As I have said many times, when it comes to Americans, I feel much more comfortable with the racists of the 20th century (Rockwell, Oliver, Pierce) than with the racialists of the 21st century, whom I call neonormies. In the last century, American racists didn’t yet make ubiquitous use of the internet because it only began to be used by the end of the century, and even before the internet they were men of honour. With the miracle of the internet, one might expect racism to improve in the present century. But it is much worse, as I have been saying recently in my comments on quotes from online articles I read sixteen years ago, when I discovered white nationalism.
How is that possible?
In these times, and thanks to the internet, the most relevant piece of information for transvaluing values is that the Allies committed a Holocaust against Germans even after 1945: the greatest secret in recent history because the victors write history—and lie by omission by not talking about it. That’s why in my featured article the first thing I recommend is Goodrich’s Hellstorm.
The greatest pathology of white nationalism in our century is that this true Holocaust of defenceless Germans is not constantly mentioned. We can expect normies like Judge Napolitano and Col. Douglas Macgregor to be able to concede that if Hitler had won the war, the Allies would have been put in the dock for war crimes at Nuremberg (as they said today). But they cite the American bombing of Japan as an example of an holocaust, not Germany!
They are normies but what about racialists? Since Counter-Currents published a review of Goodrich’s book in 2010, there is no excuse for white nationalists, as after that year the subject is no longer mentioned in their forums. That is a sin, a voluntary surrender to evil (the anti-Christian that I am sometimes likes to use Christian vocabulary!). It is neither more nor less than the greatest of sins, pride in the form of patriotardism as Canadian Sebastian Ronin pointed out years ago when talking about them.
Few racialists comment constantly here because the Holocaust perpetrated by Americans of the best Europeans that the West has ever produced is hard to swallow. Better to repress it all! In other words, they induce a neurosis, or rather a psychosis, similar to the liberal folie en masse of the normies throughout the entire West.
All this has to do with honour, as I say in “All is about valour and honesty” (pages 46-51 of Daybreak). Honour is a word that today seems like a swear word because there are no longer any honourable Aryan men, only lobotomized eunuchs with zero Lebenskraft. In Kali Yuga, as the Indo-Aryans would call it, this word, honour, is no longer heard because all white people have degenerated. Otherwise, thousands of websites would mention the Hellstorm Holocaust, where the victims were not Jews, but Germans.

Le Serment des Horaces depicts the honour of the hard Roman ethos.
The 21st century will be a century of iron and storms. It will not resemble those harmonious futures predicted up to the 1970s. It will not be the global village prophesied by Marshall McLuhan in 1966, or Bill Gates’ planetary network, or Francis Fukuyama’s end of history: a liberal global civilisation directed by a universal state.
The third age of European civilisation commences, in a tragic acceleration of the historical process, with the Treaty of Versailles and the end of the civil war of 1914-18: the catastrophic 20th century. Four generations were enough to undo the labour of more than forty.
Europe fell victim to its own tragic prometheanism, its own opening to the world and universalism, oblivious of all ethnic solidarity. The fourth age of European civilisation begins today. It will be the age of rebirth or perdition. The 21st century will be for this civilisation, the fateful century, the century of Life or Death.
Let us cultivate the pessimistic optimism of Nietzsche. “There is no more order to conserve; it is necessary to create a new one.” Will the beginning of the 21st century be difficult? Are all the indicators in the red? So much the better. They predicted the end of history after the collapse of the USSR? We wish to speed its return: thunderous, bellicose, and archaic. Islam resumes its wars of conquest. China and India wish to become superpowers. And so forth.
The 21st century will be placed under the double sign of Mars, the God of war, and of Hephaestus, the God who forges swords, the master of technology and the chthonic fires. This century will be that of the metamorphic rebirth of Europe, like the phoenix, or of its disappearance as a historical civilisation and its transformation into a cosmopolitan and sterile Luna Park.
The beginning of the 21st century will be the despairing midnight of the world of which Hölderlin spoke. But it is always darkest before the dawn. Let us prepare our children for war. Let us educate our youth, be it only a minority, as a new aristocracy [emphasis added by Ed!]. Today we need more than morality. We need hypermorality, the Nietzschean ethics of difficult times.
When one defends one’s people, i.e., one’s own children, one defends the essential. Then one follows the rule of Agamemnon and Leonidas but also of Charles Martel: what prevails is the law of the sword, whose bronze or steel reflects the glare of the sun.
—Guillaume Faye
5 replies on “Honour”
“How is that possible?” I asked above. Simply because they are behaving like the women in the painting above, not like the men with their swords.
See also Michael O’Meara’s articles, “The Sword” and “The Edge of the Sword”.
