With the PDFs of The West’s Darkest Hour (WDH) now only needing to be available as printed books, I think this site is at a crossroads.
The written word is ideal—say, the writings of Voltaire and the Enlightenment Encyclopaedists—for preparing the ground. But only oratory can bring those ideas to power. In the Beginning Was the Spoken Word said Andrew Hamilton about Hitler’s oratory in his most important article on the Counter Currents webzine.
Besides my advanced age and not being a native European or American, I will never be able to become a political speaker. But I think fellows like Nick Fuentes can be. Yesterday, for example, Fuentes spoke about Senator Chuck Schumer’s resolution on the Senate floor to condemn… Nick Fuentes! It’s obvious that if these Jews have panicked, this young man is doing something right!
The power of oratory can galvanise the masses of white men in the US: something that written-word forums have failed to achieve because they represent, as I said, the preliminary work similar to the French Encyclopaedists. During the height of the revolution, Danton was a great orator, and those unfamiliar with him should watch Danton: a 1983 French film.
The dilemma I face is that, while I can’t become a Danton for the reasons explained above, and will continue to use text on this site, I still believe I must try to communicate directly with the Groypers—the only ones speaking on highly popular podcasts—through videos in which I look directly at the camera.
The WDH message isn’t reaching the people who could potentially be the revolutionaries of the future. Yesterday, I tried to discuss this with an old commenter on The Occidental Observer, but I don’t think he or most commenters of American white nationalism (WN) are capable of questioning Christianity at this stage of their lives.
We need the WDH message to reach the Zoomers.
A brutal and direct way to try to get very young Aryan men to listen to me is, as I said a few days ago, to open a channel on Rumble with a provocative title like “WN critic” where I expose every concession Nick or any other Groyper makes to ethno-suicidal Christian morality. Not long ago, for example, Nick said he wouldn’t mind if someone like Denzel Washington lived in his neighbourhood as long as the majority of that neighbourhood was white. Let’s compare this Christian moralizing to that of the Third Reich!
Unlike the Groypers, the National Socialists had already abandoned Christian ethics: the only way to save the Aryan from extinction (white women are so stupid they’d want to marry a celebrity like Denzel, so obviously there shouldn’t be a single black person in the ethnostate).
The difference between my position and Nick’s is abysmal. But only his spoken word can begin to galvanise young white people.
If I continue writing like I did yesterday on TOO, trying to argue what seems obvious to me with an old commenter, our cause won’t advance. But by speaking audio-visually, even though I’m not Aryan, some young people might start taking notice.
I don’t care if I only manage to make one of them aware of the CQ—as long as he comes to power. Remember that Bloodraven’s work in the cave north of the Wall wasn’t to have many disciples: only one, he who would reach the crown of ruling Westeros.

8 replies on “WN critic”
By the way, yesterday’s quote was the last extensive one I’ll make from Tom Goodrich’s book.
The written word is fundamental, and every racialist should read Tom’s books on the Hellstorm Holocaust.
But it’s time to talk about this publicly and in full colour because Goodrich’s message hasn’t reached the masses of young Aryans (Hellstorm for example was published fifteen years ago).
I’m sorry but Devon Stack (Blackpilled) and Adam Green (KnowMoreNews) have already been doing exactly that.
Could you provide specific links where they criticize Fuentes’ Christian ethics?
Happy to oblige! I’ve been watching Devon Stack since July 2025 now. He has progressed splendidly compared to his old YouTube videos from 2020.
INSOMNIA STREAM: WEAK MAN EDITION (2025-10-30)
Link 1
Link 2
02:11:30 – Christian nationalism is incompatible with White nationalism
02:13:00 A Christian would rather have the White race disappear than Christianity disappear.
02:15:00 Christian nationalism is inherently universalist, colour-blind, you can’t make a moral or theological argument otherwise.
02:17:00 Converting Indians didn’t work (your whole point).
02:19:45 “Are we gonna be anti-Semitic civic nationalists?”
02:22:00 “The Congo is Christian, too.”
INSOMNIA STREAM: POLITICAL SOLUTION EDITION (2025-10-05) – critiquing the whole idea of infiltrating the Republican party
Link 3
Link 4
blackpilled responds to Nick Fuentes message on anchor baby nationalism (from “Crop Circles Edition” (2025-11-05), starting at 01:20:00)
Link 5
Link 6
Link 7
Episode 78 — Christian Zionism & J**ish Supremacy EXPOSED! w/ Adam Green and Devon Stack (© The Backlash; 2025-10-01)
Link 8
I’m at 1:42 of link 3. Compared to the WN forums, this black piller is right in his statistics and his common sense: peaceful change in the US is impossible. However, there are fundamental differences with my future Rumble channel:
1) This guy doesn’t show his face as I do on YouTube.
2) He’s a white nationalist (up to 1:42 he seems wise within the WN movement). But he’s not a Nazi, much less an exterminationist who speaks with infinite hate, like Kalki.
I’ll listen to the rest of link 3 and will add a postscript here if I have anything to say about the rest of his podcast…
Regarding link 1 (which is cloned on Odysee in link 2), based on the time you pointed out, it’s clear that this podcaster’s worldview is far superior to that of the average WNst and also Nick and his Groypers because he’s aware of Christian Question.
But the difference with my future project is enormous, since I would record myself with rage in my eyes and voice every time Nick says something stupidly Christian (Insomnia Stream mentioned several stupid Christian things Nick said to Tucker without scolding any of them). Furthermore, my project consists of ten-minute videos. This podcaster talked about Nick only after the second hour you mentioned. I would scold Nick from the very first seconds…!
On the other hand, like the usual suspects in WN, Insomnia Stream isn’t Nordicist. Has he even read Madison Grant? He’s ignorant of white history when, in the Q&A section, he talks about Slavs. When the hell will WNsts read William Pierce’s history of the white race? I’ll now check out link 4…
8:47 pm.
Link 4 says exactly the same thing as link 1/2. I’ll check link 5…
The podcaster (link 5 = link 6 and also in extended version link 7) did call out Fuentes for his doublethink. Excellent!
It would have been better if the podcaster had shown his face while calling Nick out.
Regarding link 8, I’ll be watching Adam Green’s videos…