nazis didn’t finish revaluing all values. It was a process that in the 1930s was just beginning. If National Socialism had developed over the last eighty years, there might already have been attempts to sculpt the Aryan warriors of our century inspired by Polykleitos or other classic sculptors. But at the time, national socialists still carried the shame or guilt inherited from Judeo-Christianity: it would have been inconceivable to sculpt statues of Hitler naked even if, like Titus, he had won the war against the Judea of our times.

Transvaluing includes putting naked statues of every Aryan hero in public squares, as the Greeks and Romans did, and not having them hidden and “castrated” by deranged popes in Judeo-Christian enclosures.

Sometimes I wonder, besides myself, who has transvalued all Judeo-Christian values?

Categories
Conservatism Nick Fuentes

Webbon’s

interview – 3

Nick Fuentes says that, for St Paul, the “concession” was to marry in the sense that celibacy is better.

See the inferiority of Christianity to Judaism: the stars promised to Abraham were his future kike descendants without demonising sex. But in Judeo-Christianity sex is sinful for gentiles (i.e., white people from the Mediterranean). The god of the Jews “concedes” us marriage so that we don’t burn with lust, but the highest state is non-reproductive celibacy, and Fuentes even talks about monasteries.

Then Nick confuses marital masculinity with a feminised husband. Since I’ve been talking about Breaking Bad, let’s say that Nick confuses masculinity with a character like Walter White: a “man” who put his family above everything else. On the other hand, we see true masculinity in Sparta, pre-imperial Rome, the Goths, the Vikings and National Socialism where there is Männerbund, unlike the decadent 21st-century America so well represented in the gynocentric scenes of Breaking Bad.

In practice, Nick’s Catholic recipe is perfect for the dysgenics that has been perpetrated in Europe since Christianity was imposed on whites. This dysgenics (“Are you smart? Go to the monastery and don’t reproduce!”) caused the IQ of Jews to rise over the centuries while the IQ of whites dropped. This perverse eugenics / dysgenics reached the point where Jews now have the highest IQ: a genetic courtesy of Christianity that Nick and other racialists stupidly cling. Just look at Nick’s statement in his interview with Joel Webbon: “The priesthood, the monastic life is the most masculine thing that a guy can do…”

Above, Ascyltos, and Giton playing the role of Ganymede, in Fellini Satyricon. Zeus was capable of countless love affairs not only with goddesses but with women. On one occasion, he even fancied Ganymede and abducted him to see what the androgynous ephebe tasted like. But for Nick the masculine man is not represented by Zeus but by the Aryan humiliated with a ton of guilt—the monk—if he fails to love the Jewish god.

In sharp contrast to the Greco-Roman ethos, above we see Franciscan and Benedictine monks in the film The Name of the Rose.

Webbon then quotes Paul’s epistle to the Corinthians; he says that celibacy is a gift, and talks to Nick about “fleshy appetites” in the Christian sense. Compare this with the Greco-Romans. Their Gods were openly rapists; it was Christianity that made us feel guilty about that. Fuentes, incidentally, is a virgin as he recently confessed to Piers Morgan: something inconceivable to the ancient Greeks and Romans of his age.

Are you beginning to understand what the Judeo-Christian inversion of values was? For kikes sexuality isn’t sinful but Paul preaches something else to us, and these idiots—not just Nick but Christian racialists in general—are incapable of seeing the Jewish psyop!

A little later in the interview, Nick says that many put family above God (that is, above the Semitic god with his double standard for Jews and gentiles). That’s why Fuentes goes on to say that the pinnacle of masculinity is the celibate monk.

At minute 40, Nick says that since women are ultimate conformists to the System, they can betray you if you marry in this anti-white male era. Let’s illustrate this with Skyler who, in an episode of Breaking Bad, goes to a female psychotherapist who suggests Skyler to report her husband Walter to the police for drug trafficking. Walter had been foolish enough to confess everything to his wife in private, when you should never tell women anything about serious matters, such as committing illegal acts or having an affair with Ganymede: they are incapable of understanding the male drives.

Do you see why we should only have lunches and dinners with heterosexual soldiers? Even after the Spartans were married they didn’t eat with their wives but with other tough guys where they could talk as rudely as I do on this site.

Categories
Heinrich Himmler

Church

Himmler tells the Church their time is over:

I once told a high-ranking Church representative: Your time is over; now you will face exactly what you did to us. The 2000 years where you lived in the sunshine and we in the shadows have come to an end. Now, we will live in the sunshine, and you in the shadows.

—Heinrich Himmler, speech at the group leader meeting in Bad Tölz in 1937.