web analytics
Categories
Kali Yuga Welfare of animals

Zero

Lebenskraft ! (9)

Munich

2nd May

What I said about Salzburg can also be applied to Munich. This city grew up around a Benedictine monastery. Even the very young Hitler entertained the idea of joining the Benedictines! In fact, Munich means the house or home of the monks.

What I said about nuking the cathedrals and every monument of the Abrahamic religions is no joke. Since what is causing the darkest hour of the West is that the Semitic collective unconscious, and not the Aryan collective unconscious, has taken over our souls, to save us it will be necessary to implement something similar to what Nietzsche called ‘law against Christianity’.

Nietzsche wrote in the 19th century. In our century this law would have to be expanded to consider the whole liberal range, even Wokism, as atheistic hyper-Christianity. And atheists who preach equality will deserve the same treatment as the new Catholic pontiff deserves: to throw them in ropes into the Danube. But back to Munich.

The capital of Bavaria became a kingdom whose monarchy ended in the First World War. Although Hitler loved Munich, there is no monument here honouring the memory of the Man who tried to transvalue Christian values to pre-Christian values.

By bus I passed a canal where they hired a Venetian gondolier for tourists to cross. It is an expensive area much desired by those who can afford it. Munich is the most expensive city in Germany, and it is a university city. A small flat costs €1900 plus expenses such as heating. Although the salary in Germany is €4,000, the government takes a lot from its citizens for social security.

The 1972 Olympics were designed to contrast with the 1936 Olympics: with pastel colours and undulating shapes that contrasted sharply with the red-black-white and geometric shapes of the Third Reich. It was cool that Arab ‘terrorists’ spoiled the party! The police uniforms themselves changed to show the world a feminised face, like a new anti-militarist Germany.

All the Germans I saw looked like cattle of the elites. Their birth rate is very low because their new religion, in the ‘Empire of yin’ imposed on them, is ethnosuicide. The Munich people, unlike Himmler, drink a lot of beer. This is a point I would like to go into a little more in-depth so that the visitor can understand the POV of this site.

You cannot ask people to suddenly abandon their beliefs. That’s why Hitler opted for a gradual erosion of Christianity by educating the youth in the new National Socialist religion. Nor could the masses of Germans be asked to give up their alcoholic habits. But in the upper echelons of power things had to be different: a priesthood of holy words. On a popular level, I am reminded of a scene in Game of Thrones in which the High Sparrow tells Cersei that if he didn’t accept the cup of wine the queen offered him, it wasn’t because he was puritanical, but simply because he didn’t like the taste of wine. Something similar could be said of Himmler, unlike the mass of Germans who lived under the Reich (I too cannot tolerate the taste of beer).

And something similar can be said of Hitler. White nationalists don’t understand NS because it is something that comes straight from what Jung called the Self. If Hitler became a vegetarian it was for the same reasons that Himmler didn’t drink beer: the call of the core of our Being leads psychogenically emergent men not to be involved in the torment of animals. That will never be understood by the American racial right since its members haven’t been ‘touched by the Self’ so to speak.

Unlike Hitler, a true priest of holy words, contemporary Münchner love ham hock with potatoes, ribs and sausages, including white sausage at what they call second breakfast. And unlike Himmler, as I said, they drink a lot of beer. Martin Kerr saw this very clearly when he included this cartoon in his article ‘The National Socialist Lifestyle’:

Here is a picture I took of the Münchner:

In that market there are stalls with sausages, including horse meat. Compare all this Neanderthalism with Hitler’s plan as recorded by Goebbels: if he won the war, the Führer would close down the slaughterhouses. On this point only Savitri Devi understood National Socialism!

Almost every building in Munich was destroyed by bombing. On Maximilian Street, where people like the pot-bellied man in the cartoon above have luxury boutiques, I saw this aberration:

Nearby is the church most beloved by the Münchner. Instead of sacrificing themselves for National Socialism like the soldier in the cartoon above, the lifestyle of these degenerates is abject consumerism. No wonder that in such a city the sin against the Holy Ghost is tolerated, like this thing I saw:

It hurts that, not far from this place, Richard Wagner used to be played.

It is worth saying that, sometime later, I crossed the street of Hitler’s failed putsch who, when he finally took power, didn’t move the NS offices from Munich to Berlin because the Führer loved this city so much. Indeed, Munich had been the birthplace of National Socialism…

19 replies on “Zero”

I don’t drink alcohol either. It just tastes vile to me. On the other hand, there hasn’t been a single hunter-gatherer culture in history that didn’t eat meat. It’s why we evolved such large brains. Animal rights and human nutritional requirements are incompatible. Shaming people for abiding by their evolved diet seems rather Abrahamic. In all honesty, I think veganism derives from the same utopian, blank slate assumptions as wokeness.

Benjamin strikes me as the sort of person who would try to convert his dog to a vegan diet. As with the Leftists, it is the inability to accept that the world is fundamentally an unpleasant place. Attempts to fix our inherently malevolent reality are doomed to failure.

