“Civilisation must not exist to promote the development of culture, technology, luxury or comfort but to promote the development of man himself: the evolution of the genetic code. For civilisation depends on genes, not the other way round. It is ridiculous that civilisation turns against the genetic heritage that created it, like a snake that bites its tail.”
—Eduardo Velasco
As promised yesterday, I’ve pruned Eduardo Velasco and Valg’s article. I’ll now delete the PDF of the version of The Fair Race’s Darkest Hour that included the appendix with the minor changes I made on Friday. The updated PDF of The Fair Race is now linked to the featured article. I’ve also edited my explanatory note at the end of Velasco’s article:
The preceding article was originally published in Spanish by Eduardo Velasco on July 28, 2009. Many images, including a complex phylogenetic tree summarising the new racial classification, have not been included in this much abridged translation. Most of the endnotes from the original text have also been removed, although some have been merged into the main text.
Lack of funding prevented researchers Valg and Velasco from writing the second part of the new racial classification. It is impossible to evaluate their classification scientifically because physical anthropology has been corrupted since 1945. Had the Third Reich been allowed to flourish, there would now be a constellation of anthropologists, from the Atlantic to the Urals, who would have developed this science, and numerous articles would have been published in specialised journals.
After Valg and Velasco disappeared from the internet, following the censorship of the Evropa Soberana website, we believe that pondering the origins of the white race should be done taking into account Danny Vendramini’s Neanderthal predation theory.
The pruned article can be read here.
10 replies on “Pruned”
Dear César,
Thank you for your hard work on these documents. I look forward to going through them tomorrow. At least it (the reviewed NRC) can be analysed now and referred to for what it is. It was an unfortunate mistake on Velasco and Valg’s part, but I’m glad it’s been rectified now.
Are you planning any more personal documents/articles dealing with some of the more taxing – well, to me at least – questions already raised by us from our amateur attempted synthesis of mainstream science/Evropa Soberana & Vendramini ideas over the past few days, or are we discarding all mainstream science/former ES racial anthropology ideas altogether in favour of pondering the questions from Vendramini’s perspective primarily?
i.e. I’m still confused over how to insert the Armenid effectively into Vendramini’s evolutionary progression (the chronology is already quite tight), much as it’s obvious they’re a biological reality. Part of me privately wondered if – though the former NRC was quite keen to dissuade from this viewpoint – there could be more legitimate Semitic overlap than Valg had wanted to account for, not just my proposed proto-Khoisan genes. I certainly think they can be explained without the need for any successful long-term Neanderthal interbreeding though, that is at least clear to me. The other European races, of the three settled on, seem to sort themselves out from the Cro-Magnon base-point more logically. I could well be completely wrong!
Sorry for my laboured syntax. I’m quite tired today.
Hi Ben,
It’s not about breaking with accepted academic wisdom just for the sake of it. What impresses me about the NP predation theory is that it’s very logical to say that the hominids who lived in Europe during the last Ice Age had to have fur. Furthermore, there’s the enormous difference in skeletons and skulls between Neanderthals and pre-humans that Vendramini rightly points out, and the fact that no one before him has convincingly presented a theory as to why our ancestors lost their fur.
Regarding Valg and Velasco, as I said, we need an ethnostate where these issues can be freely discussed. Old-time physical anthropology is so taboo in academia that IQ comparisons between races can ruin your career (Jared Taylor has amassed a considerable amount of information on this over the decades). Without a liberated academy, we can’t even get Valg’s real name to contact him (if he’s still alive)!
I’m not even an amateur in prehistory, although my dad loved buying huge illustrated books about our prehistoric past. So I can only make educated guesses.
Regarding the Armenids, if Valg’s thesis has any basis in reality, we could speculate that they were an evolved branch of Levantine hominids who, unlike those who migrated north after the first metamorphosis described by Vendramini, didn’t undergo the second metamorphosis that would produce Cro-Magnon and eventually white man. It must be taken into account that after the first metamorphosis, this new pre-human lineage migrated to Africa, Asia, Russia, and Europe. Apparently, only the males who went to Russia and Europe began selecting increasingly aesthetically pleasing females until the Aryan emerged. But of course, Vendramini’s thesis would have to be verified by an independent academic community. In the current anti-white climate, this is impossible.
Given that sexual and artificial selection are absolutely central to Vendramini’s thesis, who uses several Darwinian quotes to support his theory, my conjecture is that in their obsession with shedding their ape-like appearance at all costs, our ancestors created blond hair and light eyes, as well as extreme facial refinement, especially in females (this of course never happened with the Armenids). The quotes by Charles Darwin in Them & Us are striking, as they seem to suggest precisely that.
What I would suggest is leaving things as they are in the 2026 edition of FRDH, as an open question, with the (wishful thinking?) hope that a future ethnostate will resolve the matter.
Thank you, that’s a spectacular answer. I like your speculation over the origin of the Armenid race. I was thinking something along the same lines – although my further question (to myself for the moment) would be, given strict Cro-Magnon sexual/artificial selection, in terms of ‘human-ness’, who would be left to mate with the Armenid at all? An early example of regressive race mixing? Should they be considered ‘white’ human at all by Aryan standards – although remaining obviously not so by Nordic standards? It calls into question the methodology for judging what is Aryan at all, if surviving Armenid were encountered in pure form, rare as that may be. I’ll keep further questions for myself.
I agree with you also on your main conjecture, although as to exactly when and how, beyond the (fairly precise!) vagaries already known, I am unsure. I find these questions all fascinating, and am glad we now at least have some documents to work with, even if yes, we really require an ethnostate’s directed science to settle the matters comprehensively for the future… always an ongoing process.
Thank you again.
P.S. I read your edit of NRC tonight and found it captured the essence of the former document – the part that made sense at least.
Thank you and, by the way, the essay on the NRC does not consider pure Armeinds as white.
Perhaps my experience in Mexico can help answer this question.
Today I was riding the subway to buy DVDs at an Office Depot and I muttered to myself how ugly all the Mexicans I saw were—hundreds of them! From a sexual attraction standpoint, I could never sleep with any of the mestizo women I saw tonight. Never.
However, in the nineties I had a girlfriend from a low sociocultural background. She wasn’t white. My perpetual incel status led me to have a relationship with her. Fortunately, I never had children with her.
I suppose that in prehistoric times, when alpha Aryans monopolized all the women, during their conquests beta males did with Armenid women what I did with a mestiza—but unlike me they procreated!
Racial betrayal, obviously, but it would later happen on a massive scale in the Bizantine Empire and subsequently in the Americas. Before our century, the Portuguese had been the worst because they mixed with black slaves in the 16th century: a genetic catastrophe for Iberian whites.
Decades ago I heard this saying from a white Iberian man who lived in Mexico: “Carne buena y barata sólo la de la gata” (Good and cheap flesh, only that of the Indian maid).
CT, are you Iberian?
All my ancestry is recounted in my autobiography (have you seen the photos in the Metapedia articles?).
Velasco’s site got censored? In what way? Have you experienced similar here at WDH?
Evropa Soberana was taken down in 2021 (see my article here).
My site has been censored twice.
Thank you. His Sparta and Its Laws was the first extensive reading I encountered on this path back in October 2024. It is fantastic. Happy to see it in your Fair Race compilation. Rome v Judea has also been enlightening.
I advise you to visit the “human phenotypes” page; it shows the updated phenotypes.
The Armenoids would be considered non-white, although not as harmful in terms of interbreeding with other Nordic types, especially since that interbreeding with Nordics occurred many years ago. At least their skulls resembled those of Nordics, and as a result, the Dinaric peoples were formed