to my previous post
As I begin rereading the appendix to The Fair Race this morning I realise that, due to the timeline, it’s impossible to reconcile Danny Vendramini’s findings with the study by Eduardo Velasco’s collaborator, Valg (not Varg, as I mistakenly wrote the previous days).
According to Vendramini, European Neanderthals began invading the Levant around 100,000 years ago and preyed on pre-humans for 50,000 years. During that time, the latter developed evolutionary defence mechanisms—in addition to natural selection, sexual selection and artificial selection—which eventually produced a completely different species.
Cro-Magnon would evolve into contemporary Homo sapiens but the topic at hand, the white race, is a product of this sexual and artificial selection that continued after the extermination of the Neanderthals by the Cro-Magnons. The distinctive features of Aryans, such as pale pink skin, yellow or red hair, and blue or green eyes, are very recent dating back ten to twenty thousand years.
Both Velasco and Valg, as well as Vendramini, published their essays in 2009. Valg followed the old paradigm of anthropologists who have not resolved why our primate species is the only one that “got naked,” lost its fur (cf. the title of Desmond Morris’s famous book, The Naked Ape, who, like his colleagues, was unable to solve the enigma).
Since I believe Vendramini is correct with his theory of Neanderthal predation, what I did in previous days proved insufficient: removing about a page and a half from Valg & Velasco’s very long article, who were under the impression that Neanderthals were human. The page and a half I removed is insufficient because of the dates Valg includes in his study, which assume that the naked ape was much older than the dates Vendramini suggests.
So, in the coming day(s), I will dedicate myself to seriously editing Valg & Velasco’s article and reducing it to its essentials: human physiognomy, Valg’s strong point.
Regarding physical anthropology, Valg followed orthodox academia. But academia is trapped in an anti-white ideology in which, like the Boasian anthropologists, physical anthropologists religiously idealise all wingless bipeds. Using the language of my Day of Wrath, anthropologists massively project their psychoclass onto the prehistoric past: an ideological pathology. This is symptomatic of what I call neochristianity and what Gaedhal calls atheistic hyper-Christianity.
The point is that objective physical anthropology will be impossible as long as these religious figures reign in academia. The reason for considerably shortening Valg & Velasco’s essay in the coming day(s) is that I believe their new racial classification has merit. But we need a Fourth Reich so that today’s pseudoscientists—who do grotesque things like displaying shaved Neanderthals in their museums—can be challenged by studies from non-neochristians.
In the coming edition of The Fair Race Valg & Velasco’s essay will thus be pruned to its essentials: human physiognomy, although those interested can consult it as it was published in Velasco’s website, Evropa Soberana here (in Spanish) and here (in English).