What sort of a person is that? You’re correct, actually, except there’s not so much a conversion as an detailed observation, acknowledgment and facilitation of his own independent tastes. Skyler chooses the vegetables and fruits of his own volition. We noticed early on he wasn’t much of a fan of his meat, and some high-quality cuts were tried in addition to the dire standards of commercial dog food. I’m not sure what to say to you today – I addressed all your points before, and you blanked me, or at least didn’t engage again. If you feel this to be the case (the hopelessness), why do you comment here at all? Would you not like to at least try? I accept very well that the world is an unpleasant place, but an ‘is’ is not an ‘must’, as if it were set in immutable stone. Why wallow in it, washing your hands of the matter? Really, this backing away from the issues at stake strikes me more of cowardice – if one tells oneself than nothing can be changed then it saves the realisation that they damn well could be, and in practice can be – are, for that matter – if only one could pull their finger out, so to speak (although I’m sure from far prior experience that depression warps the faculties). Stop strawmanning my Veganism points with the Leftist comparison. I’ve already referenced this lazy, dismissive, disingenuous technique.

Indeed, as you wrote below: ‘you lack the ability to feel human compassion for animals’.

Bingo. And this is the problem with today’s racialists. They’re psychogenically inferior to our Führer.

Yes, and we were not raised to psychogenic awareness then either, just as we practiced mass infanticide, child abuse and human sacrifice. We could not have known then. We can know now. That’s the crux – you [Editor's interpolated note: he's referring to Autisticus Spasticus] think Veganism is leftism and I’m sensing nothing a person can say, even a Fascistic National Socialist Vegan can snap you out of that belief. We adapt as a race. There is no need for ‘assumptions’; one observes the cruelty readily. As I said before, if there is an adaptation that can serve Nature as well as it serves that facet that is us, in limiting that rampant age-old cruelty, a truly novel development, why is this innovative idealism brushed under the rug? Why the weary contempt? I too hold a couple of deep-seated beliefs on this topic 1. that all these dietary/evolution arguments are convenient hot air, a big heap of self-serving rationalizations to paper over the lack of a fully developed Aryan soul, and 2. that you’re simply addicted and a stickler for convenience, lacking the willpower and/or imagination to try a little harder on this front. Nutritional requirements?! What fallacious bollocks. If you’re truly going to put this hypothesis to the test, why not try a while without, and make a proper effort of it? To the best of my own ability to ascertain, it does me no harm, after all, and there are a wealth of commonly available substitutes and alternatives to fulfil any of your nutrient needs. If I were more suspicious I would hypothesise that the grim ‘common-sense’ pronouncements you are accustomed to utilizing in your defence only come so effortlessly to you because, fundamentally, through whatever early-environment stimulated neurological deficit, you lack the ability to feel human compassion for animals. A dispassionate person would argue like this; a string of carefully-crafted defensive techniques to prevent acknowledgment of a fundamental flaw, objectively. I’m not trying to shame you, just to call a spade a spade. I’m still waiting for someone to assimilate the scope of my previous cruelty points. It’s simply not good enough to claim idly that nothing can be done, as if it were an a priori truth.

You are making it a moral issue when it is simply an evolutionary one. Yes, we evolved large brains because our hominid ancestors ate meat. Yes, every single hunter-gatherer culture has consumed meat. If it bothers you that much, the simple solution is to stop creating humans. This is far easier than converting natural omnivores to a vegetarian diet they did not evolve to eat. I don’t really buy into this psychoclass business. I hold it in the same regard as astrology and palm reading. But that is a good question, though. I’m not entirely sure why I comment here. It is certainly the case that I have given up on life, as anyone who has read my substack essay An Indictment of Life will know.

You actually named your dog Skyler? Oh god, it’s worse than I thought. Well, you know what they say. A vegan dog is like a transsexual toddler. You know it wasn’t the one who made the decision. Of course, there is also the possibility that you have an oddball dog.

Autisticus:

Like Adunai, whom I only allowed to comment recently because he informed me of the suicide of one of our previous commenters, remember that you’re banned because, in reality, you don’t belong here. Those four words command us, ‘Eliminate all unnecessary suffering’. And what could be more unnecessary than torturing animals? Here in Mexico, for example, they throw pigs into boiling water so that their edible skin (called chicharrón) may be hair-free! Why don’t you comment on typical racialist sites whose commenters are (almost all) carnivores?

Remember: we are not white nationalists. We follow our late Führer’s lead…

Are the pigs thrown alive into the boiling water? If so, I can’t imagine why they would do that, other than pure sadism. Torturing animals is not an inherent aspect of raising them for food. They can be treated very well and killed in an entirely painless manner. Also keep in mind that many generations of Nordics have been meat eaters, and it is almost a certainty that the beautiful young women you see are all meat eaters. Do you want to kill them for that? I doubt it.

Yes, I remember. But if you’re going to talk about necessity, you should begin with the most obvious fact of all. Namely, that it isn’t necessary for any of us to exist, nor is it a necessity that our species continues to exist. You know this.

Are the pigs thrown alive into the boiling water? If so, I can’t imagine why they would do that, other than pure sadism.