Yes, nothing left to preserve of a rotting corpse. Need to prepare accordingly. Many white racialists here in America act as if there’s a political solution. That ship has long passed sailed. I thought that was viable in 2016, when I was 27 years old. I have since learned the truth. The Jew infested political system with the large hordes of non-whites that appear each new day will only hasten the collapse. The white christian cowards will perish, and the strong must survive. It must be that way.
Amen.
Unfortunately, American racialists think otherwise (see e.g., what Hunter Wallace just wrote about NS on his website).
Good morning from the UK. Sorry to interrupt the discussion (I don’t know if you’ve commented back Thomas, and I don’t want to derail you; welcome to the website by the way just speaking as another commenter!).
I just note Cesar that HW for the life of him just seems unable to comprehend that a revolutionary-minded… I’ll say pre-organization for the moment, is, yes, not into pursuing politics. Most of his arguments simply seem flabbergasted and dismayed attempts to lambast his hated ‘NS’ for not being such, whilst avoiding the fact that, fundamentally – paradigmatically – how could it be (bar later speculative paramilitary pragmatics – a public-group interactions situation that isn’t really ‘politics’ in the same meaning), there being as Thomas and yourself rightly point out, no political solutions. Perhaps, behind all this front, the recent conservative right’s efforts to negatively highlight National Socialism as a common drive across their pages suggests a little of this background niggling insecurity.
I couldn’t understand his voting argument either. So what? They don’t have Hitler, or anyone like him… they have Trump. Even if 100% voted for Trump, that would say more about them than it did about Trump’s actual competency…. after all, idiots will vote for idiots. The same way HW ‘doesn’t know how this is debateable’ also suggests more about him and his competency to handle the argument than it does about the discussion itself. Yes, very convenient that it ‘strikes him as apples and oranges’, but it isn’t. His a priori position is always Trump. I’d pity them were there a correct 21-44% NS-themed party in that stupid country, given his reliance on a moron ochlocracy, gathered around the same crumpled hymn sheet.
I don’t bother arguing on there – much as he wouldn’t censor me, as Greg Johnson seems to do (deciding with a wave of hand which on-topic, necessary, albeit nervousness-inducing posts are a total waste of time and resources – at least they are if you are cynical, mercantile, and duplicitous) he would simply find some way to mock my words with the lowest necessary effort, knowing his choir crowd are on the whole starry-eyed, true believer imbeciles who lap up the speech, not because it makes sense objectively, but because they simply want to.
You’re right I see now again on the ‘owning books’ argument you made about him – surely the last person to denigrate others as ‘bookish’. Perhaps rather than insulting those vital tomes too, he could read them, and decide for himself as, say, an adult would. I certainly don’t think I’m ‘overeducated’, that’s for sure, my full – completed – learning stopped at a very basic BA in English Lit about 20 years ago, on an entirely unrelated set of topics.
Facing another head in the sand Christian lowest common denominator type with a contempt for learning, again, where does one begin? I cannot think a debate would handle it, and besides, that’s just feminine make believe after a while, that an issue could be settled that way, as if he were operating on pure reason, and as if that itself was enough. It’s like that f**king point Dutton, another lauded idiot, made about the (to me simply materialistic) ‘success’ of Christian anti-learning stupidity over all else in forming a natural future elite (I think the book was titled The Past is a Future Country), a dying status quo, which, thankfully is scuppered to extinction by the tantalising reality of an unplaceable yet definite looming collapse, definite is that it is not a fantasy invented to white nationalists, however much again he (and the rest) would love it to be, but merely a reflection of the dedicated work of a great many pessimistic Austrian economists, peak oil scientists, and green energy evaluators across the mainstream.
I suppose to return to his point on NS being ‘not for export’/’designed for the German people’, I understand this ultimately, beyond immediate ambitions, in terms of Hitler’s Nordicism, but I suppose that would require a level of altruism far beyond what the vast majority of the southern white conservative could muster.
I don’t agree with Greg Conte’s ‘blame the Jews for it all’ stance, and am increasingly, from a high base level, inclined to level that scathing accusation at Wallace himself, and company. But that would just award him the opportunity for more petty wisecracks.
Let the future roll in, and let it incinerate them in the process, Trump, and his traitorous, mistakes and deliberate evangelical zealotry, and all. I relish the possibility of ‘helping it along’ with that.
HW says these things because he’s a Christian. It greatly irritated me when he criticised David Lane because Dave used to like nymphets. As a devout Christian, HW views Eros as a sin.
As Wm. Pierce said, if Americans don’t shake off the Christian monkey from their backs, their DNA will disappear…