Yes they’re thrown alive but not because they are ‘sadists’, but because of the ‘need’ ($) to sell tons of chicharrón to the exterminable Neanderthals of this country.

Would you like to put to me conclusively why it is not a moral issue, one for higher faculties than the scope of your primitive id? I didn’t name the dog, no. He’s my partner’s dog. I humour her. it’s not worse than you thought, don’t be so fucking dramatic. That’s a lot of assumptions there. You have no real clue. What matters is that he is a healthy, happy, energetic dog, with keen instincts, a deep, peaceable, playful temperament, and boundless energy. The call of the wild. And he certainly did make the decision – how else can I phrase it to you? He still consumes a small packet of dog meat, if he is encouraged to by us, he simply prefers (and one sees it if they know and like dogs) vegetables. Unlike what I would do with humans, in his case there is choice involved. We try to accommodate him, not the other way around. Is ceasing all life on the planet really easier for you than making one choice? I don’t think so. I think you’re simply being petulant. They would be unhappy yes, disgruntled, certainly… equally petulant. So what? Scale this petty human grievance, transient as immaterial, against the suffering. We evolved as omnivores. See it as a baseline to improve from. We evolved brains, and cognition, and consciousness. Consciousness can make choices. I see you cannot. You have one option before you, filling your mind, and that is all there is to it. No wonder you don’t believe in psychoclasses – it makes your job easier, and allows you to maintain self-esteem. I am talking to a Neanderthal. I echo Cesar’s sentiment, though it is not my place to decide.

It would be absurd to call predatory animals evil, because animals are essentially automata. You would be projecting your human values onto a creature that does not possess a mind. They simply do what they do in order to satisfy their nutritional requirements. Humans have minds, but their nutritional requirements are just as much a product of evolutionary history just as much as a lion’s is. You cannot negotiate diet, much as you cannot negotiate your sexual orientation. It is what it is. Your determination to push against this is no different than the Left’s attempt to mould reality into what they find more agreeable. It is the same utopianism, the same desire for emancipation from nature.

As I have said before, you cannot force people to eat things that they find vile. Your response to this is to brute force it, to hold a gun to our heads and demand that we change. This is also what the Left does. I may be an anti-natalist, but I don’t proselytise it. Vegans do. Much like Muslims, they cannot help themselves. They are compelled to convert and conquer.

Of course, we National Socialists want to compel the rest of the Aryans to accept our worldview, including the four words: hence the need to found a Dachau II in the new ethnostate.

I don’t know where you get your rigid, dogmatic opinions from AS, but animals certainly do possess a mind. You’re incorrect, and your worldview is barren. I take it you are not well read or up to date on this topic, as would suit your underlying brute ignorance. This is how you seem to be using ‘evolution’ also, an immutable excuse. You seem to be denying human conscious choice also. You have fixed in stone what is in reality fluid. As I say, it’s convenient to you to do that. I’m growing tired of this conversation -we could be at this all day. Stop glossing over what you seem to find psychologically difficult to accept. As the highest evolved life on the planet, and perhaps much further afield, Aryan man has a unique opportunity to alleviate suffering, utilizing that big brain, for once in a century. A problem solved. If you truly cannot see a problem, I would suggest, as I said before in other words, that you are blind (or just being stubborn), and I mean that in terms of simple empirical observation as much as soulful perception. On a side note, Muslims’ drive to convert, compel, and conquer is one of their strong points, not a flaw. Ultimately, we would do best to pursue the same, for our own conclusive exterminationist victory over them.

…for our own conclusive exterminationist victory over them.

Amen. As to those diagnosed with Asberger’s…

I hope it isn’t too cruel of me to wish instead of the ‘mentally ill’ that Hitler has turned his T4 programme onto them. Not for a deficit in IQ, but for the potential liability, their inherent soullessness. I have never met one, in real life or online, who does not infuriate me in some manner; that rigid, toddler cluelessness.

Here we see the chasm between the National Socialists of the last century, who abandoned Judeo-Christian ethics, and today’s white nationalists, who are still slaves to them. Dachau isn’t enough. An ethnostate would have to have a T4 program as well…

You know, there has been much speculation that Hitler may have had Asperger’s syndrome.

I already fixed the hyperlink in your post below. The fact that Benjamin and I said very harsh things to you above, and yet you continue to post comments like this as if nothing happened, shows that you lack empathy. It’s as if you were still arguing with a Gestapo officer of the last century who had already warned you: ‘Shut up or you’ll go to Dachau!’

Since I was very young, I found fruit and most vegetables intolerable. I would gag and regurgitate a slice of apple of banana if I tried to eat it. This is the nature of autism. We are fussy eaters, which makes us a nightmare for vegans. You may have noticed that César evaded my question about all the beautiful young nymphs he covets. They are almost certainly meat eaters. Would he therefore have them exterminated? I think he avoided the question because it caused him considerable cognitive dissonance.

I know César doesn’t like bare links, but I don’t know how to create a hyperlink, so he can either create it for me or just tolerate it.

LINK

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *